From: McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com>
To: robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Thu, 30 September, 2010 23:10:05
Subject: Re: [kictanet] KIXP connectivity
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:01 PM, lordmwesh <
lordmwesh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Robert, hold your praises on TESPOK.
>
> Even after praising Fiona, and all the Tespok crew, i dont think they
> are very genuine, or keen to embrace single players into the IXP. We
> have had so many forums, especially IGFs, and other Kictanet
> moderated forums, and at no single point have
we seen the 'grave
> isssues' raised by FIONA appear in the public domain.
At every forum I have attended, the KIXP folk have made it a point to
bring up the licensing issue.
>
> Is somebody playing PR?
>
> What would be the modalities of establishing a parallel IXP for
> private content providers, who can then peer with KIXP
You can't peer with KIXP, you peer with others at KIXP.
IIUC, if you get a Content Providers license, then you can join the
peering mesh.
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.kehttp://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanetThis message was sent to:
robertyawe@yahoo.co.ukUnsubscribe or change your options at
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/robertyawe%40yahoo.co.uk