Safaricom and Telkom Kenya have lost their bid to stop the reduction of mobile telephony interconnection charges in June, setting the stage for a further fall in calling rates.
Interconnection charge —which operators pay rival networks for handling their calls—is set to drop from Sh2.21 per minute to Sh1.44 in July and Sh1.25 in July 2012, giving the operators room to further reduce their per minute voice charges.
In February, Telkom Kenya and Safaricom asked the government to put on hold for two years the annual reduction of interconnection charges that started in 2006, arguing that it would intensify the ongoing price war and hurt the operators’ profits, jeopardise job security and slow new investments in the local telecom arena.
This prompted the Prime Minister’s office to form a task force that will determine whether to hold off revising the charges or let the revisal run as earlier set by the Communications Commission of Kenya (CCK). The taskforce returned a verdict that charges should run their course.
“Nothing has changed and mobile termination rates were done through consultation and they shall remain as such,” said Charles Njoroge, Director-General, CCK.
He added that the downward fall in the connection charges does imply that calling rates will fall adding that tariffs are mainly influenced by market forces.
The government’s verdict is a blow to Telkom Kenya—the operators of the Orange network—and Safaricom who, unlike their rivals Airtel and Essar, have criticised the free fall in airtime prices, made possible by the fall in interconnection charges.
The interconnection charge has come down from Sh6.28 in July 2007 to Sh2.21 last July and was set to drop to Sh1.44 this year and Sh0.99 in 2013.
The reduction of the interconnection fee was informed by the need to reduce the cost of calls across networks, which had remained as high as Sh25 in 2007, compared to Sh12 for calls within the same network.
This made it difficult for the small operators to gain market share from Safaricom, whose stake was about 83 per cent and who effectively used the high cross-network charges to win subscribers and discourage subscribers from switching networks.
.....