- KICTANet - KICTANet

FW: Day 5 of 10- BPO Discussions, HR Issues
by Walubengo J 08 Jun '09

08 Jun '09

from MM --- On Mon, 6/8/09, muriuki mureithi <mureithi(a)summitstrategies.co.ke> wrote: Please send this to the list - my mail was rejected by the system that it is spam ------- Hi listers >From the researcher's brief, it is very clear that Kenya cannot compete with India if the sheer volume of skilled resource is the determinant for market penetration. There is another way however, it is time we evaluate our strength and focus on a niche market. This way we can put our human resource base development efforts to considerable advantage. What is our niche or what could be our niche? Do we know? On the specific question of a database, I suspect one institution may not adequately manage the database largely due to the limited mandate. A way forward to categorise the human resource skills into a) academic skills 2) industrial skills 3) in-house specialised skills. Under a) the ministries of education or one of its institutions has or should have a mandate to keep track of what goes through its institutions of tertiary or higher learning. Under b) ministry of labour and hopefully Department of Industrial Training should have a database because they have oversight on industrial training. This would also strengthen the capacity of those institutions to do what they should do and mandated to do sustainably Cheers muriuki Mureithi

1 0

Fwd: [AfrISPA.Discuss] US cuts off 'criminal' ISP
by Brian Munyao Longwe 08 Jun '09

08 Jun '09

FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Charles Amega-Selorm <cas(a)internetresearch.com.gh> Date: Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM Subject: [AfrISPA.Discuss] US cuts off 'criminal' ISP To: members(a)gispa.org.gh, discuss(a)afrispa.org US cuts off 'criminal' net firm An American ISP allegedly involved in distributing spam and images of child abuse has been thrown off the net. The US Federal Trade Commission asked for Pricewert LLC's net links to be severed after it had gathered evidence of the firm's 'criminal' connections. The FTC alleges that Pricewert had created one of the "leading US-based havens for illegal, malicious, and harmful content". Pricewert denied the allegations and said it would fight them in court. Legal fight In an official complaint filed in a San Jose Federal court, the FTC described Pricewert as a "rogue" or "black hat" ISP that acted as a hosting centre for many hi-tech criminals. The FTC alleges that Pricewert was paid to host "child pornography, botnet command and control servers, spyware, viruses, trojans, phishing-related sites, illegal online pharmacies, investment and other web-based scams". The evidence against Pricewert was gathered with the help of Nasa's computer crime division, Symantec, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, as well as groups such as Spamhaus and the Shadowserver Foundation. In its statement accompanying its filing, the FTC said its complaint was "not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law". That, it said, would be decided by a court. A preliminary hearing will be heard on 15 June. So far, the FTC has not been able to identify who was behind Pricewert. Although its servers are based in the US, it is registered as a business in Belize and many of its employees are thought to be located in Eastern Europe. Talking to technology news site Network World, a spokesman for Pricewert said the action was "unfair" and it would take legal action to defend itself. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8084726.stm -- Charles Amega-Selorm Research Associate Internet Research Tel: +233-28-7297327 Fax: +233-21-258811 PMB 208, Accra-North http://www.internetresearch.com.gh To unsubscribe send a mail to: imailsrv(a)afrispa.org. Type the following in the body of your mail (not header): "Unsubscribe discuss" (without quotes). This List is operated by ZAnet Internet Services: www.zanet.co.za on behalf of www.afrispa.org. For any List Admin queries send mail to William(a)zanet.co.za -- Brian Munyao Longwe e-mail: blongwe(a)gmail.com cell: + 254 722 518 744 blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Day 5 of 10- BPO Discussions, HR Issues
by lily marusoi 08 Jun '09

08 Jun '09

Hi Walu, Indeed we had a very refreshing weekend. To suggest on what strategies the country should adopt to ensure a continous supply of relevant and timely BPO specific skills: 1. --- On Mon, 6/8/09, Walubengo J <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> wrote: From: Walubengo J <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> Subject: [kictanet] Day 5 of 10- BPO Discussions, HR Issues To: lmarusoi(a)yahoo.com Cc: kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 9:06 AM -Day 5 of 10- BPO Discussions, Human Capacity Issues Morning all, I trust you had a refreshing weekend. Today I want to introduce the theme on Human Resource Development for the BPO industry. The Researchers found that India, S.Africa and Mauritius had a comprehensive inventory of their skill-base that was also available for Validation by prospective employers and investors. Another observation was ofcourse the sheer numbers of Indian graduates (millions) that made it the largest base of highly skilled pool of graduates with strong mathematical/scientific orientation. Whereas, Mauritius was producing only 10,000 (university) graduates per year compared to Kenya's 30,000 per year, Mauritius had the advantage of properly documenting their national graduates database and marketing it appropriately to potential clients in Europe/America. In addition, the Researchers noted that Mauritius had a government funded but Private-Sector oriented ICT Academy that produced graduates specificially for the ICT industry. In Kenya, the Researchers observed that apart from the lack of a national database on the available skills/graduates, some of the BPO operators were engaged in vicious poaching cycles where Agents trained in-house by one Operater are immediately hired by the Competing Operators. It was noted, that an attempt has been made by the .KE Government to create an Industry-specific University (Multimedia University College of Kenya) to address the HR gap but its success or otherwise will remain to be seen in a few years time. The Researchers also noted that Kenya's English-speaking labor force had an edge over the Indian one given that the average Kenyan had a "neutral" accent unlike the Indian graduate who tended to have an "ethnic" accent that often distracted the Euro-American markets/clients. But this advantage is yet to be exploited - even as the Indians move up the BPO value chain and concentrate on non-accent related processes such as Software Engineering, Research (Financial, Medicine, etc), Product (e.g. Civil and Architectural) Design amongst others. Which leads us to todays questions. Qtn 7: How do we develop a national database on the wide-range of available ICT skill in Kenya - specifically which institution should be mandated to realise this, ensuring that such a database is kept upto date over the years? Qtn 8: What strategies should the country adopt to ensure a continuous supply of relevant and timely BPO-Specific skills? Please, lets have your comments flowing,dig yahjwalu starting now... walu. Encl: Synthesis 3 - HR Issues -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent to: lmarusoi(a)yahoo.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/lmarusoi%40yahoo.com

1 0

Day 4 of 10- BPO Discussions, Govt Subsidies
by Sam Aguyo 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

Members I would note that surprisingly there is little participation of the practitioners. This could be strategic or otherwise. Their effective participation would give practical problems affecting the industry on the ground. Sometimes it is good to avoid generalization, for example a good comparison is between same environments – a goat with a goat, a sheep with a sheep and not a goat with an Elephant, the latter even though animals but totally different characteristics. We may want to compare with our Indian brothers; however the environments could be different. In this respect facts and figures would reveal more. I mean, the government provided this sort of incentive/subsidy targeting this for this period and the output was this. Based on this, it would be critical to narrow down to specifics that require intervention or subsidy, grants. As an example, the government should improve the environment within the EPZ by availing affordable and reliable bandwidth commensurate with the requirements of the players then invite the players to station there. In return, such incentive would attract a certain percentage of players of different configurations able to employ a certain number of people and such configurations can source jobs from such kinds of markets. This would add up! We should not loose focus, what would be the return on investment for such subsidy/incentive. These words i.e. subsidy/incentive have the propensity to read handouts. Sam Aguyo ________________________________ From: Walubengo J <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> To: sam aguyo <saguyo(a)yahoo.com> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 9:48:07 PM Subject: [kictanet] Day 4 of 10- BPO Discussions, Govt Subsidies -Dear Listers, I must thank all for your insights over the last few days. I like the challenge that asked whether we are "over-regulating" an emerging market as the "answer" to the question on if we have legal and regulatory gaps. Listers are encouraged to challenge and not just answer the questions. Other arising issues included where we want to play within the BPO Value Chain, the Impact of the Political (in-)stability, the need to map our Data Protection laws to those in the target markets are just but some of the highlights I picked - and by all means this is NOT exhaustive as am still reading through the contributions. But today we need to open the theme on Government subsidies. The Researchers found the S.Africa and India had elaborate subsidy provisions for the sector that included Tax Holidays and Exemptions, Investment Grants to BPO operators, Training Subsidies, One-stop shop for Corporate Company Registrations that could be 100% foreign owned, etc. The Researchers noted the unique Mauritius case which had similar incentives but eventually abolished most of them arguing that they were more beneficial to the Operators than to the Nation. On the Kenyan front - other than the not so succesfull Govt Bandwidth subsidies for Operators, very little in terms of incentives was available to BPO Operators. It was noted that the BPO operators had to be within the EPZ in order to enjoy the subsidies other EPZ corporates operates - the problem being that most BPO operaters exist outside the EPZ area. Whats more, BPO operators had to pay additional charges to be registered by the CCK (Regulator) and should be at least 20% locally owned. Qtn6: What incentives / subsidies should the government provide to BPO operators? What of the clause requiring 20% Local shareholding in foreign companies - is it prohibitive or helpful? Floor is open comments. walu. Encl: Synthesis 2:- Subsidies and Incentives

2 1

Fw: [ISOC] ISOC launches IGF 2009 Ambassador Program
by alice munyua 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

For those who follow global internet governance policy processes, this could be a chance to attend the 4th IGF which will be held in Egypt in November. Best Alice ------Original Message------ From: Constance Bommelaer Sender: isoc-members-announce-bounces(a)elists.isoc.org To: isoc-members-announce(a)elists.isoc.org Subject: [ISOC] ISOC launches IGF 2009 Ambassador Program Sent: Jun 4, 2009 4:35 PM Dear all, Following the successful ISOC Ambassador program to the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in 2005, to the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in Rio in 2007 and in Hyderabad in 2008, we are pleased to announce a call for expressions of interest to participate in the ISOC Ambassador program to the Internet Governance Forum meeting in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, in November 2009. As part of the ISOC Internet Leaders program, the Ambassador program is designed to involve members in ISOC's global engagement activities while providing valuable expertise and know-how to the IGF meeting in Sharm El Sheikh. This year, ISOC is supporting not only the participation of first time Ambassadors, but also of returning Ambassadors to the Internet Governance Forum. The IGF 2009 meeting will take place Sunday 15 through Wednesday 18 November 2009. Interested individuals should be available to arrive no later than Saturday 14 November. Further details on ISOC's IGF 2009 Ambassador program can be found here: http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/igfambassadors/ Read also about: ISOC Internet Leaders program: http://www.isoc.org/leaders/ Internet Governance Forum: http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/ Best regards, Constance Bommelaer Senior Manager Strategic Global Engagement Internet Society (ISOC) +41 22 807 14 48 +33 6 62 17 31 86 http://www.isoc.org _______________________________________________ Isoc-members-announce mailing list Isoc-members-announce(a)elists.isoc.org http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/isoc-members-announce

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Day 2 of 10:-BPO discussions, Legal and Regulatory Frameworks
by Jotham Kilimo Mwale 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

Gilda, You are right when you say we must develop both domestic and international markets in tandem. But I think there is something to lose when the focus is too much on international market. We lose the opportunity to develop the domestic market, which, in my view, is one of the basic building block for the BPO sector in terms of capacity building/ experience which in turn will give confidence to the international market. When we talk of bad publicity for this country hampering the growth/attractiveness of the international BPO market, I believe a vibrant domestic BPO market will counter that (bad image) in a more convincing manner than asking the media to tone down on divisive politics, and will make the work easier for our international marketers. Also, I think that the move taken by some local companies to have their own in-house call/contact centres rather than outsource is a statement of 'no confidence' on the BPO operators. It has just made marketing Kenya as a BPO destination a little more difficult. Regards, Jotham --- On Thu, 6/4/09, godera(a)skyweb.co.ke <godera(a)skyweb.co.ke> wrote: From: godera(a)skyweb.co.ke <godera(a)skyweb.co.ke> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Day 2 of 10:-BPO discussions, Legal and Regulatory Frameworks To: jokilimo(a)yahoo.com Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> Date: Thursday, June 4, 2009, 4:59 AM Peres, I fully agree with your sentiments. I especially am of the very strong opinion (and I stand stoned by some) that we must develop both domestic and international markets in tandem. Much as there has been a school of thought that we focus on domestic first, I beg to differ. We need to do so in tandem with the international market. What have we to lose? Gilda > > > External perception is absolutely critical in the race to obtain > international BPO contracts. No one wants to outsource to a country > which they 'percieve' as unstable, or which they percieve as > underdeveloped. The truth is that most executives in our source > markets for BPO work, in particular USA, percieve Africa as one > country with a myriad of ills: > > Somalia -Pirates > Congo - Wars > Darfur- kicking out the Aid organizations, starvation > Kenya ? Post Elections Violence > Nigeria ? 419 Scams > Zimbabwe ? Cholera and Inflation > Etc., etc. > > The best way to counter these perceptions is to have in-coming trade > delegations from our source markets, so they can see for themselves > what Kenya has to offer. > > W need to work on changing these negative perceptions of Kenya/Africa, > BUT at the same time build up our internal capacity. We cannot do one > without the other. Local outsourcing market needs to be developed in > tandem with the international. > > Peres > > Quoting Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com>: > > > Colleagues your comments are right, however we seemed to be more inclined > at > > external perceptions as opposed to building up internal capacity, must it > > take foreigners to show us our potential? > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:01 AM, munyiva ngea <munyivangea(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Good morning, > >> > >> I agree with Peter about perception take Mauritius for example the > >> Board of Investment and the BPO Vendors strive to change the > >> perception of the country as a mere tourist attraction to an ICT Hub. > >> They invite prospective investors or clients to the country take them > >> to their lavish well equipped offices, which are probably located in > >> Ebene Cyber City the landing point of the Submarine cable so the > >> clients are assured of available internet infrastructure.After the > >> site visit the clients are then whisked away to have a fantastic > >> weekend on the beaches or on a boat. Simply put they show clients they > >> can do much more than provide BPO services they can offer quality of > >> life. > >> > >> To answer Question 3 i think without the government and local vendors > >> taking decisive steps to attract and retain investors and clients to > >> the country. Basically we need to give officials who are marketing the > >> country the funds to be able to invite the prospective investors and > >> clients to the country to show them we sufficient infrastructure and > >> Human resources. > >> > >> In order to build confidence in the country's capabilities we have to > >> have to EVIDENCE of these capabilities take India for example with its > >> National Skills Registry which is an industry initiative to ensure > >> that individuals employed by organizations have their background and > >> antecedents verified > >> (http://news.indiamart.com/news-analysis/national-skills-regi-13182.html) > >> prospective clients need only to browse through the site to be assured > >> that the country has the Human resource capacity needed. What about > >> Kenya apart from various websites which allow individuals to upload > >> their CVs where can a prospective client get information on the > >> available agents, software developers and so on?? this information is > >> not available on various institutional websites (universities, > >> colleges) so how do we expect a client to actually believe that we are > >> capable if we are unable to show it (Perception again!!) > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards > >> Munyiva Ngea > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> kictanet mailing list > >> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >> > >> This message was sent to: otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com > >> Unsubscribe or change your options at > >> > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otieno.barrack%40gmail… > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Barrack O. Otieno > > ISSEN CONSULTING > > Tel: > > +254721325277 > > +254733206359 > > http://projectdiscovery.or.ke > > To give up the task of reforming society is to give up ones responsibility > > as a free man. > > Alan Paton, South Africa > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: godera(a)skyweb.co.ke > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/godera%40skyweb.co.ke > ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent to: jokilimo(a)yahoo.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jokilimo%40yahoo.com

4 3

Day 2 of 10:-BPO discussions, Legal and Regulatory Frameworks
by Walubengo J 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

Morning all, Yesterday was like my 1st day in school - what a rich learning experience! Thanx to Waema, Nyaki, Barrack, Otuoma, and MM whose contributions were quite enlightening. Of the two questions asked, it appears that we need both comprehensive ICT and BPO Policies and Strategies. With regard to National BPO strategies and targets we learnt that there was quite some detail at the Ministry of Planning and the BPO Society which could benefit members if made widely accessible. Today we move from the Policy to the Legal, Regulatory Frameworks. The Research study found very comprehensive Legal and Regulatory environment in S.Africa, India and Mauritius that supported their BPO industry. Specifically, laws that took care of eTransactions, eCrime, Copyrights and Data Protection were well established. Furthermore their BPO Industries had adopted stringent Quality Assurance Frameworks for BPO and Contact Center Operations. The Researchers found that the case for Kenya was relatively comparable - with the recently enacted KCA Act (2009) that deals with eCrime & eTransactions leading the way, others like the Copyright Act (2001) as well as the Freedom of Information Bill cuurently at an advanced stage providing an encouraging Legal/Regulatory environment. Which brings us to the following two questions: Q3: With submarine cables landing next week and given the above legal/regulatory frameworks, how comes Kenya is NOT experiencing the anticipated boom in the BPO sector? What should we do to get local and foreign investors to show more confidence in the BPO industry? Q4: Could there be gaps in our Legal, Regulatory and Institutional frameworks that need to be addresssed? Put in black and white- Why hasn't Safaricom, Orange, Zain and several local Banks who have all opened their own very large Call-Centers NOT shown confidence in the BPO sector by outsourcing their operations to local BPO operators? What of the Government itself? Why cant it outsource non-core functions to the local BPO operators before trying attract foreign investors to do the same? The floor is open, we have only today to get comments/answers to these issues. walu.

16 24

Re: [kictanet] Day 2 of 10:-BPO discussions, Legal and Regulatory Frameworks
by munyiva ngea 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

Good morning, I agree with Peter about perception take Mauritius for example the Board of Investment and the BPO Vendors strive to change the perception of the country as a mere tourist attraction to an ICT Hub. They invite prospective investors or clients to the country take them to their lavish well equipped offices, which are probably located in Ebene Cyber City the landing point of the Submarine cable so the clients are assured of available internet infrastructure.After the site visit the clients are then whisked away to have a fantastic weekend on the beaches or on a boat. Simply put they show clients they can do much more than provide BPO services they can offer quality of life. To answer Question 3 i think without the government and local vendors taking decisive steps to attract and retain investors and clients to the country. Basically we need to give officials who are marketing the country the funds to be able to invite the prospective investors and clients to the country to show them we sufficient infrastructure and Human resources. In order to build confidence in the country's capabilities we have to have to EVIDENCE of these capabilities take India for example with its National Skills Registry which is an industry initiative to ensure that individuals employed by organizations have their background and antecedents verified (http://news.indiamart.com/news-analysis/national-skills-regi-13182.html) prospective clients need only to browse through the site to be assured that the country has the Human resource capacity needed. What about Kenya apart from various websites which allow individuals to upload their CVs where can a prospective client get information on the available agents, software developers and so on?? this information is not available on various institutional websites (universities, colleges) so how do we expect a client to actually believe that we are capable if we are unable to show it (Perception again!!) -- Best regards Munyiva Ngea

9 9

Re: [kictanet] Day 3 of 10- BPO Discussions, Institutional Frameworks
by Walubengo J 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

Eric, I like your query on what level should we as a country play within the BPO value chain. At the moment, I believe we are at the entry (low value) chain i.e. Call Center/Telemarketing which some Analyst have claimed are just electronic "hawkers" with minimal income at both individual and national level. We definately need to scale up to high-end BPO work such as software engineering, accounting, hr, etc. But I think we cannot avoid starting from the bottom. And that is where we are. As for Incentive issues, we shall cover them in tmrws theme. regards. walu. --- On Thu, 6/4/09, Eric Aligula <jairah(a)KIPPRA.OR.KE> wrote: > From: Eric Aligula <jairah(a)KIPPRA.OR.KE> > Subject: RE: [kictanet] Day 3 of 10- BPO Discussions, Institutional Frameworks > To: "Walubengo J" <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> > Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Date: Thursday, June 4, 2009, 10:22 AM > Dear All: > > Good morning! > > If I missed it, I apologize. I have two questions: > > 1. Are we agreed on which portion of the > BPO value Chain we want to enter? > 2. If we are in agreement, what should > the appropriate Incentive Regime be? > > The question regarding the speed with which speed with > which we identify and articulate our policy and other > incentive frameworks is something that must be addressed as > a matter of priority. In the fluid environment that > the global arena is, our slow processes will remain a major > headache. > > Kind regards > > Eric Aligula Magolo, PhD > Senior Analyst > Infrastructure and Economic Services Division > Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis > (KIPPRA) > P.O. Box 56445, 00200 Nairobi, Kenya > Telephone: +254-20-2719933/4 > Fax: +254-20-2719951 > E-mail: jairah(a)kippra.or.ke > URL: www.kippra.org > > > Proudly Kenyan > "In the long history of the world, only a few generations > have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour > of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this > responsibility..........I welcome it." > John F. Kennedy > "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men > to do nothing." > Edmund Burke > "Far better to dare mighty things, to win glorious > triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take > rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor > suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that > knows not victory, nor defeat." > Theodore Roosevelt > "Ex Africa semper aliquid novi" > > Repfor-----Original Message----- > RepforFrom: kictanet-bounces+jairah=kippra.or.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > Repfor[mailto:kictanet-bounces+jairah=kippra.or.ke@lists.kictanet.or.ke] > RepforOn Behalf Of Walubengo J > RepforSent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 8:14 AM > RepforTo: Eric Aligula > RepforCc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > RepforSubject: [kictanet] Day 3 of 10- BPO Discussions, > Institutional > RepforFrameworks > Repfor > Repfor > Repfor > RepforDear Listers, > Repfor > RepforI am encouraged by the flood of ideas that kicked in > after Bill and > RepforDr. Ndemo's interventions. Ofcourse Kenduiywo, > Bakuli and Peres > Repforyour discourse is as insightful as that of MM and > Barrack. Lets > Repforkeep the ideas flowing on previous themes even as we > move onto > Repfortoday's theme - just ensure you pick against the > corresponding > Repforsubject line and post. > Repfor > RepforI wish to open today's theme on Institutional > Frameworks. The > RepforResearchers found that in S.Africa, Mauritius, and > India, the > RepforPrivate Sector BPO lobby groups, Data Security Groups > and > RepforGovernment Agencies were working harmoniously with > clear, non- > Repforoverlapping mandates to support the BPO sector. In > Kenya it was > Repforfound that several bodies were involved in the BPO > Sector. These > Repforwere largely Government agencies such as the Min of > Education > Repfor(Technology Parks), Kenya ICT Board, KenInvest, > Export Promotion > RepforCouncil, CCK amongst others. The biggest challenge in > Kenya was > Repforthat there seemed to be no overall, cordinating body > overseeing > Repforthese functions - leading to alot of duplicated and > un-cordinated > Repforeffort from the various Players. And so our next Qtn > is: > Repfor > RepforQtn 5: What needs to be done to improve/strengthen > the > Repforinstitutional framework in order for the BPO and > outsourcing sector > Repforto play its planned role in the Kenyan economy? > Repfor > RepforWe have today on this since tmrw we shall move into > the Government > RepforSubsidiy/Incentive Issues for the BPO Sector. > Repfor > Repforwalu. > Repfor > Repfor > Repfor > Repfor > Repfor > Repfor_______________________________________________ > Repforkictanet mailing list > Repforkictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > Repforhttp://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > Repfor > RepforThis message was sent to: jairah(a)kippra.or.ke > RepforUnsubscribe or change your options at > Repforhttp://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jairah%40kippr > Repfora.or.ke >

4 4

Day 3 of 10- BPO Discussions, Institutional Frameworks
by Walubengo J 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

Dear Listers, I am encouraged by the flood of ideas that kicked in after Bill and Dr. Ndemo's interventions. Ofcourse Kenduiywo, Bakuli and Peres your discourse is as insightful as that of MM and Barrack. Lets keep the ideas flowing on previous themes even as we move onto today's theme - just ensure you pick against the corresponding subject line and post. I wish to open today's theme on Institutional Frameworks. The Researchers found that in S.Africa, Mauritius, and India, the Private Sector BPO lobby groups, Data Security Groups and Government Agencies were working harmoniously with clear, non-overlapping mandates to support the BPO sector. In Kenya it was found that several bodies were involved in the BPO Sector. These were largely Government agencies such as the Min of Education (Technology Parks), Kenya ICT Board, KenInvest, Export Promotion Council, CCK amongst others. The biggest challenge in Kenya was that there seemed to be no overall, cordinating body overseeing these functions - leading to alot of duplicated and un-cordinated effort from the various Players. And so our next Qtn is: Qtn 5: What needs to be done to improve/strengthen the institutional framework in order for the BPO and outsourcing sector to play its planned role in the Kenyan economy? We have today on this since tmrw we shall move into the Government Subsidiy/Incentive Issues for the BPO Sector. walu.

11 17