- KICTANet - KICTANet

Day 1 of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - Policy, Legal & Regulatory Issues
by Walubengo J 30 Nov '16

30 Nov '16

Listers, (apologies for cross-posting) Thanks again for those who spared time to provide feedback - so that the rest of us can read and interrogate the same :-) Over the next 3 days I shall share the feedback and basically hope to get further reactions from the floor. I attach the feedback document but with summaries below: 1. Policy & Legal Feedback a) 52% of the respondentsfelt that the Universal Service Fund(USF) had not met its objective. 40% feltthat it had to a moderate extent while 8% felt it had a very large extent. b) 61% of the respondents felt that ICT Policies and initiativehad not impacted the counties. 23% of the respondents felt that these hadmoderately impacted the counties, while 10% felt they had an impact to a verylarge extent. c) 41% of the respondents felt that the multi-stakeholder approachbetween ICT stakeholders and government was moderately achieved. 31% feltit was not achieved while 25% felt it was, to a very large extent. d) Policy/Legal Issues not yet addressed include: Cyber Crime/Cyber Security Bill and its position in Senate and National Assembly, DataProtection Bill, ICT Practitioners Bill, Privacy Issue Linkages betweenNational & County Governments on ICT matters, Quality of Internet,Infrastructure Sharing Regulatory Feedback2. Regulatory Feedback a) 48% of the respondents felt that the question of affordablecommunications/internet pricing had not been well addressed. 30% felt that thequestion of affordable pricing has been moderately addressed while 20% felt ithas been addressed to a very large extent. b) 68% of the respondents felt that the issue of dominance inthe sector was affecting pricing of communication services to a very largeextent. 16% felt it moderately affected pricing while 13% felt it was reallynot an issue. c) 48% of the respondents felt that the urban-rural digitaldivide had not been adequately addressed while 34% felt that it had beenmoderately addressed while only 7% felt it had been addressed to a very largeextent. d) 65% of the respondents felt that the regulator had notaddressed the issue of inclusivity with regard to persons with disabilities(PWD). 27% felt this had been moderately addressed while only 5% felt it hasbeen addressed to a large extent. e) Areas needing RegulatoryInterventions: Operator Dominance Issues, Internet Pricing & Affordabilityissues, White Spaces, Operationalization of Universal Service Fund &Access, Failed Number Portability, Data protection for Subscriber Data,Conflict between regulatory bodies, Last mile connectivity and Way-leaves,Net-Neutrality, Support for ICT-startups, Support for Digital evidence incourts, Inclusion & Support for Persons With Irrespective of whether you participated in the questionnaire or not, you are invited to comment, support, oppose and/or seek clarifications on the views of stakeholders.Tommorrow we shall post the feedback on Human Capital & Infrastructure.

4 10

Fwd: [i-network] BREAKING: MTN Mobile Money customers can now send money to Kenya and Rwanda
by Barrack Otieno 30 Nov '16

30 Nov '16

Might be of interest, i suppose i can now order for ground nut sauce from the very source online. Regards ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Margaret Sevume <sevume(a)i-network.or.ug> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:04:36 GMT Subject: [i-network] BREAKING: MTN Mobile Money customers can now send money to Kenya and Rwanda To: I-Network Uganda <i-network(a)dgroups.org> Hello all, MTN Mobile Money customers in Uganda will now also be able to send money to MPesa and MTN Mobile Money customers in Kenya and Rwanda respectively. <http://pctechmag.com/2016/11/breaking-mtn-mobile-money-customers-can-now-se…> Full story here. Regards. -- Jeddy Genrwot Gerald Sub Editor <http://pctechmag.com/> PC Tech Magazine Kampala, Uganda Mobile/WhatsApp +256 773 202 182 Skype: jeddygen Twitter: @jgenrwot Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/jgenrwot> /jgenrwot You are receiving this message because you are a leader of the community <https://dgroups.org/iicd/i-network> I-Network Uganda. All community leaders receive these notifications immediately regardless of their email settings for this community. __________ MAILING LIST RULES - http://www.i-network.or.ug/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=189… WEEKLY DISCUSSION ROUNDUPS - http://www.i-network.or.ug/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=19… QUARTERLY eNEWSLETTERS - http://www.i-network.or.ug/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&id=34&… WEBSITE - www.i-network.or.ug TWITTER - http://twitter.com/inetwork FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/inetwork.ug The I-Network Dgroup is a platform for ICT Knowledge Sharing --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit [web site]( http://dgroups.org/iicd/i-network/ ) Click [here]( mailto:leave.i-network@dgroups.org ) to unsubscribe The email is intended only for the recipients. The owners of the Dgroups cannot be held responsible for the contents of the email message. -- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254733206359 Skype: barrack.otieno PGP ID: 0x2611D86A

1 0

Fwd: [Internet Policy] Call for Nominations for Internet Technical Community Representation in the Internet Governance Forum Multistakeholder Advisory Group 2017 (MAG)
by Barrack Otieno 30 Nov '16

30 Nov '16

Listers, For your attention. Best Regards ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Carl Gahnberg <gahnberg(a)isoc.org> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:11:06 +0000 Subject: [Internet Policy] Call for Nominations for Internet Technical Community Representation in the Internet Governance Forum Multistakeholder Advisory Group 2017 (MAG) To: Internet Policy External <InternetPolicy(a)elists.isoc.org> Call for Nominations: 2017 MAG Renewal The Internet Society (ISOC) is facilitating a process leading to recommendations from the Internet Technical Collaboration Group<http://www.internetcollaboration.org/> for participation in the 2017 Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG<http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/magabout>). This process is for the technical community candidates only and candidate evaluations will include their relationship to that community. Other communities have their own processes. The purpose of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) is to advise the U.N. Secretary General on the programme and schedule of the Internet Governance Forum meetings. The MAG comprises of 55 Members from governments, the private sector and civil society, including representatives from the academic and technical communities. Those nominated should expect to attend two virtual MAG meetings per month as well as typically three face to face meetings per year. Individuals interested in being suggested by the Nominating Committee are invited to complete the Nomination Form<http://www.internetcollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/11/20…> in full and return it to information.itcg(a)gmail.com<mailto:information.itcg@gmail.com> by 2359 UTC on Tuesday, December 6th. In addition, applicants are asked to provide responses to a set of Questions<http://www.internetcollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/11/Su…> that are specific to the Internet technical community. Applications with incomplete responses to either set of questions will not be considered. Preferred formats for document submissions are .pdf and .txt. ISOC will transmit the names of nominees to the United Nations no later than December 16th 2016. Both sets of questions should be answered completely. Responses need not necessarily be lengthy, but they must be sufficiently content-full that the Nominating Committee can accurately judge from them the extent and specifics of your background. If the applicant believes that an existing CV or biographical sketch would contribute to the Nominating Committee's understanding of the candidacy, such a document may be provided in either PDF form or in the form of a link. In terms of attendance at physical meetings, potential funding for MAG members (selected applicants) is available through the IGF "Participant funding" program outlined at http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/participant-funding. Note that this program is targeted only toward participants from Least Developed Countries, Developing Countries or Transitional Economies. 2017 MAG NomCom Members: * Michael Nelson * Scott Mansfield * Nigel Hickson * Chris Disspain * Adiel Akplogan * Pablo Hinojosa * Alejandro Pisanty Quick Links: * Nomination Form<http://www.internetcollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/11/20…> (2017) * Supplementary Questions Form<http://www.internetcollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/11/Su…> (2017) * Submit both forms to: information.itcg(a)gmail.com * Potential UN funding for applicants<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/participant-funding> for attendance at physical meetings * UN Call for Nominations<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/announcement-from-mr-wu-hon…> Privacy Statement The nominating committee is required to forward information provided by nominees on the MAG Nomination Form to the United Nations for purposes of the nomination. With the exception of candidates naming themselves, information provided to the NOMCOM for its consideration shall be treated in the strictest confidence. -- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254733206359 Skype: barrack.otieno PGP ID: 0x2611D86A

1 0

Re: [kictanet] South School of Internet Governance (SSIG)
by Bonface Witaba 30 Nov '16

30 Nov '16

Hello Listers, I am hereby sharing the link to SSIG call for applications (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil): http://www.gobernanzainternet.org/ssig2017/ Kind regards Bonface Witaba Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Wed, 30 Nov, 2016 at 8:28, kictanet-request(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke<kictanet-request(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote: Send kictanet mailing list submissions to kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to kictanet-request(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke You can reach the person managing the list at kictanet-owner(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of kictanet digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Fw: [governance] Survey Request on Multistakeholderism in Internet Governance (WANGARI KABIRU) 2. Re: #GivingTuesday (Magdalene Kariuki) 3. Re: Day 2(a) of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - Human Capital Feedback (Walubengo J) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:57:40 +0000 (UTC) From: WANGARI KABIRU <wangarikabiru(a)yahoo.co.uk> To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke>, ISOC Kenya Chapter <isoc(a)lists.my.co.ke>, "internetsociety-kenyachapter(a)connectedcommunity.org" <internetsociety-kenyachapter(a)connectedcommunity.org>, "mail(a)connectedcommunity.org" <mail(a)connectedcommunity.org> Cc: Dmitry Epstein <dmitry.epstein(a)gmail.com> Subject: [kictanet] Fw: [governance] Survey Request on Multistakeholderism in Internet Governance Message-ID: <1035937458.5081215.1480445860784(a)mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" We would appreciate you completing the following survey:?http://tinyurl.com/IGF2016 The survey should take up to 20-30 minutes to complete. Participants who complete the survey will have the opportunity to be entered into a drawing for a $50 Amazon.com gift card. Blessed Tuesday! Kenyan community share in research on multistakeholderism for IG. Be blessed! Regards/Wangari ?--- Pray God Bless. 2013Wangari circa - "Being of the Light, We are Restored Through Faith in Mind, Body and Spirit; We Manifest The Kingdom of God on Earth". On Wednesday, 23 November 2016, 22:12, Dmitry Epstein <dmitry.epstein(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear IGC Community: We are researchers at UC Berkeley and University of Illinois at Chicago. We are conducting a research study about perceptions of multistakeholderism and the use of online tools for participation in internet governance processes. Our goal is to inform multistakeholder processes and help develop new online tools for inclusive participation in internet governance. We would appreciate you completing the following survey:?http://tinyurl.com/IGF2016 The survey should take up to 20-30 minutes to complete. Participants who complete the survey will have the opportunity to be entered into a drawing for a $50 Amazon.com gift card. Please reach out to us with any questions or concerns. This research protocol has been approved by the UC Berkeley Committee for Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS Protocol: 2016-08-9071). If you have any questions or concerns about your rights and treatment as a research subject, you may contact the office of UC Berkeley's Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects, at?510-642-7461?or?subjects(a)berkeley.edu. Thank you, Brandie Nonnecke and Dmitry Epstein Brandie M. Nonnecke, PhD Research and Development Manager, UC Berkeley Program Director, UC Davis CITRIS and the Banatao Institute nonnecke(a)citris-uc.org citris-uc.org?|?(a)BNonnecke?|?nonnecke.com Dmitry Epstein Assistant Professor of Digital Policy Department of Communication University of Illinois at Chicago www.thinkmacro.org comm.uic.edu?? ____________________________________________________________

1 0

#GivingTuesday
by Magdalene Kariuki 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Dear fellow listers, I hope that this email finds you well! Did you know that today is #GivingTuesday? This is a follow up to #BlackFriday which was started to get people into the Christmas spirit of supporting the less fortunate in our communities. Why do I bring this up? I am a lister that is particularly passionate about leveraging ICT for Development (ICT4D). In relation to this I'm a member of the Rotary Club of Muthaiga and we are currently running a campaign to collect 20 tonnes of food estimated at Kes. 3.5M by 12th December to take to Turkana. We have been running a water and community livelihoods programme in Turkana for the last 4 years with great success. Unfortunately due to delayed minimal rainfall people living in Liwan and Lobur especially are the most affected and are facing death by starvation. We have therefore started a mitigation campaign to collect and transport food to the people of Turkana on/ thereabout 12th December 2016. I am therefore appealing to all of us/ our companies to please help us get to our target by either donating food or cash; tweeting/ using our social media platforms to generate awareness or linking us to any individuals or companies interested in partnering with us. For food donations, dry food stuffs are preferred eg unga; rice; lentils etc. Transport to collect the food can be organised for free at your convenience. If possible you please drop it at Mayfair hotel/ Southern Sun westlands on Mondays at 6-7:30 pm which is when we meet and you'll get to meet us and hear more about the campaign. For social media engagement we are using the hash tags #skipamealforTurkana #dontwaittocountthebodies Your consideration on the matter is highly appreciated! Best, Magdalene Kariuki.

2 2

Fw: [governance] Survey Request on Multistakeholderism in Internet Governance
by WANGARI KABIRU 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

We would appreciate you completing the following survey: http://tinyurl.com/IGF2016 The survey should take up to 20-30 minutes to complete. Participants who complete the survey will have the opportunity to be entered into a drawing for a $50 Amazon.com gift card. Blessed Tuesday! Kenyan community share in research on multistakeholderism for IG. Be blessed! Regards/Wangari --- Pray God Bless. 2013Wangari circa - "Being of the Light, We are Restored Through Faith in Mind, Body and Spirit; We Manifest The Kingdom of God on Earth". On Wednesday, 23 November 2016, 22:12, Dmitry Epstein <dmitry.epstein(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear IGC Community: We are researchers at UC Berkeley and University of Illinois at Chicago. We are conducting a research study about perceptions of multistakeholderism and the use of online tools for participation in internet governance processes. Our goal is to inform multistakeholder processes and help develop new online tools for inclusive participation in internet governance. We would appreciate you completing the following survey: http://tinyurl.com/IGF2016 The survey should take up to 20-30 minutes to complete. Participants who complete the survey will have the opportunity to be entered into a drawing for a $50 Amazon.com gift card. Please reach out to us with any questions or concerns. This research protocol has been approved by the UC Berkeley Committee for Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS Protocol: 2016-08-9071). If you have any questions or concerns about your rights and treatment as a research subject, you may contact the office of UC Berkeley's Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects, at 510-642-7461 or subjects(a)berkeley.edu. Thank you, Brandie Nonnecke and Dmitry Epstein Brandie M. Nonnecke, PhD Research and Development Manager, UC Berkeley Program Director, UC Davis CITRIS and the Banatao Institute nonnecke(a)citris-uc.org citris-uc.org | @BNonnecke | nonnecke.com Dmitry Epstein Assistant Professor of Digital Policy Department of Communication University of Illinois at Chicago www.thinkmacro.org comm.uic.edu ____________________________________________________________

1 0

Day 2(a) of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - Human Capital Feedback
by Gideon 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

>From the findings, my few comments on c) 40% of the respondents felt that tertiary institutions were,to a moderate extent providing the requisite skill set for the ICT industry.34% felt they were to a large extent providing these skills while 24% felt they were not. Comment: Tech and specifically the ICT world is an ever evolving realm, and while therre are basics that remain constant, the institutions have the responsibility to introduce these basics and as a plus, engage the industry directly so that there is synergy and so that somehow the students come out of the labs co-established and supported by the industry such as the specialty labs with coding/startup ecosystems with skills hat can be arbsored directly. Does the millennial factor play a lot in this agile system, i think yes and is it time to consider the millennial factor? e) Provide general ICT literacy programmes to the public, Codingas a skill to all students ? irrespective of discipline, Continuity ingovernment offices (rather than sabotage of previous holder initiatives),Improve Academia- Government-Industry linkages, Cryptography training, Identifyand support Technology Universities, Promote Incubation Center, Have mechanismsto weed out ICT quacks, Provide ICT scholarships, Standardize ICT Trainings,Digitization of key services - police occurrence books, land registries shouldbe availed to the youth. Comment: Digitization of all these legacy systems is a goo start, utilizing the digitized systems should be improved so that efficiency is achieved. Incubation centers are great to the extent that actual output can be measured. Regards Rop On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:36 PM, <kictanet-request(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote: > Send kictanet mailing list submissions to > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > kictanet-request(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > > You can reach the person managing the list at > kictanet-owner(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of kictanet digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. > > Day 2(a) of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - Human > Capital Feedback (Walubengo J) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:26:24 +0000 (UTC) > From: Walubengo J <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> > To: Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com>, KICTAnet ICT Policy > Discussions <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Subject: [kictanet] Day 2(a) of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - > Human Capital Feedback > Message-ID: <2039769444.2418071.1480411584604(a)mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Thanx Barrack, > Looks like Day1 had little reaction/comments. Feel free to belatedly post > on Policy, Legal/ Regulatory matters but just keep the correct subject line. > Today we to move to Day2a (Human Capital feedback) and Day 2b > (Infrastructure feedback to be sent in next email) > Summary feedback on Human Capital was as follows with detailed document > attached. > a) 41% of the respondents felt that the government had providedsufficient > ICT opportunities for the youth to a moderate extent. 30% howeverfelt youth > opportunities had not been effectively provided, while 27% felt ithad been > done to a large extent. > > b) 58% of the respondents felt that the DLP (Laptop Project)will have a > positive impact to a very large extent. 30% felt it would be amoderate > impact while 12% think it will have little or no impact. > > > c) 40% of the respondents felt that tertiary institutions were,to a > moderate extent providing the requisite skill set for the ICT industry.34% > felt they were to a large extent providing these skills while 24% felt > theywere not. > > d) 40% of the respondents felt that Konza City will have apositive impact > to a very large extent. 21% felt it will be a moderate impactwhile 25% > think it will have no impact. > > e) Provide general ICT literacy programmes to the public, Codingas a skill > to all students ? irrespective of discipline, Continuity ingovernment > offices (rather than sabotage of previous holder initiatives),Improve > Academia- Government-Industry linkages, Cryptography training, Identifyand > support Technology Universities, Promote Incubation Center, Have > mechanismsto weed out ICT quacks, Provide ICT scholarships, Standardize ICT > Trainings,Digitization of key services - police occurrence books, land > registries shouldbe availed to the youth. > > Toa maoni (let hear your reactions) > walu. > > From: Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com> > To: Walubengo J <jwalu(a)yahoo.com>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions < > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:47 AM > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Day 1 of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - > Policy, Legal & Regulatory Issues > > Listers, > > We welcome? more feedback? on day 1 discussions on how we have > performed as an industry in 2016 . We will start day two this > afternoon after providing a summary of day ones discussion should we > receive feedback by then. > > Best Regards > > On 11/28/16, Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Walu, > > > > Many thanks for the email. My humble opinion is that generally the > > government and related agencies have made great efforts in investing > > in ICT's. However it is worth noting that government is never good at > > marketing itself or communicating and i guess this is where the > > Ministry and related agencies need to pay attention. For example the > > issue of IFMIS has really been misunderstood. Software should never be > > blamed for fraud , people commit Fraud. We should always remember that > > ICT's are a means to an end and not an end in themselves. > > > > Regards > > >

1 0

Ajira Digital Program
by Peter Wakaba 25 Nov '16

25 Nov '16

Dear All, My apologies for cross posting. I am looking for someone who can give independent analysis of the recently launched Ajira Digital Program, which was rolled out by the ICT ministry yesterday, and which aims to introduce Kenyans to online work, and provide the tools, training and mentorship needed to work and earn an income. This would be a quick live television interview today at about 2.10pm about five minutes from I and M building in the city centre? It would dwell around what this means for youth and just how this will jell across teh entire country with the proposed digital hubs.

2 1

Threats to our Internet freedom remain plentiful
by Liz Orembo 25 Nov '16

25 Nov '16

Listers, This article is worth reading as we head towards the elections. To Quote: "...Kenya, having a more sophisticated leadership, can encroach on Internet freedoms in more subtle ways than many other African countries can. In other words, Kenyan authorities are unlikely to orchestrate a countrywide Internet shutdown like what typically happens in Uganda or Zimbabwe. However, they can achieve the same effect by shutting down selected zones of the country as and when they deem it necessary" Full article here <http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560-3461054-52e4id/in…> -- Best regards. Liz. PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF

4 4

Invitation to the Kenya ICT year in review cocktail - 2nd December 2016 from 6pm to 9pm
by Mwendwa Kivuva 25 Nov '16

25 Nov '16

Greetings, As we approach the end of the year, KICTANET has organised a cocktail to evaluate the progress of the ICT sector in Kenya. The cocktail will be held on 2nd Dec 2016 at the Laico Hotel, Nairobi Kenya from 6pm to 9pm. Findings of the "Kenya 2016 ICT sector Year in Review survey" will be shared and deliberate with the community. Please register for the event at this eventbrite page to enable logistics and planning: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/kenya-ict-sector-2016-end-year-shindig-tickets… If you have any questions, you can direct them to info(a)kictanet.or.ke Sincerely ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya twitter.com/lordmwesh

1 0