- KICTANet - KICTANet

TR: Looking for entrepreneurs - apply before March 10 - Cartier Women's Initiative Awards]
by alice 17 Feb '10

17 Feb '10

Hi All, I am sure we have a number of women entrepreneurs who can make this award. best alice -------------------------------------------------------- For more information: <http://www.cartierwomensinitiative.com/> > >CARTIER SEEKS EXCEPTIONAL ENTREPRENEURS >Deadline: March 10, 2010 > >Recognising entrepreneurs as having "the >audacity to create, innovate and imagine the >future," the Cartier Women's Initiative Awards >aim to support female entrepreneurs who have >just set up their own companies. Launched in >2006 in partnership with the Women's Forum, >McKinsey & Co. and the INSEAD business school, >Cartier's programme involves an international >business-plan competition for female >entrepreneurs who lead creative, sustainable and >socially responsible companies. > >The awards are presented every year to five >laureates, one from each continent. Applicants, >who can be from any country, are invited to >apply online by presenting their business >project in its initial phase (company must not >have been created more than three years ago). > >The prize includes personalised coaching, a >$20,000 grant and an invitation to the annual >Women's Forum Meeting in Deauville (France). >Applications will be accepted until 10 March 2010. > >For more information, including eligibility criteria, please visit: >www.cartierwomensinitiative.com or contact freja.day(a)cartier.com > > > >Freja Day >Project leader Cartier Women's Initiative Awards >33 rue Boissy d'Anglas 75008 Paris, France Tel >+33 1 58 18 10 28 / Fax +33 1 58 18 10 01 ><http://www.cartierwomensinitiative.com>www.cartierwomensinitiative.com > > > > > >

1 0

[Fwd: RE: [Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: [ccnso-members] FW: [ccTLDcommunity] FW: Nairobi Update - 12 Feb. 2010]]]
by alice 16 Feb '10

16 Feb '10

Another view on the ICANN meeting from Namibia. Namibia had also placed a bid for the same meeting that Kenya won. See below. best alice > > Dear Doug, > > thank you (or rather not) for the security information posted at > > http://nbo.icann.org/meetings/security-information-11feb10-en.htm > http://nbo.icann.org/meetings/security-information-12feb10-en.htm > > and emailed. > > Now I have my own opinion about the choice of Nairobi as the venue of > the African ICANN meeting, but this is very much influenced by the > fact that we submitted a bid to have this very meeting in Windhoek. > > > But, I am really getting upset about the lack of professionalism with > which this is (mis)handled. But I feel it my duty to inject some sense > of reality into the topic and support my African brothers, and not > just because out of solidarity. > > Uncorroborated, untested, unevaluated and uninterpreted rumors like > the one giving raise to this thread should not be published until they > have been corroborated, tested, evaluated and interpreted unless there > is a credible threat requiring urgent changes in plans (which is > clearly not the case here). > > This can be done in almost all cases within 24 hours as has been done > in this case. > > > I have taken the trouble to look up the travel pages for Kenya of the > Department of State, the French and German Foreign Ministries and the > Foreign Office. Neither one has listed any recent changes in their > travel advisories. > > Not even the State Department has listed this particular issue on > their web site, which tells me something how credible they think it > is. > > In other words since the decision to hold the meeting there was taken > nothing really has changed. Which has been the point I have made on the > conference call already. > > I strongly urge to continue concentrating on your laudable efforts to > make a success out of the situation we are finding ourselves in. > > greetings, el > -- > Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Senior Member, Omadhina (cc) > accounts(a)omadhina.co.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) > PO Box 98256 \ /Please do NOT send e-mail to el(a)lisse.NA > Windhoek Namibia ;____/ if it is in ANY way DNS/Omadhina related > > > ------ End of Forwarded Message > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4866 (20100214) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4866 (20100214) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *KeNIC MailScanner* <http://www.kenic.or.ke/>, > and is > believed to be clean. > > Kenya Network Information Centre (KeNIC). -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by * KeNIC MailScanner* <http://www.kenic.or.ke/>, and is believed to be clean. Kenya Network Information Centre (KeNIC).

1 0

Informatin Security: Protecting the Global Enterprise
by Evans Kahuthu 16 Feb '10

16 Feb '10

Listers, The use of information technology has become paramount in today’s business. It has become an important asset and a vital management tool for any business success. Business information is power hence its security is a must for a competitive advantage. Are your information systems and resources secure? The increased use of Internet by organisations has enhanced threats of attack on information systems and resources. Hacking, cyber crimes, virus attacks and spam have become common occurrence and are on the rise in today’s business arena especially with the arrival of the fibre optic cable. It is with the above in mind that The Kenya Institute of Management and Teqlink Solutions LTD have organised a workshop on Information Security covering principles, threats, challenges and solutions. The workshop will be held on the 23-24the Februaryr, 2010 at the Sarova Panafric Hotel, Nairobi- Kenya. We hereby attach a brief description of the workshop programme covering definition of the workshop, objectives, course content, target group and registration form. Evans

1 0

The EASSy has landed! Landing partner Telkom's ring around Africa
by Victor Gathara 15 Feb '10

15 Feb '10

Seems there is some movement in (not so) EASSy... The EASSy has landed! Landing partner Telkom's ring around Africa The East African Submarine Cable System (EASSy) - one of the nine undersea telecommunications cables that will connect various parts of Sub-Saharan Africa to the rest of the world by 2011 - will land at Mtunzini, on the northern KwaZulu-Natal coastline, tomorrow. Telkom is the South African landing partner for EASSy. In all, there are nine EASSy landing stations in Sudan, Djibouti, Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania, Comoros, Madagascar, Mozambique and South Africa, with shore-end landings already having occurred in Mozambique and Sudan. "EASSy is one of the elements of Telkom's cable investment strategy and is a key step towards the process of establishing a Telkom fibre ring capability around Africa," said Alphonzo Samuels, Telkom's Managing Executive for Wholesale Services. He added: "EASSy further increases the robustness of Telkom's international bandwidth offerings and portfolio. Together with other undersea cables and/or land based fibre routes, EASSy creates redundant fibre access prospects into East Africa." EASSy is a 10 000 km undersea cable system currently being constructed along the east African coastline. Its 1.4 Tbps system design capacity, coupled with its two fibre-pair configuration, equips EASSy with the highest capacity of all undersea cable systems along the east coast of Africa. Interconnection with various other undersea international cable systems will enable traffic on EASSy to seamlessly connect to Europe, North and South America, the Middle East and Asia, thereby enhancing the east coast of Africa's connectivity into the global telecommunications network. "EASSy is routed from South Africa to Sudan, linking the coastal countries of East Africa. An extensive backhaul system linking landlocked countries to the coastal countries has been developed and is at various stages of completion," stated Samuels, adding that EASSy is scheduled to be ready for commercial service from August this year. Samuels explained that submarine cables held many benefits such as superior transmission quality, considerably lesser delays compared to satellite, high transmission capacity, access to the global optical fibre network, lower unit costs (compared to satellite), no electromagnetic interference and higher resistance against adverse weather conditions. "However, activities such as fishing and anchoring, ocean drilling, fish bites and earthquakes constituted some of the commonly known submarine cable hazards," cautioned Samuels. Various initiatives were nevertheless undertaken to protect submarine cables. These included conducting ocean bed surveys to select the safest undersea routes; burying cable in sand where possible, especially at the shallow end; avoiding heavy shipping lanes when approaching landing points; selecting safe beaches, bearing in mind that later beach erosion could expose cables; designing the shortest land cable route for maximum security; and, manufacturing cables to exceed the 25 year design life of the cable system. "Redundancy, protection and - where necessary - restoration are also key considerations," said Samuels. He explained: "Redundancy means that we have duplicated equipment at the cable stations, duplicated power converters, generators, etc. Therefore, if a single piece of equipment should fail, we have another piece of equipment standing by to take its place." Protection ensures that a fully duplicated amount of capacity is available to re-route traffic on the same cable in the event of an internal failure impacting only one path or fibre. Protection therefore implies that for everything that is duplicated, automated switching takes place. Samuels added that restoration required traffic to be routed onto other cable systems via completely different traffic paths and even different routes. "This usually happens when a complete failure of a cable system occurs, usually via an external influence such as a ship's anchor breaking a cable, to the extent that 'in-system' protection on the same system is not possible." He also explained that customers have a choice between the regular international private lease circuits that includes restoration for their bandwidth or a product that excludes restoration, which would be termed non-restorable bandwidth or traffic. "It must be emphasised, though, that in the event of submarine cable service interruptions, every attempt is always made to expedite customer services," emphasised Samuels. Although EASSy will not be commercially active by the time this year's 2010 FIFA World Cup(tm) kicks off in June, Samuels stated that "Telkom's undersea capacity has been significantly upgraded". "For example, by end-October last year, SAT-3 and SAFE were upgraded to at least three times their former capacity." He added that SAT3 provided the shortest route to Europe while SAFE was the shortest link to Asia. From an undersea capacity perspective, therefore, "it's all systems go for the World Cup," emphasised Samuels. As it's investment in EASSy highlighted, Samuels said that Telkom had a robust strategy with regard to undersea cable investments. The Company's cable investments included COLUMBUS3, SEA-ME-WE3 (South East Asia-Middle East-Western Europe), SAT3/WASC/SAFE (South Atlantic Telecommunications / West Africa Submarine Cable /South Africa Far East), EASSy, EIG (Europe India Gateway) and WACS (West Africa Cable System). "Our investments are geared by the participation of other operators and we firmly believe that investment sharing translates to better unit costs and improved customer prices," he added. "Ultimately, we believe that EASSy will also go a long way towards increasing Africa's bandwidth capacity, affordability and create increased diversity and fibre redundancy between SA and Europe as well as within East Africa" concluded Samuels. Issued by: Group Communication and Brand <http://www.telkom.co.za/pls/portal/docs/page/contents/archive/legalnoti ce/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.pdf> DFID, the Department for International Development: leading the UK Government's fight against world poverty. Find out more at http://www.dfid.gov.uk. ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Peapod. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.peapod.co.uk/cleanmail

1 0

III International Meeting on ICT for Development Cooperation
by Inge Vervloesem 15 Feb '10

15 Feb '10

Hi, is anybody going to the following? Seems very interesting .... III International Meeting on ICT for Development Cooperation - New models of Cooperation in ICT for Human Development: Innovation from the South LABoral Centro de Arte y Creación Industrial - (Gijón - Spain) 1st – 2nd March 2010 Check it out on http://encuentro2010.fundacionctic.org/en Regards, Inge

1 0

[Kictanet] Attachment for Elizabeth Muthoni
by Chairman itSMF Kenya 14 Feb '10

14 Feb '10

Dear all, Elizabeth Muthoni is a young lady known to me who is pursuing a JKUAT BSc in Information Technology. She is currently looking for Industrial attachment. Her documents are hereby attached. Please let me know if you are able to help. Regards, Nick Wambugu Chairman - itSMF Kenya www.itsmfea.co.ke "Training, Implementation and Maintenance of Benchmarks in IT Governance"

6 7

[Fwd: ICANN Nairobi; relocation, relocation?]
by alice 14 Feb '10

14 Feb '10

http://crookedtimber.org/2010/02/12/14645/ ICANN Nairobi; relocation, relocation? by Maria on February 12, 2010 Although I no longer work for ICANN, I’d planned on attending its meeting in Nairobi <http://nbo.icann.org/> next month to meet old friends and drum up some work for my new consulting business. The Nairobi meeting is scheduled to run from 7-12 March. The biggest issue on the table is a crucial stage in the addition of new top level domains; the vote by the Board on how to handle expressions of interest. But in the last 24 hours, ICANN’s COO, Doug Brent, has published a security warning <http://nbo.icann.org/meetings/security-information-11feb10-en.htm> that may result in the meeting being cancelled. If this happens, it will be a real blow for the Kenyan Internet community. A previously planned meeting in Nairobi was cancelled because of security concerns prompted by election violence a couple of years ago. I thought this was the wrong call at the time, as election violence tends to die down and our meeting wasn’t till several months later. But I didn’t question and don’t envy the people who have to make that decision. An ICANN meeting brings about 1200 people from around the world to a country chosen from host applications about a year in advance. It’s a mix between a trade show and a party conference, with endless parallel sessions, soap-boxing, hallway deal-making and late night drinking. Probably two thirds One third (thanks, Kieren <http://public.icann.org/meeting-participation-data>) of the participants are regulars, and there’s always a ‘back to school’ feeling on the first day as you greet people you’ve not seen in months with an enthusiasm that wears off in about a nanosecond. The dominance of the regulars causes ongoing criticism that the whole travelling circus doesn’t work to get more and different people to take part, and should halt its global peregrinations and stay put in L.A., Frankfurt or Singapore. It’s expensive to take part in person, but however much resources are put into it, the number of remote participants is always disappointing. The in-person meetings have an uneasy mix of lobbyists, volunteers (many of whom are self-styled volunteers and in fact make their living from ICANN activities), beleagured staff members, G-men, NGO types, ccTLD reps, techies, salesmen, and confused-looking locals. Like it or loathe it, the travelling ICANN meeting is a big deal for the local hosts and the Internet community of the country and region it’s in. It’s their moment to come together as a group and strut their stuff on the global stage. The latest security warning about Nairobi concerns a known threat, the possibility of a terrorist attack by Al-Shabaab, a Somalia based Islamist insurgency group. The group has said it will attack if Kenya supports the Somali Transitional Federal Government. The UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office put out a warning <http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/…> in December 2009 that terrorist attacks throughout Kenya remain a high risk, but that only non-essential travel to near the Somali border is to be avoided. Like London, New York or Washington DC, Nairobi functions admirably despite a constant threat of terrorism. However, the US State Department has just issued a specific warning about possible suicide attacks on the Kenyatta Conference Centre where the meeting will be held. It says the individuals planning on carrying out attacks have been living in Somali communities within Kenya since early February. Although the Board just voted a couple of weeks ago to go ahead with the Nairobi meeting despite the more general security concerns, the latest warning has re-opened this tough question. Ultimately, ICANN’s CEO and Chairman must weigh up the risk of bringing over a thousand people to a potential terrorist target. Their decision isn’t simple as that sounds. Chances are, no attacks will happen and the meeting will be a success. But I suspect the maxim ‘if we cancel it, the terrorists have already won’ has a lot more rhetorical than practical weight if you’re the person on whose conscience the safety of hundreds of people will sit. The Nairobi meeting is hugely important to the people directly involved, in a way I’m finding hard to articulate. As well as the official programme, endless meetings and interactions will take place that are very important to the African and indeed the global Internet community. The solidarity and awareness of what it takes to keep the Internet going in different parts of the world grows from talking and sitting side by side for hours in endless technical workshops and council meetings. It can’t be got any other way. Or put it another way, if the meeting gets moved to ICANN’s home base in Los Angeles, lots of people who would have come won’t be able to. Not least because of visa problems. If ICANN Nairobi has to be cancelled, the loss in the Internet community’s regional momentum and global amity will be great. Over the years, I’ve heard a lot of carping – from mostly American community members, I have to admit – about ICANN going to high-crime places like Sao Paolo, Delhi or Mexico City. In my experience, the non-Americans in the Internet community are markedly sanguine about visiting visiting poor and potentially dangerous places. When we cancelled Nairobi last time round, the Kenyans had to more or less button their anger and disappointment to stay in the game. But it’s infuriating to be told by people you work with that they can’t possibly risk themselves in a city you live in year round. However, there is a qualitative difference between visiting a city with a lot of crime against property and one where you may be a live target. As a nonprofit with a public interest mission and a healthy contingency fund, relocating the meeting will hurt ICANN, but not mortally. I’m sure as I write that the meetings team is triggering its contingency plans to hold the meeting elsewhere if needed. It can be done. I just hope it doesn’t have to be, and that more information about the security threat means fore-warned is fore-armed. Already, a couple of companies have pulled their people regardless. That’s their choice. But if the meeting goes ahead, I for one will be going to Nairobi. -------------------------------- > Harry, all; > > This seems to be the latest update: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:47 AM, <no-reply(a)icann.org> wrote: > >> Updated Security Information as of 11 February 2010 >> Date: >> Thursday, 11 February 2010 >> >> Dear ICANN Community, >> >> Within the last 24 hours, we received an unclassified report from the United States’ Department of State related to the Kenyatta International Conference Center, the venue for our upcoming meeting (attached below). >> >> The types of threats outlined in that communication are difficult to assess. ICANN is now reaching out to different parties in Kenya and elsewhere to see if it is possible to better assess the situation, and of course will share any further information with you. >> >> Sammy Buruchara, Chairman of the ICANN 2010 Local Steering Committee in Nairobi has already provided the following information: >> >> “In relation with the Security threat by Al Shabaab to US Embassy and KICC, I wish to on behalf of ICANN 2010 Local Organizing committee and on behalf of the relevant Kenya Government Security Agencies state the following: >> >> The Kenya Government is aware of the Security Threat by Al Shabaab on KICC and on the United States Embassy in Nairobi. Our security organs that include National Security Intelligence Service (NSIS) and Kenya Anti-Terrorism Police have been alerted and will make appropriate security responses to deal with this threat. Through their network of security agents, they have made contingency plans to thwart any possible terrorist plot that will target Nairobi City, including KICC and all the Hotels in which delegates will be hosted, and the US Embassy. >> >> I wish to assure ICANN Community that the Kenya Government is committed to ensure your safety during the ICANN event and will take necessary security measures to guarantee the safety of all participants during the Conference.” >> >> In the most transparent manner possible, ICANN will continue to share information as it becomes available. Just like you, we’re processing this information, and seeing how and if we need to update procedures and plans for the upcoming meeting. >> >> Sincerely, >> ICANN >> >> Information from U.S. State Department >> >> “As of early February 2010, individuals affiliated with al-Shabaab al-Islamiya were planning suicide bombing attacks on the US Embassy and Kenyan International Conference Center in Nairobi, Kenya. The individuals were targeting the KICC because it was deemed the largest and oldest building associated with the Kenyan government. The US Embassy was targeted for its support of the Kenyan government. As of early February, the individuals planning to carry out the attacks were living in Somali communities in Kenya. We have no additional information regarding the possible individuals involved in the plot, timing, or method of the attack. >> >> This is all the information we have at this time, and we will continue to keep you updated if there are any potential updates.” >> >> >> >> > > > >

2 1

AfTLD Africa ccTLD Event in Nairobi - Registration closes on Monday 15 February]
by alice 14 Feb '10

14 Feb '10

Hi all For all those intending to participate and contribute to the AfTLD meeting/conference in March. best alice -------- Original Message -------- Dear Colleagues Registration for the AfTLD Africa ccTLD Event in Nairobi in March 2010 closes on Monday, 15 February 2010. If you plan to attend and have not yet registered, please register at: http://www.aftld.org/ke2010 Kind Regards, ------------------ Eric Akumiah AfTLD Administrative Manager, [T/F] : +233-21767466 [M] : +233-243380612, +233-203774281 [E]: eric(a)aftld.org [W]: http://www.aftld.org Skype: ericaftldsec -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by KeNIC MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Kenya Network Information Center (KENIC) _______________________________________________

1 0

Why ICANN Nairobi may be a blessing in disguise
by alice 14 Feb '10

14 Feb '10

Kieren McCarthy [dotcom] <http://kierenmccarthy.com> Why ICANN Nairobi may be a blessing in disguise February 12, 2010 · <http://kierenmccarthy.com/category/internet-governance/> There is a questionmark over ICANN’s upcoming meeting in Nairobi, Kenya /again/. This time it has more bite than the usual xenophobia: the COO has published <http://nbo.icann.org/meetings/security-information-11feb10-en.htm> a US Department of State report that lists the conference centre itself as a specific threat from a Somalian insurgency group, Al-Shabaab <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harakat_al-Shabaab_Mujahideen>. In response, a number of Internet companies have already announced they are pulling their people. The Kenya conference was cancelled last year following election violence, and the meeting this year has been under a constant review – with the Board finally deciding the bite the bullet at a meeting <http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-22jan10-en.htm> on 22 January (my heart, incidentally, goes out to my former colleagues in the meetings team who have a near-impossible job of preparing for over 1,000 attendees at short notice). Now there is fresh discussion about whether to go ahead with the meeting – due to start on 7 March. Maria Farrell has written an interesting post <http://crookedtimber.org/2010/02/12/14645/> giving some background (although, I feel the need to point out that the attendees at ICANN meetings are: one third regulars; one third occasional; one third entirely new – my analysis online here <http://public.icann.org/meeting-participation-data>). So I thought I’d write a post pointing out how this bad news can be turned around to be positive for the organization. *If the meeting goes ahead…* It is a terrific opportunity for ICANN to really work on remote participation since large numbers of ICANNers will not be physically attending. This fact has not been missed (thank god) by the Board’s Public Participation Committee <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/participation/>, which has been pushing for participation guides at its past <http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-ppc-27jan10-en.htm> two <http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-ppc-13jan10-en.htm> meetings. I am delighted to see this approach, especially since it was a main recommendation <http://kierenmccarthy.com/2009/12/01/public-participation-my-icann-leaving-…> of mine in my leaving report <http://kierenmccarthy.com/2009/12/01/public-participation-my-icann-leaving-…> as general manager of public participation. Most of the tools for effective remote participation are already in place. What is missing are the cultural and procedural guidelines to make the most of them. With lots of people unlikely to attend, this is an ideal opportunity for ICANN to step up a notch and start making remote participation a functional reality. *If the meeting is cancelled…* Then I sincerely hope that the Board decides to simply cancel the event and reinvest the $2 million it costs to run an ICANN meeting (or as much as it can recoup) into events that focus people’s attention on the issues that need to be tackled. There are only really two things of importance that the Nairobi meeting is going to cover: the Expressions of Interest model for new Internet extensions (whether people have to pre-apply for their gTLD); and the registry/registrar separation issue (the rules surrounding the split between those who sell domains and those who run the Internet registry itself). The Board is going to make the decision regarding the Expressions of Interest. And it has lots of comment <http://forum.icann.org/lists/draft-eoi-model/> from the community following a very active public comment period. I’d like to see the Board meet physically somewhere else (Los Angeles?) for a week and really tackle the issue and do what it needs to do – make a decision. The community has had its say, having another meeting on the issue is only chewing up valuable time. And wrt registry/registrar separation – well, it seems that there is work being done on that by the Board, as made clear in the latest Board minutes (item k) <http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-04feb10-en.htm#k>. So why not have the staff focus on producing the work the Board has asked for, and then have the Board spend a week discussing and reviewing the issue, coming out with firm recommendations for review – rather than engage in another largely pointless and time-consuming community discussion that is scheduled for Nairobi. The other HUGE advantage to cancelling the whole meeting would be to overcome the status-quo fears of some in the community about moving from three to two international public meetings a year. Over the past four years, first Susan Crawford (ex-Board member and former advisor to President Obama), then Paul Levins (ex-VP of Corporate Affairs and the man who negotiated an end to the Joint Project Agreement), and then the Board Public Participation Committee as well as the Head of Meetings have all argued that ICANN should reduce the number of large international meetings the organization runs each year. Having studied this issue closely myself, I have absolutely no doubt that reducing the number of international public meetings would benefit both ICANN and the community. All it requires is the community to get over its fear of change. And cancelling the whole meeting will cause minds to focus, and provide some funds to think about what meetings do need to happen to move the organization’s work forward. So, possibly, hopefully, this Nairobi problem will end up a blessing in disguise.

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Vandalism menace
by Mwangi Wamae 13 Feb '10

13 Feb '10

I can think of four reasons why cable vandalism would occur: 1. Malicious – cable theft: The thief benefits primarily from reselling the metal (is fibre ever resold/). 2. Malicious – corporate sabotage: The thief’s organization will benefit from the service woes of a competitor. 3. Benign – construction work: Someone digging a foundation, trench or similar inadvertently severs a cable. 4. Benign – accident: An unforeseeable event occurs that damages the cable. I don’t have data about the breakdown of the incidences into these four categories. I believe we need to collect real data first before prescribing a solution. However here are my thoughts about how we should address each of these if the incidence warrants it. 1. Cable theft: This is petty thievery; we already have enough statutes in our books to address the perpetrators. The recent ban on the export of scrap metal may have helped – the decline in copper prices may have helped more but prices have been recovering. 2. Corporate sabotage: We need a level competitive playing field and if there is corporate sanctioned sabotage against competitors then the perpetrating company should have some real sanctions including imprisonment for guilty executives and possibly even the loss of their licenses. Telkom in recent press reports seems to be strongly alluding that this is what is going on. 3. Construction work: In Connecticut, (and many other parts of the US), it is the law to call a hotline 48-hours before digging. A joint effort by all the utilities & municipalities in the state (water, electricity, telecoms, sewerage, gas etc) is responsible for coming out to your site and marking where the underground utilities are buried. (There is a call centre to field the calls!) Failure to do so has real consequences on the contractor if there is damage to utilities. 4. Accidents: Nothing we can do here. I am shaking my head in disbelief at the suggestion that any of these (that does not result in death or injury) may even be construed to be a capital crime. Are we really going to hang people for severing a strand of glass fibre? On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Kai Wulff <kai.wulff(a)kdn.co.ke> wrote: > It is not only punishment.. Fiber police .. Well how many people do you > want to deploy all over the country? > > > > > > What is lacking is understanding and respect > > > > When it comes to vandals .. If it was their child needing medical > assistance and the call does not go through because of a cable cut …. > > > > Contractors (Road, Water and other industries ..) they regard fiber not as > an important infrastructure .. So why bother to avoid damage .. > > > > Property owners ….. Cutting the fiber and then complaining about the > Internet being down .. > > > > > > Building owners asking for rent for fiber to be terminated … Are they > getting paid rent by KPLC, TKL, Water … > > > > > > Education should solve the problem …. > > > > > > Last category: Saboteurs .. TREASON > > > > *Von:* kictanet-bounces+kai.wulff=kdn.co.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke [mailto: > kictanet-bounces+kai.wulff <kictanet-bounces%2Bkai.wulff>=kdn.co.ke > @lists.kictanet.or.ke] *Im Auftrag von *Kevin > *Gesendet:* Tuesday, February 09, 2010 17:50 > *An:* kai.wulff(a)kdn.co.ke > > *Cc:* KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > *Betreff:* Re: [kictanet] Vandalism menace > > > > Jevans, > > > > I totally agree with you. I think to answer Dr. Ndemo's question, why not > classify the fiber optic infrastructure as "Critical National Communication > Infrastructure" and make vandalism a capital offence without the option of a > fine. in the same vein, IP network providers should work together to defend > the infrastructure as one entity and jointly safeguard the multi-billion > shilling investment instead of fighting media wars for individual benefit. > > > > A joint national anti-vandalism education campaign would be a good start. > Not all fiber vandals in the rural and urban areas understand the risk of > their actions, especially since they don't see how the fiber crossing their > village is benefiting them directly. For all they know, it only serves the > rich people living in the towns where the fiber is heading. Villagers need > to own the fiber. How? > > > > 1. By fiber companies ensuring that there are digital centres in the > villages where the fiber is passing for villagers to see its benefits (just > like power cables;cut power cables in village= no power=darkness,no TV=no > development). > > > > 2. Establishing a fiber police unit! > > > > > > Any other suggestions good people?? > > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jevans Nyabiage <jnyabiage(a)nation.co.ke> > wrote: > > Should this not be made a capital offence? Which of these competitors > cannot afford just Sh1 million? > > The Kenya Communications (Amendment) Act says any person found guilty of > cable vandalism is liable to five-year jail term or a fine of Sh1 million. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: kictanet-bounces+jnyabiage=nation.co.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke[mailto: > kictanet-bounces+jnyabiage <kictanet-bounces%2Bjnyabiage>=nation.co.ke@ > lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of bitange(a)jambo.co.ke > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:11 PM > To: Jevans Nyabiage > Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Vandalism menace > > Henry, > If today you had the power that the Government has, what is the something > you would do to these thieves? > > Ndemo. > > Sent from my BlackBerry(r) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Henry Okatch <hokatch(a)gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:16:38 > To: <bitange(a)jambo.co.ke> > Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Vandalism menace > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: bitange(a)jambo.co.ke > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: jnyabiage(a)nation.co.ke > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jnyabiage%40nation.co.… > > DISCLAIMER: The information contained in or accompanying this e-mail is > intended for the use of the stated recipient only. It may contain > confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No > confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If > you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all > copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the > sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, > print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended > recipient. > > Any views or opinions presented herein are solely those of the author and > do not necessarily represent those of the Nation Media Group. > > ‘To get all breaking news alerts send the word BREAK to 6667 or visit > http://mobile.nation.co.ke to read news on your mobile phone.’ > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: wanjalak(a)gmail.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/wanjalak%40gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: mwangi.wamae(a)gmail.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangi.wamae%40gmail.c… > >

2 1