- KICTANet - KICTANet

Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] FW: Chaos Over EASSy Project
by alice＠apc.org 10 May '06

10 May '06

FYI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Suhayl ESMAILJEE" <suhayl(a)africaonline.com> To: "'Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants'" <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:14 AM Subject: [Fibre-for-africa] FW: Chaos Over EASSy Project > FYI.Things do not seem to be looking very good. > > > > Suhayl > > > > East Africa: Chaos Over <http://allafrica.com/stories/200605090379.html> > EASSy Project > > <http://allafrica.com/stories/200605090379.html> > http://allafrica.com/stories/200605090379.html > > > May 8, 2006 > Posted to the web May 9, 2006 > > Geoffrey Kamali - Kigali > > The NEPAD e-Africa Commission, a body mandated with the development of > a continental ICT infrastructure network, is taking a tough stance > over ownership of the proposed Eastern Africa undersea cable system > (EASSy). > > The Commission appears to be set on a clear collision course with the > consortium formed to promote the project, which prefers the 'Club' or > members-only ownership, against the Open Access, favored by the World > Bank. > > For months now, the US$240m project has been marred by controversy > over its ownership and financing, with consortium members openly > bickering against each other. > > NEPAD officials are critical of the 'Club' model, arguing that it is > discriminatory and in its form, the model has no incentive to bring > down the high telecom prices, seen as an obstacle to growth. > > Dr. Edmund Katiti, the policy advisor to the e-Africa Commission, told > the Africa ICT investment summit in Kigali last week that NEPAD > favours the Open Access model because it encourages collaboration and > regional integration. > > He said previous projects created under similar arrangements had > failed to yield the desired impact, resulting instead in stagnant high > telecommunications costs and promoting monopolies. > > He said such monopolies would drive small telecom operators out of > business in their own countries. > > Africa has the highest telecom prices despite a submarine cable system > running from Cape Town to West Africa. > > "They have led to the cost of international communications being too > expensive for the ordinary citizen and they don't provide level > playing field for newly licensed telecom co anies," Katiti argued. > > EASSy has generated heated arguments over its ownership and financing, > with the promoters seeking to finance the project and reap big profits > from non-member telecom operators, who also happen to be their > competitors. > > Last week, Kenya, the brain behind the project, threatened to go ahead > in the wake of the ownership controversy and finance the project > alone, citing delays since the project was mooted three years ago. > > "The cost of the meetings alone is half the cost of the project," Dr. > Ndemo Bitange, Kenya's information and communication permanent > secretary, was quoted as saying. > > A delegate at the summit, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the > frustration of the Kenyans is understandable. > > But Katiti said: "We wish the Kenyans good luck but we believe they > are an important player in this project. The NEPAD way is through > collaboration." > > "While some members feel the project has been delayed, others feel there > hasn't been enough consultation. That's the environment we have to endure. > > "There are a number of countries, companies and individuals in the region > who can single-handedly put aside $500m to put up a cable system. But > NEPAD > is not looking at who can finance the project at the quickest time, but > instead to integrate Africa through technology transfer," he added. > > Asked if NEPAD would run a parallel undersea cable, Dr. Katiti simply said > the project would continue as planned. "They should run a parallel cable > if > they want but ours will continue." > > > Under NEPAD's open access arrangement, the venture will be owned by > shareholders who comprise of licenced international gateway operators, > non-operator entities nominated by African states and interested > international operators outside the region. > > To ensure affordable equity subscription to the project, shareholders will > contribute at least $1m and the rest of the share capital will be acquired > through debt financing. > > Construction works on the project is expected to be complete by the end of > this year as all relevant studies, policy formulation and supply contracts > have been concluded. > > _____ > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by <http://www.africaonline.co.tz/> Africa Online > Tanzania, and is > believed to be clean. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Fibre-for-africa mailing list > Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >

1 0

RE: WALTER OTIENO
by Otieno, Simon 09 May '06

09 May '06

ATTENTION:Mr Waudo I came across your mail which was written almost one year ago on the above Subject. I am Walter's Brother, I am requesting if you could Assist me in ADVICE ONLY! Please you can reach me on 0720 766 906.. for further information. I will appreciate you your response Thanks Simon

1 0

fictional stocking cap
by Elmer Robbins 09 May '06

09 May '06

1 0

RE: [Kictanet] where is meeting for EASSY
by mwangati＠ns1.ispkenya.com 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hello Warigia, Did you find out where the EASSY meeting is being held today and at what time? We're interested in attending it. Best, Maureen M.A Original Message: ----------------- From: warigia bowman warigiabowman(a)hotmail.com Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 03:02:09 -0500 To: mwangati(a)measureafrica.org Subject: [Kictanet] where is meeting for EASSY Hello Brian please give us more info on the meeting on EASSY? Where is it and what do we need to do to attend? Yours, Rigia >Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:12 AM >Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre Optic > > >>I would urgently suggest that anybody who is interested in this subject >>and is in Nairobi on the 8th should attend the workshop that the Ministry >>has called. The PS is now in Djibouti and I expect that he will come back >>with some interesting suggestions. The workshop is intended to address >>all the issues required to establish multi- million Multimedia technology >>park and I believe that internet infrastructure is a key element. For >>those of you who saw the notice in the newspapers it was clear that >>investors, contractors, architects, development partners etc are being >>called to attend this event and chart the way forward. Unfortunately I >>will be out of the country at the time - otherwise I would have really >>wanted to participate. >> >>Regards, >> >>Brian >> >> >>On May 5, 2006, at 10:11 AM, <alice(a)apc.org> <alice(a)apc.org> wrote: >> >>>Well said Bill. >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Kagai" <billkagai(a)gmail.com> >>>To: <eric(a)afrispa.org>; "Private list for use by EASSY Workshop >>>Participants" <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> >>>Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:49 PM >>>Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre >>>Optic >>> >>> >>>I dont have authority to speak on this but as an interested party I can >>>say::: >>> >>>1. The dynamics of capitalism are at play and the demand for the cable >>>ultimately has to be met. For the local investors, we find the >>>Djibouti route cheaper and accessible. But I am also aware that other >>>interested parties are actually interested in laying the cable from >>>Mombasa to India...and talks are in progress. >>> >>>2. Raising money from the Stock Exchange will not be easy as some have >>>purported. Though we have had successes in the market, blue chip is >>>not yet fully embraced since the collapse of Africa Lakes??? Africa >>>Online. I know and have experienced that before Capital Markets >>>Authority allows you to transact in the market it takes minimum 3 >>>years of vetting. So raising money from the NSE is (IMHO) impossible >>>on the said time frame. >>> >>>3. Regardless of all the other unresolved problems, the ultimate >>>scenario for some of us if for Govt to take the lead though a SPV >>>worth USD 200 Million. We can then invest in the said vehicle which >>>will have Govt as a share holder with a certain stake. This will >>>probably be the best solution for interested entities and the money we >>>invest proratas to the shares we get. I think Ubuntunet Alliance is >>>also looking for a similar route. Then the SPV can assume legal >>>status, acquire all the necessary licenses from CCK, later go public >>>and we are on the move. >>> >>>Probably, if we were to form a consortia of this nature then we can >>>negotiate with Govt, get things done and we all smile to the bank. >>> >>>The other thing I know for sure is that the Kenya Govt is very >>>committed to PlanB of EASSy but they will require PPP to make it >>>happen. I prefer this direction rather than wait for E-Africa >>>Commission to be releasing info in bits and pieces to an extent where >>>the investors we represent cannot tangibly make a decision on EASSy. >>>-- >>>With Kind Regards, >>>Bildad Kagai >>>MD - Circuits & Packets Communications Ltd >>>Content & Training Partner - JKUAT E-Government Academy >>>Suite B2, Tetu Apartments, State House Avenue >>>P. O. Box 20311 - 00200 >>>Nairobi, Kenya >>>Tel. 254 20 2728332 >>>Fax. 254 20 2726965 >>>Cell. 254 722 379409 >>>URL. www.circuitspackets.co.ke >>>URL. egov.jkuat.ac.ke >>> >>> >>>On 5/4/06, Eric Osiakwan <eric(a)afrispa.org> wrote: >>> >>>>Question, is there a specfic reason why the cable is being build from >>>>Mombasa to Djibouti, Bill? >>>> >>>>On another note, am not sure of the argument that the EA and SA >>>>governments and people have waited too long for EASSy to happen so they >>>>are tired and considering alternate approaches. >>>> >>>>Since we have all become Open Acces believers on the basis that the >>>>"closed access" aka "club deal" has not the expected evidence in SAT3, >>>>the consenssus is to try an alternate approach. Hence the original plan >>>>for EASSy needs to change to an Open Access structure so lets be >>>>patient and work through the mechanism except if we have given up >>>>already and want to do EASSy the SAT3 way, God forbid.... >>>> >>>>Eric here >>>> >>>> >>>>---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >>>>From: brian(a)pure-id.com >>>>Reply-To: Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants >>>><fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> >>>>Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:17:50 -0500 >>>> >>>> > >>>> >Actually I wouldn't be that hasty in thinking that this is an >>>>entirely >bad >>>> >thing. It seems that the government has gotten tired of waiting >>>>for the >>>> >operators to get their act together and mobilise EASSY (they have >>>>now >pushed >>>> >the completion date to 2008). >>>> > >>>> >So what the KE govt has decided to do is try and commission a cable >>>> >running from >>>> >Djibouti to Mombasa. To try and fast track the country's >>>>"connectedness". >A >>>> >potential spinoff is that this could potentially save EASSY the >>>> >construction of >>>> >that portion. >>>> > >>>> >It seems that we are not the only ones who are feeling frustrated >>>>at how >>>> >difficult EASSY seems to be getting.... >>>> > >>>> >Regards, >>>> > >>>> >Brian >>>> > >>>> >Quoting Badru Ntege <ntegeb(a)one2net.co.ug>: >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> The announcement by the Kenyan Government to go it alone >>>> >>> on the proposed optic fibre already presents a sharky >>>> >>> start and uncertain maturation of the ESSY project which has >>>> >>> significant impact on bth the the profile and expecations >>>> >>> within the consortium. >>>> >> >>>> >> It's a pitty though not too surprised. This is indicative of >>>>the >> typical >>>> >> African short sightedness where a few government technocrats >>>>hide their >>>> >> limited knowledge on simple issues behind the vail of national >> >>>>security. >>>> >> >>>> >> So when some of us who have been knocking our heads against >>>>stalwarts >> like >>>> >> these don't seem to excited by Eassy you can understand. As >>>>long as >>>> >> governments are anywhere near the deal, it has a 40% chance of >>>>success. >>>> >> >>>> >> Sorry to our kenyan brothers and sisters, there goes your tax >>>>money in >> a >>>> >> black hole. I predict that if they proceed, the project will >>>>be >> reviewed >>>> >> under a special comission of inquiry a few years later which >>>>will >> conclude >>>> >> that the funds were mismanaged, find one or two scapegoats who >>>>will >> still >>>> >> gate away with it. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>> >> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>> >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for- >>>>africa >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >_______________________________________________ >>>> >Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>> >Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>> >http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>>> > >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Eric M.K Osiakwan >>>>Executive Secretary >>>>AfrISPA (www.afrispa.org) >>>>Tel: + 233.21.258800 >>>>Fax: + 233.21.258811 >>>>Cell: + 233.244.386792 >>>>Handle: eosiakwan >>>>Snail Mail: Pmb 208, Accra-North >>>>Office: BusyInternet - 42 Ring Road Central, Accra-North >>>>Blog: http://afrispa.skybuilders.com/users/Eric/blog.html >>>>Slang: "Tomorrow Now" >>>>-- >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>>Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>>> >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa > > >_______________________________________________ >kictanet mailing list >kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke >http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >Please unsubscribe or change your options at >http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/warigiabowman%40hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Please unsubscribe or change your options at http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangati%40measureafrica.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

1 0

Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre Optic
by alice＠apc.org 06 May '06

06 May '06

For those interested in EASSy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Longwe" <brian(a)pure-id.com> To: "Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants" <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre Optic >I would urgently suggest that anybody who is interested in this subject >and is in Nairobi on the 8th should attend the workshop that the Ministry >has called. The PS is now in Djibouti and I expect that he will come back >with some interesting suggestions. The workshop is intended to address all >the issues required to establish multi- million Multimedia technology park >and I believe that internet infrastructure is a key element. For those of >you who saw the notice in the newspapers it was clear that investors, >contractors, architects, development partners etc are being called to >attend this event and chart the way forward. Unfortunately I will be out >of the country at the time - otherwise I would have really wanted to >participate. > > Regards, > > Brian > > > On May 5, 2006, at 10:11 AM, <alice(a)apc.org> <alice(a)apc.org> wrote: > >> Well said Bill. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Kagai" <billkagai(a)gmail.com> >> To: <eric(a)afrispa.org>; "Private list for use by EASSY Workshop >> Participants" <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> >> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:49 PM >> Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre >> Optic >> >> >> I dont have authority to speak on this but as an interested party I can >> say::: >> >> 1. The dynamics of capitalism are at play and the demand for the cable >> ultimately has to be met. For the local investors, we find the >> Djibouti route cheaper and accessible. But I am also aware that other >> interested parties are actually interested in laying the cable from >> Mombasa to India...and talks are in progress. >> >> 2. Raising money from the Stock Exchange will not be easy as some have >> purported. Though we have had successes in the market, blue chip is >> not yet fully embraced since the collapse of Africa Lakes??? Africa >> Online. I know and have experienced that before Capital Markets >> Authority allows you to transact in the market it takes minimum 3 >> years of vetting. So raising money from the NSE is (IMHO) impossible >> on the said time frame. >> >> 3. Regardless of all the other unresolved problems, the ultimate >> scenario for some of us if for Govt to take the lead though a SPV >> worth USD 200 Million. We can then invest in the said vehicle which >> will have Govt as a share holder with a certain stake. This will >> probably be the best solution for interested entities and the money we >> invest proratas to the shares we get. I think Ubuntunet Alliance is >> also looking for a similar route. Then the SPV can assume legal >> status, acquire all the necessary licenses from CCK, later go public >> and we are on the move. >> >> Probably, if we were to form a consortia of this nature then we can >> negotiate with Govt, get things done and we all smile to the bank. >> >> The other thing I know for sure is that the Kenya Govt is very >> committed to PlanB of EASSy but they will require PPP to make it >> happen. I prefer this direction rather than wait for E-Africa >> Commission to be releasing info in bits and pieces to an extent where >> the investors we represent cannot tangibly make a decision on EASSy. >> -- >> With Kind Regards, >> Bildad Kagai >> MD - Circuits & Packets Communications Ltd >> Content & Training Partner - JKUAT E-Government Academy >> Suite B2, Tetu Apartments, State House Avenue >> P. O. Box 20311 - 00200 >> Nairobi, Kenya >> Tel. 254 20 2728332 >> Fax. 254 20 2726965 >> Cell. 254 722 379409 >> URL. www.circuitspackets.co.ke >> URL. egov.jkuat.ac.ke >> >> >> On 5/4/06, Eric Osiakwan <eric(a)afrispa.org> wrote: >> >>> Question, is there a specfic reason why the cable is being build from >>> Mombasa to Djibouti, Bill? >>> >>> On another note, am not sure of the argument that the EA and SA >>> governments and people have waited too long for EASSy to happen so they >>> are tired and considering alternate approaches. >>> >>> Since we have all become Open Acces believers on the basis that the >>> "closed access" aka "club deal" has not the expected evidence in SAT3, >>> the consenssus is to try an alternate approach. Hence the original plan >>> for EASSy needs to change to an Open Access structure so lets be >>> patient and work through the mechanism except if we have given up >>> already and want to do EASSy the SAT3 way, God forbid.... >>> >>> Eric here >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >>> From: brian(a)pure-id.com >>> Reply-To: Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants >>> <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> >>> Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:17:50 -0500 >>> >>> > >>> >Actually I wouldn't be that hasty in thinking that this is an >>> entirely >bad >>> >thing. It seems that the government has gotten tired of waiting >>> for the >>> >operators to get their act together and mobilise EASSY (they have >>> now >pushed >>> >the completion date to 2008). >>> > >>> >So what the KE govt has decided to do is try and commission a cable >>> >running from >>> >Djibouti to Mombasa. To try and fast track the country's >>> "connectedness". >A >>> >potential spinoff is that this could potentially save EASSY the >>> >construction of >>> >that portion. >>> > >>> >It seems that we are not the only ones who are feeling frustrated >>> at how >>> >difficult EASSY seems to be getting.... >>> > >>> >Regards, >>> > >>> >Brian >>> > >>> >Quoting Badru Ntege <ntegeb(a)one2net.co.ug>: >>> > >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> The announcement by the Kenyan Government to go it alone >>> >>> on the proposed optic fibre already presents a sharky >>> >>> start and uncertain maturation of the ESSY project which has >>> >>> significant impact on bth the the profile and expecations >>> >>> within the consortium. >>> >> >>> >> It's a pitty though not too surprised. This is indicative of >>> the >> typical >>> >> African short sightedness where a few government technocrats >>> hide their >>> >> limited knowledge on simple issues behind the vail of national >>> >> security. >>> >> >>> >> So when some of us who have been knocking our heads against >>> stalwarts >> like >>> >> these don't seem to excited by Eassy you can understand. As >>> long as >>> >> governments are anywhere near the deal, it has a 40% chance of >>> success. >>> >> >>> >> Sorry to our kenyan brothers and sisters, there goes your tax >>> money in >> a >>> >> black hole. I predict that if they proceed, the project will >>> be >> reviewed >>> >> under a special comission of inquiry a few years later which >>> will >> conclude >>> >> that the funds were mismanaged, find one or two scapegoats who >>> will >> still >>> >> gate away with it. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>> >> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>> >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for- >>> africa >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >_______________________________________________ >>> >Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>> >Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>> >http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Eric M.K Osiakwan >>> Executive Secretary >>> AfrISPA (www.afrispa.org) >>> Tel: + 233.21.258800 >>> Fax: + 233.21.258811 >>> Cell: + 233.244.386792 >>> Handle: eosiakwan >>> Snail Mail: Pmb 208, Accra-North >>> Office: BusyInternet - 42 Ring Road Central, Accra-North >>> Blog: http://afrispa.skybuilders.com/users/Eric/blog.html >>> Slang: "Tomorrow Now" >>> -- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >> _______________________________________________ >> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fibre-for-africa mailing list > Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa

2 1

E-Mail Address
by chelimo kenneth 06 May '06

06 May '06

Thank you for subscribing me to Kictanet mailing list. I anticipate constructive issues from this arrangement. Thanks. Ken Chelimo --------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.

2 1

Fw: Fw: Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story
by alice＠apc.org 05 May '06

05 May '06

Dear all FYI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Abiodun Jagun" <abi(a)apc.org> To: <wcurrie(a)apc.org> Cc: <alice(a)apc.org> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:11 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story > Dear Alice and Willie: > > I have been trying to follow the discussion on the proposed "Kenya cable" > on the fibreforafrica list, whilst at the same time reviewing the detailed > feasibility study (DSF) that was submitted by Axion to the EASSy > consortium. Bill Woodcock makes an important point about the type of > "model" that will be adopted ... from my readings, the decision that is > made concerning this will determine the interpretation of "openness" that > will be adopted by the new cable. > > It is therefore important to re-think fundamental conceptions about the > way submarine cable projects are structured or risk making the same > "closed" decisions irrespective of who the players are! > > I shall try to explain this using EASSy as and the DSF submitted to the > consortium as an example. I've come across three different > models/structures that have to be decided upon in constructing a submarine > cable: [i]ownership structure, [ii] financial structure, and [iii] > governance structure. They are of course interrelated and adopting a > certain type of ownership structure has an impact on the range of > available options for the other types of structure. > >>From reading the DSF (dated May 2005) I got the distinct impression that > Axion recommended the Consortium model to EASSy. For example the report > states: > > "The Consortium model is seen as successful as soon (as) it gets to the > financial closing of the project. In case system capacity is poorly used > or capacity usage principles are incorrectly designed, it only impacts the > individual business plan of each Consortium member. The long-term > economical viability of projects built under a Consortium umbrella is > never at risk." (Axiom, 2005:41) > > An alternate model (involving the setting up of a Special Purpose Cable > Company - SPCC or Special Purpose Vehicle - SPV) is also recommended where > the Consortium members cannot raise the finance required for the project. > > The DSF gives a detailed description of what (in its own interpretation) > constitutes a Consortium. I have tried to summarise these below: > > 1. Comprised exclusively of International Telecom Entities (or ITEs) > 2. Each member of the consortium commits to [i] an upfront capital cost > representing its investment share in the system, and [ii] an operational > and maintenance cost share of the system over its life-span. > 3. Each member of the consortium carries out a business plan and business > model to support its investment decision > 4. Each member obtains its own source of finance either from its own > management or from the debt market > 5. **There is no relevant business plan/model relating to the whole > system** > 6. Core group of ITEs (also referred to as "MOU parties") together develop > the configuration of the cable system, agree on funding rules to cover > capital and costs, and also agree on how capacity will be allocated > 7. Additional members can join the core group on condition that [i] "it > makes sense for the initial core group to include them (e.g. increased > business opportunities, limited risk of competition, etc.) and [ii] they > as a minimum cover any additional configuration costs that may be > incurred" > 8. The consortium membership is closed when [i] agreement is reached on > the configuration of the cable system, [ii] agreement is reached on the > principles guiding the sharing of ownership, and [iii] financing is > completed > 9. **Investment shares committed by all consortium members is 100% of the > capital cost of the system** > 10. (As a result of 9) The capacity pricing scheme is NOT derived from the > Design (technical) Capacity but from the Notional (expected sales) > Capacity - which is computed from traffic forecasts and market share > calculations > 11. The small print: Encourages people to plan their capacity needs in > terms of market shares and NOT traffic forecasts > 13. Provides opportunity for ITEs who are not members of the consortium to > purchase or lease capacity after its financial closure BUT the consortium > then determines the price at which this capacity is sold > 14. **The proceeds from these additional sales are distributed among > consortium members AFTER the close of finances for the project. Thus cash > is not the issue and such sales of capacity are often hampered by members' > desire to protect their business plans and returns** > 15. Other funding opportunities may arise when traffic requires for the > upgrading of the initial system configuration (at marginal cost) - such > new opportunities are however limited to consortium members. Pricing of > 'new' capacity needs to take into account the initial platform that is now > subject to depreciation and the new 'to be lit' part(s) > > I emphasised points 5, 9 and 14. Point 5 implies that the "big picture" - > that is the global view of the EASSy cable as a whole is secondary to > "local" (i.e. National) concerns. Combined with points 9 and 14 it is easy > to understand why (as Steve Song indicated in one of his posts on the > fiberforafrica list) openness to the Consortium is defined in terms of > owning a part of the cable and not in terms of affordable and fair access. > What I'm trying to emphasise is that THE CONSORTIUM MODEL REINFORCES > MONOPOLISTIC BEHAVIOUR ... because Consortiums close when ITEs have raised > the required capital, cash from selling capacity is usually NOT the MAIN > objective. > > This is why it is important that organisations like KICTANet begin to get > involved at the very early stages of the "Kenya cable" to influence the > ownership/financial/governance model that is adopted. > > I am currently reading up on other models as the coverage in the DSF of > alternatives to the Consortium model is quite poor. The DSF mentions the > following: > > Carrier's Carrier Model > 1. Submarine telecom cable is fully funded by SPV > 2. SPV shareholders not considered as ITEs and as such are not regarded as > competitors to ITEs. SPV therefore considered to be 'independent' and > 'market-neutral'[2] > 3. **Profit from capacity sales is primary objective of the SPV** > > Mini-Consortium Model > 1. Described as a modern form of the non-profit cable company (NPCC) model > 2. Limited number of ITEs come together under a SPV arrangement > 3. Members ". address all the capacity market and do not exclude anymore > to make (reasonable?) profit out of the sale of capacity." Under NPCC > model capacity is sold to all parties (as IRUs - Indefeasible Rights of > Use) > 4. With NPCC model, the ITEs of the landing countries (referred to as > Terminal Parties - TPs) provided financial guarantees to the NPCC > shareholders which makes it easier for members of this model to access > financial markets > 5. (Due to guarantees provided by founding ITEs?) Model is not considered > to be 'market-neutral' > 6. **Primary objectives of consortium members are (i) early disposal of > capacity and (ii) generation of enough proceeds from capacity sales to > fulfill SPV financial obligations** > > Hybrid Model > 1. Equity is provided by ITEs, non ITEs, and/or finance players > 2. Clear financial benefits at the start of the project and during the > construction of the cable, but this model requires careful balance between > constituent parties for the rest of the life of the project/cable. > 3. **"The shareholder agreement shall be drafted in a subtle way to ensure > that both equity providers will remain tied to each other, i.e. equally > interested in marketing the system to other ITEs (potentially competing > with the funding ITEs) and boosting the proceeds from any further capacity > sales."** > > > > -- > Abiodun Jagun > APC, Africa ICT Policy Researcher > > > > > >> Gosh, Alice, this really needs thinking about! >> >> I certainly think it's an interesting development and raises similar >> questions as the EASSy issue in terms of open access. >> >> If the Kenya cable is simply handed over to Telcom Kenya to exploit the >> ISps and mobile companies - continuing the practice of fixed line >> monopolies leveraging the value of international bandwidth - there will >> be >> a problem, i.e. that there is little point in having the Kenya cable in >> terms of really making a difference to the economy. The emphasis has to >> be >> on creating an enabling environment for maximising the value of the ICT >> sector as well as benefiting the economy by radically cutting the cost of >> bandwidth. It may be worth specifying the price at which it would make a >> difference as in Richard Bell's paper on the fibre list - US$200-300 per >> meg per second per month, I think. >> >> So I would think it useful for KICTANet to engage in constructive >> discussions with the Minister/PS on these issues. I certainly think you >> should not condemn the government for this initiative - rather try to >> explore the economic and regulatory issues with them as well as how the >> EASSy cable would fit in (or not) with this proposal. The question of >> raising capital from the stock exchange should also be explored - there >> was talk at the Mombasa EASSy workshop of raising bonds as one form of >> finance. There is also the issue raised by Abi Jagun, who is now working >> for APC as Africa ICT Policy Researcher, on the fibreforafrica list about >> distinguishing between investment and operations with regard to EASSy >> which could as well apply here. Please discuss this further with her. >> The question of the landlocked countries should also be raised. >> >> It may also be that this adds to the pressure around EASSy Consortium >> eAfrica Commission to deliver which may or may not be a bad thing, I'm >> not >> sure. I certainly think that competition in cable delivery may be a good >> thing... >> >> Let's try and have an online chat about it as well as how things are >> going >> with you. >> >> Warm regards >> Willie >> >> >>> What are your thoughts on this new development re; EASSy Kenya? >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Bill Woodcock" <woody(a)pch.net> >>> To: "KIPlist" <kiplist-cl(a)lyris.idrc.ca> >>> Cc: <kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke> >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 9:44 PM >>> Subject: Re: Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, 3 May 2006, John Walubengo wrote: >>>> > i) What happens to the Kenyan (TKL) investment sunk into the >>>> EASSy >>>> project? >>>> >>>> Wasn't the Permanent Secretary's answer that it had been spent on >>>> meetings? :-) >>>> >>>> > ii) What model (management/ownership) is/will be applied to the >>>> new >>>> project (if similar to EASSy then we r back to square one) >>>> >>>> Yes, that seems like the principal danger here: the possibility that it >>>> will be built but monopolized, and you'll just enter a new and >>>> different >>>> era of stagnation, like many of the west African countries on SAT3... >>>> With expensive fiber which hasn't made a difference because it's still >>>> monopoly-controlled and priced prohibitively. >>>> >>>> I think I and others would be happy to write letters stating that >>>> danger, >>>> if they'd do any good. That might be naive, I don't know. >>>> >>>> -Bill >>>> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Submitted by: woody(a)pch.net 2006-05-03 14:54:21 EDT4 >>>> (Please reply to original submitter for private communication) >>>> --- >>>> You are currently subscribed to kiplist-cl as: [alice(a)apc.org] >>>> To unsubscribe, forward this message to >>>> leave-kiplist-cl-100946B(a)lyris.idrc.ca >>> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Abiodun Jagun > APC, Africa ICT Policy Researcher > >

1 0

RE: [Kictanet] Media Breakfast to Review ICT bill Postponed
by mwangati＠ns1.ispkenya.com 05 May '06

05 May '06

Good morning Alice, Thanks for your email concerning the meeting cancellation. It has however come rather late as I checked my emails at 7:15pm yesterdy evening and your message had not come through by then. Being that this was a breakfast meeting, we had to leave Karen early to get to Westlands on time for the meeting at 7:45am. I could not therefore check my email at the office early this morning. In future would you please try and ensure that all Kicktanet members are alerted on time, either by SMS or phone call so all get the message within good time so as to avoid this kind of inconvenience in future? Thanks and kind regards, Maureen Original Message: ----------------- From: alice(a)apc.org Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:03:26 +0300 To: jkimiti01(a)yahoo.co.uk, mwangati(a)measureafrica.org Subject: [Kictanet] Media Breakfast to Review ICT bill Postponed Dear Colleagues, Due to the unavailability of the PS Information and Communication, Dr. Bitange Demo, the Kenya ICT Action Network has postponed the media breakfast meeting, which was scheduled for May 5th 2006. We shall communicate the new dates soon. beThanks st regards alice _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Please unsubscribe or change your options at http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangati%40measureafrica.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

2 1

The Research Competition on Knowledge Systems
by alice＠apc.org 05 May '06

05 May '06

Colleagues, <Please circulate> This research competition is being organized by IDRC as part of the <http://www.idrc.ca/roks>Research on Knowledge Systems (RoKS) exploration under the newly established "<http://www.idrc.ca/ips>Innovation, Policy and Science" Program Area, which supports the development of science, technology and innovation policies to alleviate poverty in developing countries. This competition will support research to better understand the changing roles of universities in the South, and the implications for developing country governments and research institutions. The Research Competition The overall objective of this competition is to develop an ongoing "knowledge network" that can advance collective understanding of the "Changing Role of Universities in the South." To build enduring partnerships, grantees will interact with each other and with <http://developinguniversities.blogsome.com/>UniDev throughout the research process. The research competition includes three different competitions (Regional, National, Graduate) and is open to researchers and research institutions throughout the developing world. Some recent thinking on the changing role of Southern universities is available on the <http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-94518-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html>RoKS website and should be consulted when developing proposals. Objectives and Research Themes This competition invites research proposals that address the following questions: * What are the new forms of universities in the South, what is driving this change, and what does this change mean for universities in the South? * How should the role and impact of university research in the South be in order to meet its development potential? * How should entrepreneurship and academic research functions be linked? The deadline for concept note submission is June 16, 2006 (5:00pm EST) for Regional and National Awards. Deadline for Graduate Awards' applications is September 1, 2006. Submissions received after that date, or which are incomplete, will not be eligible for consideration. Concept notes that are qualified through a peer review process will be asked to submit full proposals. Information regarding the status of your application, other than our confirmation of its receipt, will not be available. For more information and to download a complete concept note application kit, please click on: http://www.idrc.ca/roks/ev-94514-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html or contact roks(a)idrc.ca. IDRC is committed to equity and encourages applications from qualified women, men, visible minorities, aboriginal peoples and persons with disabilities. We thank all applicants for their interest and will ONLY contact those teams whose background, quality & feasibility best match the criteria of the award.

1 0

Fw: [wsisyouthkenya] NetCorps Kenya is seeking an Intern Coach
by Wainaina Mungai 04 May '06

04 May '06

> -------Original Message------- > > From: Joseph Maruti <mmaruti(a)hotmail.com> > > Sent: 04 May '06 14:24 > > > > NetCorps Kenya, Digital Opportunity Trust's Global NetCorps program in > > Kenya, is seeking to IMMEDIATELY fill the positions of Intern Coach and > > Gender Specialist Consultant. > > > > > > Those interested in either of these positions should forward their > > application letter and resumes (CV)s for consideration to: > > > > > > Joseph Maruti > > > > Country Director > > > > > > NetCorps Kenya > > > > P O Box 21428, Nairobi 00505 > > > > > > email: [LINK: mailto:[email protected]] > > jmaruti(a)globalnetcorps.org > > > > > > In your application letter please specify which of these positions you > > wish to be considered. > > > > > > Kind Regards > > > > Maruti

1 0

Knowledge Sharing in African Agricultural Research - session in Nairobi
by alice＠apc.org 04 May '06

04 May '06

Dear members Some of you might want to attend this workshop -------------------------------------------------------------- Dear all, Please allow me to forward this invitation to a one-day workshop on Knowledge Sharing in Research at the IAALD (International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists) conference in Nairobi on May, 22. Simone Simone Staiger-Rivas Communications Unit Webpublishing Knowledge Sharing - InforCom Project (Information and Communications for Rural Communities ) CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical) E-mail: s.staiger(a)cgiar.org CIAT Web site: www.ciat.cgiar.org <http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/> InforCom Web site: www.ciat.cgiar.org/inforcom Knowledge Sharing Web site: http://www.ks-cgiar.org <http://www.ks-cgiar.org/> "With support from CTA, IAALD members and partners in Africa are organising a conference from 21 to 26 May, 2006 in Nairobi, Kenya. The meeting will look at five broad themes: Building capacity in agricultural information resources management; Enabling policy for agricultural information management; Narrowing the digital divide; Knowledge sharing and information systems for networking and partnerships; Meeting the information needs of stakeholders. Information on how to participate, contribute, or sponsor the event is available on the <http://www.asareca.org/iaald-africa/> conference web site." http://www.asareca.org/iaald-africa/ <http://www.iaald.org/> IAALD Logo ICT-KM Program Knowledge Sharing in Agricultural Research A workshop at the First IAALD Africa Chapter Conference in Nairobi Are you looking for better ways to build collegial relationships that are essential for creative collaboration in agricultural research for development? Would you like to explore knowledge sharing techniques currently in use and of potential use in African agricultural research? Would you like to know how you can optimize participation in collaborative processes in important aspects of your organization's life and work? If so, then join us for an interactive knowledge sharing event, including a fair, a "chat show", and a world café session. We would like to share with you how initiatives of the CGIAR ICT-KM Program tackle the issue of creative collaboration in agricultural research for development. You will also help shape future plans of the CGIAR ICT-KM Program for expanding and strengthening knowledge management and sharing within the CGIAR and its partnerships. Come and take part in the CGIAR's new knowledge sharing culture. Monday, 22 May 2006, 10:00am to 5:00pm, in the Le Chateau Room Hotel Intercontinental, Nairobi Seats are limited, so register early to avoid disappointment by sending an e-mail to <mailto:[email protected]> ictkm(a)cgiar.org --- You are currently subscribed to km4dev-l as: dhalaby(a)gdnet.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-km4dev-l-369565F(a)dgroups.org Please note that hitting the Reply button will send a message to the entire list. The KM4Dev mailing list is a public forum, and our mailing list archives are publicly available on the website. Check out the KM4dev website: http://www.km4dev.org --- You are currently subscribed to km4dev-l as: dhalaby(a)gdnet.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-km4dev-l-369565F(a)dgroups.org Please note that hitting the Reply button will send a message to the entire list. The KM4Dev mailing list is a public forum, and our mailing list archives are publicly available on the website. Check out the KM4dev website: http://www.km4dev.org

1 0

Media Breakfast to Review ICT bill Postponed
by alice＠apc.org 04 May '06

04 May '06

Dear Colleagues, Due to the unavailability of the PS Information and Communication, Dr. Bitange Demo, the Kenya ICT Action Network has postponed the media breakfast meeting, which was scheduled for May 5th 2006. We shall communicate the new dates soon. best regards alice

1 0

Re: Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story
by John Walubengo 03 May '06

03 May '06

good move for Kenya (going it alone?). But this does raise even more questions than answers e.g. i) What happens to the Kenyan (TKL) investment sunk into the EASSy project? ii) What model (management/ownership) is/will be applied to the new project (if similar to EASSy then we r back to square one) iii) Could we have documented reasons for abandoning EASSy? (lessons learnt). iv) etc, walu. >>> <alice(a)apc.org> 05/03/06 10:26am >>> http://www.nationmedia.com/dailynation/nmgcontententry.asp?premiumid=0&cate… Kenya to build Sh15bn fibre optic cable link Story by JEFF OTIENO Publication Date: 5/3/2006 Kenya has decided to go it alone in the construction of a Sh15 billion fibre optic undersea sea cable system connecting it to the rest of the world. Fibre optic cables are hair-thin glass fibre for the transmission of data in the form of light. According to the Government, the envisaged Eastern Africa Submarine System (EASSy) cable project driven by 15 telecommunications firms from 13 Eastern Africa countries was taking too long. EASSy was aimed at establishing an undersea cable system connecting Mtunzini, located just north of Durban, in South Africa to Port Sudan, in Sudan a distance of about 9,900 km Information and Communication permanent secretary, Bitange Ndemo, said Kenya would begin would begin discussions with Djibouti, one the countries involved in the construction of the cable network. It is believed that a link to Djibouti will connect Kenya to the rest of the world. Apart from Kenya and Djibouti, other countries involved in the project are South Africa, Sudan, Mozambique, Madagascar, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Malawi, Botswana, Ethiopia and Somalia. Dr Ndemo lamented that three-years since the project was envisaged nothing had been done apart from the holding of numerous meetings. "The costs of the meetings is almost half the total cost of the project," he added. Dr Ndemo spoke at an East African Regulatory, Posts and Telecommunications organisation meeting held in Nairobi yesterday. The PS said Kenya needed the cable more than any other country saying many foreign companies had expressed interest to invest in the country but were holding back due to connectivity problems. He, however, denied that the decision would put Kenya on collision course with other ESSAy members adding that one had to take the lead. "Somebody has to take control and start the project or else we will not get anywhere," he added. The fibre optic cable would be used to connect Nairobi and Mombasa to open up employment opportunities to thousands of youths in ICT. The money, the PS said would be raised using the Nairobi Stock Exchange where the public would buy shares. A meeting involving players in the industry has already been organised to deliberate of raising funds and will be attended by among others Kenya Data Networks, Celtel and Telkom Kenya. "The cable should be ready by next year to enable the country benefit from the technology," Dr Ndemo said. _______________________________________________ Fibre-for-africa mailing list Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa --- Submitted by: alice(a)apc.org 2006-05-03 03:36:24 EDT4 (Please reply to original submitter for private communication) --- You are currently subscribed to kiplist-cl as: [jwalubengo(a)kcct.ac.ke] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-kiplist-cl-102682Q(a)lyris.idrc.ca

1 0

Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story
by alice＠apc.org 03 May '06

03 May '06

http://www.nationmedia.com/dailynation/nmgcontententry.asp?premiumid=0&cate… Kenya to build Sh15bn fibre optic cable link Story by JEFF OTIENO Publication Date: 5/3/2006 Kenya has decided to go it alone in the construction of a Sh15 billion fibre optic undersea sea cable system connecting it to the rest of the world. Fibre optic cables are hair-thin glass fibre for the transmission of data in the form of light. According to the Government, the envisaged Eastern Africa Submarine System (EASSy) cable project driven by 15 telecommunications firms from 13 Eastern Africa countries was taking too long. EASSy was aimed at establishing an undersea cable system connecting Mtunzini, located just north of Durban, in South Africa to Port Sudan, in Sudan a distance of about 9,900 km Information and Communication permanent secretary, Bitange Ndemo, said Kenya would begin would begin discussions with Djibouti, one the countries involved in the construction of the cable network. It is believed that a link to Djibouti will connect Kenya to the rest of the world. Apart from Kenya and Djibouti, other countries involved in the project are South Africa, Sudan, Mozambique, Madagascar, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Malawi, Botswana, Ethiopia and Somalia. Dr Ndemo lamented that three-years since the project was envisaged nothing had been done apart from the holding of numerous meetings. "The costs of the meetings is almost half the total cost of the project," he added. Dr Ndemo spoke at an East African Regulatory, Posts and Telecommunications organisation meeting held in Nairobi yesterday. The PS said Kenya needed the cable more than any other country saying many foreign companies had expressed interest to invest in the country but were holding back due to connectivity problems. He, however, denied that the decision would put Kenya on collision course with other ESSAy members adding that one had to take the lead. "Somebody has to take control and start the project or else we will not get anywhere," he added. The fibre optic cable would be used to connect Nairobi and Mombasa to open up employment opportunities to thousands of youths in ICT. The money, the PS said would be raised using the Nairobi Stock Exchange where the public would buy shares. A meeting involving players in the industry has already been organised to deliberate of raising funds and will be attended by among others Kenya Data Networks, Celtel and Telkom Kenya. "The cable should be ready by next year to enable the country benefit from the technology," Dr Ndemo said. _______________________________________________ Fibre-for-africa mailing list Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa

1 0

Re: Invitation to a Breakfast Meeting to discuss the Kenya Information Communication Bill.
by alice＠apc.org 03 May '06

03 May '06

Dear Colleagues, The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) invites you to a breakfast meeting on Friday 5 May 2006 from 7:30 to 10:00am to discuss the broadcasting and media sections on the Information Communication Bill 2006 at the Jacaranda Hotel, Gazebo Banda. The Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Information and Communication, Dr Bitange Ndemo will be chairing the meeting. The Ministry of Information and Communications finalized the ICT Policy early this year and Cabinet approved it. Subsequently, KICTANet has established a team to facilitate a comprehensive review of the draft ICT bill to make substantial recommendations for those who will finalize it. The key issues to be addressed include context, construction and implementation of the bill. Media groups are critical to this process and KICTANet would like to ensure that they contribute to this review process. To RSVP please contact Judy Kimiti on Cell phone number 0722-716020 or email jkimiti(a)email.kictanet.or.ke before 04 May 2006 Thank You -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDA: Breakfast Meeting to discuss the Kenya Information Communication Bill. 7: 30 Breakfast 7: 45 Remarks on the purpose 7: 50 Remarks by the P.S Dr. Bitange Ndemo of Information and Communication 8: 00 Presentation by KICTANet Review Team 9: 00 Comments from Media Owners 9:45 Closure

1 0

Minutes from meeting April 27th
by warigia bowman 02 May '06

02 May '06

Here are my notes from this months meeting. Warigia _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

1 0

Interim Report: Review and analysis of the Kenya Information Communication Bill 2006
by alice＠apc.org 02 May '06

02 May '06

Dear KICTANET Members Below and attached is the interim report for the review and analysis of our IC bill. Thank you and best regards alice --------------------------------------------------------- 1.0 Introduction Following the publication of Kenya Information and Communications Bill 2006 by the Ministry of Information and Communications in Feb 2006, KICTAnet decided to establish an infrastructure to review the bill in a systematic manner. The purpose was to take on board comments emerging from stakeholders in an efficient, constructive and nationally engaging process. Consequently KICTAnet established a team to undertake the review. This an interim report of the work of the I&C Review Team 2.0 Team composition The Team was formally constituted in the beginning of May and comprise of the following facilitators and their theme of responsibility in the Bill review exercise as set out in Table 1. Table 1: team membership and area of focus 1. Telecommunications: Muruiki Mureithi 2. Legal/Regulatory: J. N. Kihanya 3. Social Dimensions, including gender, youth etc: Dorcas Muthoni 4. Broadcasting/Media: Grace Githaiga 5. Acadamia: Victor Kyalo 6. Internet and information technology: John Walubengo 7. Economics: Ndungu Kimani 8. Outreach: Alari Alare The team Chair is Mr Muriuki Mureithi 3.0 Activities At its first meeting held on April 10th the team - approved an innovative model to review the bill . The model developed by Summit Strategies Ltd breaks down the review process into three dimensions, namely carriage system(s), content and finally services provision environment over three time phases. A detailed description of the model is attached - reviewed and allocated responsibilities for each team member as indicated in Table 1 above - Agreed to finalise and present phase 1 – contextualisation by Tue April 25 - Requested the Chair to brief and seek collaboration from PS Ministry of Information and Communications - Decided to publicise the bill review process to get constructive engagement with broad participation by all stakeholders - Decided to engage an expert to help engage the media on the review process These activities were carried out and reported in the 2nd meeting held on April 19th .This second meeting took note of the following;- - Briefing on the meeting with PS on April 13th who committed to support the process as reported below Dear Colleagues Further to our concurrence to work with the Ministry of Infocom, I met the PS on Thursday April 13th at 1700hrs and briefed him - on the framework and strategy we are using to review the bill - that the motivation of the process was to create synergy among all stake holders and enhance efficiency in the review process - that it was an open process we seek to bring all stakeholder interest on board - the team is giving time as a national contribution to development of ICT in the country - being a phased approach we shall have a peer review meeting on May 12th and a national workshop towards end of May or early June to be determined by the publishing of the bill by the AG The PS expressed appreciation to the work we are doing and committed to support us in this noble activity. He indicated that he will send his staff on the meeting of May 12th and that the ministry will takeover ownership of the national workshop to ensure high level participation. His office is open for any consultations we may need or support to undertake research that we may need. The Asst minister also came in briefly in our meeting Email to team members dated April 18th , 2006 , by Muriuki Mureithi chair - very concise reports by all members on their respective themes - the process leading to publishing of the bill by the Attorney General explained below ‘My very rudimentary understanding of the Bills process will be that on finalisation by the AG, the Bill will be published and forwarded to the House Business Committee, which will in turn forward it to the relevant committee of the House. The Bill will then be presented for its first reading by the Minister for communications. This involves a paragraph by paragraph reading of the all clauses in the Bill..or highlight of the PARTS of the Bill...It will then go to the second stage where the house will convert itself into a committee and raise queries on the Bill and then refer the Bill to the appropriate committee for any amendments proposed. It will then come back to the House for a final third reading and if passed, will await presidential assent to become law. I hope this gives a guide of some sort ON THE TIME FRAME.I could make a detailed report after enquiries. I am not aware of the internal workings at the AGs but would assume that the relevant officers will make the relevant changes to accord the Bill a final parliamentary style and when passed by the AG, the process above would kick in..’ Submission to the team by J N Kihanya Legal/ regulatory on Parliamentary process April 18th - Low response from the KICTANET list members. The team tasked a specialist Mr Alari to develop a strategy to engage all stakeholders in the bill review process - Commenced phase 2 – analysis of the bill with a view to make substantive proposals on the bill. A guideline has been developed by the legal expert on how to make proposals to the text as below Section 58(1)(ICBill) “The Minister may, by notification in the Kenya gazette, declare that any computer system or computer network is s a protected system.” Comment Delete entire section. The data protection regime needs a more robust treatment and we should seek views in other jurisdictions on how they have achieved this. Mr J N Kihanya Legal expert - to hold a media owners/ senior editors workshop in the first week of May to brief the media on the process - others key stakeholders to be engaged and briefed include TESPOK, Telkom Kenya, Safaricom, Celtel , E-government Secretariat, Postal Corporation of Kenya, CCK, Civil Society of Organisation - to meet on May 10th to present output of Phase 2 - to present our findings to a ½ morning workshop for peer review on may 12th - 4.0 Status PS Ministry of I&C has confirmed to attend the breakfast media briefing workshop on May 5th. We are now finalising the logistics to organise the meeting and bring in Media owners and senior editors Team members have almost finalised the final reports of Phase 1 whose cut off was Tue April 25th 5.0 Future programme The team has planned the following near term activities a.. Brief the Minister on the review once the report is complete b.. To organise a one day workshop for ICT reporters once review is complete to educate them on the contents of the Bill and our proposals Once the Bill is published by the AG a.. Jointly with the Minister organise a one day national workshop b.. Jointly with IEA , ATPS hold a two day workshop for Members of Parliament Committee responsible for ICTs 6.0 Resources The team is literally donating time and expertise for these national activities. The team needs funding for the better honoraria to cover direct costs and funding to organise the National workshop as well as the two day workshop with Members of Parliament Committee responsible for ICTs. +++

3 2

Fw: [Apc.africa] (Fwd) Invitation to join a Consultation Process - Strengthenin
by alice＠apc.org 01 May '06

01 May '06

Dear all > > My apologies if you have seen this already. I am subscribed to this list > and have noticed that it does not seem to have participation from > media people from Africa who were involved in the WSIS process. > > Please do consider joining this important discussion. > > Best > > Anriette > > ------- Forwarded message follows ------- > Send reply to: <dacosta(a)igc.org> > From: "Peter da Costa" <dacosta(a)igc.org> > To: "'Africa Media Group'" <africamedia(a)uneca.org> > Subject: Invitation to join a Consultation Process - Strengthening > Africa's Media > Date sent: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:37:36 +0100 > > Dear Colleagues > > > > We'd be grateful if you could circulate the below announcement to as > many of your contacts working in media-related fields in Africa, and > beyond. Your participation is also welcome. > > > > Many thanks in advance, best regards > > > > Peter > > For the Secretariat > > 'Strengthening Africa's Media' > > > > _____ > > From: Martha Mogus [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Africa > Media > Group Sent: 14 April 2006 06:30 Subject: Invitation to join a > Consultation Process - Strengthening Africa's Media > > > > > Dear colleague, > > As a media practitioner working in or on Africa, we're writing to > invite you to participate in 'Strengthening Africa's Media', an online > forum - due to kick off on Thursday 20 April 2006 and lasts for 12 > weeks. > > The forum will provide a platform for African media actors, in > collaboration with their support partners, to articulate concerns and > perspectives, identify priority issues and areas requiring support, > and propose concrete initiatives and programmes towards a > strengthened > media sector. We define media inclusively, spanning the mainstream > press and broadcast media, alternative and community media, civil > society media, formal and non-formal communication, and new media. > The > definition also includes special interest media, addressing > cross-cutting concerns such as gender equity and human rights. > > The 'Strengthening' online forum is part of a broader consultation > process - supported by the Department for International Development > (DFID) - that includes physical meetings, both at sub-regional level > and on specific issues of concern. Your views will form the basis of a > 'Strategic Framework for Strengthening Media in Africa', a document > intended to make the case for enhanced investment in media. What > you > have to say will also be of critical importance in framing the issues > for a Stakeholder Conference, to be held in September 2006, at which > the priorities for strengthening Africa's media will be further > discussed and agreed upon. > > The content of the electronic consultation will be structured around > four groups of media actors - Owners, Practitioners, Trainers and > Support Organizations. Two weeks will be dedicated to discussions > related to each group, with a two-week period of open discussion at > the end during which the main points contributed will be revisited and > summarized. Each segment of the consultation will be informed by a > series of questions. > > These questions, along with instructions on how to participate, will > be sent to you in a Welcome Message which you will receive once you > confirm that you are interested in taking part. Once we get > confirmation from you, we will register you and you will receive the > Welcome Message and guidelines as to how to participate. Should you > wish to do so, you can also sign up on your own by visiting > http://www.dgroups.org/groups/AMDP and following the instructions. > > We look forward to hearing from you and hope that you can join us in > what promises to be a lively and stimulating discussion! > > Best regards > > > Martha Mogus > For the Secretariat > 'Strengthening Africa's Media' > Addis Ababa, Ethiopia > africamedia(a)uneca.org > > > > > ------- End of forwarded message ------- > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Anriette Esterhuysen, Executive Director > Association for Progressive Communications > anriette(a)apc.org > http://www.apc.org > PO Box 29755, Melville, South Africa. 2109 > Tel. 27 11 726 1692 > Fax 27 11 726 1692 > > _______________________________________________ > Apc.africa mailing list > Apc.africa(a)lists.apc.org > http://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.africa

1 0

Fw: [alac] Big holes in net's heart revealed
by alice＠apc.org 01 May '06

01 May '06

Big holes in net's heart revealed > By Mark Ward > Technology Correspondent, BBC News website > > Simple attacks could let malicious hackers take over more than > one-third of the net's sites, reveals research. > > The finding was uncovered by researchers who analysed how the net's > addressing system works. > > They also found that if the simple attacks were combined with > so-called denial-of-service attacks, 85% of the net becomes > vulnerable to take-over. > > The researchers recommended big changes to the net's addressing > system to tackle the vulnerability at its heart. > > Site seizing > > When you visit a website, such as news.bbc.co.uk, your computer often > asks one of the net's address books, or domain name servers, for > information about where that site resides. > > But the number of computers that have to be consulted to find the > computers where that site is located often makes sites vulnerable to > attack by vandals and criminals, found Assistant Professor Emin Gun > Sirer and Venugopalan Ramasubramanian from the Department of Computer > Science at Cornell University. > > Professor Sirer told the BBC News website that, on average, 46 > computers holding different information about the components of net > addresses are consulted to find out where each dotcom site is > actually hosted. > > But, he said, this chain of dependencies between the computers that > look after the different parts of net addresses creates all kinds of > vulnerabilities that clever hackers could easily exploit. > > "The growth of the internet has caused these dependencies to emerge," > said Professor Sirer. "Instead of having to compromise one you can > compromise any one of the three dozen." > > All the information gathered and analysed by the researchers has to > be publicly available to keep the net's addressing system working. > The research analysed information about almost 600,000 computers. > > The research also revealed that 17% of the servers that host the > net's address books are vulnerable to attack via widely known > exploits. > > "Because of these dependencies about one-third of the net's names are > trivially compromisable by script kiddies," he said. > > One site vulnerable in this way was run by the FBI, said Professor. > Sirer. Although the five computers that act as the first reference > point for the fbi.gov domain were secure, one of the five that > connect to these has yet to install a patch for a well-known bug. > > That computer was fixed after the Cornell team reported its findings > to the FBI, but hundreds of thousands of sites suffer from similar > problems. > > The most vulnerable net domain found by the survey was that of the > Roman Catholic Church in the Ukraine. > > Criminals such as phishing gangs would be interested in re-directing > traffic from well-known sites so they can grab key login and personal > details that would help them de-fraud web users. > > [snip] > The research had exposed a big problem that net administrators need > to tackle, said Professor Sirer. Thought should be given to using a > secure version of the system used to pass around information about > net addresses. > "The domain name system has been incredibly successful so far but it > is showing its age," he said. "We need to re-think the entire naming > infrastructure of the internet." > > The hierarchical structure of the net's address books could be > replaced with a more resilient system, he said, that uses a > peer-to-peer type structure that would be harder to compromise. > Story from BBC NEWS: > <http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/technology/4954208.stm> > > Published: 2006/04/28 13:58:07 GMT

1 0

KICTANet Monthly Meeting April 28 4pm Jacaranda
by Andrew Karanja 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Dear Members You are all invited for a network monthly meeting, which will take place on Wednesday at 4.00p.m. at the Jacaranda hotel. The meetings proposed agenda will be as follows: .Update on the setting up of the secretariat .Feedback on the Analysis of the ICT Bill 2005 . Planning for the Open Policy Forums at Constituency Levels (10 Constituencies), slated for May-August . An update on the KICTANet registration . Finalized MOU between AeRC and KICTAnet . Review of proposal to IDRC for institutional assessment and strengthening . fundraising activities . A.O.B Kindly confirm attendance Regards Andrew Karanja

7 6

Fw: KICTANet OSIEA Proposal
by alice＠apc.org 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

----- Original Message ----- From: "Florence Etta" <feanywhere(a)yahoo.co.uk> To: "Warigia Bowman" <warigiabowman(a)hotmail.com>; "FEMNET FEMNET" <communication(a)femnet.or.ke>; "'Alex Gakuru'" <gakuru(a)mail.co.ke>; "Bill Kagai" <billkagai(a)gmail.com>; "Lizette Kraft" <lkraft(a)idrc.or.ke>; "Brian Longwe" <brian(a)pure-id.com>; "'Brian Longwe'" <brian(a)inhand.co.ke>; "Joseph Mucheru" <mucheru(a)wananchi.com>; "Wainaina Mungai" <wainaina.mungai(a)oneworld.net>; "Alice Munyua" <alice(a)apc.org>; "Muriuki Mureithi" <mureithi(a)summitstrategies.co.ke>; "'Dorcas Muthoni'" <dmuthoni(a)kenet.or.ke>; "'Grace Mutung'u'" <nmutungu(a)gmail.com>; "charles nduati" <charlesnduati2002(a)yahoo.co.uk>; "james Nguo" <james(a)alin.or.ke>; "Lucy Njogu" <luchiru(a)yahoo.com>; "Ben Sihanya" <innovativelawyer(a)wananchi.com>; "'Tony Wafula'" <twaf78(a)yahoo.com>; "'John Walubengo'" <jwalubengo(a)kcct.ac.ke>; "Rebecca Wanjiku" <rebeccawanjiku(a)yahoo.com>; "'Tim Wanyonyi'" <timwanyonyi(a)kenyanparaplegic.org> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 7:34 PM Subject: Fw: KICTANet OSIEA Proposal > Hi all, > I am sorry that I could not attend today's meeting as planned. Could you > please deal with this OSIEA offer as seen fit? > Cheers, > FE > > > Florence Etta PhD > Tel: + 254-733-621851(Mobile)/254-20-7121506 > Email:[email protected] > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Florence Etta <feanywhere(a)yahoo.co.uk> > To: Kerry Shapleigh <kshapleigh(a)sorosny.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 25 April, 2006 2:11:41 PM > Subject: RE: KICTANet Proposal > > Dear Kerry, > Thank you very much for this welcome news. I just got back to Nairobi > after about three weeks in West Africa. There will be a KICTANet meeting > at the end of this week and I will table this information there and will > therefore be in a better position to give you an update etc. > > In the meantime do give our warn regards to Binafer if you are in touch > with her. I was not aware that she is away on medical grounds. > > Cheers, > FE > > Kerry Shapleigh <kshapleigh(a)sorosny.org> wrote: RE: KICTANet Proposal > Dear Florence, > I hope my message finds you well. As you are probably aware, Binaifer is > currently on medical leave and will be returning to OSIEA in about one > month. In the meantime, I have been tasked with guiding proposals through > the review process. We recently brought the KICTANET proposal to our > committee, presenting the attached workplan. > The committee has approved the proposal for 2 disbursements of $36,500 > each and $31,000 as a matching grant. Essentially, OSIEA will issue a > grant of US $73,000. If KICTANET is able to raise an additional US > $31,000, OSIEA will also match that amount. Please consider this > arrangement and let me know your thoughts. > Best, > Kerry > > <<Work plan 2005.doc>> > > Send instant messages to your online friends > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > >

1 0

Gazettement of the Kenya National ICT Policy
by Muriuki Mureithi 28 Apr '06

28 Apr '06

Hi colleagues The Minister has gazetted the National ICT Policy and therefore conforms to the requirement of Kenya Communications Act 1998 as a policy notification to Communications Commission of Kenya. CCK may therefore implement the policy A copy is available at Government Printer at Ksh 50 Rgds Muriuki Mureithi --------------------------------------- Summit Strategies Ltd - Strategic information for decision support in infocommunication business ICT Consultancy & Research in Eastern & Central African markets Contacts : Tel +254 (20) 3875824 , Cell + 254 (722) 520090, email: <mailto:[email protected]> mureithi(a)summitstrategies.co.ke

1 0

Media Workshop Report -Mombasa, 10th-13th March 2006
by alice＠apc.org 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Dear KICTANet members Attached the media and ICT policy workshop report. The workshop took place in Mombasa in March with Media editors from the mainstream media and alternative media thank you and best alice

1 0

Do you or your organization want to influence decisions that shape the Internet?
by alice＠apc.org 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Apologies for cross posting --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Do you or your organization want to influence decisions that shape the Internet? If you do, why not apply to be designated "At-Large Structure" and participate in the Internet Cooperation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) decisions critical to the Internet's end users? ICANN's Interim At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) is now accepting applications from existing or new groups that involve (or want to involve) individuals in Internet issues. Go to <http://alac.icann.org/> for more information. A new mechanism for individual Internet users participation in ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) has been launched for people who want to be involved in issues that affect individuals use of the Internet's domain name system. ICANN is involved in shaping the Internet and is dealing with issues such as privacy protections for your personal domain registration information (called the WHOIS database), the implementation of internationalized domain names (use of non-ASCII characters), trade mark and domain name disputes and related matters, and how new top-level domains (i.e. .info, .name, .museum, etc.) are introduced. These are but a few ICANN issues on which the end-users voice needs to be heard. Groups throughout the world that deal with individual Internet users' interests are encouraged to register and participate in ICANN by submitting a simple application form. Groups that meet the minimum requirements will be designated as "At-Large Structures." The ALAC is an Advisory Committee to ICANN's Board charged with providing advice on activities of ICANN that relate to the interests of individual Internet users, and helping to organize At-Large groups throughout the world for structured involvement and informed participation of the individual Internet user community. Why become an At-Large Structure? By being designated an At-Large Structure, your group gets: a.. A recognized role in forming the policies that affect how individuals' use the Internet (ICANN is listening. Make sure your voice is heard!); b.. Quick and easy access to first-hand information on what's happening in ICANN and why it matters to end-users; c.. Opportunities to provide your members education on ICANN's work and Internet developments; d.. Participation in building your region's At-Large organization (RALO), and opportunities to network with other groups in your country and region as At-Large grows; e.. Representation in ICANN at the regional and international level, plus your group's members will be eligible to serve on important regional and international decision-making bodies in ICANN; f.. A free web page and other Internet-based mechanisms to support your group's work; and g.. Opportunities for funding to support some of your group's activities (ALAC is applying for grant funding). What type of groups can be At-Large Structures? Any group that supports individuals' ability to share their views on ICANN issues, and that meets the few simple criteria listed on the ALAC's website, can apply to be an At-Large Structure. Types of groups that have expressed interest in being designated At-Large Structures include: a.. Professional societies (e.g. engineers, attorneys, etc.) b.. Academic and research organizations c.. Community networking groups d.. Consumer advocacy groups e.. Internet Society chapters f.. Computer user organizations g.. Internet civil society groups Where can I get more information? Send an email to <als(a)alac.icann.org>, or go to the ALAC website at <http://alac.icann.org/>. We look forward to working with you, and hearing from you. ~ The Interim At-Large Advisory Committee

1 0

Fw: [APC Forum] Digital Divide narrowing...
by alice＠apc.org 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Is this a good example of why the term 'digital divide' is misleading? > Technical vs education discouses? > > Maybe not. > > Frédéric Dubois > APC information coordinator > > Source: http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/26/business/lost.php - > Reuters, International Herald Tribune > World's digital divide gets smaller > Reuters > > WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, 2006 > > > BERLIN The digital divide is narrowing as citizens in emerging markets > get online via computers and mobile phones, > with some regions now on a par with developed nations, a ranking of > Web-savvy countries showed Wednesday. > > "Encouraging is the apparent narrowing of the digital divide," the > annual study, published by IBM and the intelligence unit > of British magazine The Economist, said. "This is particularly evident > in basic connectivity: Emerging markets are providing > the vast majority of the world's new phone and Internet connections." > > Within China and India, regions like Shanghai and Bangalore have almost > the same level of Internet and > mobile phone connections as developed nations, said Peter Korsten, > European director at IBM's Institute for Business Value. > > "This is the first time we see a level playing field between developed > and developing nations in terms of > connectivity," he said. "It's up to governments to take advantage with > education and other initiatives." > > The survey looks beyond basic connections and also studies how the > Internet is being used to > improve productivity and reduce costs, including online access to > public services. > > "Virtually all countries have improved their scores over the past > year," the study said. > "The improvement is greater in the lower tiers of the rankings than at > the top. > As a result, the distance separating the best from the rest has > declined." > > > > > ======================================= > APC Forum is a meeting place for the APC community - people and > institutions who are or have been involved in collaboration with APC, and > share the APC vision - a world in which all people have easy, equal and > affordable access to the creative potential of information and > communication technologies (ICTs) to improve their lives and create more > democratic and egalitarian societies. > > _______________________________________________ > apc.forum mailing list > apc.forum(a)lists.apc.org > http://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.forum

1 0