- KICTANet - KICTANet

BungeSMS.com implements Ushahidi Engine
by Wainaina Mungai 20 Jul '09

20 Jul '09

Thanks to assistance from the team at Ushahidi, you can now view mapped BungeSMS messages from various constituencies on http://www.bungesms.com/reports/ The main thrust of the BungeSMS reports is devolved funds in constituencies. The reports shall be extended to the Agenda 4 process and peace building efforts. More on the developments will be communicated soon. Regards Wainaina --- http://www.bungesms.com http://www.madeinkenya.org -- --- http://www.bungesms.com http://www.madeinkenya.org

1 0

Is ICANN Accountable to the Global Public Interest? ICANN Ignores Non-Commercial Users in Internet Policy Development Process
by Gakuru Alex 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

Dear All, This message is very important to every user. Please forward it as widely as possible to all end-users of the internet. Help steer ICANN away from it a path that threatens users online presence, globally. Send your comments to gnso-stakeholder-charters(a)icann.org today to remind ICANN who they work for. Act Now!! Deadline is next Tuesday 21 July, 2009 Regards, Alex Gakuru NCUC - Kenya --------- Below is a blog post on the tragedy of the ICANN NCSG charter situation. See numerous hyperlinks for further background reading at: http://ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCUC-ICANN-Injustices.html ________________________ Is ICANN Accountable to the Global Public Interest? ICANN Ignores Non-Commercial Users in Internet Policy Development Process By Robin D. Gross, IP Justice 13 July 2009 ----------------------------------------- Everyone is a Noncommercial User of the Internet NCUC logoThe Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) is the home to noncommercial users in ICANN's GNSO policy development process. NCUC represents 109 members from more than 40 countries, and includes large organizations, small nonprofits and individuals committed to developing Internet policy that protects the rights of noncommercial users. NCUC is concerned with a broad range of issues including human rights such as freedom of expression and privacy protections, educational needs such as those of libraries or academic institutions, and concerns from community and religious organizations, consumer rights groups, and other noncommercial interests related to Internet governance. In today's world, everyone is a noncommercial user of the Internet at one point of their day or another. This noncommercial interest, is an important interest which we all share, regardless of what we do for a living or the fact that we also use the Internet for commercial purposes. We are also noncommercial users and want our ability and right to use the Internet for noncommercial purposes to be protected in ICANN policy negotiations. This objective is in everyone's interest, so it should be respected throughout ICANN's policy development process and governance structures. Restructuring ICANN's GNSO Policy Development Framework ICANN's Generic Names Supporting Organizations (GNSO) is the supposedly "bottom-up" process that allegedly provides ICANN with legitimacy to make and enforce Internet policy decisions. ICANN's GNSO is responsible for making policy recommendations to ICANN's Board of Directors regarding policies covering all generic top-level domains (such as .com, .edu, .org, .net). Presently GNSO policy recommendations are negotiated among competing interests or 6 distinct "constituencies". However, the GNSO is the process of restructuring and reforming its membership away from 6 arbitrary and out-dated "constituencies" and into 4 distinct "stakeholder groups": i) noncommercial users; ii) commercial users; iii) registrar companies; and iv) registry companies. Board Appointed (top-down) vs. Elected (bottom-up) Represent ion on GNSO Council Noncommercial users have been fighting for years to obtain parity with commercial users in the GNSO policy development process at ICANN. A 2006 report by the London School of Economics found ICANN undervalues noncommercial interests in the policy development process (5 specialized commercial constituencies vs. 1 noncommercial constituency to represent all noncommercial interests). In February 2008 the Board Governance Committee Report also recognized this imbalance and the need to address it in order to protect noncommercial interests in ICANN policy development. As a result, the ICANN Board approved a major shift for ICANN's GNSO by deciding noncommercial users should finally be given parity with commercial users in the GNSO policy development process. Specifically, beginning with the Seoul ICANN Meeting in October 2009, noncommercial users and commercial users are each supposed to have elected 6 representatives to the GNSO Council. However, as a result of back channel lobbying by the commercial constituencies who lost the advantage in numbers of councilors, the 3 new GNSO Council seats that should have gone up for election to noncommercial users, will instead become board appointments. Despite the lack of any support from ICANN, NCUC's membership has grown by more than 125% since 2008 when parity between commercial and noncommercial interests was established by the Board Governance Committee. Yet despite the significant increase in participation from noncommercial users, the "parity principle" has lost support from the board, who now may deny the new noncommercial membership elected representation on the GNSO Council. Development of Consensus for Charter for Noncommercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) In April 2009 noncommercial users responded to ICANN's call for public comment on how to design a stakeholder group charter to maximize the effectiveness of noncommercial users in policy development and encourage the broadest range of participation from the most diverse viewpoints. The answer was clear: noncommercial users overwhelmingly supported a stakeholder group charter that encourages cooperation between constituencies, the charter proposed by the NCUC. NCUC's charter was developed by a multi-stakeholder process that involved months of open consultations, dozens of participants, numerous discussions with ICANN board and staff, At-Large members, existing noncommercial participants at ICANN and prospective noncommercial participants. NCUC's charter went through significant modifications in response to public feedback, including more than half a dozen distinct public drafts, before reaching a consensus on the final charter submitted for a Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG). In addition to NCUC's membership, ICANN's public comment period on the stakeholder group charters brought additional support to the NCUC charter, including support from over 63 organizations and dozens of individuals from all corners of the globe. Public Comment Against a Charter that Would Stranglehold Noncommercial Users Two competing proposals, vastly different in their substance and effect, were submitted to ICANN to charter the new Noncommercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG). In addition to the charter supported by civil society from NCUC, another proposal was submitted from CP80, an Internet pro-censorship group led by Cheryl Preston, Ralph Yarro III (SCO Chairman), and Debra Peck out of Salt Lake City, Utah. Outside from the drafters of the CP80 petition, not a single public comment argued in support of the CP80 proposal or its governance model during ICANN's Public Comment Period. The lack of public support for the CP80 "constituency-based" voting model is not surprising since its provisions would stranglehold noncommercial users in endless competition among factionalized constituencies, constantly fighting over scarce resources and representation on ICANN's GNSO Council. NCUC's charter encourages noncommercial users to work together toward shared goals, while the CP80 model keeps noncommercial users constantly fighting over their differences, and ultimately ineffective at influencing policy decisions at ICANN. Noncommercial Organizations Unanimous in Favor of Joint Civil Society Proposal During ICANN's April 2009 Public Comment period, a total of 23 distinct comments from organizations and individuals were submitted on the topic of stakeholder group charters. Several of these comments were signed by dozens of noncommercial organizations and individuals, increasing public participation by much more than 23 comments would initially imply. However of these 23 comments, the only 2 to argue in favor of the CP80 proposal to hard-wire GNSO Council Seats to constituencies were the drafters of the proposal themselves. No one else. As many commentators noted, CP80's proposed "constituency-based" structure would stranglehold noncommercial users and discourage consensus building and cooperation among competing constituencies. The "constituency-based" voting it proposes creates a constant zero-sum struggle between noncommercial constituencies, rendering the entire Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group ineffective in ICANN policy development. In stark contrast to the lack of any support for the CP80 model, more than 63 organizations and 55 individuals submitted comments in favor of the joint civil society charter that provides for a democratic vote of all its membership to elect representatives to serve on the GNSO Council. Every single noncommercial organization who submitted a public comment on the topic argued against the stranglehold charter model proposed by CP80 and in favor of the cooperation charter submitted by noncommercial users and created through a consensus process. ICANN Defies Public Comment and Imposes Stranglehold Charter Model What did ICANN do in response to the public comment it received and the global consensus against the stranglehold charter model proposed by CP80? ICANN adopted the stranglehold charter model for noncommercial users, defying the unanimous public support expressed for the charter drafted by noncommercial users that was created through a consensus process. Welcome to "bottom-up" policy making at ICANN: where participants are invited to build a "consensus" among a broad range of interests, only to have that consensus discarded by ICANN as a result of relentless insider back-channel lobbying from special interests. Apparently we noncommercial users wasted our time building consensus among global civil society and participating in a public discussion forum, when we should have been lobbying ICANN board members and ICANN executive staffers -- since that seems to be the only channel of public input ICANN feels accountable to. Obviously, noncommercial users will never be able to effectively participate in a policy development forum that is predicated on and dominated by insider lobbying from entrenched commercial interests. ICANN's Board of Directors has a responsibility to the global public interest to ensure noncommercial interests can play a meaningful role in ICANN policy development despite its lack of economic backing. Unfortunately protection for noncommercial interests is systematically being squeezed-out of ICANN's policy development process by commercial interests. ICANN's Sneaky Move to Keep Plans Hidden On 23 June 2009, when ICANN finally released its proposed charter to noncommercial users, in addition to the charter being an entirely different different structure than the one created by the consensus process, ICANN's charter also omitted to include the most important section 5 which deals with management of the NCSG and in particular, representation on the GNSO Policy Council. Only after explicitly requesting to see the omitted section, was NCUC provided section 5 from ICANN with the understanding that it is staff's proposal for governing the NCSG. One will not find ICANN's proposed section 5 in its NCSG charter published on the ICANN website, but it can read be read here -- and it must be read together with the ICANN-drafted NCSG charter for it be clear what sneakiness is at play. Exactly the stranglehold governance structure that noncommercial users uniformly rejected in April, ICANN intends to march ahead with at full steam and impose on noncommercial users. But not transparently and not in a manner that conveys its clear intentions to the public so those effected may provide feedback. When asked at the 23 June 2009 ICANN meeting why didn't staff listen to non-commercial users in the public comment period about how they want to elect their GNSO Council Representatives, ICANN spokesman Ken Bour frankly said that ICANN staff adopted the constituency-based charter "because it is what staff wanted all along". Tell ICANN to Listen to Noncommercial Users and Protect the Public Interest The message is clear. ICANN has forgotten who it works for - us - Internet users - including noncommercial users. Now is the time to remind ICANN that it must be accountable to the global public interest or it has no business in Internet governance. Tell ICANN to listen to noncommercial users and not to impose the stranglehold charter on noncommercial users against our will. Send an email to gnso-stakeholder-charters(a)icann.org (until 21 July 2009) and ask that noncommercial voices be heard in Internet policy decisions. Send a copy of your comment to your local Congressman or Member of Parliament to keep them informed about ICANN injustices to noncommercial users. You can also file a complaint over ICANN injustices with the ombudsman, who is supposed to keep the organization accountable to the public. Thomas Jefferson noted that the exercise of political power without the consent of the governed is illegitimate. ICANN's attempt to impose a governance structure on noncommercial users against their will calls into question ICANN's legitimacy to govern; it undermines confidence in ICANN's commitment to democratic values; and it appears ICANN is unable to protect the broader public interest against commercial pressures. We must remind ICANN to protect the public interest and the rights of noncommercial users - all of us. Send a quick email to gnso-stakeholder-charters(a)icann.org today to remind ICANN who they work for. IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin(a)ipjustice.org _______________________________________________ ke-internetusers mailing list ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net http://www.bdix.net/mailman/listinfo/ke-internetusers

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Of Presidential directives and policy
by Betty Ogange 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Listers, I have read with great interest the directive by the President to the Ministry of Information and Communication to ‘come up with’ programmes for the training and development of the youth nationwide after the launch of the fibre optic cable. http://www.information.go.ke/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=478 This, he rightly says, will ‘catch the generation of truly digital Kenyans.’ I think it is a timely assertion coming from the Head of State. However, I have a feeling that if the directive had been aimed at the Ministry of Youth Affairs and the Ministry of Education, then the Ministry of ICT would play its default role of providing the infrastructural and related support to enable these two Ministries (and any other Ministries with similar programmes) to expand the training programmes that already exist and initiate new ones. I am not aware of the full structure of the Ministry of ICT but I suspect that taking full responsibility of initiating or co-ordinating youth training in ICT countrywide might overstretch its already crowded mandate. Again, if our accountability processes still hold, then the President will at some point expect to be briefed by the Ministry of ICT on how far the directive has progressed. At this point, I see some difficulties with agency and responsibility for outcomes. Which leads me to ask: How does a presidential directive convert to actionable policy? What has been the success level of such directives in the ICT sector? How might a directive like this one be actioned without power games coming into play? Any ideas? Betty

4 4

Business Unusual at ICANN !!
by Gakuru Alex 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

[Excuse this long message. The issue is very important and I wanted to give as much relevant background information as possible. Alex] Four issues covered on this message: - 1. Disclosure within ICANN: 2. Commercial Stakeholders are going to allow any of the existing members of the IPR, ISP, and Commercial Constituencies VETO any board vote creating a new commercial constituency in the CSG. 3. Proved: ICANN ignored own bottom-up Policy Development Process ( or PDP) 4. Subject: ICANN and Free Speech Thank you for reading and your action is needed Alex Gakuru ICT Consumers Association of Kenya Non-Commercial Users Constituency - Kenya -------- 1. Disclosure within ICANN: [Of big brand owners and 'Intellectual Property" industry oiling ICANN domain name policy making process - to the detriment of people like us, in Kenya, and Africa. Countries that do not have well established digital IP laws, "Famous Marks" registries, and poor, if any, software and IT innovations patent system. If just continue sitting back and allow ICANN be influenced by wealthy IP interests, then expect those IP interests to patent/copyright even our traditional languages such that we cannot have our cultures nor use languages over the internet. Who knows, even using vernacular language on email could become 'copyright infringement' We already know the kiondo and Kikoy examples. Alex Gakuru] ---- The US government requires lobbying efforts to be documented, figures of dollars spent per industry are broken down by sector. This is because of the right of people to know who is spending what when policy is being made. Domain name law, such as it is, is being written as we watch. A large number of people are spending a lot of money to do this. Marilyn Cade spoke and wasn't exacly forthright that she represented the intellectual property interests of AT&T or that AT&T was the #1 "heavy hitter" for lobbying the government, something Marilyn has done since 1996. And it's no coincidence the Department of Commerce that oversees ICANN is the fourth most lobbied agency in the US government. The amount the trademark lobby spend on preventing new TLDs since 1996 is staggering IBM admitted to spending $30M/yr in 1998 and 1999 but we have no other figures. There is not now, full disclosure of lobbying efforts on behalf of the trademark lobby Or known how much big business spending this year to lobby against the creation of new top level domains. Question part 1: Is full disclosure of lobbying not consistent with ICANN's "open and transparent" US Government mandate? Question part 2: Would anybody care to estimate what they think this figure might be this year lobbying ICANN and what has WIPO spent doing this since the 1995 OECD meeting where they first publically ventured into this issue? Can these figures be published sometime before the end of this quarter for both WIPO and the business community as a intrest group in this consultation under this current monopoly procedure that could create thousands of jobs? For more information, see http://docs.vrx.net/dns/timeline/20/09/nyc_irt/ 2. Commercial Stakeholders Group are going to allow any of the existing members of the IPR, ISP, and Commercial Constituencies VETO any board vote creating a new commercial constituency in the CSG. We (noncommercial users) have really been asleep at the wheel over the last year while the ICANN Board of Directors had their heads filled with mis-representations about NCUC by relentless back-door lobbying. They get it from the commercial/IPR crowd and they get it from staff, neither of whom want to see noncommercial users effective in policy development. The fact that we haven't engaged in backdoor lobbying the way our critics do is coming back to haunt us by ICANN trying to take away our newly won 3 elected council seats for noncommercial users and staff imposing its "stranglehold" charter while ignoring all of work we did to develop one that was supported by global civil society (63 organizations + dozens of individuals in public comments). In particular, under the SIC approved charter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/csg-proposed-petition-charter-22jun09…>for the CSG, they are going to allow any of the existing members of the IPR, ISP, and Commercial Constituencies VETO any board vote creating a new commercial constituency in the CSG. Amazing! The press should be having a field day with this level of incompetence and favoritism. "4.2 Membership shall also be open to any additional constituency recognised by ICANN’s Board under its by-laws, provided that such constituency, as determined by the unanimous consent of the signatories to this charter, is representative of commercial user interests which for the purposes of definition are distinct from and exclude registry and prospective registry, registrar, re-seller or other domain name supplier interests." We must push-back against ICANN injustice to get them to listen to noncommercial users and to stop developing policy through backdoor negotiations while ignoring the expressed will of the public and a bottom-up process. ICANN is accepting public comments until 21 July on their imposed charter, so we have to weigh in loudly on their failure to follow bottom-up processes and allow noncommercial users to govern themselves. More info on comment period: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#stakeholder --- 3. Proved: *ICANN ignored own bottom-up Policy Development Process ( or PDP) * Attached find two documents:- The first is a set of comments describing our procedural concerns about the way the IRT Committee was constituted and much fairer ways to proceed forward. The second is s set of detailed comments with our deep substantive concerns re: the IRT Report, and particularly the problems of the Globally Protected Marks List, the URSP system (a displacement of the UDRP), the IP Clearinghouse and the Thick Whois. Your action needed: Send your comments to ICANN under Non-Commercial Users Constituency (“Internet Users”) Attachments: 1. NCUC Procedural Comments on IRT Final Report.pdf 84K 2. NCUC Substantive Comments on IRT Final Report.pdf 116K ---forwarded message--- *4. Subject: **ICANN and Free Speech* For what it's worth I wrote a post on my blog about ICANN free speech issues and the importance of including non-commercial voices, aimed at people who know little or nothing about the IRT, NCUC, or how ICANN works. http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/2009/07/icann-and-free-speech.… Best, Rebecca Rebecca MacKinnon Open Society Fellow | Co-founder, GlobalVoicesOnline.org Assistant Professor, Journalism & Media Studies Centre, University of Hong Kong

3 3

Fwd: [IFIP International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection]
by waudo siganga 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

----- Original message ----- From: "Eduard Dundler" <eduard.dundler(a)ifip.org> To: "IFIP General Assembly" <ifip_ga(a)ifip.org>, Ifip_tcchairs(a)ifip.org, ifip_memsocs(a)ifip.org Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:34:37 +0200 Subject: [Ifip_ga] WG: [Fwd: IJCIP - e-mail alert] Von: Leon Strous [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 12:31 An: Eduard Dundler Cc: I.vanKorlaar(a)elsevier.com; Sujeet Shenoi Betreff: [Fwd: IJCIP - e-mail alert] Eduard, could you forward the following message to the GA members, the TC chairs and the member society secretariats. Thanks. kind regards, Leon Dear member societies, GA members and TC chairs, it is my pleasure to inform you that a new issue of one of IFIP's journals is now available free to read. You can view this issue of the International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection via the following link http://mail.elsevier-alerts.com/go.asp?/bESJ001/mHGMC69/u70GG5/x9Q4C69 We would appreciate it if you could bring this to the attention of those specialists that have an interest in the topic. Furthermore we would like to encourage submission of articles for the journal. If you have specific questions about IJCIP, please contact the editor-in-chief Sujeet Shenoi or the publisher. kind regards, Leon Strous IFIP TC-11 editor for IJCIP

1 0

Idea for Telcos: Open Platform.
by wesley kiriinya 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Hi yall, Can one of our ever competing Telcos develop a platform and expose APIs that allow developers to plug in applications to their back-end infrastructure that they hold dear? There are many developers who want to build awesome mobile applications but they would like access to the Telcos infrastructure for the application to make business/market sense. With all these applications, come the subscribers. If there is a Telco out there willing to do the next big thing after M-PESA, then I believe this is it. Have a department of skilled developers familiar with Telco stuff and the department will be the link to the outside developers, providing knowledge, support etc that a normal developer would need to plug in. Hopefully if at all the developer is charged anything then it will be reasonable. O_o?

1 0

New Chief Defends U.S. Base for Agency That Manages Web
by alice 12 Jul '09

12 Jul '09

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/13/technology/internet/13iht-icann13.html?_r… New Chief Defends U.S. Base for Agency That Manages Web Rod Beckstrom spoke after he was announced as the next chief executive of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers in June. PARIS — The U.S.-based agency that regulates Internet addresses, facing criticism that it is too America-centric, remains the best guardian of a “single, unified, global Internet,” according its new chief executive. Rod Beckstrom, a technology entrepreneur and former U.S. government Internet security official, took over this month as head of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, succeeding Paul Twomey, an Australian. As use of the Internet expands around the world, there have been rising calls for a new way of overseeing some of its basic functions, including the allocation of domain suffixes like .com and .org. This duty, and other important technical functions, have been in the hands of Icann, a private, nonprofit organization based in Marina Del Rey, California, for the past decade, under an agreement with the U.S. Commerce Department. “There will always be different voices out there, but the ultimate proof that Icann is functioning properly is that the Internet is functioning properly,” Mr. Beckstrom said by telephone last week. One critic of Icann, the European Union media and telecommunications commissioner, Viviane Reding, recently called for a severing of Icann’s links with the U.S. government when the current agreement with the Commerce Department expires this autumn. Instead, she proposed the creation of a “G-12 for Internet governance” to oversee an independent Icann. “In the long run, it is not defendable that the government department of only one country has oversight of an Internet function which is used by hundreds of millions of people in countries all over the world,” Ms. Reding said in May. Ms. Reding also called for the creation of an “independent, international tribunal” to review Icann decisions. Now, any legal challenges generally occur in California courts. “California law is good law for technology,” Mr. Beckstrom said. He said that at a recent Icann meeting in Sydney, there had been discussion of creating an international subsidiary of the organization, possibly based in Switzerland. But he said he would oppose efforts to fragment Icann. “Everyone can’t have it their own way and have it unified,” Mr. Beckstrom said. “Part of the power of the Internet is that the standards that parties have to agree on are so minimal.” Icann has moved over the years to give itself a more international profile, holding three major meetings a year outside the United States. Gatherings are also planned for Seoul in October and Nairobi next March. The organization’s Governmental Advisory Committee, which has representatives from more than 80 countries, has been trying to broaden its membership. China, for instance, recently agreed to rejoin the committee after a five-year absence, Mr. Beckstrom said. Now he is trying to woo another big holdout, Russia. Mr. Beckstrom said he hoped that a plan to allow Internet domain names to be rendered in Cyrillic, set to begin next year, would help. The move to embrace Cyrillic addresses, along with other scripts like Arabic and Chinese, is part of a broader drive by Icann to open up the domain naming system, an initiative that also has its critics. The organization plans to start adding large numbers of new address suffixes, or “global top-level domains,” next year, making it possible to register city or company names like .paris or .nestle. While Icann says the creation of new addresses will help accommodate the international diversification of the Internet, some companies worry that the process will make it harder to protect their brand names. The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse, a group based in Washington and representing multinational marketers, says the expansion of domain names could lead to a rise in the practice known as cybersquatting. Joshua Bourne, president of the coalition, called for Icann to “halt all current or future policy initiatives” until a commission, appointed by the U.S. president or Congress, and consisting of government, academic and business representatives, had reviewed its operations. Mr. Bourne said Icann was too beholden to companies that sell and manage actual domain names on behalf of Web sites. Mr. Beckstrom is no stranger to conflict. In March, he left his previous job, as head of the U.S. National Cyber Security Center, part of the Homeland Security Department, saying he feared the National Security Agency was seeking too much influence at the center. Before that, Mr. Beckstrom was a technology entrepreneur, starting a company in 1984 that created derivatives trading software, which he sold in 1999. He said he intended to take a pragmatic approach to his new job, rather than moving Icann in new directions. “There is a lot to do,” he said. “My focus very much is going to be to support the execution of these primary tasks.”

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Obama's Speech @ Ghana
by Walubengo J 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

deadly speech - as usual. Picked some highlights from: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iXHQkTrA9IUUQBC9WHPK3ZMK_… @on Kenya But despite the progress that has been made — and there has been considerable progress in many parts of Africa — we also know that much of that promise has yet to be fulfilled. Countries like Kenya had a per capita economy larger than South Korea's when I was born. They have badly been outpaced. Disease and conflict have ravaged parts of the African continent. In many places, the hope of my father's generation gave way to cynicism, even despair. Now, it's easy to point fingers and to pin the blame of these problems on others. Yes, a colonial map that made little sense helped to breed conflict. The West has often approached Africa as a patron or a source of resources rather than a partner. But the West is not responsible for the destruction of the Zimbabwean economy over the last decade, or wars in which children are enlisted as combatants. In my father's life, it was partly tribalism and patronage and nepotism in an independent Kenya that for a long stretch derailed his career, and we know that this kind of corruption is still a daily fact of life for far too many. @ on Democracy: This is about more than just holding elections. It's also about what happens between elections. Repression can take many forms, and too many nations, even those that have elections, are plagued by problems that condemn their people to poverty. No country is going to create wealth if its leaders exploit the economy to enrich themselves ... or if police — if police can be bought off by drug traffickers. No business wants to invest in a place where the government skims 20 percent off the top ... or the head of the port authority is corrupt. No person wants to live in a society where the rule of law gives way to the rule of brutality and bribery. That is not democracy, that is tyranny, even if occasionally you sprinkle an election in there. And now is the time for that style of governance to end. @ on Civil Society. Across Africa, we've seen countless examples of people taking control of their destiny and making change from the bottom up. We saw it in Kenya, where civil society and business came together to help stop postelection violence. We saw it in South Africa, where over three-quarters of the country voted in the recent election — the fourth since the end of apartheid. We saw it in Zimbabwe, where the Election Support Network braved brutal repression to stand up for the principle that a person's vote is their sacred right. As I said earlier, Africa's future is up to Africans. @ on African Capacity/Spirit. The people of Africa are ready to claim that future. And in my country, African Americans — including so many recent immigrants — have thrived in every sector of society. We've done so despite a difficult past, and we've drawn strength from our African heritage. With strong institutions and a strong will, I know that Africans can live their dreams in Nairobi and Lagos, Kigali, Kinshasa, Harare, and right here in Accra. walu. --- On Tue, 7/7/09, Eric M.K Osiakwan <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> wrote: From: Eric M.K Osiakwan <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> Subject: Re: [kictanet] President Obama's upcoming trip - media resources for your involvement To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 6:40 PM Walu, Am sorry but i did not mean it in that sense, except to give information for participation. You know am as African as a Kenyan, Ghana happens to be my locus for coming into time. On a much lighter note, African tradition demands that if your son in visiting me, i need to inform you - we need to keep our Africaness intact....:-) Eric here On 7 Jul 2009, at 09:02, Walubengo J wrote: Eric @ Ghana, dont rub it in. He maybe visiting Ghana but he is still our son of "K'ogelo". :-) walu @ Kenya. --- On Tue, 7/7/09, Eric M.K Osiakwan <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> wrote: From: Eric M.K Osiakwan <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> Subject: [kictanet] President Obama's upcoming trip - media resources for your involvement To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 12:36 PM Dear All, Hope your morning is well. Below are some outlets for getting involved in President Obama's visit - http://www.whitehouse.gov/mediaresources/ SMS. We’ve launched an SMS platform to allow citizens to submit questions, comments and words of welcome (in English and in French) . Using a local SMS short code in Ghana (1731) , Nigeria (32969) , South Africa (31958)and Kenya (5683), as well as a long code across the rest of the world*, Africans and citizens worldwide will be encouraged to text their messages to the President. SMS participants will also be able to subscribe to speech highlights in English and French. Long numbers for mobile registration pan-Africa: 61418601934 and 45609910343. This SMS platform is not available in the US. We’d love to get a bunch of people signed up and submitting questions via SMS today. Radio. A live audio stream of the President's speech will be pushed to national and local radio stations during the speech. After the speech, a taped audio recording of the President’s answers to the SMS messages received will be made available to radio stations and websites. The President hopes to answer a variety of questions and comments by topic and region. The audio recording will also be made available for download on www.whitehouse.gov and iTunes. Online chat. We will host a live web chat around the speech on Facebook. The White House will also create a Facebook “event” around the speech wherein participants from around the world can engage with one another. A Twitter hashtag (i.e. #obamaghana) has been promoted to consolidate input and reaction around the event. WhiteHouse.gov/Ghana - On the day of the speech, we will launch www.whitehouse.gov/ghana with links to all of the relevant programs and content (including transcript, video, etc.) for both domestic and foreign audiences. NB: Sorry for crossposting. Eric M.K OsiakwanDirector Internet Researchwww.internetresearch.com.ghemko(a)internetresearch.com.gh42 Ring Road Central, Accra-NorthTel: +233.21.258800 ext 7031Fax: +233.21.258811Cell: +233.24.4386792 -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com Eric M.K OsiakwanDirector Internet Researchwww.internetresearch.com.ghemko(a)internetresearch.com.gh42 Ring Road Central, Accra-NorthTel: +233.21.258800 ext 7031Fax: +233.21.258811Cell: +233.24.4386792 -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com

1 0

Re: [kictanet] FW: latest writing
by Alex Gakuru 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

Latest News: "Report: Bush surveillance program was massive" <http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090711/ap_on_go_co/us_domestic_surveillance> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com> wrote: > From: Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] FW: latest writing > To: alex.gakuru(a)yahoo.com > Cc: kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 11:05 AM > Hello Edith, > > Thanks for sharing. I would be most interested in the > debate - see my > below message. > > Prof. Lessig proposes a mechanism where consumers, services > providers > and government all accept some compromises (i.e. all move > out of > respective 'dug-in' positions as regards privacy and > security) > > I would be very interested in a local debate on it, more > towards > building online trust. > > Dunno who else might be? > > Regards, > > Alex > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Alex Gakuru <gakuru(a)gmail.com> > Date: Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:47 PM > Subject: [ke-internetusers] Lawrence Lessig - Privacy & > Security v2 > To: ke-users <ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net> > > > Hello, > > Yesterday, I downloaded this incredible presentation. > > Government, Regulator, Telecommunications companies, Civil > Society as > well as individuals should find very useful. > <http://a26.video2.blip.tv/2770001091994/Lessig-Privacy20778.flv> > (warning: it's 340 MB) > > [in case you'd need it on a CD + two others by the same > speaker (and > if prepared to refund media, handing, and assistant's costs > to your > offices) feel free to request off list.] > > Regards, > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > ke-internetusers mailing list > ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net > http://www.bdix.net/mailman/listinfo/ke-internetusers > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Edith Adera<eadera(a)idrc.or.ke> > wrote: > > This might be of interest (see attached). Wonder what > Kenya is planning. Worth a debate? > > > > Edith > > > > ----- > > The following excerpt is quite telling: > > > > "...Pakistan has created a national smart ID card > database, managed by the National Database and Registration > Authority (NADRA) . Currently this database holds 170 > million fingerprints, 72 million facial images, and has > already issued 70 million ID cards. The information stored > within the system is used for highway toll collection, cash > grant systems, national drivers license system, civil > registrations, passport and visa issuing, passport insurance > and control biometric refugee registration, and the ID cards > and access control system for the Pakistani army. The mere > scale of this database raises questions about access > management, security, and interoperability, but these have > yet to be answered. A centralised pool of information may be > an invaluable tool to any government; especially one trying > to raise its people out of poverty. But given how high the > stakes are, we need to ask ourselves whether adopting a > one-sided approach and focusing on the benefits alone will > not harm those same people in the long run. " > > > > _______________________________________________ > > kictanet mailing list > > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > > > This message was sent to: alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com > > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alexgakuru.lists%40gma… > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: alex.gakuru(a)yahoo.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alex.gakuru%40yahoo.com >

1 0

IGF Review - open comment period
by Adam Peake 10 Jul '09

10 Jul '09

Email below from Markus Kummer about the IGF review, he asked the email be forwarded to all potential contributors. Comments from all would be very welcome. Best, Adam At 10:16 AM +0200 7/8/09, Markus KUMMER wrote: > >Dear colleagues, > >You may recall that we set 15 July as a deadline >for submitting comments with regard to the IGF >Review process. All comments received within >that deadline will be reflected in a synthesis >paper that will be translated into all six UN >languages as an official input into the >³consultation with Forum participants² at the >Sharm El Sheikh meeting. The call for >contributions is posted on our Web site. We have >also sent a letter to all Missions in Geneva, >asking for comments. Comments can be sent by >electronic means, but also by fax or by normal >mail. > >I would also like to encourage all MAG members >to send us comments on behalf of their >respective institutions, if they have not >already done so, and please encourage others to >submit contributions. The more comments we >receive, the more valuable our paper will be! > >While we cannot guarantee that the synthesis >paper will reflect comments received after the >15 July deadline, we will do our utmost to do >so. In any case, all papers received after that >deadline will be posted on our Web site. > >Best regards >Markus >

1 1

FW: latest writing
by Edith Adera 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

This might be of interest (see attached). Wonder what Kenya is planning. Worth a debate? Edith ----- The following excerpt is quite telling: "...Pakistan has created a national smart ID card database, managed by the National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) . Currently this database holds 170 million fingerprints, 72 million facial images, and has already issued 70 million ID cards. The information stored within the system is used for highway toll collection, cash grant systems, national drivers license system, civil registrations, passport and visa issuing, passport insurance and control biometric refugee registration, and the ID cards and access control system for the Pakistani army. The mere scale of this database raises questions about access management, security, and interoperability, but these have yet to be answered. A centralised pool of information may be an invaluable tool to any government; especially one trying to raise its people out of poverty. But given how high the stakes are, we need to ask ourselves whether adopting a one-sided approach and focusing on the benefits alone will not harm those same people in the long run. "

2 1

Re: [kictanet] President Obama's upcoming trip - media resources for your involvement
by benomnta＠yahoo.com 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

think this' what kagai meant: ERIC, THAT IS THE KENYA WE LIVE IN. TRIBAL BILL. Michael Ouma Journalist Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-725-537823 / +254-0731-201729 Email: benomnta(a)yahoo.com --- On Tue, 7/7/09, Bildad Kagai <billkagai(a)gmail.com> wrote: > From: Bildad Kagai <billkagai(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] President Obama's upcoming trip - media resources for your involvement > To: benomnta(a)yahoo.com > Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 8:24 AM > > Echo Romeo India Charlie, > Tango Hotel Alpha Tango India Sierra Tango Hotel > Echo Kilo Echo November Yankee Alpha Whisky Echo Lima India > Victor Echo India November. > Tango Romeo India Bravo Alpha Lima. > Bravo India Lima Lima > On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Eric M.K Osiakwan > wrote: > Walu, > Am sorry but i did not mean it in that sense, > except to give information for participation. You know am as > African as a Kenyan, Ghana happens to be my locus for coming > into time. > On a much lighter note, African tradition > demands that if your son in visiting me, i need to inform > you - we need to keep our Africaness > intact....:-) > Eric here > > > On 7 Jul 2009, at 09:02, Walubengo J > wrote: > Eric @ Ghana, > > dont rub it in. He maybe visiting Ghana but he is still our > son of "K'ogelo". :-) > > walu @ Kenya. > > --- On Tue, 7/7/09, Eric M.K Osiakwan <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> > wrote: > > From: Eric M.K Osiakwan <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> > Subject: [kictanet] President Obama's upcoming trip - > media resources for your involvement > To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com > Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 12:36 PM > > Dear All, > Hope your morning is well. > Below are some outlets for getting involved in > President Obama's visit - http://www.whitehouse.gov/mediaresources/ > SMS. We’ve launched an SMS > platform to allow citizens to submit questions, > comments and words of welcome (in English and in > French) . Using a local SMS short code in > Ghana (1731) , Nigeria (32969) , South > Africa (31958)and Kenya (5683), as well as a long code > across the rest of the world*, Africans and citizens > worldwide will be encouraged to text their messages to > the President. SMS participants will also be able to > subscribe to speech highlights in English and French. Long > numbers for mobile registration pan-Africa: 61418601934 and > 45609910343. This SMS platform is not available in the > US. > We’d love to get a bunch of people signed up and > submitting questions via SMS today. > Radio. A live audio > stream of the President's speech will be > pushed to national and local radio stations during the > speech. After the speech, a taped audio recording of the > President’s answers to the SMS messages received will > be made available to radio stations and websites. The > President hopes to answer a variety of questions and > comments by topic and region. The audio recording will also > be made available for download on www.whitehouse.gov and > iTunes. > Online chat. We will host a > live web chat around the speech on Facebook. The White > House will also create a Facebook “event” around the > speech wherein participants from around the world can engage > with one another. A Twitter hashtag (i.e. #obamaghana) > has been promoted to consolidate input and reaction around > the event. > WhiteHouse.gov/Ghana - On the day > of the speech, we will launch www.whitehouse.gov/ghana with > links to all of the relevant programs and content > (including transcript, video, etc.) for both > domestic and foreign audiences. > NB: Sorry for crossposting. > Eric > M.K OsiakwanDirector Internet > Researchwww.internetresearch.com.ghemko(a)internetresearch.com.gh42 > Ring Road Central, Accra-NorthTel: +233.21.258800 > ext 7031Fax: +233.21.258811Cell: > +233.24.4386792 > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com > > > Eric > M.K OsiakwanDirector Internet > Researchwww.internetresearch.com.ghemko(a)internetresearch.com.gh42 > Ring Road Central, Accra-NorthTel: +233.21.258800 > ext 7031Fax: +233.21.258811Cell: > +233.24.4386792 > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: billkagai(a)gmail.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/billkagai%40gmail.com > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: benomnta(a)yahoo.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/benomnta%40yahoo.com >

1 0

Fw: RE: One subject, varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses
by Walubengo J 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

forwarded--- On Thu, 6/25/09, Emmanuel Khisa <emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke> wrote: From: Emmanuel Khisa <emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke> Subject: RE: [kictanet] One subject,varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses To: "'Walubengo J'" <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> Date: Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:11 AM And Project Discovery Kenya has been able to train more that 200 primary school teachers over the last five years in conjunction with Institute of Software technologies...I also know that similar training went on in Yala Division last April for Primary school teachers in the division organised by the Computers for Schools. On the subject of lack of adequate professors, I will leave that to Academicians and those keen on interrogating academics, I however would like the ICT training to move from over concentration with the academics and more to the more handson...more like incubator based learning approach...While the Far East economies have good universities, they still put more premium on handson skills...It is sad that even our graduate engineers let alone IT graduates (who by the way take a lot of flack) cannot invent or think outside the box...I mean no invention ever comes out of these highly restricted courses yet only a select few universities dare to venture into... The answer in my opinion lies in building skills that are more practical and focussed on creating entrepreneural opportunities. Rgds, Manu "New opinions are always suspected and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not already common." P Before printing, think about the Environment and your responsibilities -----Original Message----- From: kictanet-bounces+emmanuel.khisa=kadet.co.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Walubengo J Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:41 AM To: emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject,varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses I agree that something is happening within the High-School teaching fraternity. Last April, Multimedia University College trained 80 high school headteachers from Samburu and I think Transmara Districts, giving them basic ICT skills...am aware Strathmore University, IAT etc also do such trainings regularly...It may not be enough, but its definitely a good kick in the right direction. As for the University Level IT faculty staff. Unfortunately the statistics are likely to be true. You can count the number of IT Professors in this country on your three fingers ;-) walu. --- On Wed, 6/24/09, Barnabas K. Sang <bksang(a)education.go.ke> wrote: > From: Barnabas K. Sang <bksang(a)education.go.ke> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses > To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com > Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 11:32 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Betty, > > > > Thanks for your response on the article > mentioned below. Will go > through it and perhaps respond on key issues raised, which > ICT in Education has > already done or planned. I hope it will minimize fears all > of us have or may be > persuaded to think all is totally misplaced and lost. > > > > > “ICT Integration” is currently Ministry > of Education focus, and > steps already put in place are expected to make Kenya > improve both teaching and > learning environment, with better education ‘products’ > across all levels. > > > > Kind regards > > > > B. K. Sang > > > > > > > > From: > kictanet-bounces+bksang=education.go.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > [mailto:[email protected]] > On > Behalf Of Betty Ogange > > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 4:31 PM > > To: Barnabas K. Sang > > Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > > Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality > - We lack an > accreditation system for ICT courses > > > > > > > > > Hallo David, > Last week there was furore in this forum > about media > misrepresentation of the Kenyan situation. The article > that you make > reference to in today’s Standard (24.06.09) may be > accurate in the areas that > you have highlighted. However, I wish to take issue with > a few points raised > in the article. http://www.eastandard.net/education/InsidePage.php?id=1144017693&cid=316 > > ‘Unlike other academic fields, very > little has been done > to train most teachers in ICT skills. Currently, no > primary teacher training > college offers comprehensive pre-service training in > information technology.’ > > Anyone with a modest interest in education in > Kenya would not > miss something as obvious as a subject in the national > curriculum when reporting > in a national daily. Prior to the year 2004, a few > colleges had ICT skills > courses for pre-service teachers based on in-house > curricula that were > independently developed by each college. The Primary > Teacher Education (PTE) > ICT curriculum developed by the Kenya Institute of > Education has been in > force since the year 2004 and ICT is taught as a > compulsory subject in all > primary teacher training colleges. It is examined > internally at the end of > the first year and all students must pass in the subject, > among other > subjects, in order to proceed to second year. There are > several > implementation hitches in this programme arising from the > fact that ICT is > being taught as a discrete subject in the curriculum and > has yet to be > mainstreamed in the other subjects in the PTE curriculum. > The debate around > ICT- pedagogy integration in education and how to > operationalise it right > from curriculum development to classroom level > implementation continues in > the education circles. > > ‘In-service training is often > provided by trainers who > are just barely literate in > computers’ > > In my knowledge, this has happened especially > in instances when > some hardware providers ‘dangle’ teacher training as > an additional offer to > the institution. TTCs used to hire ICT technicians to > teach the course, but > in the last 2 years, the Teacher Service Commission has > posted trained > lecturers of ICT to a number of TTCs. There have also > been some highly > professional training offered to college lecturers by > Microsoft (in > conjunction with the Institute of Advanced Technology - > IAT) and the Kenya > Technical Teachers College. Computers for Schools Kenya > and the Nepad > e-schools teacher training programmes have also reached > teachers in selected > secondary schools. Lack of co-ordination (as with the > rest of the ICT > initiatives in Kenya ), lack of clear training targets > and time-lines have > compromised continuity and impact of some of these > training programmes. > > ‘The > entire ICT education is in tatters’ > An interesting analogy there. But I see a > sector that is struggling > with what some scholars in educational reform have called > an ‘implementation > dip’ – that for a number of reasons things normally > tend to get worse before > they can get better. There are lots of difficulties in > implementing large > scale ICT initiatives in the education sector world over. > In our country, > there have been positive efforts by the Ministry of > Education, the KIE and a > number of stakeholders in education, and these do count. > On the other hand, > there has been the tendency (by education leaders) > towards elaborate policy > documents, ‘ICT networks’ and trust funds whose > mandates remain > indeterminate. All these need to be researched and > accurately presented. > > Accurate reporting by the media and objective > analysis of both > the positives and difficulties are important in helping > the public target > their attention and effort. Besides the inaccuracies, the > use of expressions > such as ‘in tatters’ ‘the situation is bad’, > ‘alarmed professionals’ > ‘obsolete hardware’ to describe ICT in education in > Kenya sounds to me fairly > sensational. > > Betty > > > > > > --- On Wed, 6/24/09, David Otwoma > <otwomad(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > From: David Otwoma <otwomad(a)gmail.com> > > Subject: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality - We > lack an accreditation > system for ICT courses > > To: ogange(a)yahoo.com > > Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" > <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 9:32 AM > > > .....universities > offer many degrees but their quality and market demand > differ...... > > > > > > Although > nearly all universities offer degrees, only the > University of Nairobi, Jomo > Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology and > Strathmore have > Master’s programmes and only UON and Jkuat teach at > doctoral level. > > > There > is a diminishing number of staff with PhDs in ICT > departments. According to > Prof Rodrigues, UoN has the highest number of full-time > lecturers with PhDs > in ICT that stands at eight of 18, while Jkuat has three > of six, which is the > same number for Strathmore. > > > Kenyatta > University has nine full-time but none of them have a PhD > or an equivalent > qualification, while none of the Kabarak’s eight > lecturers have a PhD. Two of > six of United States International University has > doctoral degrees. > > > Many > lecturers have no experience as ICT professionals as > engineers, software > developers or in the emerging area of computer and > network security. > > > > > > See http://www.eastandard.net/education/InsidePage.php?id=1144017693&cid=316& > for full story > > > > > > -- > > David Otwoma, > > Chief Science Secretary, > > National Council for Science and Technology, > > Utalii House 9th Floor, > > Mobile tel: +254 722 141771, > > Office tel: +254 (0)20 2346915, > > P. O. Box 5687 - 00100, Nairobi, Kenya > > email: otwomad(a)gmail.com & otwoma(a)ncst.go.ke > > www.ncst.go.ke > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > > kictanet mailing list > > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > > > This message was sent to: ogange(a)yahoo.com > > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ogange%40yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent to: emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emmanuel.khisa%40kadet. co.ke

7 10

Re: [kictanet] President Obama's upcoming trip - media resources for your involvement
by Walubengo J 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Eric @ Ghana, dont rub it in. He maybe visiting Ghana but he is still our son of "K'ogelo". :-) walu @ Kenya. --- On Tue, 7/7/09, Eric M.K Osiakwan <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> wrote: From: Eric M.K Osiakwan <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> Subject: [kictanet] President Obama's upcoming trip - media resources for your involvement To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 12:36 PM Dear All, Hope your morning is well. Below are some outlets for getting involved in President Obama's visit - http://www.whitehouse.gov/mediaresources/ SMS. We’ve launched an SMS platform to allow citizens to submit questions, comments and words of welcome (in English and in French) . Using a local SMS short code in Ghana (1731) , Nigeria (32969) , South Africa (31958)and Kenya (5683), as well as a long code across the rest of the world*, Africans and citizens worldwide will be encouraged to text their messages to the President. SMS participants will also be able to subscribe to speech highlights in English and French. Long numbers for mobile registration pan-Africa: 61418601934 and 45609910343. This SMS platform is not available in the US. We’d love to get a bunch of people signed up and submitting questions via SMS today. Radio. A live audio stream of the President's speech will be pushed to national and local radio stations during the speech. After the speech, a taped audio recording of the President’s answers to the SMS messages received will be made available to radio stations and websites. The President hopes to answer a variety of questions and comments by topic and region. The audio recording will also be made available for download on www.whitehouse.gov and iTunes. Online chat. We will host a live web chat around the speech on Facebook. The White House will also create a Facebook “event” around the speech wherein participants from around the world can engage with one another. A Twitter hashtag (i.e. #obamaghana) has been promoted to consolidate input and reaction around the event. WhiteHouse.gov/Ghana - On the day of the speech, we will launch www.whitehouse.gov/ghana with links to all of the relevant programs and content (including transcript, video, etc.) for both domestic and foreign audiences. NB: Sorry for crossposting. Eric M.K OsiakwanDirector Internet Researchwww.internetresearch.com.ghemko(a)internetresearch.com.gh42 Ring Road Central, Accra-NorthTel: +233.21.258800 ext 7031Fax: +233.21.258811Cell: +233.24.4386792 -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com

5 4

FW: [acacia-admin-cl] FW: LINK CENTRE: Executive Course: Telecommunications & Broadcasting Policy, Law & Regulation
by Edith Adera 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

________________________________ From: link-info-bounces(a)lists.wits.ac.za [link-info-bounces(a)lists.wits.ac.za] On Behalf Of Charley Lewis [Charley.Lewis(a)wits.ac.za] Sent: July 7, 2009 9:57 AM To: link-info(a)lists.wits.ac.za Cc: Tennyson Mashiloane Subject: LINK CENTRE: Executive Course: Telecommunications & Broadcasting Policy, Law & Regulation =========================================== Executive Course: Telecommunications & Broadcasting Policy, Law & Regulation =========================================== [cid:[email protected]] Please forward to colleagues who might benefit from attending... There are still a few places left on this exciting one-week short course commencing on 20 July 2009. Blast away those Confed Cup blues - warm the cockles of your heart with some power-packed ICT regulatory soup, expertly brewed by South Africa's leading trainers in the field. It's not too late to register. Book now! This executive course is one of the three modules comprising the highly-acclaimed Certificate in Telecommunications Policy, Regulation and Management, offered by the LINK Centre, School of Public and Development Management, University of the Witwatersrand - Southern Africa's the leading research and training body in the field of information and communications technology policy, regulation and management. Registration for this single module is open to participants who wish to focus specifically on Telecommunications & Broadcasting Policy, Law and Regulation, or whose busy schedule does not permit them to register for the full certificate. Content Overview * The SA Constitution and administrative law; * ICT sector regulation: rationales, principles, approaches and practices; * Competition law, and the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors in SA; * ICT sector reform in SA: overview; * Legislative, regulatory and licensing framework for telecommunications in SA: institutions, structure, processes and issues; * Legislative, regulatory and licensing framework for broadcasting in SA: institutions, structure, processes and issues; * Interconnection, facilities leasing and essential facilities: principles, law and regulation; * Licensing: the objectives, typology, procedures, content and monitoring of licences; * Pricing and tariffs; * Quality of service and consumer protection. Presenters are drawn from LINK Centre staff, as well as a number of other experts in the field, including: Andrew Barendse, Aynon Doyle, Norman Manoim, Sanele Sibanda and Carla Rafinetti. A certificate of attendance is issued to all participants who attend a minimum of 80% of the course sessions. Who should attend? Decision-makers and senior policy-makers in the Department of Communications, ICASA and the USA, managers and regulatory staff in industry (manufacturers, service providers and fixed and mobile operators), bidders for PSTN licences, broadcasters, lawyers, consultants, journalists, union officials and NGOs involved in the sector. About LINK The LINK Centre is the leading public policy, regulation and management educational body in the area of information and communication in Southern Africa. LINK focuses on capacity building in the public sector and development arenas through quality training, applied research and consultancy services necessary to maximise the benefits of the Information Society and the Knowledge Economy. Visit the LINK web site at http://link.wits.ac.za for more information. Methodology An interactive and intensive teaching methodology is used, comprised of several learning methods, including lectures, case studies, structured learning group discussions and presentations from local and international experts in the field. In this way participants will develop a strong practical focus directly applicable to their own organisations. Fees R 8 000 plus VAT per participant. Venue All lectures are held at the Graduate School of Public and Development Management campus, 2 St David's Place, Parktown. Lectures run daily from 08:30 to 17:00 with breaks for lunch and teas. Convenor Charley Lewis + 27 + 11 + 717-3784 or lewis.c(a)pdm.wits.ac.za Registration For more information, or to register online, please consult the web page for the full Certificate in Telecommunications Policy, Regulation and Management at http://link.wits.ac.za/training/tc1.html. Alternatively, contact Tennyson Mashiloane on Tennyson.Mashiloane(a)wits.ac.za<mailto:[email protected]>. - - - ends - - - Charley Lewis Senior Lecturer, LINK Centre Tel: + 27 11-717-3784 Fax: + 27 86-529-5562 /+ 27 11-717-3910 Mobile: + 27 83-539-5242 Post (personal): Box 81185, Parkhurst, 2120, SOUTH AFRICA Skype: charley.lewis URL: http://link.wits.ac.za Mwalimu House, School of Public & Development Management, University of the Witwatersrand 2 St David's Place, Parktown, 2193, SOUTH AFRICA ==> Master of Management in ICT Policy & Regulation: http://link.wits.ac.za/training/training4.html<UrlBlockedError.aspx> ==> Certificate in Telecomms Policy, Regulation & Management: http://link.wits.ac.za/training/tc1.html [cid:[email protected]] This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the permission of the University. Only authorized signatories are competent to enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in writing to the contrary.

1 0

Notes on workshop on development of a BPO industry in Kenya.doc
by Victor Gathara 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Hi Edith, Attached are some notes I scribbled from the BPO workshop. Included are some questions I felt were not answered. Pardon the lack of analysis/order. I've copied in listers as some may find them useful . Overall found it a good workshop to attend. I think we should have had more time to discuss issues arising. Would have liked to see more industry stakeholders there too. Victor DFID, the Department for International Development: leading the British Government's fight against world poverty. Find out more about the major global poverty challenges and get the facts on what DFID is doing to fight them: http://www.dfid.gov.uk ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Peapod. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.peapod.co.uk/cleanmail

2 3

Creativity and Living Abroad
by Luvisia Bakuli 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Maddux and Galinsky (2009) have published a thought-provoking article reporting a significantly positive relationship between living abroad and creativity. The researchers wanted to answer the question:"does spending time in new cultures transform individuals into more creative beings?" Using five creative contexts to answer the question, the researchers said that in one test that involved a creative negotiation deal, the results indicated that "the amount of time spent living abroad, but not traveling abroad, significantly predicted whether a deal was reached even when [they] controlled for a variety of important personality and demographic factors. Openness to experience predicted creative deals . . . " Access to a greater number of novel ideas and concepts; ability to approach problems from different perspectives; and psychological readiness to accept and recruit ideas from unfamiliar sources -- which may lead to unconscious idea recombination and conceptual expansion, both being critical processes in the creative process, are among the elements that contribute to the creativity. I think this article will spawn a long list of research. It leads to many questions, some of which I can guess to be: Is there is a positive relationship between living in another culture, within a country, and creativity? For example, are Kambas who have lived in Nyanza more creative than those who never left Ukambani? If so, how long would they need to live in the alien culture to improve their creativity? What are the educational policy implications for educational institutions - does having a students spend a good amount of time in a foreign culture improve their creativity? At what age should one go abroad, and for how long, in order to improve their creativity? The complete citation for the article is: Maddux, William W. and Adam D. Galinsky. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 1047-1061. Here is a link to the article: http://www.apa.org/journals/releases/psp9651047.pdf And a summary of the article is also here: http://www.apa.org/releases/creativity.html What do you think? I'd be interested in your take on the article. Best regards, DBL

3 2

President Obama's upcoming trip - media resources for your involvement
by Eric M.K Osiakwan 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Dear All, Hope your morning is well. Below are some outlets for getting involved in President Obama's visit - http://www.whitehouse.gov/mediaresources/ SMS. We’ve launched an SMS platform to allow citizens to submit questions, comments and words of welcome (in English and in French) . Using a local SMS short code in Ghana (1731) , Nigeria (32969) , South Africa (31958)and Kenya (5683), as well as a long code across the rest of the world*, Africans and citizens worldwide will be encouraged to text their messages to the President. SMS participants will also be able to subscribe to speech highlights in English and French. Long numbers for mobile registration pan-Africa: 61418601934 and 45609910343. This SMS platform is not available in the US. We’d love to get a bunch of people signed up and submitting questions via SMS today. Radio. A live audio stream of the President's speech will be pushed to national and local radio stations during the speech. After the speech, a taped audio recording of the President’s answers to the SMS messages received will be made available to radio stations and websites. The President hopes to answer a variety of questions and comments by topic and region. The audio recording will also be made available for download on www.whitehouse.gov and iTunes. Online chat. We will host a live web chat around the speech on Facebook. The White House will also create a Facebook “event” around the speech wherein participants from around the world can engage with one another. A Twitter hashtag (i.e. #obamaghana) has been promoted to consolidate input and reaction around the event. WhiteHouse.gov/Ghana - On the day of the speech, we will launch www.whitehouse.gov/ghana with links to all of the relevant programs and content (including transcript, video, etc.) for both domestic and foreign audiences. NB: Sorry for crossposting. Eric M.K Osiakwan Director Internet Research www.internetresearch.com.gh emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh 42 Ring Road Central, Accra-North Tel: +233.21.258800 ext 7031 Fax: +233.21.258811 Cell: +233.24.4386792

1 0

Fellowship Applications now being accepted for AfriNIC-11
by alice 06 Jul '09

06 Jul '09

Dear Colleagues, Please be advised that AfriNIC is offering five fellowships to attend AfriNIC-11 which will take place 21-27 November 2009, Dakar, Senegal. The fellowship is reserved for individuals representing small organizations, universities, and journalists who are actively involved in Internet development in the African Region or ICT Policy in their countries and respective communities, who can positively and actively contribute to IP address management awareness in the AfriNIC region of service. Upon selection of the fellows, AfriNIC will notify the selected fellows directly and allow the fellow 7 days to reply with an acceptance of the fellowship. Public announcement of the fellowship winners will be made after the acceptance by the winners. Please find hereafter the schedule for the fellowship process: 14 August 2009 : Last Call for fellowship applications 21 August 2009: Selection of fellows 28 August 2009: Notification to fellows 04 September 2009 : Acceptance of fellowship 11 September 2009 : Announcement of winners The fellowship includes: assistance with round-trip airfare to the meeting venue, hotel accommodates for the AfriNIC event, from the night before the beginning of the event to the last day of the event. If you think you meet the criteria above, please complete the questions annexed in this email and then submit to fellowship(a)afrinic.net along with your personal detail information before 14 August 2009. Sincerely, Stephanie Moorghen-Bernon Events Coordinator & Membership Liaison Officer AfriNIC Tel: (230) 466 6616 _______________________________________________ AfrICANN mailing list AfrICANN(a)afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Fw: RE: One subject, varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses
by Alex Gakuru 06 Jul '09

06 Jul '09

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:38 AM, <bitange(a)jambo.co.ke> wrote: > Alex, > FOI is one of the issues in Agenda 4 and also in the the Private Sector > Roundtable with Prime Minister. We finished both the policy and the draft > bill more than six months ago and forwarded it to Cabinet. It is in the > priority list of the Cabinet Sub Committee Chaired by the PM. It should > be though anytime. > > Regards > > Ndemo. > > >> Dear Dr. Ndemo, >> >> I find myself under increasing pressure from progressive >> quarters to request/remind you to post FOI and Data >> Protection Bills for discussions to this mailing list. >> >> Kindly come to my rescue :-) >> >> regards, >> >> >> Alex >> _______________________________________________ >> ke-internetusers mailing list >> ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net >> http://www.bdix.net/mailman/listinfo/ke-internetusers >> >> ---------------------------------------------- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> --------------------------------------------- >> "easy access to the world" >> --- On Mon, 7/6/09, Wainaina Mungai <wainaina(a)madeinkenya.org> wrote: > From: Wainaina Mungai <wainaina(a)madeinkenya.org> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Fw: RE: One subject, varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses > To: alex.gakuru(a)yahoo.com > Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Date: Monday, July 6, 2009, 12:44 AM > Thanks for such 'espionage' research > ;-) ..... > > I hope Dr Ndemo can respond to each matter raised. > > That said, it has fueled greater interest in the 'Freedom > of > Information Act'. What's the status there? > > Wainaina > > On 7/4/09, Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Eunice, > > > > Consumer public watchdog role of public offices is > called for by the ICT > > Policy. 9.6 (c) "Consumers and users will be expected > to participate in > > ensuring continued review of Government policy in > accordance with > > technological and consumer trends." > > > > I put it that Ndemo and Eunice are playing around with > words to conceal and > > “manage” public perception of what they are > actually implementing all while > > giving lip service support to FOSS, if not using > every evidence and > > opportunity they get to attempt to discredit > FOSS and its local ICT > > entrepreneurs. > > > > Ndemo and the Board actually got shs 320 million from > the World Bank for > > proprietary software licenses and surrounding expenses > for their > > projects."Licenses, the management system and the > rudimentary data warehouse > > are estimated at US$4 million" The World Bank required > ICT policy (also on > > software) to be followed. It was not followed and > Ndemo's statement “What > > each party (Proprietary or OSS) does should not > concern policy” is thus null > > and void. Why did they not also have a provision for > Open Source Software on > > the funding proposals? > > > > Eunice has questioned my credibility I am therefore > providing indisputable > > evidence-right to reply candidly giving my defense at > this public court - > > interpret below document reference in this context. > Excuse me for not > > sending it onlist but you may also ask the World Bank, > if you want. > > > > Courtesy of US Freedom of Information Act (governs > World Bank information) > > on 31 July, 2008, I requested and was directed to the > complete “KENYA > > TRANSPARENCY & COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE > PROJECT (TCIP/CIP 1)” dated 5 > > March, 2007. > > > > Which I read and observed its stated terms of use: > “This document has a > > restricted distribution and may be used by recipients > only in the > > performance of their official duties. Its contents may > not otherwise be > > disclosed without World Bank authorization. > > ” > > > > ----excerpt----- > > 25.TCIP contribution to connect Government. TCIP will > fund the following: > > The internal LAN connections in two buildings which > are shared with > > government offices (NSSF and Utalii House) along with > their connections to > > the fiber optics network to serve five small > Ministries. This is estimated > > cost US$1 million. > > > > The enterprise software licenses for government staff > and the document > > management system for government records will be > procured and deployed in a > > manner consistent with the standards and guidelines > specified in the > > Government’s I C T policy, along with the hardware > required for storage o f > > the data. Licenses, the management system and the > rudimentary data warehouse > > are estimated at US$4 million. > > > > The project will also fund the software and hardware > required for the IP > > Platform and the Network Operations Center, also in a > manner consistent with > > the standards and guidelines specified in the > Government’s I C T policy. > > This subcomponent i s estimated at US$7 million. > > > > Furthermore, TCIP will fund the training, change > management and capacity > > building which will enable the government to take full > advantage o f the > > internal systems and to ensure that they are > professionally deployed and > > maintained. Considerable resources are required, on > the order o f US$4 > > million. > > > > 26.Leveraging other sources of finance. Other > development partners have > > indicated their willingness to fund the National Data > Center and the > > Disaster Recovery Center; it should be noted that > success o f the Government > > o f Kenya’s communication network is contingent on > secured funding for all > > elements described above. > > > > 27. T U P Component 2d - Support to the Digital > Village initiative – US$lO > > million TCIP will support the scaling-up of > successfully piloted Digital > > Village initiative. Digital villages are e-centers > that provide a suite o f > > services to the public via computers connected to the > internet, digital > > cameras, printers, fax machines and other > communication infrastructure. > > > > These services include, but are not limited to: e-mail > and internet access; > > e-banking (e.g., money transfer services such as Posta > Pay); eGovernment > > (e.g., police abstract forms, tax returns, P3 forms, > and driving license > > applications); e- business (e.g., franchised postal > and courier services); > > e-learning; e-health; e-markets (e.g., agricultural > commodity pricing and > > exchange); and e-monitoring *(e.g., real-time local > level monitoring of > > development funds and projects)*. Pilot Digital > Villages are run by private > > entrepreneurs who obtained training in business and > information technology > > from a certified program. This component will support > the Government over 3 > > years to roll out and scale up the successfully > piloted Digital Village > > initiative which aims at providing internet access and > e-services at the > > grassroots level via public-private partnerships. > > > > 28.TCIP support to include training, a grant facility, > I T support, and > > internet connectivity. > > The provision o f training programs in business and > information technology > > from a certified program will be supported by the > project (US$2 million). > > Prospective entrepreneurs who have obtained > certification will be eligible > > to apply for a Digital Village development loan from a > revolving fund: the > > Digital Village Fund (DVF). The project will > contribute US$4 million to the > > Government funded DVF over a three year period in 3 > installments. Although > > initially envisaged as a grant facility, the DVF could > be structured as a > > revolving fund (the funds allocated to each > entrepreneur would be repayable > > into the DVF over a 3 year period). These funds > received by the > > entrepreneurs will be used to finance set-up costs and > the required > > infrastructure (computers, printers, software etc). > The grant facility will > > be managed by the ICT Board Grant Manager and will > follow the governance and > > disbursement mechanisms set in the Grants Operational > Manual (the manual > > will be formulated as part o f the technical > assistance activity specified > > in l(c) above). Over the first 3 years the project > will support the > > provision o f IT support to Digital Villages (US$2 > million) and finance > > internet connectivity (US$2 million) which are > critical to support the > > incubation o f the initiative and ensure > sustainability. Overall it i s > > expected this project component will support the > establishment of 300 > > Digital Villages over a 3 year period. > > > > -- end citation -- > > > > Conclusions: > > > > 1.Digital Villages funding need not be 'loans' to the > entrepreneurs since as > > 'grants' was provided for. What was the rationale used > by the ICT board to > > decide all Digital Villages funds should be loaned to > the entrepreneurs and > > persons with disabilities? (In as much as it was also > provided for) > > > > 2. We appreciate the power of Freedom of Information > law. > > > > 3. I highly doubt Dr. Ndemo's commitment to our > Freedom of Information law > > legislation. > > > > 4.It is not proper for the PS to lay claim on “A > good policy levels the play > > ground.” > > > > 5.'Problem solving postponement' routine while the > PPDA, 2005 law is in > > place? “That is why we need the procurement rules > change to give everybody > > an equal chance.” is a mere 'perception management' > path/decoy. > > > > 6.Elsewhere, we strongly differ on ethics as regards > Public Office use to > > promote private interests and own gain. The PS now > reportedly appears > > Safaricom (private mobico) television commercials and > obviously “he received > > something.” He responds saying that he sees nothing > wrong with that, > > “apologies for what?” he asks. > > > > 7.If you want to know what local technical community > feels of the current > > ICT leadership in government, a local mailing member > recently wrote “Ideas > > and issues should be floated regularly and > resoundingly so that at the end > > of the day there are no excuses why in some countries > you can receive almost > > all services online while here we fondly believe > 'download and print' is > > e-government. > > > > 8.Perhaps the 2006 ICT Policy may have erred in > professing Kenya had > > automagically found High Level ICT leadership and > calling for it to be > > “protected” . Previous ICT Policy drafts lamented > absence of high level > > leadership. > > > > 9.Processes and leaderships that suppress > (irrepressible) truths only serve > > to entrench public resentment of government > culminating to disasters like > > early last year's. We should work hard to avoid their > repeat.. > > > > Above document refers to 300 digital villages and up > until Eunice's message > > the ICT Board training materials developed were > proprietary software-base, > > none were on FOSS. > > > > I hope for specific responses to all above issues > raised. > > > > Gakuru > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM, <eunicekariuki(a)ict.go.ke> > wrote: > >> Dear Alex, > >> I am not sure why you got your information about > the ICT board having > > rolled out 300 digital Villages with proprietary > software from these are not > > fact based. > >> > >> When that time comes, the entrepreneurs will be > free to procure whichever > > computer brands with whichever operating systems they > prefer they feel will > > enable them operate the digital villages. > >> > >> This is why the board is training entrepreneurs > who will be capable of > > making prudent business decisions on their own. > >> > >> After the training they will apply for grants from > the board, through an > > agency, with which to procure what they need to be > able to run their digital > > villages. > >> > >> I believe Dr Ndemo clarified the government policy > and Sang raised > > pertinent issues to chew on. > >> > >> It would be good to comment on issues based on > facts. > >> > >> Ek > >> > >> > >> > >> , because the board has > >> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Zain > Kenya > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com> > >> > >> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:34:24 > >> To: <eunicekariuki(a)ict.go.ke> > >> Cc: <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > >> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Fw: RE: One subject, > >> varying quality - We > lack an accreditation system for ICT > > courses > >> > >> > >> It is not and in fact the law reinforces it. But > while Section 34 of > >> the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, 2005 is > very clear on > >> procurement, public officials continually break > this law by choosing > >> to purchase proprietary software. Those in the > know say that savings > >> on proprietary licences, in one year alone, are > enough to bring > >> elevate 1 district's ICT to the level Nairobi > enjoys. What motivates > >> government procurement officials to insist on > spending public funds on > >> proprietary software? > >> > >> Also consider the case of ICT Board 300+ "digital > villages" all rolled > >> out on proprietary software. This means those > entrepreneuers will > >> every year pay Operating syetem and surrounding > sofwtare licences ad > >> infinitum. Talk of unnecessary cost burdens... > >> > >> Despite local Open Source Software community > calling on the ICT Board > >> to inform and train them on the abundantly > available FOSS options. > >> > >> Over to Uhuru Kenyatta and treasury public > expenditure cost-saving > > officials... > >> --- > >> > >> "Finance Minister Uhuru Kenyatta Thursday directed > the Public > >> Procurement Oversight Authority - PPOA to develop > guidelines that will > >> ensure that procurement of public goods and > services is done > >> transparently while safeguarding public funds from > misuse. > >> > >> Uhuru who addressed a news conference immediately > after reading the > >> budget estimates to parliament, said the Public > Procurement Oversight > >> Authority has to ensure transparency among > government departments that > >> deal with procurement." > >> <http://www.kbc.co.ke/story.asp?ID=57928 > >> > >> regards, > >> > >> Alex > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Mwololo Tim<timwololo(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> Listers, > >>> > >>> Our 2006 national ICT policy is silent on open > source software (OSS). As > > we > >>> think of a review of this policy, which > according to me is due due to a > >>> number of issues (Vision 2030, BPO, and many > other developments), we > > should > >>> think seriously about a section on OSS > policy. > >>> > >>> tim mwololo > >>> > >>> > >>> On 6/29/09, Evans Ikua <ikua(a)lpakenya.org> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> There is also Camara Kenya (the local > office of camara.ie) that has done > >>>> tremendous work in the area of putting > hardware in schools, both Primary > > and > >>>> Secondary, installing open source > software, supporting them, and > > training > >>>> the teachers. This in a short period of > time. > >>>> > >>>> Their work has mainly been in the coast > region but they are also getting > >>>> into the hinterland. They have about 150 > volunteers from Ireland who > > have > >>>> just come in and they will conduct > trainings for about a month. > >>>> > >>>> They have equipped schools in the whole of > Lamu island, and many schools > >>>> at the coast. > >>>> > >>>> They are achieving much more by using FOSS > as a computer installed with > >>>> Linux gives much more to a student as > opposed to one installed with > > Windows. > >>>> Because they are not spending a penny on > software licenses, they are > > able to > >>>> supply like twice the number of PCs than > if they were to have the > > schools > >>>> buy licenses. > >>>> > >>>> Ikua > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Evans Ikua > >>>> Linux Professional Association of Kenya > >>>> Tel: +254-20-2250381, Cell: +254-722 955 > 831 > >>>> Eagle House, 2nd Floor > >>>> Kimathi Street, Opp. Corner House > >>>> www.lpakenya.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Quoting Walubengo J <jwalu(a)yahoo.com>: > >>>> > >>>>> forwarded--- On Thu, 6/25/09, Emmanuel > Khisa > >>>>> <emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> From: Emmanuel Khisa <emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke> > >>>>> Subject: RE: [kictanet] One > subject,varying quality - We lack an > >>>>> accreditation system for > ICT courses > >>>>> To: "'Walubengo J'" <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> > >>>>> Date: Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:11 > AM > >>>>> > >>>>> And Project Discovery Kenya has been > able to train more that 200 > > primary > >>>>> school teachers over the last five > years in conjunction with Institute > > of > >>>>> Software technologies...I also know > that similar training went on in > > Yala > >>>>> Division last April for Primary school > teachers in the division > > organised > >>>>> by > >>>>> the Computers for Schools. > >>>>> On the subject of lack of adequate > professors, I will leave that to > >>>>> Academicians and those keen on > interrogating academics, I however would > >>>>> like > >>>>> the ICT training to move from over > concentration with the academics and > >>>>> more > >>>>> to the more handson...more like > incubator based learning > > approach...While > >>>>> the Far East economies have good > universities, they still put more > >>>>> premium > >>>>> on handson skills...It is sad that > even our graduate engineers let > > alone > >>>>> IT > >>>>> graduates (who by the way take a lot > of flack) cannot invent or think > >>>>> outside the box...I mean no invention > ever comes out of these highly > >>>>> restricted courses yet only a select > few universities dare to venture > >>>>> into... > >>>>> > >>>>> The answer in my opinion lies in > building skills that are more > > practical > >>>>> and > >>>>> focussed on creating entrepreneural > opportunities. > >>>>> > >>>>> Rgds, > >>>>> > >>>>> Manu > >>>>> > >>>>> "New opinions are always suspected and > usually opposed, without any > > other > >>>>> reason but because they are not > already common." > >>>>> P Before printing, think about the > Environment and your > > responsibilities > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: > kictanet-bounces+emmanuel.khisa=kadet.co.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >>>>> > [mailto:kictanet-bounces+emmanuel.khisa<kictanet-bounces%2Bemmanuel.khisa> > > =kadet.co.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke] > >>>>> On > >>>>> Behalf Of Walubengo J > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:41 AM > >>>>> To: emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke > >>>>> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > >>>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] One > subject,varying quality - We lack an > >>>>> accreditation system for ICT courses > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I agree that something is happening > within the High-School teaching > >>>>> fraternity. Last April, Multimedia > University College trained 80 high > >>>>> school > >>>>> headteachers from Samburu and I think > Transmara Districts, giving them > >>>>> basic > >>>>> ICT skills...am aware Strathmore > University, IAT etc also do such > >>>>> trainings > >>>>> regularly...It may not be enough, but > its definitely a good kick in the > >>>>> right direction. > >>>>> > >>>>> As for the University Level IT faculty > staff. Unfortunately the > >>>>> statistics > >>>>> are likely to be true. You can > count the number of IT Professors in > > this > >>>>> country on your three fingers ;-) > >>>>> > >>>>> walu. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> --- On Wed, 6/24/09, Barnabas K. Sang > <bksang(a)education.go.ke> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> From: Barnabas K. Sang <bksang(a)education.go.ke> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] One > subject, varying quality - We lack an > >>>>> > >>>>> accreditation system for ICT > courses > >>>>>> > >>>>>> To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com > >>>>>> Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy > Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > >>>>>> Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, > 11:32 PM > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Betty, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks for your response on the > article > >>>>>> mentioned below. Will go > >>>>>> through it and perhaps respond on > key issues raised, which > >>>>>> ICT in Education has > >>>>>> already done or planned. I hope it > will minimize fears all > >>>>>> of us have or may be > >>>>>> persuaded to think all is totally > misplaced and lost. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ?ICT Integration? is currently > Ministry > >>>>>> of Education focus, and > >>>>>> steps already put in place are > expected to make Kenya > >>>>>> improve both teaching and > >>>>>> learning environment, with better > education ?products? > >>>>>> across all levels. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kind regards > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> B. K. Sang > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: > >>>>>> kictanet-bounces+bksang=education.go.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >>>>>> [mailto:kictanet-bounces+bksang > <kictanet-bounces%2Bbksang>= > > education.go.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke] > >>>>>> On > >>>>>> Behalf Of Betty Ogange > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 > 4:31 PM > >>>>>> > >>>>>> To: Barnabas K. Sang > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy > Discussions > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] One > subject, varying quality > >>>>>> - We lack an > >>>>>> accreditation system for ICT > courses > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hallo David, > >>>>>> Last week there was > furore in this forum > >>>>>> about media > >>>>>> misrepresentation of > the Kenyan situation. The article > >>>>>> that you make > >>>>>> reference to in > today?s Standard (24.06.09) may be > >>>>>> accurate in the areas that > >>>>>> you have highlighted. > However, I wish to take issue with > >>>>>> a few points raised > >>>>>> in the article. > >>>>> > >>>>> > > http://www.eastandard.net/education/InsidePage.php?id=1144017693&cid=316 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ?Unlike > other academic fields, very > >>>>>> little has been done > >>>>>> to train most > teachers in ICT skills. Currently, no > >>>>>> primary teacher training > >>>>>> college offers > comprehensive pre-service training in > >>>>>> information technology.? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Anyone with a modest > interest in education in > >>>>>> Kenya would not > >>>>>> miss something as > obvious as a subject in the national > >>>>>> curriculum when reporting > >>>>>> in a national daily. > Prior to the year 2004, a few > >>>>>> colleges had ICT skills > >>>>>> courses for > pre-service teachers based on in-house > >>>>>> curricula that were > >>>>>> independently > developed by each college. The Primary > >>>>>> Teacher Education (PTE) > >>>>>> ICT curriculum > developed by the Kenya Institute of > >>>>>> Education has been in > >>>>>> force since the year > 2004 and ICT is taught as a > >>>>>> compulsory subject in all > >>>>>> primary teacher > training colleges. It is examined > >>>>>> internally at the end of > >>>>>> the first year and > all students must pass in the subject, > >>>>>> among other > >>>>>> subjects, in order to > proceed to second year. There are > >>>>>> several > >>>>>> implementation > hitches in this programme arising from the > >>>>>> fact that ICT is > >>>>>> being taught as a > discrete subject in the curriculum and > >>>>>> has yet to be > >>>>>> mainstreamed in the > other subjects in the PTE curriculum. > >>>>>> The debate around > >>>>>> ICT- pedagogy > integration in education and how to > >>>>>> operationalise it right > >>>>>> from curriculum > development to classroom level > >>>>>> implementation continues in > >>>>>> the education > circles. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ?In-service training is often > >>>>>> provided by trainers who > >>>>>> are just barely > literate in > >>>>>> computers? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In my knowledge, this > has happened especially > >>>>>> in instances when > >>>>>> some hardware > providers ?dangle? teacher training as > >>>>>> an additional offer to > >>>>>> the institution. TTCs > used to hire ICT technicians to > >>>>>> teach the course, but > >>>>>> in the last 2 years, > the Teacher Service Commission has > >>>>>> posted trained > >>>>>> lecturers of ICT to a > number of TTCs. There have also > >>>>>> been some highly > >>>>>> professional training > offered to college lecturers by > >>>>>> Microsoft (in > >>>>>> conjunction with the > Institute of Advanced Technology - > >>>>>> IAT) and the Kenya > >>>>>> Technical Teachers > College. Computers for Schools Kenya > >>>>>> and the Nepad > >>>>>> e-schools teacher > training programmes have also reached > >>>>>> teachers in selected > >>>>>> secondary schools. > Lack of co-ordination (as with the > >>>>>> rest of the ICT > >>>>>> initiatives in Kenya > ), lack of clear training targets > >>>>>> and time-lines have > >>>>>> compromised > continuity and impact of some of these > >>>>>> training programmes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ?The > >>>>>> entire ICT education is in > tatters? > >>>>>> An interesting > analogy there. But I see a > >>>>>> sector that is struggling > >>>>>> with what some > scholars in educational reform have called > >>>>>> an ?implementation > >>>>>> dip? ? that for a > number of reasons things normally > >>>>>> tend to get worse before > >>>>>> they can get > better. There are lots of difficulties in > >>>>>> implementing large > >>>>>> scale ICT initiatives > in the education sector world over. > >>>>>> In our country, > >>>>>> there have been > positive efforts by the Ministry of > >>>>>> Education, the KIE and a > >>>>>> number of > stakeholders in education, and these do count. > >>>>>> On the other hand, > >>>>>> there has been the > tendency (by education leaders) > >>>>>> towards elaborate policy > >>>>>> documents, ?ICT > networks? and trust funds whose > >>>>>> mandates remain > >>>>>> indeterminate. All > these need to be researched and > >>>>>> accurately presented. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Accurate reporting by > the media and objective > >>>>>> analysis of both > >>>>>> the positives and > difficulties are important in helping > >>>>>> the public target > >>>>>> their attention and > effort. Besides the inaccuracies, the > >>>>>> use of expressions > >>>>>> such as ?in tatters? > ?the situation is bad?, > >>>>>> ?alarmed professionals? > >>>>>> ?obsolete hardware? > to describe ICT in education in > >>>>>> Kenya sounds to me fairly > >>>>>> sensational. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Betty > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --- On Wed, 6/24/09, > David Otwoma > >>>>>> <otwomad(a)gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: David Otwoma > <otwomad(a)gmail.com> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Subject: [kictanet] > One subject, varying quality - We > >>>>>> lack an accreditation > >>>>>> system for ICT > courses > >>>>>> > >>>>>> To: ogange(a)yahoo.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cc: "KICTAnet ICT > Policy Discussions" > >>>>>> <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Date: Wednesday, June > 24, 2009, 9:32 AM > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> .....universities > >>>>>> offer many degrees > but their quality and market demand > >>>>>> differ...... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Although > >>>>>> nearly all > universities offer degrees, only the > >>>>>> University of Nairobi, Jomo > >>>>>> Kenyatta University > of Agriculture and Technology and > >>>>>> Strathmore have > >>>>>> Master?s programmes > and only UON and Jkuat teach at > >>>>>> doctoral level. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There > >>>>>> is a diminishing > number of staff with PhDs in ICT > >>>>>> departments. According to > >>>>>> Prof Rodrigues, UoN > has the highest number of full-time > >>>>>> lecturers with PhDs > >>>>>> in ICT that stands at > eight of 18, while Jkuat has three > >>>>>> of six, which is the > >>>>>> same number for > Strathmore. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kenyatta > >>>>>> University has nine > full-time but none of them have a PhD > >>>>>> or an equivalent > >>>>>> qualification, while > none of the Kabarak?s eight > >>>>>> lecturers have a PhD. Two of > >>>>>> six of United States > International University has > >>>>>> doctoral degrees. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Many > >>>>>> lecturers have no > experience as ICT professionals as > >>>>>> engineers, software > >>>>>> developers or in the > emerging area of computer and > >>>>>> network security. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> See > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > > http://www.eastandard.net/education/InsidePage.php?id=1144017693&cid=316& > >>>>>> > >>>>>> for full story > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> David Otwoma, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Chief Science > Secretary, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> National Council for > Science and Technology, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Utalii House 9th > Floor, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Mobile tel: +254 722 > 141771, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Office tel: +254 > (0)20 2346915, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> P. O. Box 5687 - > 00100, Nairobi, Kenya > >>>>>> > >>>>>> email: otwomad(a)gmail.com > & otwoma(a)ncst.go.ke > >>>>>> > >>>>>> www.ncst.go.ke > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -----Inline > Attachment Follows----- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> kictanet mailing > list > >>>>>> > >>>>>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This message was sent > to: ogange(a)yahoo.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Unsubscribe or change > your options at > >>>>> > >>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ogange%40yahoo.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -----Inline Attachment > Follows----- > >>>>>> > >>>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>> kictanet mailing list > >>>>>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >>>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com > >>>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options > at > >>>>> > >>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>> kictanet mailing list > >>>>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >>>>> > >>>>> This message was sent to: emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke > >>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at > >>>>> > >>>>> > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emmanuel.khisa%40kadet. > >>>>> co.ke > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>> kictanet mailing list > >>>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >>>> > >>>> This message was sent to: timwololo(a)gmail.com > >>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at > >>>> > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/timwololo%40gmail.com > >>> > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>> kictanet mailing list > >>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >>> > >>> This message was sent to: alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com > >>> Unsubscribe or change your options at > >>> > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alexgakuru.lists%40gma… > >>> > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> kictanet mailing list > >> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > >> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >> > >> This message was sent to: eunicekariuki(a)ict.go.ke > >> Unsubscribe or change your options at > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/eunicekariuki%40ict.go… > >> > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > --- > http://www.bungesms.com > > http://www.madeinkenya.org > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: alex.gakuru(a)yahoo.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alex.gakuru%40yahoo.com >

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Fw: RE: One subject, varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses
by Mwololo Tim 06 Jul '09

06 Jul '09

Bwana Sang, You have a point. We do not have strong OSS champions, especially in the public sector - at least not as powerful as the evangilists for proprietary software. This situation is not helped by a non-committal policy. Let me chew over how we can change things. Mwololo On 6/30/09, Barnabas K. Sang <bksang(a)education.go.ke> wrote: > > Tim, > > > > I agree with you to some extent, that we all need revision of the current > ICT Policy to accommodate the key issues Kenya currently is focusing on. On > OSS, I still doubt capacity of “*OSS Champions*” on the issue having > observed in the past one year, how an opportunity to have 210 secondary > schools each equipped with 25 PCs and use both proprietary software and OSS > (Funds provided for) progressed. > > > > To date, no OSS proponents have brought any concept on how MOE can > facilitate the adoption and use of OSS. There are some brilliant OSS > solutions, particularly supporting teaching and learning (animated content > -> good for illustrations of difficult concepts in some subjects) and > development of content for use by all education and training stakeholders > (teachers, students, parents and researchers). > > > > I would like to acknowledge existence of sufficient leadership (policy and > managers) to support modernization of education (ICT integration to teaching > and learning). We may not have all necessary capacity yet for > decision-makers to guide the process, but in partnership with all > stakeholders, I believe OSS will definitely find a niche in the whole ICT > integration exercise being spearheaded by MOE. Perhaps people like yourself > and others in this network, could enlightened us on how OSS could be part of > ICT integration efforts at an early stage as possible. > > > > Kind Regards > > > > B. K. Sang > > > > *From:* kictanet-bounces+bksang=education.go.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke[mailto: > kictanet-bounces+bksang <kictanet-bounces%2Bbksang>=education.go.ke@ > lists.kictanet.or.ke] *On Behalf Of *Mwololo Tim > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:02 AM > *To:* Barnabas K. Sang > *Cc:* KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > *Subject:* Re: [kictanet] Fw: RE: One subject, varying quality - We lack > an accreditation system for ICT courses > > > > Listers, > > > > Our 2006 national ICT policy is silent on open source software (OSS). As we > think of a review of this policy, which according to me is due due to a > number of issues (Vision 2030, BPO, and many other developments), we should > think seriously about a section on OSS policy. > > > > tim mwololo > > > > On 6/29/09, *Evans Ikua* <ikua(a)lpakenya.org> wrote: > > There is also Camara Kenya (the local office of camara.ie) that has done > tremendous work in the area of putting hardware in schools, both Primary and > Secondary, installing open source software, supporting them, and training > the teachers. This in a short period of time. > > Their work has mainly been in the coast region but they are also getting > into the hinterland. They have about 150 volunteers from Ireland who have > just come in and they will conduct trainings for about a month. > > They have equipped schools in the whole of Lamu island, and many schools at > the coast. > > They are achieving much more by using FOSS as a computer installed with > Linux gives much more to a student as opposed to one installed with Windows. > Because they are not spending a penny on software licenses, they are able to > supply like twice the number of PCs than if they were to have the schools > buy licenses. > > Ikua > > -- > Evans Ikua > Linux Professional Association of Kenya > Tel: +254-20-2250381, Cell: +254-722 955 831 > Eagle House, 2nd Floor > Kimathi Street, Opp. Corner House > www.lpakenya.org > > > > > Quoting Walubengo J <jwalu(a)yahoo.com>: > > forwarded--- On Thu, 6/25/09, Emmanuel Khisa <emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke> > wrote: > > From: Emmanuel Khisa <emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke> > Subject: RE: [kictanet] One subject,varying quality - We lack an > accreditation system for ICT courses > To: "'Walubengo J'" <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> > Date: Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:11 AM > > And Project Discovery Kenya has been able to train more that 200 primary > school teachers over the last five years in conjunction with Institute of > Software technologies...I also know that similar training went on in Yala > Division last April for Primary school teachers in the division organised > by > the Computers for Schools. > On the subject of lack of adequate professors, I will leave that to > Academicians and those keen on interrogating academics, I however would > like > the ICT training to move from over concentration with the academics and > more > to the more handson...more like incubator based learning approach...While > the Far East economies have good universities, they still put more premium > on handson skills...It is sad that even our graduate engineers let alone IT > graduates (who by the way take a lot of flack) cannot invent or think > outside the box...I mean no invention ever comes out of these highly > restricted courses yet only a select few universities dare to venture > into... > > The answer in my opinion lies in building skills that are more practical > and > focussed on creating entrepreneural opportunities. > > Rgds, > > Manu > > "New opinions are always suspected and usually opposed, without any other > reason but because they are not already common." > P Before printing, think about the Environment and your responsibilities > -----Original Message----- > From: kictanet-bounces+emmanuel.khisa=kadet.co.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > [mailto:kictanet-bounces+emmanuel.khisa<kictanet-bounces%2Bemmanuel.khisa> > =kadet.co.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke] On > Behalf Of Walubengo J > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:41 AM > To: emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke > Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject,varying quality - We lack an > accreditation system for ICT courses > > > I agree that something is happening within the High-School teaching > fraternity. Last April, Multimedia University College trained 80 high > school > headteachers from Samburu and I think Transmara Districts, giving them > basic > ICT skills...am aware Strathmore University, IAT etc also do such trainings > regularly...It may not be enough, but its definitely a good kick in the > right direction. > > As for the University Level IT faculty staff. Unfortunately the statistics > are likely to be true. You can count the number of IT Professors in this > country on your three fingers ;-) > > walu. > > > > --- On Wed, 6/24/09, Barnabas K. Sang <bksang(a)education.go.ke> wrote: > > From: Barnabas K. Sang <bksang(a)education.go.ke> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality - We lack an > > accreditation system for ICT courses > > To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com > Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 11:32 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Betty, > > > > Thanks for your response on the article > mentioned below. Will go > through it and perhaps respond on key issues raised, which > ICT in Education has > already done or planned. I hope it will minimize fears all > of us have or may be > persuaded to think all is totally misplaced and lost. > > > > > ?ICT Integration? is currently Ministry > of Education focus, and > steps already put in place are expected to make Kenya > improve both teaching and > learning environment, with better education ?products? > across all levels. > > > > Kind regards > > > > B. K. Sang > > > > > > > > From: > kictanet-bounces+bksang=education.go.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > [mailto:kictanet-bounces+bksang <kictanet-bounces%2Bbksang>= > education.go.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke] > On > Behalf Of Betty Ogange > > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 4:31 PM > > To: Barnabas K. Sang > > Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > > Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality > - We lack an > accreditation system for ICT courses > > > > > > > > > Hallo David, > Last week there was furore in this forum > about media > misrepresentation of the Kenyan situation. The article > that you make > reference to in today?s Standard (24.06.09) may be > accurate in the areas that > you have highlighted. However, I wish to take issue with > a few points raised > in the article. > > http://www.eastandard.net/education/InsidePage.php?id=1144017693&cid=316 > > > ?Unlike other academic fields, very > little has been done > to train most teachers in ICT skills. Currently, no > primary teacher training > college offers comprehensive pre-service training in > information technology.? > > Anyone with a modest interest in education in > Kenya would not > miss something as obvious as a subject in the national > curriculum when reporting > in a national daily. Prior to the year 2004, a few > colleges had ICT skills > courses for pre-service teachers based on in-house > curricula that were > independently developed by each college. The Primary > Teacher Education (PTE) > ICT curriculum developed by the Kenya Institute of > Education has been in > force since the year 2004 and ICT is taught as a > compulsory subject in all > primary teacher training colleges. It is examined > internally at the end of > the first year and all students must pass in the subject, > among other > subjects, in order to proceed to second year. There are > several > implementation hitches in this programme arising from the > fact that ICT is > being taught as a discrete subject in the curriculum and > has yet to be > mainstreamed in the other subjects in the PTE curriculum. > The debate around > ICT- pedagogy integration in education and how to > operationalise it right > from curriculum development to classroom level > implementation continues in > the education circles. > > ?In-service training is often > provided by trainers who > are just barely literate in > computers? > > In my knowledge, this has happened especially > in instances when > some hardware providers ?dangle? teacher training as > an additional offer to > the institution. TTCs used to hire ICT technicians to > teach the course, but > in the last 2 years, the Teacher Service Commission has > posted trained > lecturers of ICT to a number of TTCs. There have also > been some highly > professional training offered to college lecturers by > Microsoft (in > conjunction with the Institute of Advanced Technology - > IAT) and the Kenya > Technical Teachers College. Computers for Schools Kenya > and the Nepad > e-schools teacher training programmes have also reached > teachers in selected > secondary schools. Lack of co-ordination (as with the > rest of the ICT > initiatives in Kenya ), lack of clear training targets > and time-lines have > compromised continuity and impact of some of these > training programmes. > > ?The > entire ICT education is in tatters? > An interesting analogy there. But I see a > sector that is struggling > with what some scholars in educational reform have called > an ?implementation > dip? ? that for a number of reasons things normally > tend to get worse before > they can get better. There are lots of difficulties in > implementing large > scale ICT initiatives in the education sector world over. > In our country, > there have been positive efforts by the Ministry of > Education, the KIE and a > number of stakeholders in education, and these do count. > On the other hand, > there has been the tendency (by education leaders) > towards elaborate policy > documents, ?ICT networks? and trust funds whose > mandates remain > indeterminate. All these need to be researched and > accurately presented. > > Accurate reporting by the media and objective > analysis of both > the positives and difficulties are important in helping > the public target > their attention and effort. Besides the inaccuracies, the > use of expressions > such as ?in tatters? ?the situation is bad?, > ?alarmed professionals? > ?obsolete hardware? to describe ICT in education in > Kenya sounds to me fairly > sensational. > > Betty > > > > > > --- On Wed, 6/24/09, David Otwoma > <otwomad(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > From: David Otwoma <otwomad(a)gmail.com> > > Subject: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality - We > lack an accreditation > system for ICT courses > > To: ogange(a)yahoo.com > > Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" > <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 9:32 AM > > > .....universities > offer many degrees but their quality and market demand > differ...... > > > > > > Although > nearly all universities offer degrees, only the > University of Nairobi, Jomo > Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology and > Strathmore have > Master?s programmes and only UON and Jkuat teach at > doctoral level. > > > There > is a diminishing number of staff with PhDs in ICT > departments. According to > Prof Rodrigues, UoN has the highest number of full-time > lecturers with PhDs > in ICT that stands at eight of 18, while Jkuat has three > of six, which is the > same number for Strathmore. > > > Kenyatta > University has nine full-time but none of them have a PhD > or an equivalent > qualification, while none of the Kabarak?s eight > lecturers have a PhD. Two of > six of United States International University has > doctoral degrees. > > > Many > lecturers have no experience as ICT professionals as > engineers, software > developers or in the emerging area of computer and > network security. > > > > > > See > > http://www.eastandard.net/education/InsidePage.php?id=1144017693&cid=316& > > for full story > > > > > > -- > > David Otwoma, > > Chief Science Secretary, > > National Council for Science and Technology, > > Utalii House 9th Floor, > > Mobile tel: +254 722 141771, > > Office tel: +254 (0)20 2346915, > > P. O. Box 5687 - 00100, Nairobi, Kenya > > email: otwomad(a)gmail.com & otwoma(a)ncst.go.ke > > www.ncst.go.ke > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > > kictanet mailing list > > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > > > This message was sent to: ogange(a)yahoo.com > > Unsubscribe or change your options at > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ogange%40yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emmanuel.khisa%40kadet > . > co.ke > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: timwololo(a)gmail.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/timwololo%40gmail.com > > >

7 9

[Fwd: [Security Forum] AFR0W00T HACKERS CONVENTION, CALL FOR PAPERS PLANNED BY NSPKENYA]
by chuks Jonia 06 Jul '09

06 Jul '09

Hi Members We are inviting InfoSec members as we take Exploitation tools on steroids up the highways of Nairobi, in a Hacker Convention this August. More Discussions at Security forums/Mailists, Link for Archives: http://lists.my.co.ke/pipermail/security/2009-July/thread.html See you there soon. ./Chuks -- -- Gichuki John Ndirangu, C.E.H , C.P.T.P, O.S.C.P I.T Security Analyst and Penetration Tester infosigmer(a)inbox.com {FORUM}http://lists.my.co.ke/pipermail/security/ http://nspkenya.blogspot.com/ http://chuksjonia.blogspot.com/ http://www.kamongo.co.ke/

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Fw: RE: One subject, varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses
by Walubengo J 05 Jul '09

05 Jul '09

Alex, Is this what Americans call "friendly-fire"? I just hope I wont end up being classified as "collateral damage"... But I have to admit I like the bit where you had to go to the US to get data about a Kenyan Project! walu. nb: Meanwhile you should consider a career change and work for the NSIS (intelligence espionage and covert operations ;-) --- On Sat, 7/4/09, Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com> wrote: From: Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Fw: RE: One subject, varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com Cc: kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 6:15 PM Eunice, Consumer public watchdog role of public offices is called for by the ICT Policy. 9.6 (c) "Consumers and users will be expected to participate in ensuring continued review of Government policy in accordance with technological and consumer trends." I put it that Ndemo and Eunice are playing around with words to conceal and “manage” public perception of what they are actually implementing all while giving lip service support to FOSS, if not using every evidence and opportunity they get to attempt to discredit FOSS and its local ICT entrepreneurs. Ndemo and the Board actually got shs 320 million from the World Bank for proprietary software licenses and surrounding expenses for their projects."Licenses, the management system and the rudimentary data warehouse are estimated at US$4 million" The World Bank required ICT policy (also on software) to be followed. It was not followed and Ndemo's statement “What each party (Proprietary or OSS) does should not concern policy” is thus null and void. Why did they not also have a provision for Open Source Software on the funding proposals? Eunice has questioned my credibility I am therefore providing indisputable evidence-right to reply candidly giving my defense at this public court - interpret below document reference in this context. Excuse me for not sending it onlist but you may also ask the World Bank, if you want. Courtesy of US Freedom of Information Act (governs World Bank information) on 31 July, 2008, I requested and was directed to the complete “KENYA TRANSPARENCY & COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT (TCIP/CIP 1)” dated 5 March, 2007. Which I read and observed its stated terms of use: “This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. ” ----excerpt----- 25.TCIP contribution to connect Government. TCIP will fund the following: The internal LAN connections in two buildings which are shared with government offices (NSSF and Utalii House) along with their connections to the fiber optics network to serve five small Ministries. This is estimated cost US$1 million. The enterprise software licenses for government staff and the document management system for government records will be procured and deployed in a manner consistent with the standards and guidelines specified in the Government’s I C T policy, along with the hardware required for storage o f the data. Licenses, the management system and the rudimentary data warehouse are estimated at US$4 million. The project will also fund the software and hardware required for the IP Platform and the Network Operations Center, also in a manner consistent with the standards and guidelines specified in the Government’s I C T policy. This subcomponent i s estimated at US$7 million. Furthermore, TCIP will fund the training, change management and capacity building which will enable the government to take full advantage o f the internal systems and to ensure that they are professionally deployed and maintained. Considerable resources are required, on the order o f US$4 million. 26.Leveraging other sources of finance. Other development partners have indicated their willingness to fund the National Data Center and the Disaster Recovery Center; it should be noted that success o f the Government o f Kenya’s communication network is contingent on secured funding for all elements described above. 27. T U P Component 2d - Support to the Digital Village initiative – US$lO million TCIP will support the scaling-up of successfully piloted Digital Village initiative. Digital villages are e-centers that provide a suite o f services to the public via computers connected to the internet, digital cameras, printers, fax machines and other communication infrastructure. These services include, but are not limited to: e-mail and internet access; e-banking (e.g., money transfer services such as Posta Pay); eGovernment (e.g., police abstract forms, tax returns, P3 forms, and driving license applications); e- business (e.g., franchised postal and courier services); e-learning; e-health; e-markets (e.g., agricultural commodity pricing and exchange); and e-monitoring (e.g., real-time local level monitoring of development funds and projects). Pilot Digital Villages are run by private entrepreneurs who obtained training in business and information technology from a certified program. This component will support the Government over 3 years to roll out and scale up the successfully piloted Digital Village initiative which aims at providing internet access and e-services at the grassroots level via public-private partnerships. 28.TCIP support to include training, a grant facility, I T support, and internet connectivity. The provision o f training programs in business and information technology from a certified program will be supported by the project (US$2 million). Prospective entrepreneurs who have obtained certification will be eligible to apply for a Digital Village development loan from a revolving fund: the Digital Village Fund (DVF). The project will contribute US$4 million to the Government funded DVF over a three year period in 3 installments. Although initially envisaged as a grant facility, the DVF could be structured as a revolving fund (the funds allocated to each entrepreneur would be repayable into the DVF over a 3 year period). These funds received by the entrepreneurs will be used to finance set-up costs and the required infrastructure (computers, printers, software etc). The grant facility will be managed by the ICT Board Grant Manager and will follow the governance and disbursement mechanisms set in the Grants Operational Manual (the manual will be formulated as part o f the technical assistance activity specified in l(c) above). Over the first 3 years the project will support the provision o f IT support to Digital Villages (US$2 million) and finance internet connectivity (US$2 million) which are critical to support the incubation o f the initiative and ensure sustainability. Overall it i s expected this project component will support the establishment of 300 Digital Villages over a 3 year period. -- end citation -- Conclusions: 1.Digital Villages funding need not be 'loans' to the entrepreneurs since as 'grants' was provided for. What was the rationale used by the ICT board to decide all Digital Villages funds should be loaned to the entrepreneurs and persons with disabilities? (In as much as it was also provided for) 2. We appreciate the power of Freedom of Information law. 3. I highly doubt Dr. Ndemo's commitment to our Freedom of Information law legislation. 4.It is not proper for the PS to lay claim on “A good policy levels the play ground.” 5.'Problem solving postponement' routine while the PPDA, 2005 law is in place? “That is why we need the procurement rules change to give everybody an equal chance.” is a mere 'perception management' path/decoy. 6.Elsewhere, we strongly differ on ethics as regards Public Office use to promote private interests and own gain. The PS now reportedly appears Safaricom (private mobico) television commercials and obviously “he received something.” He responds saying that he sees nothing wrong with that, “apologies for what?” he asks. 7.If you want to know what local technical community feels of the current ICT leadership in government, a local mailing member recently wrote “Ideas and issues should be floated regularly and resoundingly so that at the end of the day there are no excuses why in some countries you can receive almost all services online while here we fondly believe 'download and print' is e-government. 8.Perhaps the 2006 ICT Policy may have erred in professing Kenya had automagically found High Level ICT leadership and calling for it to be “protected” . Previous ICT Policy drafts lamented absence of high level leadership. 9.Processes and leaderships that suppress (irrepressible) truths only serve to entrench public resentment of government culminating to disasters like early last year's. We should work hard to avoid their repeat.. Above document refers to 300 digital villages and up until Eunice's message the ICT Board training materials developed were proprietary software-base, none were on FOSS. I hope for specific responses to all above issues raised. Gakuru On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM, <eunicekariuki(a)ict.go.ke> wrote: > Dear Alex, > I am not sure why you got your information about the ICT board having rolled out 300 digital Villages with proprietary software from these are not fact based. > > When that time comes, the entrepreneurs will be free to procure whichever computer brands with whichever operating systems they prefer they feel will enable them operate the digital villages. > > This is why the board is training entrepreneurs who will be capable of making prudent business decisions on their own. > > After the training they will apply for grants from the board, through an agency, with which to procure what they need to be able to run their digital villages. > > I believe Dr Ndemo clarified the government policy and Sang raised pertinent issues to chew on. > > It would be good to comment on issues based on facts. > > Ek > > > > , because the board has > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Zain Kenya > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com> > > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:34:24 > To: <eunicekariuki(a)ict.go.ke> > Cc: <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Fw: RE: One subject, > varying quality - We lack an accreditation system for ICT courses > > > It is not and in fact the law reinforces it. But while Section 34 of > the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, 2005 is very clear on > procurement, public officials continually break this law by choosing > to purchase proprietary software. Those in the know say that savings > on proprietary licences, in one year alone, are enough to bring > elevate 1 district's ICT to the level Nairobi enjoys. What motivates > government procurement officials to insist on spending public funds on > proprietary software? > > Also consider the case of ICT Board 300+ "digital villages" all rolled > out on proprietary software. This means those entrepreneuers will > every year pay Operating syetem and surrounding sofwtare licences ad > infinitum. Talk of unnecessary cost burdens... > > Despite local Open Source Software community calling on the ICT Board > to inform and train them on the abundantly available FOSS options. > > Over to Uhuru Kenyatta and treasury public expenditure cost-saving officials... > --- > > "Finance Minister Uhuru Kenyatta Thursday directed the Public > Procurement Oversight Authority - PPOA to develop guidelines that will > ensure that procurement of public goods and services is done > transparently while safeguarding public funds from misuse. > > Uhuru who addressed a news conference immediately after reading the > budget estimates to parliament, said the Public Procurement Oversight > Authority has to ensure transparency among government departments that > deal with procurement." > <http://www.kbc.co.ke/story.asp?ID=57928 > > regards, > > Alex > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Mwololo Tim<timwololo(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Listers, >> >> Our 2006 national ICT policy is silent on open source software (OSS). As we >> think of a review of this policy, which according to me is due due to a >> number of issues (Vision 2030, BPO, and many other developments), we should >> think seriously about a section on OSS policy. >> >> tim mwololo >> >> >> On 6/29/09, Evans Ikua <ikua(a)lpakenya.org> wrote: >>> >>> There is also Camara Kenya (the local office of camara.ie) that has done >>> tremendous work in the area of putting hardware in schools, both Primary and >>> Secondary, installing open source software, supporting them, and training >>> the teachers. This in a short period of time. >>> >>> Their work has mainly been in the coast region but they are also getting >>> into the hinterland. They have about 150 volunteers from Ireland who have >>> just come in and they will conduct trainings for about a month. >>> >>> They have equipped schools in the whole of Lamu island, and many schools >>> at the coast. >>> >>> They are achieving much more by using FOSS as a computer installed with >>> Linux gives much more to a student as opposed to one installed with Windows. >>> Because they are not spending a penny on software licenses, they are able to >>> supply like twice the number of PCs than if they were to have the schools >>> buy licenses. >>> >>> Ikua >>> >>> -- >>> Evans Ikua >>> Linux Professional Association of Kenya >>> Tel: +254-20-2250381, Cell: +254-722 955 831 >>> Eagle House, 2nd Floor >>> Kimathi Street, Opp. Corner House >>> www.lpakenya.org >>> >>> >>> Quoting Walubengo J <jwalu(a)yahoo.com>: >>> >>>> forwarded--- On Thu, 6/25/09, Emmanuel Khisa >>>> <emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Emmanuel Khisa <emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke> >>>> Subject: RE: [kictanet] One subject,varying quality - We lack an >>>> accreditation system for ICT courses >>>> To: "'Walubengo J'" <jwalu(a)yahoo.com> >>>> Date: Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:11 AM >>>> >>>> And Project Discovery Kenya has been able to train more that 200 primary >>>> school teachers over the last five years in conjunction with Institute of >>>> Software technologies...I also know that similar training went on in Yala >>>> Division last April for Primary school teachers in the division organised >>>> by >>>> the Computers for Schools. >>>> On the subject of lack of adequate professors, I will leave that to >>>> Academicians and those keen on interrogating academics, I however would >>>> like >>>> the ICT training to move from over concentration with the academics and >>>> more >>>> to the more handson...more like incubator based learning approach...While >>>> the Far East economies have good universities, they still put more >>>> premium >>>> on handson skills...It is sad that even our graduate engineers let alone >>>> IT >>>> graduates (who by the way take a lot of flack) cannot invent or think >>>> outside the box...I mean no invention ever comes out of these highly >>>> restricted courses yet only a select few universities dare to venture >>>> into... >>>> >>>> The answer in my opinion lies in building skills that are more practical >>>> and >>>> focussed on creating entrepreneural opportunities. >>>> >>>> Rgds, >>>> >>>> Manu >>>> >>>> "New opinions are always suspected and usually opposed, without any other >>>> reason but because they are not already common." >>>> P Before printing, think about the Environment and your responsibilities >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: kictanet-bounces+emmanuel.khisa=kadet.co.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >>>> [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> On >>>> Behalf Of Walubengo J >>>> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:41 AM >>>> To: emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke >>>> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions >>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject,varying quality - We lack an >>>> accreditation system for ICT courses >>>> >>>> >>>> I agree that something is happening within the High-School teaching >>>> fraternity. Last April, Multimedia University College trained 80 high >>>> school >>>> headteachers from Samburu and I think Transmara Districts, giving them >>>> basic >>>> ICT skills...am aware Strathmore University, IAT etc also do such >>>> trainings >>>> regularly...It may not be enough, but its definitely a good kick in the >>>> right direction. >>>> >>>> As for the University Level IT faculty staff. Unfortunately the >>>> statistics >>>> are likely to be true. You can count the number of IT Professors in this >>>> country on your three fingers ;-) >>>> >>>> walu. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- On Wed, 6/24/09, Barnabas K. Sang <bksang(a)education.go.ke> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Barnabas K. Sang <bksang(a)education.go.ke> >>>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality - We lack an >>>> >>>> accreditation system for ICT courses >>>>> >>>>> To: jwalu(a)yahoo.com >>>>> Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> >>>>> Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 11:32 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Betty, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your response on the article >>>>> mentioned below. Will go >>>>> through it and perhaps respond on key issues raised, which >>>>> ICT in Education has >>>>> already done or planned. I hope it will minimize fears all >>>>> of us have or may be >>>>> persuaded to think all is totally misplaced and lost. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ?ICT Integration? is currently Ministry >>>>> of Education focus, and >>>>> steps already put in place are expected to make Kenya >>>>> improve both teaching and >>>>> learning environment, with better education ?products? >>>>> across all levels. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> B. K. Sang >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: >>>>> kictanet-bounces+bksang=education.go.ke(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> On >>>>> Behalf Of Betty Ogange >>>>> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 4:31 PM >>>>> >>>>> To: Barnabas K. Sang >>>>> >>>>> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions >>>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality >>>>> - We lack an >>>>> accreditation system for ICT courses >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hallo David, >>>>> Last week there was furore in this forum >>>>> about media >>>>> misrepresentation of the Kenyan situation. The article >>>>> that you make >>>>> reference to in today?s Standard (24.06.09) may be >>>>> accurate in the areas that >>>>> you have highlighted. However, I wish to take issue with >>>>> a few points raised >>>>> in the article. >>>> >>>> http://www.eastandard.net/education/InsidePage.php?id=1144017693&cid=316 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ?Unlike other academic fields, very >>>>> little has been done >>>>> to train most teachers in ICT skills. Currently, no >>>>> primary teacher training >>>>> college offers comprehensive pre-service training in >>>>> information technology.? >>>>> >>>>> Anyone with a modest interest in education in >>>>> Kenya would not >>>>> miss something as obvious as a subject in the national >>>>> curriculum when reporting >>>>> in a national daily. Prior to the year 2004, a few >>>>> colleges had ICT skills >>>>> courses for pre-service teachers based on in-house >>>>> curricula that were >>>>> independently developed by each college. The Primary >>>>> Teacher Education (PTE) >>>>> ICT curriculum developed by the Kenya Institute of >>>>> Education has been in >>>>> force since the year 2004 and ICT is taught as a >>>>> compulsory subject in all >>>>> primary teacher training colleges. It is examined >>>>> internally at the end of >>>>> the first year and all students must pass in the subject, >>>>> among other >>>>> subjects, in order to proceed to second year. There are >>>>> several >>>>> implementation hitches in this programme arising from the >>>>> fact that ICT is >>>>> being taught as a discrete subject in the curriculum and >>>>> has yet to be >>>>> mainstreamed in the other subjects in the PTE curriculum. >>>>> The debate around >>>>> ICT- pedagogy integration in education and how to >>>>> operationalise it right >>>>> from curriculum development to classroom level >>>>> implementation continues in >>>>> the education circles. >>>>> >>>>> ?In-service training is often >>>>> provided by trainers who >>>>> are just barely literate in >>>>> computers? >>>>> >>>>> In my knowledge, this has happened especially >>>>> in instances when >>>>> some hardware providers ?dangle? teacher training as >>>>> an additional offer to >>>>> the institution. TTCs used to hire ICT technicians to >>>>> teach the course, but >>>>> in the last 2 years, the Teacher Service Commission has >>>>> posted trained >>>>> lecturers of ICT to a number of TTCs. There have also >>>>> been some highly >>>>> professional training offered to college lecturers by >>>>> Microsoft (in >>>>> conjunction with the Institute of Advanced Technology - >>>>> IAT) and the Kenya >>>>> Technical Teachers College. Computers for Schools Kenya >>>>> and the Nepad >>>>> e-schools teacher training programmes have also reached >>>>> teachers in selected >>>>> secondary schools. Lack of co-ordination (as with the >>>>> rest of the ICT >>>>> initiatives in Kenya ), lack of clear training targets >>>>> and time-lines have >>>>> compromised continuity and impact of some of these >>>>> training programmes. >>>>> >>>>> ?The >>>>> entire ICT education is in tatters? >>>>> An interesting analogy there. But I see a >>>>> sector that is struggling >>>>> with what some scholars in educational reform have called >>>>> an ?implementation >>>>> dip? ? that for a number of reasons things normally >>>>> tend to get worse before >>>>> they can get better. There are lots of difficulties in >>>>> implementing large >>>>> scale ICT initiatives in the education sector world over. >>>>> In our country, >>>>> there have been positive efforts by the Ministry of >>>>> Education, the KIE and a >>>>> number of stakeholders in education, and these do count. >>>>> On the other hand, >>>>> there has been the tendency (by education leaders) >>>>> towards elaborate policy >>>>> documents, ?ICT networks? and trust funds whose >>>>> mandates remain >>>>> indeterminate. All these need to be researched and >>>>> accurately presented. >>>>> >>>>> Accurate reporting by the media and objective >>>>> analysis of both >>>>> the positives and difficulties are important in helping >>>>> the public target >>>>> their attention and effort. Besides the inaccuracies, the >>>>> use of expressions >>>>> such as ?in tatters? ?the situation is bad?, >>>>> ?alarmed professionals? >>>>> ?obsolete hardware? to describe ICT in education in >>>>> Kenya sounds to me fairly >>>>> sensational. >>>>> >>>>> Betty >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- On Wed, 6/24/09, David Otwoma >>>>> <otwomad(a)gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: David Otwoma <otwomad(a)gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> Subject: [kictanet] One subject, varying quality - We >>>>> lack an accreditation >>>>> system for ICT courses >>>>> >>>>> To: ogange(a)yahoo.com >>>>> >>>>> Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" >>>>> <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> >>>>> >>>>> Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 9:32 AM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> .....universities >>>>> offer many degrees but their quality and market demand >>>>> differ...... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Although >>>>> nearly all universities offer degrees, only the >>>>> University of Nairobi, Jomo >>>>> Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology and >>>>> Strathmore have >>>>> Master?s programmes and only UON and Jkuat teach at >>>>> doctoral level. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There >>>>> is a diminishing number of staff with PhDs in ICT >>>>> departments. According to >>>>> Prof Rodrigues, UoN has the highest number of full-time >>>>> lecturers with PhDs >>>>> in ICT that stands at eight of 18, while Jkuat has three >>>>> of six, which is the >>>>> same number for Strathmore. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kenyatta >>>>> University has nine full-time but none of them have a PhD >>>>> or an equivalent >>>>> qualification, while none of the Kabarak?s eight >>>>> lecturers have a PhD. Two of >>>>> six of United States International University has >>>>> doctoral degrees. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Many >>>>> lecturers have no experience as ICT professionals as >>>>> engineers, software >>>>> developers or in the emerging area of computer and >>>>> network security. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> See >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.eastandard.net/education/InsidePage.php?id=1144017693&cid=316& >>>>> >>>>> for full story >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> David Otwoma, >>>>> >>>>> Chief Science Secretary, >>>>> >>>>> National Council for Science and Technology, >>>>> >>>>> Utalii House 9th Floor, >>>>> >>>>> Mobile tel: +254 722 141771, >>>>> >>>>> Office tel: +254 (0)20 2346915, >>>>> >>>>> P. O. Box 5687 - 00100, Nairobi, Kenya >>>>> >>>>> email: otwomad(a)gmail.com & otwoma(a)ncst.go.ke >>>>> >>>>> www.ncst.go.ke >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows----- >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> kictanet mailing list >>>>> >>>>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This message was sent to: ogange(a)yahoo.com >>>>> >>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at >>>> >>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ogange%40yahoo.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows----- >>>>> >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>> kictanet mailing list >>>>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >>>>> >>>>> This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com >>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at >>>> >>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>> kictanet mailing list >>>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >>>> >>>> This message was sent to: emmanuel.khisa(a)kadet.co.ke >>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at >>>> >>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emmanuel.khisa%40kadet. >>>> co.ke >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>> kictanet mailing list >>> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >>> >>> This message was sent to: timwololo(a)gmail.com >>> Unsubscribe or change your options at >>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/timwololo%40gmail.com >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >> kictanet mailing list >> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >> >> This message was sent to: alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com >> Unsubscribe or change your options at >> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alexgakuru.lists%40gma… >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: eunicekariuki(a)ict.go.ke > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/eunicekariuki%40ict.go… > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent to: jwalu(a)yahoo.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com

1 0

Quotations Invited: ICT standards web portal
by Gakuru Alex 03 Jul '09

03 Jul '09

Local Software Developers/ICT Solution providers, You are hereby invited to submit quotations for the provision of: 1. Open Source website Content Management System (CMS) services 2. Open Source website Document Management System (DMS) services Your quotation should include, among others, CMS: a) customisation costs, b) cost of template, c) deployment costs d) cost of training 4 persons (administrator and 3 users) e) post installation & training support costs f) etc.. DMS: a) customisation costs, b) cost of template, c) deployment costs d) cost of training 4 persons (administrator and 3 users) e) post installation & training support costs f) etc.. If you feel that you can offer above ICT services please send your quotations by email to the undersigned addressed to: Alex Gakuru, The Chairman, Working Group, SC 34 Technical Committee(TC), Kenya Bureau of Standards email: gakuru(a)gmail.com

1 1

(US) Government launches website to track IT spending
by Christopher Kiagiri 02 Jul '09

02 Jul '09

Remember last month when Obama's CIO announced data.gov (which has already grown from 47 data sets to over 100,000)? ... Well, VK didn't stop there. Now there's USAspending.gov (details below). http://www.washingtonpost.com/<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR200906300…> wp-dyn/content/article/2009/<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR200906300…> 06/30/AR2009063001370.html?<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR200906300…> hpid=moreheadlines<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR200906300…> Government Launches Web Site to Track IT Spending By Kim Hart<http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/articles/kim+hart/> Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, June 30, 2009; 10:29 AM NEW YORK, June 30 -- Vivek Kundra, the federal chief information officer, on Tuesday announced a new Web site designed to track more than $70 billion in government information technology spending, showing all contracts held by major firms within every agency. The revamped site, USAspending.gov <http://usaspending.gov/>, was launched early this morning, and Kundra unveiled it at the Personal Democracy Forum conference on technology and politics. The site shows detailed information about whether IT contracts are being monitored and budgets being met. "Everyone knows there have been spectacular failures when it comes to technology investments," Kundra said. "Now for the first time the entire country can see how we're spending money and give us input." The site is the latest effort by Kundra and the Office of Management and Budget to make data about the government's projects and performance visible to the public. Citizens and Web developers can parse the data, combine it with other data sets and publish the results on Web feeds or their Facebook profiles. The data also show which contracts were won through a competitive process or in a no-bid method, which has been criticized by good-government advocates for excluding firms from business opportunities. Each prime contractor is listed as well as the status of that project; sub-contractors are not yet shown on the site. Last month, Kundra launched Data.gov <http://data.gov/>, a repository for data feeds that are publicly available but often hard to find. The site started with 47 data sets. Kundra said there are now more than 100,000. Kundra's announcement was met with cheers and a standing ovation from the Twittering crowd at a Lincoln Center auditorium. The launch fulfills one of the promises Kundra made to Congress, in which he pledged to develop a new way of monitoring federal technology spending by the end of June. Launching a site that makes spending practices open to the public met some opposition from the agencies' chief information officers and government contractors, some of whom were nervous about letting citizens who aren't familiar with the contracting process and technology needs of the government judge the spending decisions. Kundra said he met with every agency and dozens of company executives over the past six weeks. "I talked to the CIO Council and saw the data change overnight," Kundra said. "It was cleaned up immediately when people realized it was going to be made public." A federal report last year found that $30 billion worth of IT projects were not going smoothly or were in danger of failing. Kundra pointed to a $6 million project to use wireless devices in gathering information for the U.S. Census. After two years, it was deemed unsuccessful and census takers reverted to using the old paper-based system. "We've seen this with system after system," he said. "Vendors over-promise and budgets have run away in terms of excessive spending. We're trying to provide you with the tools to let American people show us a better way." Because the data change frequently as IT contracts change, the feeds run the risk of containing inaccuracies. Maintaining and updating the databases is also labor-intensive and some agencies say the initiative creates an enormous workload for them. "There is a good chance you'll go through this and find places where the data is wrong, and that's okay," said Macon Phillips, new media director for the White House. "I'd rather have this up and out there than not at all."

1 0