- KICTANet - KICTANet

Fw: [governance] Signposts in Cyberspace report
by alice＠apc.org 18 Aug '05

18 Aug '05

----- Original Message ----- From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller(a)syr.edu> To: <plenary(a)wsis-cs.org> Cc: <governance(a)lists.cpsr.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:00 PM Subject: [governance] Signposts in Cyberspace report > Colleagues, > > Recently, The National Academies Computer Science Telecommunications > Board study, "Signposts in Cyberspace" was released. It deals in detail > with "Internet Governance" issues surrounding the DNS. I was on the > study committee and think its worth the attention of your readers. > > A "summary brochure" highlighting the report contents and takes readers > to the download site. It is at: > > http://www.cstb.org/dns/signpost.html > > Unlike anything else available on the topic, it provides a compendium > of historical information, technical details, and reasoned analysis > about alternative courses of policy by a group of experts representing > and considering a wide range of viewpoints. We agreed on some things and > not on others- and the report details why. > > > > Dr. Milton Mueller > Syracuse University School of Information Studies > http://www.digital-convergence.org > http://www.internetgovernance.org > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance(a)lists.cpsr.org > https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >

2 1

Re: [Kictanet] Fw: [governance] Emergency resolution on .xxx recall -and thedestruction of ICANN's integ
by John Walubengo 17 Aug '05

17 Aug '05

Mhhh... very interesting thread. thanx for keeping me (us?) posted on some of these issues. walu. >>> <alice(a)apc.org> 08/16/05 05:52pm >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller(a)syr.edu> To: <NCUC-DISCUSS(a)listserv.syr.edu> Cc: <governance(a)lists.cpsr.org>; <iza(a)anr.org>; <vb(a)bertola.eu.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 5:32 PM Subject: [governance] Emergency resolution on .xxx recall - and thedestruction of ICANN's integrity > Many of us have warned for years that the US's unilateral political > power over ICANN was a problem. Too many people didn't listen. Now that > power is being displayed and used in a way that even the most abject > apologists for the system cannot deny. > > Over the weekend ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee transmitted a > letter asking ICANN to reverse its decision to approve the .xxx TLD. A > letter from the US Commerce Dept supporting that request has also been > filed. http://www.icann.org/correspondence/gallagher-to-cerf-15aug05.pdf > > > I believe it is essential that NCUC, ALAC and WSIS civil society join > together in a resolution or letter to ICANN, its GAC and the US Commerce > department expressing concern over and opposition to the GAC's attempt > to reverse the .xxx delegation. > > What is at stake here is the very model of the Internet as a private > sector and civil society-driven institution, and as an INTERNATIONAL > institution. This is not about .xxx per se. (although it should be noted > that all .xxx proposes to do is openly and accurately identify porn on > the Internet, which is in every legitimate user's interest. The > creation of a .xxx TLD does not CREATE pornography, which we all know is > already out there.) > > The decision by the US to exercise in an unambiguous way its unilateral > power over ICANN has been made in a surprising context. But I have > checked the facts and there is no doubt about it. The US Commerce > Department's Deputy Secretary David A. Sampson, confirmed by the Senate > July 22, is responsible for the sudden decision of the US to support the > GAC's attack on ICANN's delegation process. Sampson was influenced by > the Family Research Council, a culturally conservative religious group > in the US, which made it an issue. Sampson is a graduate of David > Lipscomb University , the New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary and > earned his doctorate at Abilene Christian University. > http://www.commerce.gov/bios/sampson_bio.htm > > ICANN participants must stand up for the integrity of the institution > as a global, legitimate policy making system. One government cannot be > given an arbitrary and unlimited power to reverse the result of a > decision making process that has gone on for five years and consumed > millions of dollars in resources, just because a domestic political > constituency doesn't like the result. > > If this recall is allowed to go forward unchallenged, governments will > have asserted and gained a form of arbitrary power over the Internet at > its very core. ICANN's often flawed attempt to be a bottom-up > organization will be completely defeated, forever. This is a very > important issue. It is essential for ALAC, NCUC and other civil society > actors to unite on this. > > I will be drafting a proposed short resolution. I hope to transmit it > to these lists soon. > > > Dr. Milton Mueller > Syracuse University School of Information Studies > http://www.digital-convergence.org > http://www.internetgovernance.org > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance(a)lists.cpsr.org > https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

1 0

KICTANet activities
by emutua 17 Aug '05

17 Aug '05

I would like to inquire if there any areas of collaboration or stages at which i can join in currently with some of ICT related programs we intend to to initiate here at theNational Council of NGOs' for our member networks.In the case of voip i would suggest an voip network connectivity for cso's (is it possible to intergrate their separate ones into one intergrated network that is viable ?with ofcourse an isp -preferably ARCC,which is a cso).Thanks for any of your response. Emanuel Mutua Network administrator Tel:+254(020) 2715259, 2738288 Fax:+254(020) 273 6345 GSM:0733 772580, 0720 707927 Website:www.ngocouncil.org

1 0

Fw: KICTANet activities
by alice＠apc.org 17 Aug '05

17 Aug '05

----- Original Message ----- From: "wanjiru njogu" <luchiru(a)yahoo.com> To: <alice(a)apc.org> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 3:42 PM Subject: KICTANet activities > Alice, for Goal-ICT it will be more specific to the > youth as relates to the consumer awareness campaign. > > Lucy. > > --- wrote: > >> Dear all >> >> Some of the activities that we had agreed upon >> during the planning meeting >> are due to begin soon. >> Among them under advocacy >> 1. Consumer awareness campaigns comprising: >> -Study consumer lobby groups in Kenya (James >> Nguo) >> -SMS broadcasts (One World) >> -Monthly public Forums (KIS) >> -Workshop for media people (Media ICT >> network) >> >> Some of the organisations have already begun >> discussions on the budget and >> activities. We are currently discussion the SMS >> broadcasts with One world. >> >> Other activities that KICTANet will support are >> >> ISOC public Forum TBC >> LinuxChix Career workshop for high school girls to >> be held in September 10 >> 2005. We are hoping that this activity will linked >> to the breakfast meeting >> we had proposed for women parliamentarians. >> >> Members interested in supporting or getting engaged >> in any of the above >> activities please let me know. >> >> thanks >> alice >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> kictanet mailing list >> kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke >> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >> > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > >

3 3

Fw: [governance] Emergency resolution on .xxx recall - and thedestruction of ICANN's integrity
by alice＠apc.org 16 Aug '05

16 Aug '05

----- Original Message ----- From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller(a)syr.edu> To: <NCUC-DISCUSS(a)listserv.syr.edu> Cc: <governance(a)lists.cpsr.org>; <iza(a)anr.org>; <vb(a)bertola.eu.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 5:32 PM Subject: [governance] Emergency resolution on .xxx recall - and thedestruction of ICANN's integrity > Many of us have warned for years that the US's unilateral political > power over ICANN was a problem. Too many people didn't listen. Now that > power is being displayed and used in a way that even the most abject > apologists for the system cannot deny. > > Over the weekend ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee transmitted a > letter asking ICANN to reverse its decision to approve the .xxx TLD. A > letter from the US Commerce Dept supporting that request has also been > filed. http://www.icann.org/correspondence/gallagher-to-cerf-15aug05.pdf > > > I believe it is essential that NCUC, ALAC and WSIS civil society join > together in a resolution or letter to ICANN, its GAC and the US Commerce > department expressing concern over and opposition to the GAC's attempt > to reverse the .xxx delegation. > > What is at stake here is the very model of the Internet as a private > sector and civil society-driven institution, and as an INTERNATIONAL > institution. This is not about .xxx per se. (although it should be noted > that all .xxx proposes to do is openly and accurately identify porn on > the Internet, which is in every legitimate user's interest. The > creation of a .xxx TLD does not CREATE pornography, which we all know is > already out there.) > > The decision by the US to exercise in an unambiguous way its unilateral > power over ICANN has been made in a surprising context. But I have > checked the facts and there is no doubt about it. The US Commerce > Department's Deputy Secretary David A. Sampson, confirmed by the Senate > July 22, is responsible for the sudden decision of the US to support the > GAC's attack on ICANN's delegation process. Sampson was influenced by > the Family Research Council, a culturally conservative religious group > in the US, which made it an issue. Sampson is a graduate of David > Lipscomb University , the New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary and > earned his doctorate at Abilene Christian University. > http://www.commerce.gov/bios/sampson_bio.htm > > ICANN participants must stand up for the integrity of the institution > as a global, legitimate policy making system. One government cannot be > given an arbitrary and unlimited power to reverse the result of a > decision making process that has gone on for five years and consumed > millions of dollars in resources, just because a domestic political > constituency doesn't like the result. > > If this recall is allowed to go forward unchallenged, governments will > have asserted and gained a form of arbitrary power over the Internet at > its very core. ICANN's often flawed attempt to be a bottom-up > organization will be completely defeated, forever. This is a very > important issue. It is essential for ALAC, NCUC and other civil society > actors to unite on this. > > I will be drafting a proposed short resolution. I hope to transmit it > to these lists soon. > > > Dr. Milton Mueller > Syracuse University School of Information Studies > http://www.digital-convergence.org > http://www.internetgovernance.org > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance(a)lists.cpsr.org > https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >

1 0

Fwd: Re: Call Centre in Nairobi
by Florence Etta 16 Aug '05

16 Aug '05

Hi all, >Some interesting work (if you have not seen it already) which was done by >USAID consultants for Ministry of Education is available >at <http://ict.aed.org/kenya>http://ict.aed.org/kenya Comments are >still welcome. The MoEST is reviewing the document at the moment. > Cheers, FE

1 0

Fw: [DigAfrica] VOIP is a Challenge for Telephone Firms in Kenya
by alice＠apc.org 16 Aug '05

16 Aug '05

VOIP is a Challenge for Telephone Firms > The Nation (Nairobi) > > COLUMN > August 16, 2005 > Posted to the web August 15, 2005 > Pauline Wangui > Nairobi > > It is now official. The Communications Commission of Kenya last week > issued guidelines for the provision of voice over internet protocol > (VoiP). > > Going by the Commission's definition, VoiP is the transmission of > voice as packets over traditional switched networks or over internet > networks (a telecommunication service whereby voice messages are > transmitted as packets over the internet or other telecommunications > network). > > This means that VoIP is finally taking off and the prospect of > internet telephony displacing traditional telephony is now a reality. > > VoiP kills distance, and is of great interest within the telecom > industry. With VoiP service, subscribers have an opportunity to > significantly reduce their local and long-distance calling expenses, > while long-distance carriers have an opportunity to possibly avoid > sharing a large portion of their revenues with the local telephone > companies for use of their access links. > > Moreover, VoiP enables a rich array of services ranging from web-like > phone displays, information services, and data exchange. > > This is a transformative technology, that will redefine the phone and > the way people use it. > > As more businesses and consumers adopt the lower-cost alternative of > VoIP, the normal carriers will be forced to lower their wireline > intercarrier tariffs in order to compete. > > Already, large companies like Time Warner Cable have experimented VoiP > service within their various service territories over the past year. > > Although regulation for VoiP is still being defined, operators > including incumbent Telkom Kenya and new entrants can now incorporate > VoiP as long as they have been licensed. > > However there are key business issues to be addressed. > > The bottom line is that for this or any technology to flourish, there > must be a sustainable business model behind it. The door to the inner > core of telecommunications has just been opened to innovators willing > to expand on relatively simple technologies of digitizing and putting > voice in packets. > > This ability enables a new paradigm in the telecom sector that is > really just beginning. But are the traditional voice carriers ready to > deal with VoiP at operational levels, are they prepared and are they > capable of managing a successful migration?. > > Companies like Net2Phone and Vonage press ahead with new business > models. New comers like Skype and Free World Dial-Up drive innovation > and integration of new uses. > > Collectively such consistently reshape their markets by adopting new > business models that provide for layered services like voice, data, > video, audio and internet. Such innovators can and will erode the > revenue base that the telecom industry fights so hard to hang on to. > > Corporate strategy will have to be reconsidered and decisions made > about the new position in the new voice market. > > Flexible and effective management information systems have to be put > in place in the new environment. Migrations plans must be put in place > to ensure that the migration to VoiP is both operationally and > financially successful. > > Telcos must move fast to position themselves in the VoiP value chain. > They are used to focusing on maximizing returns from their current > infrastructure. > > However, with many new VoIP entrants expected in the market, the > traditional operators cannot afford to sit back as simple > infrastructure providers but need to effect strategies that maintain > their positions. They need to work out how best to position themselves > in this new IP-driven value chain and assess the impact this will have > on their already existing business. > > They also need to know how they intend to deal with new alliances and > partnership with applications and content providers as they maintain > customer s during migration. > > Among the main issues operators will face in the transition are costs > and success of customer migration. > > Extensive investment is required. Risks associated with migration need > to be addressed. > > VoiP-specific issues, such as voice quality and customer churn have to > be looked into. > > With VoiP, the market battle is expected to intensify. What IP > services do consumers want? Who can best deliver them? > > Who can build a sustainable business model, and who will continue the > evolution by keeping the pressure on all the players to innovate. > > These are just but few issues. In telecommunications, you lead, follow > or get out of the way. You can be a steamroller, or you can become > part of the pavement others walk on. > > But if you are, innovative, and creative, you can outrun the telecom > industry that is still slow in this region. > > The writer is a telecoms strategy analyst. > > http://allafrica.com/stories/200508151302.html > > > > > Dig Africa site welcomes you to join us at > http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/Digafrica > > Also if you are interested to join a Swahili/English discussion group > click > http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/kiswahili > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > a.. Visit your group "DigAfrica" on the web. > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DigAfrica-unsubscribe(a)yahoogroups.com > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >

2 1

Media Turmoil in UG
by John Walubengo 16 Aug '05

16 Aug '05

Hey, Folks in Uganda, give us a shout on what's on the ground regarding the media. What is coming out is that some FM stations aired rumours and speculation regarding Dr. Garang's death to the point where the President personally ordered them shut down. I have no problem with them being shut, my problem is HOW they got shut. My worry here is about institutional independence. I do believe that UG has an established ICT Policy, Regulatory Body and all the other nice things that Kenya is just beginning to move towards. And yet, suddenly out of nowhere, the 'S' word (Security) seems to be exceptionally supreme and deployable by the Executive - at the expense of any written regulatory framework... What can Kenya learn from this as it tries to finalise its ICT policy? walu.

1 0

KICTANet activities
by alice＠apc.org 13 Aug '05

13 Aug '05

Dear all Some of the activities that we had agreed upon during the planning meeting are due to begin soon. Among them under advocacy 1. Consumer awareness campaigns comprising: -Study consumer lobby groups in Kenya (James Nguo) -SMS broadcasts (One World) -Monthly public Forums (KIS) -Workshop for media people (Media ICT network) Some of the organisations have already begun discussions on the budget and activities. We are currently discussion the SMS broadcasts with One world. Other activities that KICTANet will support are ISOC public Forum TBC LinuxChix Career workshop for high school girls to be held in September 10 2005. We are hoping that this activity will linked to the breakfast meeting we had proposed for women parliamentarians. Members interested in supporting or getting engaged in any of the above activities please let me know. thanks alice

3 2

Fw: [ipdet] experts in PRSP monitoring system and GBS
by alice＠apc.org 12 Aug '05

12 Aug '05

Dear all Any experts on PRSP out there can apply for this short term consultancy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paola Gosparini" <p.gosparini(a)drn-network.com> To: "IPDET Distribution List" <ipdet(a)lists.worldbank.org> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 7:27 PM Subject: [ipdet] experts in PRSP monitoring system and GBS Dear IPDETers, We are looking for 3 experts for a short term consultancy in Nicaragua to design an integrated PRSP and General Budgetary Support performance Matrix monitoring system. Here below a short background and profile of the experts. The consultancy should start by the end of August at the latest. It is requested good command of Spanish, and EU or Latin American nationality. For CVs and further information, please contact Mari Carmen Bueno : m.bueno(a)drn-network.com Thanks a lot for your cooperation, Best regards Paola Gosparini DRN - Development Researchers' Network Square E. Plasky 92- 1030 Brussels- Belgium tel. +32-2- 7361663 fax +32-2-7065442 <mailto:p.gosparini@drn-network.com> p.gosparini(a)drn-network.com <http://www.drn-network.com> www.drn-network.com Via I. Nievo, 62- 00153 Rome- Italy tel. +39-06-5816074/6107 fax: +39-06-5816390 Background The ERCEP (Nicaraguan PRSP) established a system of indicators and impact, and a great number of structural policies and measures to be implemented by the Government. Later on, a monitoring system of indicators and reforms was created. The main monitoring system is the annual ERCEP progress report, which has been published in 2002, 2003 and 2004. The SINASIP(Sistema Nacional de seguimientos a los Indicadores de la Pobreza) was created in order to carry out a continuous monitoring of the indicators and it is under the supervision of the SECEP (Secretaria de Coordinación y Estrategia de la Presidencia), who collect the data of the different sources, make the statistics and publish it in the Web so that the Government has access to recent data. The Sistema Integrado de Gestión Financiera y Auditoria (SIGFA), which is both under the supervision of the Public Finance Ministry and under the supervision of the SECEP through the Sistema de Inversión Pública (SNIP), manages also other financial indicators related to public finance and budgetary implementation. Also, in order to monitor these indicators, a certain number of official surveys are launched regularly. The actual monitoring and indicators system is therefore very complex and does not allow responding to the needs of the country. The system is quite expensive to handle and its sustainability is very doubtful. Last May a group of donors signed with the government a financing agreement for the provision of General Budgetary support aligned with the objective on the National Development Plan and monitored through a Performance assessment Matrix (PAM) which indicators are drawn from the PND. Objective of this consultancy To elaborate a strategy, a "road map", to obtain an integrated monitoring system of the PND (Plan Nacional de Desarrollo) with progress reports that incorporate in a single process, managed by the government, the economic and social progress reports made by the government to the assembly, the civil society, the donors and international institutions. This would allow to obtain also a higher level of coordination of the indicators systems both at sectoral and global level and at project/programme level. Profile of the experts Team Leader: Economist, senior category. Specialist in PRSP monitoring systems and indicators. Experience in statistics. Experience with budgetary support and PAM (Performance Assesment Matrix) matrices. Statistics expert: Specialist in national systems of statistic. Specialist in PRSP monitoring systems and indicators. Experience with budgetary support and PAM (Performance Assesment Matrix) matrices. Only backstopping activities in relation to statistic systems (up to 5 days of work) Senior Economist: Specialist in PRSP monitoring systems and indicators. Period of work 2 weeks and 2 for report revision. --- You are currently subscribed to ipdet as: alice(a)apc.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ipdet-5022085V(a)lists.worldbank.org

1 0