- KICTANet - KICTANet

senatorial submit
by Silvester Hilliard 13 May '06

13 May '06

1 0

Fw: [africtic] Africa’s e-government dilemma
by alice＠apc.org 13 May '06

13 May '06

*Dear All, > * > > > > For many African governments, moves towards embracing e-governance have > gone little beyond the opening of websites for state ministries and > departments. But even where such websites exist, in many cases they > contain little information of value to the public, and they do not in any > fundamental way connect governments and citizens, as e-government aims to > do. While information on the “who is who” in the ministry, its > organizational structure and mission will often be abundantly available > (though not necessarily updated), the average website will not have public > service information, for instance on how to go about applying for a > particular service, who the right office/ person to approach is, and where > on the website to download and even electronically submit these > application forms. > > > > But e-governance entails more than a government website on the Internet – > even if that website has a great deal of public service information, > offers a great deal of interactivity and enables citizens to get a range > of services electronically. As Queen’s University Belfast law lecturer Dr > Subhajit Basu has said, “The strategic objective of e-governance is to > support and simplify governance for all parties: government, citizens and > businesses. The use of ICT can connect all these parties and support > processes and activities. In other words, in e-governance electronic means > support and stimulate good governance.” > > > > One scholar has defined e-governance simply as the use by government > agencies of information technologies such as Wide Area Networks, the > Internet and mobile computing, that have the ability to transform > relations with citizens, businesses and other forms of government. > Inherent in this definition are three critical issues for e-governance to > work effectively: a range of information technologies have to be applied, > government’s attitude towards service provision has to change, and there > must be a high level of transparency in government operations. > > > > The often-cited possible benefits e-governance can bring to developing > countries include faster access to government services, lower costs for > administrative services, greater public access to budgets and documents, > and a corresponding increase in transparency and accountability of > government functions. > > > > For e-governance to work in Africa, governments should be willing to > decentralize responsibilities and processes, and to start using electronic > means of communicating and delivering services. Citizens could then > contact their leaders and public servants through website where all forms, > legislation, news and other information is made available. Basu says in > effect, governments would serve their citizens better and save costs by > making internal operations more efficient, cutting down the complex and > over-stretched bureaucratic system. > > > > But this is only the ideal situation. The reality in many African > countries makes e-governance unattainable in the immediate term, and the > main reasons have little to do with the lack of money to fund the roll-out > of e-government programmes, or the need to fund other pressing priorities > like providing access to safe drinking water or funding universal primary > education. E-governance breaks bureaucracy and that is not desirable to > many government workers. To many of them, bureaucracy means power and is > also a source of side income for them. A person applying for a trading > license may have to pay the person who dishes out the application forms, > bribe the clerk to have their application stamped, and pay a string of > other people just to get the application considered, let alone granted. > This is an eating chain that e-governance would minimize. And the > e-illiterate public servants seem best placed to recognize this. > > > > Another issue is that just about two percent of the populations of various > African countries access the Internet. Hence, whatever initiatives > government departments may make in introducing the use of IT in their > work, they will not go far if the issue of accessibility and affordability > to the Internet for the average person are not addressed. > > > > Additionally, many African governments have a culture of keeping even the > most innocent information in ‘confidential’ folders, and only the > permanent secretary of a ministry or other administrative head of a > department can authorize the release of any such information. This culture > goes counter to the logic of e-governance, which is to increase > transparency in governance, including giving the public access to a wider > range of government records. What this means is that where public > officials or administrative systems benefit from poor governance and the > lack of transparency, they will be reluctant to open up their budgets and > other records to the public. > > > > Accordingly, e-government experts like Dr Basu say in order to examine the > risk of implementing e-governance solutions, the following factors have to > be taken into account: whether a country is a democracy or a dictatorial > regime; the government structure – whether it is centralized or > decentralized, the adequacy of the legal framework, an the level of trust > in government. For most African governments, the scale seems to be > strongly tilted against e-governance. > > Regards, > > -- > Vincent Waiswa Bagiire, > Director, CIPESA > Plot 30, Bukoto Street, P.O. Box 26970 Kampala > Tel: 256-41-533057 > Fax: 256-41-533054 > Cell: 256-77-702256 or 256-71-702256 > Email: vincent(a)cipesa.org > www.cipesa.org > > > > Dgroups is a joint initiative of Bellanet, DFID, Hivos, ICA, ICCO, IICD, > OneWorld, UNAIDS and World Bank > --- You are currently subscribed to africtic as: alice(a)apc.org > To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-africtic-617601R(a)dgroups.org

1 0

Re: [Kictanet] JOB OPPORTUNITIES
by alice＠apc.org 12 May '06

12 May '06

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sylvia Limo" <sylvia(a)computer-pride.com> To: <alice(a)apc.org> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:43 AM Subject: RE: [Kictanet] JOB OPPORTUNITIES > Apologies everyone. > Thanks > > -----Original Message----- > From: alice(a)apc.org [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:04 PM > To: sylvia(a)computer-pride.com > Cc: antoine(a)e-tools.com; Odhiambo_Washington > Subject: Fw: [Kictanet] JOB OPPORTUNITIES > Importance: High > > Dear Sylvia and Antoine > > Please communicate of line. rather than copying the entire list > > thanks > alice > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "antoine bigirimana" <antoine(a)e-tools.com> > To: <alice(a)apc.org> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:16 PM > Subject: RE: [Kictanet] JOB OPPORTUNITIES > > >> Hi Alice, >> >> Please, re-send the CV. I did not get it. >> Thanks. >> antoine >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: alice(a)apc.org [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:54 AM >> To: Antoine(a)e-tools.com >> Subject: Re: [Kictanet] JOB OPPORTUNITIES >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sylvia Limo" <sylvia(a)computer-pride.com> >> To: <alice(a)apc.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:49 PM >> Subject: RE: [Kictanet] JOB OPPORTUNITIES >> >> >>>I have submitted my CV to Antoine(a)e-tools.com hope to pass for the job. >>> Thank you >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: kictanet-bounces+sylvia=computer-pride.com(a)kictanet.or.ke >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf >>> Of Alfelt Abio >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:57 PM >>> To: sylvia(a)computer-pride.com >>> Subject: [Kictanet] JOB OPPORTUNITIES >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I am looking for young professionals to work in our Regional office in >>> Rwanda from July 2006 and probably later come back to work in our >> Nairobi >>> offices. >>> Age: Not above 32 Years >>> Educ: Bachelor Degree in Computer Science and 3 years of experience >>> Profesional Exp: MCSE, MCP and MCT >>> >>> Will need an MVP at a later stage since we currently have one. >>> >>> Please contact me or direct candidates you know to me but would prefer >>> email. Thanks. >>> >>> >>> Alfelt M. Abio-Gunda >>> Managing Director >>> Electronic Company (E-tools) Kenya >>> P.O. Box 39790-00623 >>> Nairobi - Kenya >>> Tel/Fax: +254-202700647 >>> +254-202711718 >>> Mbl: +254-733604740 >>> +254-722510586 >>> Website: http://www.e-tools.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> kictanet mailing list >>> kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke >>> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >>> >>> Please unsubscribe or change your options at >>> >> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/sylvia%40computer-pride.c >> om >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> kictanet mailing list >>> kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke >>> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >>> >>> Please unsubscribe or change your options at >>> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alice%40apc.org >>

1 0

Returned mail: see transcript for details
by MAILER-DAEMON 12 May '06

12 May '06

This message was not delivered due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely there is a network problem that prevented delivery, but it is also possible that the computer is turned off, or does not have a mail system running right now. Your message could not be delivered within 1 days: Host 181.237.116.86 is not responding. The following recipients did not receive this message: <kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke> Please reply to postmaster(a)kictanet.or.ke if you feel this message to be in error.

1 0

Fw: KICTANET Website
by alice＠apc.org 11 May '06

11 May '06

Dear All Linux Chicks have provided a link ( http://www.kenet.or.ke/kictanet/ ) for the KICTANet website. Please pay a visit and make comments. thank you and best regards alice ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dorcas Muthoni" <dmuthoni(a)kenet.or.ke> To: "Alice Munyua" <alice(a)apc.org> Cc: "LORNA AYAKO" <lornaab(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:01 PM Subject: KICTANET Website > Hi Alice, > > Please follow this link to review the design of the KICTANET website. > Provide comments and feedback. May be we can also have member comments > at the meeting. > > http://www.kenet.or.ke/kictanet/ > > Regards, > Muthoni >

4 4

AfNOG Tutorials and Meetings
by Michuki Mwangi 11 May '06

11 May '06

<apologies for cross posting> Dear All, I wish to take this opportunity to invite you to the 7th AfNOG meetings and tutorials to be held on the 14th and 15th of May 2006 at the Pan-Afric Hotel. Highlights of the tutorials on 14th will be; * Discussions and presentations on MPLS enabled networks * Deployment of wireless networking case studies * Implementation of IPv6 for African ISP's * and BGP multi-homing technics. Highlights of the AfNOG meetings on the 15th will be; * Presentation by Randy Bush on Heroes and Heroins of the Internet revolution * Discussions on the recently identified Amplified Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attacks on Domain Name Systems * African Country updates. Please see a detailed program at the following URL http://www.afnog.org/afnog06agenda.pdf Regards -- Michuki Mwangi KENIC

1 0

marketing hemisphere
by Kenneth Gomez 11 May '06

11 May '06

1 0

FW: PO-MAC Nairobi Position Announcement deadline 12 June 2006
by alice＠apc.org 10 May '06

10 May '06

>>>This announcement (see below) is disseminated by OCPA on behalf of the >>>Ford Foundation. >>> >>>The Ford Foundation is seeking to fill the position of Program Officer in >>>Media, Arts and Culture, to be based at the Foundation s Office in >>>Nairobi, Kenya. >>> >>>For submissions and questions concerning this announcement, please >>>contact >>> >>>Emilie Mbom >>>Search Coordinator >>>The Ford Foundation >>>320 E. 43rd Street >>>New York, NY 10017 >>>v: 212-573-4972 >>>f: 212-351-3644 >>>email: e.mbom(a)fordfound.org >>> >>>---------- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>THE FORD FOUNDATION >>> >>>POSITION ANNOUNCEMENT >>> >>> >>> >>>Program Officer >>> >>>Media, Arts and Culture >>> >>>Eastern Africa >>> >>> >>> >>>SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: The Program Officer will be responsible for grant >>>making in media, arts and culture in the Foundation s Office in Eastern >>>Africa. The Program Officer will build on and develop programming >>>achievements in the portfolio s Building Sustainable Spaces for >>>Creativity and Culture initiative, while developing and strengthening >>>innovative interventions in an emergent media aspect of the work. The >>>successful candidate will be expected to carry forward a strong portfolio >>>of grants supporting high quality artistic production, creativity, policy >>>development and the promotion of viable institutions and players in the >>>creative arts, media and culture as means of focusing public reflection, >>>promoting civic engagement and addressing society s concerns. Grant >>>making will also be expected to build and strengthen linkages and >>>exchange programs among artistic, cultural and media organizations in the >>>region, across the continent and worldwide. The Program Officer is >>>expected to develop and maintain close working relationship with existing >>>and potential grantees, research and training institutions, leaders in >>>government and civil society. >>> >>> >>> >>>Working with the Representative in Nairobi and other Ford Foundation >>>staff, the Program Officer will develop grant making strategies; identify >>>prospective grantees; solicit, review and respond to grant proposals; >>>prepare recommendations for Foundation funding; and monitor and evaluate >>>progress. In addition to advancing the media, arts and culture agenda, >>>the Program Officer is expected to contribute to the office s overall >>>strategic direction for the region. The Program Officer will also >>>collaborate with colleagues in the Foundation s other offices to advance >>>a worldwide agenda around the Foundation s goals in the media, arts and >>>culture fields. >>> >>> >>> >>>QUALIFICATIONS: A degree in the arts, humanities, the design disciplines, >>>media or other related disciplines (preferably an advanced degree); >>>professional experience and leadership in the arts, culture and the >>>media; an understanding of program development and the ability to >>>conceptualize programmatic ideas and strategies; strong managerial, >>>organizational and interpersonal skills; excellent analytical and writing >>>skills in English; and strong facilitating skills. Experience in East >>>Africa or similar geographical location is highly desirable. Grant >>>making experience will be an advantage. >>> >>> >>> >>>Location: Nairobi, >>>Kenya Target Date: Fall >>>2006 >>> >>> >>> >>>Salary is based on experience and on the Foundation s commitment to >>>internal equity. A generous benefits package is provided. >>> >>> >>> >>>To apply for the position visit >>><http://www.fordfound.org/employment>www.fordfound.org/employment or send >>>full application materials (consisting of substantive cover letter, c.v., >>>and a 5-20 page sole-authored writing sample in English) to Ms. E. Mbom >>>at 320 E. 43rd St., New York, NY 10017, USA, by June 12, 2006. >>> >>> >>> >>>Equal employment opportunity and having a diverse staff are fundamental >>>principles at The Ford Foundation, where employment and promotional >>>opportunities are based upon individual capabilities and qualifications >>>without regard to race, color, religion, gender, pregnancy, sexual >>>orientation/affectional preference, age, national origin, marital status, >>>citizenship, disability, veteran status or any other protected >>>characteristic as established under law. >>> >>> >>>April >>>2006 >>> >

1 0

JOB OPPORTUNITIES
by Alfelt Abio 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi everyone, I am looking for young professionals to work in our Regional office in Rwanda from July 2006 and probably later come back to work in our Nairobi offices. Age: Not above 32 Years Educ: Bachelor Degree in Computer Science and 3 years of experience Profesional Exp: MCSE, MCP and MCT Will need an MVP at a later stage since we currently have one. Please contact me or direct candidates you know to me but would prefer email. Thanks. Alfelt M. Abio-Gunda Managing Director Electronic Company (E-tools) Kenya P.O. Box 39790-00623 Nairobi - Kenya Tel/Fax: +254-202700647 +254-202711718 Mbl: +254-733604740 +254-722510586 Website: http://www.e-tools.com --

2 1

Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] FW: Chaos Over EASSy Project
by alice＠apc.org 10 May '06

10 May '06

FYI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Suhayl ESMAILJEE" <suhayl(a)africaonline.com> To: "'Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants'" <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:14 AM Subject: [Fibre-for-africa] FW: Chaos Over EASSy Project > FYI.Things do not seem to be looking very good. > > > > Suhayl > > > > East Africa: Chaos Over <http://allafrica.com/stories/200605090379.html> > EASSy Project > > <http://allafrica.com/stories/200605090379.html> > http://allafrica.com/stories/200605090379.html > > > May 8, 2006 > Posted to the web May 9, 2006 > > Geoffrey Kamali - Kigali > > The NEPAD e-Africa Commission, a body mandated with the development of > a continental ICT infrastructure network, is taking a tough stance > over ownership of the proposed Eastern Africa undersea cable system > (EASSy). > > The Commission appears to be set on a clear collision course with the > consortium formed to promote the project, which prefers the 'Club' or > members-only ownership, against the Open Access, favored by the World > Bank. > > For months now, the US$240m project has been marred by controversy > over its ownership and financing, with consortium members openly > bickering against each other. > > NEPAD officials are critical of the 'Club' model, arguing that it is > discriminatory and in its form, the model has no incentive to bring > down the high telecom prices, seen as an obstacle to growth. > > Dr. Edmund Katiti, the policy advisor to the e-Africa Commission, told > the Africa ICT investment summit in Kigali last week that NEPAD > favours the Open Access model because it encourages collaboration and > regional integration. > > He said previous projects created under similar arrangements had > failed to yield the desired impact, resulting instead in stagnant high > telecommunications costs and promoting monopolies. > > He said such monopolies would drive small telecom operators out of > business in their own countries. > > Africa has the highest telecom prices despite a submarine cable system > running from Cape Town to West Africa. > > "They have led to the cost of international communications being too > expensive for the ordinary citizen and they don't provide level > playing field for newly licensed telecom co anies," Katiti argued. > > EASSy has generated heated arguments over its ownership and financing, > with the promoters seeking to finance the project and reap big profits > from non-member telecom operators, who also happen to be their > competitors. > > Last week, Kenya, the brain behind the project, threatened to go ahead > in the wake of the ownership controversy and finance the project > alone, citing delays since the project was mooted three years ago. > > "The cost of the meetings alone is half the cost of the project," Dr. > Ndemo Bitange, Kenya's information and communication permanent > secretary, was quoted as saying. > > A delegate at the summit, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the > frustration of the Kenyans is understandable. > > But Katiti said: "We wish the Kenyans good luck but we believe they > are an important player in this project. The NEPAD way is through > collaboration." > > "While some members feel the project has been delayed, others feel there > hasn't been enough consultation. That's the environment we have to endure. > > "There are a number of countries, companies and individuals in the region > who can single-handedly put aside $500m to put up a cable system. But > NEPAD > is not looking at who can finance the project at the quickest time, but > instead to integrate Africa through technology transfer," he added. > > Asked if NEPAD would run a parallel undersea cable, Dr. Katiti simply said > the project would continue as planned. "They should run a parallel cable > if > they want but ours will continue." > > > Under NEPAD's open access arrangement, the venture will be owned by > shareholders who comprise of licenced international gateway operators, > non-operator entities nominated by African states and interested > international operators outside the region. > > To ensure affordable equity subscription to the project, shareholders will > contribute at least $1m and the rest of the share capital will be acquired > through debt financing. > > Construction works on the project is expected to be complete by the end of > this year as all relevant studies, policy formulation and supply contracts > have been concluded. > > _____ > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by <http://www.africaonline.co.tz/> Africa Online > Tanzania, and is > believed to be clean. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Fibre-for-africa mailing list > Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >

1 0

RE: WALTER OTIENO
by Otieno, Simon 09 May '06

09 May '06

ATTENTION:Mr Waudo I came across your mail which was written almost one year ago on the above Subject. I am Walter's Brother, I am requesting if you could Assist me in ADVICE ONLY! Please you can reach me on 0720 766 906.. for further information. I will appreciate you your response Thanks Simon

1 0

fictional stocking cap
by Elmer Robbins 09 May '06

09 May '06

1 0

RE: [Kictanet] where is meeting for EASSY
by mwangati＠ns1.ispkenya.com 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hello Warigia, Did you find out where the EASSY meeting is being held today and at what time? We're interested in attending it. Best, Maureen M.A Original Message: ----------------- From: warigia bowman warigiabowman(a)hotmail.com Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 03:02:09 -0500 To: mwangati(a)measureafrica.org Subject: [Kictanet] where is meeting for EASSY Hello Brian please give us more info on the meeting on EASSY? Where is it and what do we need to do to attend? Yours, Rigia >Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:12 AM >Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre Optic > > >>I would urgently suggest that anybody who is interested in this subject >>and is in Nairobi on the 8th should attend the workshop that the Ministry >>has called. The PS is now in Djibouti and I expect that he will come back >>with some interesting suggestions. The workshop is intended to address >>all the issues required to establish multi- million Multimedia technology >>park and I believe that internet infrastructure is a key element. For >>those of you who saw the notice in the newspapers it was clear that >>investors, contractors, architects, development partners etc are being >>called to attend this event and chart the way forward. Unfortunately I >>will be out of the country at the time - otherwise I would have really >>wanted to participate. >> >>Regards, >> >>Brian >> >> >>On May 5, 2006, at 10:11 AM, <alice(a)apc.org> <alice(a)apc.org> wrote: >> >>>Well said Bill. >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Kagai" <billkagai(a)gmail.com> >>>To: <eric(a)afrispa.org>; "Private list for use by EASSY Workshop >>>Participants" <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> >>>Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:49 PM >>>Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre >>>Optic >>> >>> >>>I dont have authority to speak on this but as an interested party I can >>>say::: >>> >>>1. The dynamics of capitalism are at play and the demand for the cable >>>ultimately has to be met. For the local investors, we find the >>>Djibouti route cheaper and accessible. But I am also aware that other >>>interested parties are actually interested in laying the cable from >>>Mombasa to India...and talks are in progress. >>> >>>2. Raising money from the Stock Exchange will not be easy as some have >>>purported. Though we have had successes in the market, blue chip is >>>not yet fully embraced since the collapse of Africa Lakes??? Africa >>>Online. I know and have experienced that before Capital Markets >>>Authority allows you to transact in the market it takes minimum 3 >>>years of vetting. So raising money from the NSE is (IMHO) impossible >>>on the said time frame. >>> >>>3. Regardless of all the other unresolved problems, the ultimate >>>scenario for some of us if for Govt to take the lead though a SPV >>>worth USD 200 Million. We can then invest in the said vehicle which >>>will have Govt as a share holder with a certain stake. This will >>>probably be the best solution for interested entities and the money we >>>invest proratas to the shares we get. I think Ubuntunet Alliance is >>>also looking for a similar route. Then the SPV can assume legal >>>status, acquire all the necessary licenses from CCK, later go public >>>and we are on the move. >>> >>>Probably, if we were to form a consortia of this nature then we can >>>negotiate with Govt, get things done and we all smile to the bank. >>> >>>The other thing I know for sure is that the Kenya Govt is very >>>committed to PlanB of EASSy but they will require PPP to make it >>>happen. I prefer this direction rather than wait for E-Africa >>>Commission to be releasing info in bits and pieces to an extent where >>>the investors we represent cannot tangibly make a decision on EASSy. >>>-- >>>With Kind Regards, >>>Bildad Kagai >>>MD - Circuits & Packets Communications Ltd >>>Content & Training Partner - JKUAT E-Government Academy >>>Suite B2, Tetu Apartments, State House Avenue >>>P. O. Box 20311 - 00200 >>>Nairobi, Kenya >>>Tel. 254 20 2728332 >>>Fax. 254 20 2726965 >>>Cell. 254 722 379409 >>>URL. www.circuitspackets.co.ke >>>URL. egov.jkuat.ac.ke >>> >>> >>>On 5/4/06, Eric Osiakwan <eric(a)afrispa.org> wrote: >>> >>>>Question, is there a specfic reason why the cable is being build from >>>>Mombasa to Djibouti, Bill? >>>> >>>>On another note, am not sure of the argument that the EA and SA >>>>governments and people have waited too long for EASSy to happen so they >>>>are tired and considering alternate approaches. >>>> >>>>Since we have all become Open Acces believers on the basis that the >>>>"closed access" aka "club deal" has not the expected evidence in SAT3, >>>>the consenssus is to try an alternate approach. Hence the original plan >>>>for EASSy needs to change to an Open Access structure so lets be >>>>patient and work through the mechanism except if we have given up >>>>already and want to do EASSy the SAT3 way, God forbid.... >>>> >>>>Eric here >>>> >>>> >>>>---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >>>>From: brian(a)pure-id.com >>>>Reply-To: Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants >>>><fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> >>>>Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:17:50 -0500 >>>> >>>> > >>>> >Actually I wouldn't be that hasty in thinking that this is an >>>>entirely >bad >>>> >thing. It seems that the government has gotten tired of waiting >>>>for the >>>> >operators to get their act together and mobilise EASSY (they have >>>>now >pushed >>>> >the completion date to 2008). >>>> > >>>> >So what the KE govt has decided to do is try and commission a cable >>>> >running from >>>> >Djibouti to Mombasa. To try and fast track the country's >>>>"connectedness". >A >>>> >potential spinoff is that this could potentially save EASSY the >>>> >construction of >>>> >that portion. >>>> > >>>> >It seems that we are not the only ones who are feeling frustrated >>>>at how >>>> >difficult EASSY seems to be getting.... >>>> > >>>> >Regards, >>>> > >>>> >Brian >>>> > >>>> >Quoting Badru Ntege <ntegeb(a)one2net.co.ug>: >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> The announcement by the Kenyan Government to go it alone >>>> >>> on the proposed optic fibre already presents a sharky >>>> >>> start and uncertain maturation of the ESSY project which has >>>> >>> significant impact on bth the the profile and expecations >>>> >>> within the consortium. >>>> >> >>>> >> It's a pitty though not too surprised. This is indicative of >>>>the >> typical >>>> >> African short sightedness where a few government technocrats >>>>hide their >>>> >> limited knowledge on simple issues behind the vail of national >> >>>>security. >>>> >> >>>> >> So when some of us who have been knocking our heads against >>>>stalwarts >> like >>>> >> these don't seem to excited by Eassy you can understand. As >>>>long as >>>> >> governments are anywhere near the deal, it has a 40% chance of >>>>success. >>>> >> >>>> >> Sorry to our kenyan brothers and sisters, there goes your tax >>>>money in >> a >>>> >> black hole. I predict that if they proceed, the project will >>>>be >> reviewed >>>> >> under a special comission of inquiry a few years later which >>>>will >> conclude >>>> >> that the funds were mismanaged, find one or two scapegoats who >>>>will >> still >>>> >> gate away with it. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>> >> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>> >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for- >>>>africa >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >_______________________________________________ >>>> >Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>> >Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>> >http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>>> > >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Eric M.K Osiakwan >>>>Executive Secretary >>>>AfrISPA (www.afrispa.org) >>>>Tel: + 233.21.258800 >>>>Fax: + 233.21.258811 >>>>Cell: + 233.244.386792 >>>>Handle: eosiakwan >>>>Snail Mail: Pmb 208, Accra-North >>>>Office: BusyInternet - 42 Ring Road Central, Accra-North >>>>Blog: http://afrispa.skybuilders.com/users/Eric/blog.html >>>>Slang: "Tomorrow Now" >>>>-- >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>>Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>>> >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>>Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa > > >_______________________________________________ >kictanet mailing list >kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke >http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > >Please unsubscribe or change your options at >http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/warigiabowman%40hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Please unsubscribe or change your options at http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangati%40measureafrica.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

1 0

Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre Optic
by alice＠apc.org 06 May '06

06 May '06

For those interested in EASSy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Longwe" <brian(a)pure-id.com> To: "Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants" <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre Optic >I would urgently suggest that anybody who is interested in this subject >and is in Nairobi on the 8th should attend the workshop that the Ministry >has called. The PS is now in Djibouti and I expect that he will come back >with some interesting suggestions. The workshop is intended to address all >the issues required to establish multi- million Multimedia technology park >and I believe that internet infrastructure is a key element. For those of >you who saw the notice in the newspapers it was clear that investors, >contractors, architects, development partners etc are being called to >attend this event and chart the way forward. Unfortunately I will be out >of the country at the time - otherwise I would have really wanted to >participate. > > Regards, > > Brian > > > On May 5, 2006, at 10:11 AM, <alice(a)apc.org> <alice(a)apc.org> wrote: > >> Well said Bill. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Kagai" <billkagai(a)gmail.com> >> To: <eric(a)afrispa.org>; "Private list for use by EASSY Workshop >> Participants" <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> >> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:49 PM >> Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya to Build Kshs 15 Billion Fibre >> Optic >> >> >> I dont have authority to speak on this but as an interested party I can >> say::: >> >> 1. The dynamics of capitalism are at play and the demand for the cable >> ultimately has to be met. For the local investors, we find the >> Djibouti route cheaper and accessible. But I am also aware that other >> interested parties are actually interested in laying the cable from >> Mombasa to India...and talks are in progress. >> >> 2. Raising money from the Stock Exchange will not be easy as some have >> purported. Though we have had successes in the market, blue chip is >> not yet fully embraced since the collapse of Africa Lakes??? Africa >> Online. I know and have experienced that before Capital Markets >> Authority allows you to transact in the market it takes minimum 3 >> years of vetting. So raising money from the NSE is (IMHO) impossible >> on the said time frame. >> >> 3. Regardless of all the other unresolved problems, the ultimate >> scenario for some of us if for Govt to take the lead though a SPV >> worth USD 200 Million. We can then invest in the said vehicle which >> will have Govt as a share holder with a certain stake. This will >> probably be the best solution for interested entities and the money we >> invest proratas to the shares we get. I think Ubuntunet Alliance is >> also looking for a similar route. Then the SPV can assume legal >> status, acquire all the necessary licenses from CCK, later go public >> and we are on the move. >> >> Probably, if we were to form a consortia of this nature then we can >> negotiate with Govt, get things done and we all smile to the bank. >> >> The other thing I know for sure is that the Kenya Govt is very >> committed to PlanB of EASSy but they will require PPP to make it >> happen. I prefer this direction rather than wait for E-Africa >> Commission to be releasing info in bits and pieces to an extent where >> the investors we represent cannot tangibly make a decision on EASSy. >> -- >> With Kind Regards, >> Bildad Kagai >> MD - Circuits & Packets Communications Ltd >> Content & Training Partner - JKUAT E-Government Academy >> Suite B2, Tetu Apartments, State House Avenue >> P. O. Box 20311 - 00200 >> Nairobi, Kenya >> Tel. 254 20 2728332 >> Fax. 254 20 2726965 >> Cell. 254 722 379409 >> URL. www.circuitspackets.co.ke >> URL. egov.jkuat.ac.ke >> >> >> On 5/4/06, Eric Osiakwan <eric(a)afrispa.org> wrote: >> >>> Question, is there a specfic reason why the cable is being build from >>> Mombasa to Djibouti, Bill? >>> >>> On another note, am not sure of the argument that the EA and SA >>> governments and people have waited too long for EASSy to happen so they >>> are tired and considering alternate approaches. >>> >>> Since we have all become Open Acces believers on the basis that the >>> "closed access" aka "club deal" has not the expected evidence in SAT3, >>> the consenssus is to try an alternate approach. Hence the original plan >>> for EASSy needs to change to an Open Access structure so lets be >>> patient and work through the mechanism except if we have given up >>> already and want to do EASSy the SAT3 way, God forbid.... >>> >>> Eric here >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >>> From: brian(a)pure-id.com >>> Reply-To: Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants >>> <fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org> >>> Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:17:50 -0500 >>> >>> > >>> >Actually I wouldn't be that hasty in thinking that this is an >>> entirely >bad >>> >thing. It seems that the government has gotten tired of waiting >>> for the >>> >operators to get their act together and mobilise EASSY (they have >>> now >pushed >>> >the completion date to 2008). >>> > >>> >So what the KE govt has decided to do is try and commission a cable >>> >running from >>> >Djibouti to Mombasa. To try and fast track the country's >>> "connectedness". >A >>> >potential spinoff is that this could potentially save EASSY the >>> >construction of >>> >that portion. >>> > >>> >It seems that we are not the only ones who are feeling frustrated >>> at how >>> >difficult EASSY seems to be getting.... >>> > >>> >Regards, >>> > >>> >Brian >>> > >>> >Quoting Badru Ntege <ntegeb(a)one2net.co.ug>: >>> > >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> The announcement by the Kenyan Government to go it alone >>> >>> on the proposed optic fibre already presents a sharky >>> >>> start and uncertain maturation of the ESSY project which has >>> >>> significant impact on bth the the profile and expecations >>> >>> within the consortium. >>> >> >>> >> It's a pitty though not too surprised. This is indicative of >>> the >> typical >>> >> African short sightedness where a few government technocrats >>> hide their >>> >> limited knowledge on simple issues behind the vail of national >>> >> security. >>> >> >>> >> So when some of us who have been knocking our heads against >>> stalwarts >> like >>> >> these don't seem to excited by Eassy you can understand. As >>> long as >>> >> governments are anywhere near the deal, it has a 40% chance of >>> success. >>> >> >>> >> Sorry to our kenyan brothers and sisters, there goes your tax >>> money in >> a >>> >> black hole. I predict that if they proceed, the project will >>> be >> reviewed >>> >> under a special comission of inquiry a few years later which >>> will >> conclude >>> >> that the funds were mismanaged, find one or two scapegoats who >>> will >> still >>> >> gate away with it. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>> >> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>> >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for- >>> africa >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >_______________________________________________ >>> >Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>> >Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>> >http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Eric M.K Osiakwan >>> Executive Secretary >>> AfrISPA (www.afrispa.org) >>> Tel: + 233.21.258800 >>> Fax: + 233.21.258811 >>> Cell: + 233.244.386792 >>> Handle: eosiakwan >>> Snail Mail: Pmb 208, Accra-North >>> Office: BusyInternet - 42 Ring Road Central, Accra-North >>> Blog: http://afrispa.skybuilders.com/users/Eric/blog.html >>> Slang: "Tomorrow Now" >>> -- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >>> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >> _______________________________________________ >> Fibre-for-africa mailing list >> Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fibre-for-africa mailing list > Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa

2 1

E-Mail Address
by chelimo kenneth 06 May '06

06 May '06

Thank you for subscribing me to Kictanet mailing list. I anticipate constructive issues from this arrangement. Thanks. Ken Chelimo --------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.

2 1

Fw: Fw: Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story
by alice＠apc.org 05 May '06

05 May '06

Dear all FYI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Abiodun Jagun" <abi(a)apc.org> To: <wcurrie(a)apc.org> Cc: <alice(a)apc.org> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:11 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story > Dear Alice and Willie: > > I have been trying to follow the discussion on the proposed "Kenya cable" > on the fibreforafrica list, whilst at the same time reviewing the detailed > feasibility study (DSF) that was submitted by Axion to the EASSy > consortium. Bill Woodcock makes an important point about the type of > "model" that will be adopted ... from my readings, the decision that is > made concerning this will determine the interpretation of "openness" that > will be adopted by the new cable. > > It is therefore important to re-think fundamental conceptions about the > way submarine cable projects are structured or risk making the same > "closed" decisions irrespective of who the players are! > > I shall try to explain this using EASSy as and the DSF submitted to the > consortium as an example. I've come across three different > models/structures that have to be decided upon in constructing a submarine > cable: [i]ownership structure, [ii] financial structure, and [iii] > governance structure. They are of course interrelated and adopting a > certain type of ownership structure has an impact on the range of > available options for the other types of structure. > >>From reading the DSF (dated May 2005) I got the distinct impression that > Axion recommended the Consortium model to EASSy. For example the report > states: > > "The Consortium model is seen as successful as soon (as) it gets to the > financial closing of the project. In case system capacity is poorly used > or capacity usage principles are incorrectly designed, it only impacts the > individual business plan of each Consortium member. The long-term > economical viability of projects built under a Consortium umbrella is > never at risk." (Axiom, 2005:41) > > An alternate model (involving the setting up of a Special Purpose Cable > Company - SPCC or Special Purpose Vehicle - SPV) is also recommended where > the Consortium members cannot raise the finance required for the project. > > The DSF gives a detailed description of what (in its own interpretation) > constitutes a Consortium. I have tried to summarise these below: > > 1. Comprised exclusively of International Telecom Entities (or ITEs) > 2. Each member of the consortium commits to [i] an upfront capital cost > representing its investment share in the system, and [ii] an operational > and maintenance cost share of the system over its life-span. > 3. Each member of the consortium carries out a business plan and business > model to support its investment decision > 4. Each member obtains its own source of finance either from its own > management or from the debt market > 5. **There is no relevant business plan/model relating to the whole > system** > 6. Core group of ITEs (also referred to as "MOU parties") together develop > the configuration of the cable system, agree on funding rules to cover > capital and costs, and also agree on how capacity will be allocated > 7. Additional members can join the core group on condition that [i] "it > makes sense for the initial core group to include them (e.g. increased > business opportunities, limited risk of competition, etc.) and [ii] they > as a minimum cover any additional configuration costs that may be > incurred" > 8. The consortium membership is closed when [i] agreement is reached on > the configuration of the cable system, [ii] agreement is reached on the > principles guiding the sharing of ownership, and [iii] financing is > completed > 9. **Investment shares committed by all consortium members is 100% of the > capital cost of the system** > 10. (As a result of 9) The capacity pricing scheme is NOT derived from the > Design (technical) Capacity but from the Notional (expected sales) > Capacity - which is computed from traffic forecasts and market share > calculations > 11. The small print: Encourages people to plan their capacity needs in > terms of market shares and NOT traffic forecasts > 13. Provides opportunity for ITEs who are not members of the consortium to > purchase or lease capacity after its financial closure BUT the consortium > then determines the price at which this capacity is sold > 14. **The proceeds from these additional sales are distributed among > consortium members AFTER the close of finances for the project. Thus cash > is not the issue and such sales of capacity are often hampered by members' > desire to protect their business plans and returns** > 15. Other funding opportunities may arise when traffic requires for the > upgrading of the initial system configuration (at marginal cost) - such > new opportunities are however limited to consortium members. Pricing of > 'new' capacity needs to take into account the initial platform that is now > subject to depreciation and the new 'to be lit' part(s) > > I emphasised points 5, 9 and 14. Point 5 implies that the "big picture" - > that is the global view of the EASSy cable as a whole is secondary to > "local" (i.e. National) concerns. Combined with points 9 and 14 it is easy > to understand why (as Steve Song indicated in one of his posts on the > fiberforafrica list) openness to the Consortium is defined in terms of > owning a part of the cable and not in terms of affordable and fair access. > What I'm trying to emphasise is that THE CONSORTIUM MODEL REINFORCES > MONOPOLISTIC BEHAVIOUR ... because Consortiums close when ITEs have raised > the required capital, cash from selling capacity is usually NOT the MAIN > objective. > > This is why it is important that organisations like KICTANet begin to get > involved at the very early stages of the "Kenya cable" to influence the > ownership/financial/governance model that is adopted. > > I am currently reading up on other models as the coverage in the DSF of > alternatives to the Consortium model is quite poor. The DSF mentions the > following: > > Carrier's Carrier Model > 1. Submarine telecom cable is fully funded by SPV > 2. SPV shareholders not considered as ITEs and as such are not regarded as > competitors to ITEs. SPV therefore considered to be 'independent' and > 'market-neutral'[2] > 3. **Profit from capacity sales is primary objective of the SPV** > > Mini-Consortium Model > 1. Described as a modern form of the non-profit cable company (NPCC) model > 2. Limited number of ITEs come together under a SPV arrangement > 3. Members ". address all the capacity market and do not exclude anymore > to make (reasonable?) profit out of the sale of capacity." Under NPCC > model capacity is sold to all parties (as IRUs - Indefeasible Rights of > Use) > 4. With NPCC model, the ITEs of the landing countries (referred to as > Terminal Parties - TPs) provided financial guarantees to the NPCC > shareholders which makes it easier for members of this model to access > financial markets > 5. (Due to guarantees provided by founding ITEs?) Model is not considered > to be 'market-neutral' > 6. **Primary objectives of consortium members are (i) early disposal of > capacity and (ii) generation of enough proceeds from capacity sales to > fulfill SPV financial obligations** > > Hybrid Model > 1. Equity is provided by ITEs, non ITEs, and/or finance players > 2. Clear financial benefits at the start of the project and during the > construction of the cable, but this model requires careful balance between > constituent parties for the rest of the life of the project/cable. > 3. **"The shareholder agreement shall be drafted in a subtle way to ensure > that both equity providers will remain tied to each other, i.e. equally > interested in marketing the system to other ITEs (potentially competing > with the funding ITEs) and boosting the proceeds from any further capacity > sales."** > > > > -- > Abiodun Jagun > APC, Africa ICT Policy Researcher > > > > > >> Gosh, Alice, this really needs thinking about! >> >> I certainly think it's an interesting development and raises similar >> questions as the EASSy issue in terms of open access. >> >> If the Kenya cable is simply handed over to Telcom Kenya to exploit the >> ISps and mobile companies - continuing the practice of fixed line >> monopolies leveraging the value of international bandwidth - there will >> be >> a problem, i.e. that there is little point in having the Kenya cable in >> terms of really making a difference to the economy. The emphasis has to >> be >> on creating an enabling environment for maximising the value of the ICT >> sector as well as benefiting the economy by radically cutting the cost of >> bandwidth. It may be worth specifying the price at which it would make a >> difference as in Richard Bell's paper on the fibre list - US$200-300 per >> meg per second per month, I think. >> >> So I would think it useful for KICTANet to engage in constructive >> discussions with the Minister/PS on these issues. I certainly think you >> should not condemn the government for this initiative - rather try to >> explore the economic and regulatory issues with them as well as how the >> EASSy cable would fit in (or not) with this proposal. The question of >> raising capital from the stock exchange should also be explored - there >> was talk at the Mombasa EASSy workshop of raising bonds as one form of >> finance. There is also the issue raised by Abi Jagun, who is now working >> for APC as Africa ICT Policy Researcher, on the fibreforafrica list about >> distinguishing between investment and operations with regard to EASSy >> which could as well apply here. Please discuss this further with her. >> The question of the landlocked countries should also be raised. >> >> It may also be that this adds to the pressure around EASSy Consortium >> eAfrica Commission to deliver which may or may not be a bad thing, I'm >> not >> sure. I certainly think that competition in cable delivery may be a good >> thing... >> >> Let's try and have an online chat about it as well as how things are >> going >> with you. >> >> Warm regards >> Willie >> >> >>> What are your thoughts on this new development re; EASSy Kenya? >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Bill Woodcock" <woody(a)pch.net> >>> To: "KIPlist" <kiplist-cl(a)lyris.idrc.ca> >>> Cc: <kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke> >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 9:44 PM >>> Subject: Re: Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, 3 May 2006, John Walubengo wrote: >>>> > i) What happens to the Kenyan (TKL) investment sunk into the >>>> EASSy >>>> project? >>>> >>>> Wasn't the Permanent Secretary's answer that it had been spent on >>>> meetings? :-) >>>> >>>> > ii) What model (management/ownership) is/will be applied to the >>>> new >>>> project (if similar to EASSy then we r back to square one) >>>> >>>> Yes, that seems like the principal danger here: the possibility that it >>>> will be built but monopolized, and you'll just enter a new and >>>> different >>>> era of stagnation, like many of the west African countries on SAT3... >>>> With expensive fiber which hasn't made a difference because it's still >>>> monopoly-controlled and priced prohibitively. >>>> >>>> I think I and others would be happy to write letters stating that >>>> danger, >>>> if they'd do any good. That might be naive, I don't know. >>>> >>>> -Bill >>>> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Submitted by: woody(a)pch.net 2006-05-03 14:54:21 EDT4 >>>> (Please reply to original submitter for private communication) >>>> --- >>>> You are currently subscribed to kiplist-cl as: [alice(a)apc.org] >>>> To unsubscribe, forward this message to >>>> leave-kiplist-cl-100946B(a)lyris.idrc.ca >>> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Abiodun Jagun > APC, Africa ICT Policy Researcher > >

1 0

RE: [Kictanet] Media Breakfast to Review ICT bill Postponed
by mwangati＠ns1.ispkenya.com 05 May '06

05 May '06

Good morning Alice, Thanks for your email concerning the meeting cancellation. It has however come rather late as I checked my emails at 7:15pm yesterdy evening and your message had not come through by then. Being that this was a breakfast meeting, we had to leave Karen early to get to Westlands on time for the meeting at 7:45am. I could not therefore check my email at the office early this morning. In future would you please try and ensure that all Kicktanet members are alerted on time, either by SMS or phone call so all get the message within good time so as to avoid this kind of inconvenience in future? Thanks and kind regards, Maureen Original Message: ----------------- From: alice(a)apc.org Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:03:26 +0300 To: jkimiti01(a)yahoo.co.uk, mwangati(a)measureafrica.org Subject: [Kictanet] Media Breakfast to Review ICT bill Postponed Dear Colleagues, Due to the unavailability of the PS Information and Communication, Dr. Bitange Demo, the Kenya ICT Action Network has postponed the media breakfast meeting, which was scheduled for May 5th 2006. We shall communicate the new dates soon. beThanks st regards alice _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Please unsubscribe or change your options at http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangati%40measureafrica.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

2 1

The Research Competition on Knowledge Systems
by alice＠apc.org 05 May '06

05 May '06

Colleagues, <Please circulate> This research competition is being organized by IDRC as part of the <http://www.idrc.ca/roks>Research on Knowledge Systems (RoKS) exploration under the newly established "<http://www.idrc.ca/ips>Innovation, Policy and Science" Program Area, which supports the development of science, technology and innovation policies to alleviate poverty in developing countries. This competition will support research to better understand the changing roles of universities in the South, and the implications for developing country governments and research institutions. The Research Competition The overall objective of this competition is to develop an ongoing "knowledge network" that can advance collective understanding of the "Changing Role of Universities in the South." To build enduring partnerships, grantees will interact with each other and with <http://developinguniversities.blogsome.com/>UniDev throughout the research process. The research competition includes three different competitions (Regional, National, Graduate) and is open to researchers and research institutions throughout the developing world. Some recent thinking on the changing role of Southern universities is available on the <http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-94518-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html>RoKS website and should be consulted when developing proposals. Objectives and Research Themes This competition invites research proposals that address the following questions: * What are the new forms of universities in the South, what is driving this change, and what does this change mean for universities in the South? * How should the role and impact of university research in the South be in order to meet its development potential? * How should entrepreneurship and academic research functions be linked? The deadline for concept note submission is June 16, 2006 (5:00pm EST) for Regional and National Awards. Deadline for Graduate Awards' applications is September 1, 2006. Submissions received after that date, or which are incomplete, will not be eligible for consideration. Concept notes that are qualified through a peer review process will be asked to submit full proposals. Information regarding the status of your application, other than our confirmation of its receipt, will not be available. For more information and to download a complete concept note application kit, please click on: http://www.idrc.ca/roks/ev-94514-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html or contact roks(a)idrc.ca. IDRC is committed to equity and encourages applications from qualified women, men, visible minorities, aboriginal peoples and persons with disabilities. We thank all applicants for their interest and will ONLY contact those teams whose background, quality & feasibility best match the criteria of the award.

1 0

Fw: [wsisyouthkenya] NetCorps Kenya is seeking an Intern Coach
by Wainaina Mungai 04 May '06

04 May '06

> -------Original Message------- > > From: Joseph Maruti <mmaruti(a)hotmail.com> > > Sent: 04 May '06 14:24 > > > > NetCorps Kenya, Digital Opportunity Trust's Global NetCorps program in > > Kenya, is seeking to IMMEDIATELY fill the positions of Intern Coach and > > Gender Specialist Consultant. > > > > > > Those interested in either of these positions should forward their > > application letter and resumes (CV)s for consideration to: > > > > > > Joseph Maruti > > > > Country Director > > > > > > NetCorps Kenya > > > > P O Box 21428, Nairobi 00505 > > > > > > email: [LINK: mailto:[email protected]] > > jmaruti(a)globalnetcorps.org > > > > > > In your application letter please specify which of these positions you > > wish to be considered. > > > > > > Kind Regards > > > > Maruti

1 0

Knowledge Sharing in African Agricultural Research - session in Nairobi
by alice＠apc.org 04 May '06

04 May '06

Dear members Some of you might want to attend this workshop -------------------------------------------------------------- Dear all, Please allow me to forward this invitation to a one-day workshop on Knowledge Sharing in Research at the IAALD (International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists) conference in Nairobi on May, 22. Simone Simone Staiger-Rivas Communications Unit Webpublishing Knowledge Sharing - InforCom Project (Information and Communications for Rural Communities ) CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical) E-mail: s.staiger(a)cgiar.org CIAT Web site: www.ciat.cgiar.org <http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/> InforCom Web site: www.ciat.cgiar.org/inforcom Knowledge Sharing Web site: http://www.ks-cgiar.org <http://www.ks-cgiar.org/> "With support from CTA, IAALD members and partners in Africa are organising a conference from 21 to 26 May, 2006 in Nairobi, Kenya. The meeting will look at five broad themes: Building capacity in agricultural information resources management; Enabling policy for agricultural information management; Narrowing the digital divide; Knowledge sharing and information systems for networking and partnerships; Meeting the information needs of stakeholders. Information on how to participate, contribute, or sponsor the event is available on the <http://www.asareca.org/iaald-africa/> conference web site." http://www.asareca.org/iaald-africa/ <http://www.iaald.org/> IAALD Logo ICT-KM Program Knowledge Sharing in Agricultural Research A workshop at the First IAALD Africa Chapter Conference in Nairobi Are you looking for better ways to build collegial relationships that are essential for creative collaboration in agricultural research for development? Would you like to explore knowledge sharing techniques currently in use and of potential use in African agricultural research? Would you like to know how you can optimize participation in collaborative processes in important aspects of your organization's life and work? If so, then join us for an interactive knowledge sharing event, including a fair, a "chat show", and a world café session. We would like to share with you how initiatives of the CGIAR ICT-KM Program tackle the issue of creative collaboration in agricultural research for development. You will also help shape future plans of the CGIAR ICT-KM Program for expanding and strengthening knowledge management and sharing within the CGIAR and its partnerships. Come and take part in the CGIAR's new knowledge sharing culture. Monday, 22 May 2006, 10:00am to 5:00pm, in the Le Chateau Room Hotel Intercontinental, Nairobi Seats are limited, so register early to avoid disappointment by sending an e-mail to <mailto:[email protected]> ictkm(a)cgiar.org --- You are currently subscribed to km4dev-l as: dhalaby(a)gdnet.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-km4dev-l-369565F(a)dgroups.org Please note that hitting the Reply button will send a message to the entire list. The KM4Dev mailing list is a public forum, and our mailing list archives are publicly available on the website. Check out the KM4dev website: http://www.km4dev.org --- You are currently subscribed to km4dev-l as: dhalaby(a)gdnet.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-km4dev-l-369565F(a)dgroups.org Please note that hitting the Reply button will send a message to the entire list. The KM4Dev mailing list is a public forum, and our mailing list archives are publicly available on the website. Check out the KM4dev website: http://www.km4dev.org

1 0

Media Breakfast to Review ICT bill Postponed
by alice＠apc.org 04 May '06

04 May '06

Dear Colleagues, Due to the unavailability of the PS Information and Communication, Dr. Bitange Demo, the Kenya ICT Action Network has postponed the media breakfast meeting, which was scheduled for May 5th 2006. We shall communicate the new dates soon. best regards alice

1 0

Re: Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story
by John Walubengo 03 May '06

03 May '06

good move for Kenya (going it alone?). But this does raise even more questions than answers e.g. i) What happens to the Kenyan (TKL) investment sunk into the EASSy project? ii) What model (management/ownership) is/will be applied to the new project (if similar to EASSy then we r back to square one) iii) Could we have documented reasons for abandoning EASSy? (lessons learnt). iv) etc, walu. >>> <alice(a)apc.org> 05/03/06 10:26am >>> http://www.nationmedia.com/dailynation/nmgcontententry.asp?premiumid=0&cate… Kenya to build Sh15bn fibre optic cable link Story by JEFF OTIENO Publication Date: 5/3/2006 Kenya has decided to go it alone in the construction of a Sh15 billion fibre optic undersea sea cable system connecting it to the rest of the world. Fibre optic cables are hair-thin glass fibre for the transmission of data in the form of light. According to the Government, the envisaged Eastern Africa Submarine System (EASSy) cable project driven by 15 telecommunications firms from 13 Eastern Africa countries was taking too long. EASSy was aimed at establishing an undersea cable system connecting Mtunzini, located just north of Durban, in South Africa to Port Sudan, in Sudan a distance of about 9,900 km Information and Communication permanent secretary, Bitange Ndemo, said Kenya would begin would begin discussions with Djibouti, one the countries involved in the construction of the cable network. It is believed that a link to Djibouti will connect Kenya to the rest of the world. Apart from Kenya and Djibouti, other countries involved in the project are South Africa, Sudan, Mozambique, Madagascar, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Malawi, Botswana, Ethiopia and Somalia. Dr Ndemo lamented that three-years since the project was envisaged nothing had been done apart from the holding of numerous meetings. "The costs of the meetings is almost half the total cost of the project," he added. Dr Ndemo spoke at an East African Regulatory, Posts and Telecommunications organisation meeting held in Nairobi yesterday. The PS said Kenya needed the cable more than any other country saying many foreign companies had expressed interest to invest in the country but were holding back due to connectivity problems. He, however, denied that the decision would put Kenya on collision course with other ESSAy members adding that one had to take the lead. "Somebody has to take control and start the project or else we will not get anywhere," he added. The fibre optic cable would be used to connect Nairobi and Mombasa to open up employment opportunities to thousands of youths in ICT. The money, the PS said would be raised using the Nairobi Stock Exchange where the public would buy shares. A meeting involving players in the industry has already been organised to deliberate of raising funds and will be attended by among others Kenya Data Networks, Celtel and Telkom Kenya. "The cable should be ready by next year to enable the country benefit from the technology," Dr Ndemo said. _______________________________________________ Fibre-for-africa mailing list Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa --- Submitted by: alice(a)apc.org 2006-05-03 03:36:24 EDT4 (Please reply to original submitter for private communication) --- You are currently subscribed to kiplist-cl as: [jwalubengo(a)kcct.ac.ke] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-kiplist-cl-102682Q(a)lyris.idrc.ca

1 0

Fw: [Fibre-for-africa] Kenya and its Own Cable..Full Story
by alice＠apc.org 03 May '06

03 May '06

http://www.nationmedia.com/dailynation/nmgcontententry.asp?premiumid=0&cate… Kenya to build Sh15bn fibre optic cable link Story by JEFF OTIENO Publication Date: 5/3/2006 Kenya has decided to go it alone in the construction of a Sh15 billion fibre optic undersea sea cable system connecting it to the rest of the world. Fibre optic cables are hair-thin glass fibre for the transmission of data in the form of light. According to the Government, the envisaged Eastern Africa Submarine System (EASSy) cable project driven by 15 telecommunications firms from 13 Eastern Africa countries was taking too long. EASSy was aimed at establishing an undersea cable system connecting Mtunzini, located just north of Durban, in South Africa to Port Sudan, in Sudan a distance of about 9,900 km Information and Communication permanent secretary, Bitange Ndemo, said Kenya would begin would begin discussions with Djibouti, one the countries involved in the construction of the cable network. It is believed that a link to Djibouti will connect Kenya to the rest of the world. Apart from Kenya and Djibouti, other countries involved in the project are South Africa, Sudan, Mozambique, Madagascar, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Malawi, Botswana, Ethiopia and Somalia. Dr Ndemo lamented that three-years since the project was envisaged nothing had been done apart from the holding of numerous meetings. "The costs of the meetings is almost half the total cost of the project," he added. Dr Ndemo spoke at an East African Regulatory, Posts and Telecommunications organisation meeting held in Nairobi yesterday. The PS said Kenya needed the cable more than any other country saying many foreign companies had expressed interest to invest in the country but were holding back due to connectivity problems. He, however, denied that the decision would put Kenya on collision course with other ESSAy members adding that one had to take the lead. "Somebody has to take control and start the project or else we will not get anywhere," he added. The fibre optic cable would be used to connect Nairobi and Mombasa to open up employment opportunities to thousands of youths in ICT. The money, the PS said would be raised using the Nairobi Stock Exchange where the public would buy shares. A meeting involving players in the industry has already been organised to deliberate of raising funds and will be attended by among others Kenya Data Networks, Celtel and Telkom Kenya. "The cable should be ready by next year to enable the country benefit from the technology," Dr Ndemo said. _______________________________________________ Fibre-for-africa mailing list Fibre-for-africa(a)lists.apc.org http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa

1 0

Re: Invitation to a Breakfast Meeting to discuss the Kenya Information Communication Bill.
by alice＠apc.org 03 May '06

03 May '06

Dear Colleagues, The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) invites you to a breakfast meeting on Friday 5 May 2006 from 7:30 to 10:00am to discuss the broadcasting and media sections on the Information Communication Bill 2006 at the Jacaranda Hotel, Gazebo Banda. The Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Information and Communication, Dr Bitange Ndemo will be chairing the meeting. The Ministry of Information and Communications finalized the ICT Policy early this year and Cabinet approved it. Subsequently, KICTANet has established a team to facilitate a comprehensive review of the draft ICT bill to make substantial recommendations for those who will finalize it. The key issues to be addressed include context, construction and implementation of the bill. Media groups are critical to this process and KICTANet would like to ensure that they contribute to this review process. To RSVP please contact Judy Kimiti on Cell phone number 0722-716020 or email jkimiti(a)email.kictanet.or.ke before 04 May 2006 Thank You -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDA: Breakfast Meeting to discuss the Kenya Information Communication Bill. 7: 30 Breakfast 7: 45 Remarks on the purpose 7: 50 Remarks by the P.S Dr. Bitange Ndemo of Information and Communication 8: 00 Presentation by KICTANet Review Team 9: 00 Comments from Media Owners 9:45 Closure

1 0

Minutes from meeting April 27th
by warigia bowman 02 May '06

02 May '06

Here are my notes from this months meeting. Warigia _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

1 0