- KICTANet - KICTANet

Re: [kictanet] " Houston : We have a problem... "
by aki 12 Dec '08

12 Dec '08

Thats right, we do and I speak for data. > > My sincere apology for the cross posting and am just sharing my > experience that the situation on network quality in our country is getting > out of hand. I cannot expect telco CEOs / MDs like the Mr Joseph, > Mr Saint-Jean or Mr Murray or even from any Network Operators etc to roll up > their sleeves and go down to their respective Network Centres or Operations > and reboot caching servers or load balancers! > > Network management of data services has reached a point where I'm forced to > use strong words that either most of kenyan networks are run by people who > do not undestand them or that there are no quality of service systems in > place. This is scary given that we hope to provide at least some tiered > services to a potential audience in the near future. Most technology > equipment is useless and awaits data entry from skilled operator to turn > devices into anything meaningful. Are the skilled personell or systems doing > their jobs? I'd highly recommend to the management of network companies to > re-evaluate their technologies or even staff and put in place systems that > allow for real time analysis of their systems and performances. Even a 1% > packet loss in a modern network is totally unacceptable. Local loop > latenices must be maintained within 50-200ms and not the 1000-2000ms seen. > Just one simple question : If it was done right the first time then why keep > tinkering with it?! > > Even if we received some out of the world super submarine fiber, the whole > process is useless if we cannot maintain/run internal networks to > international standards. Which leads to a further question : how stable is > the fiber between Mombasa, Nairobi to kisumu? We need some serious thoughts > on quality by respective players in the industry so that in future marketing > as say eg a telecom hub, some investor somewhere does not ask an insulting > question : how reliable are your networks? > > Asante and Happy Jamhuri Day. > > > > > > > >

1 0

Re: [kictanet] IGF 2008 Highlights - Day 4
by mwende njiraini 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

*Day 4: 6th December 2008* *Theme: Emerging Issues* * * *09:00 - 10:30 Workshop 84: The role and mandate of the IGF* * * *Main success of IGF* - Success of multi-stakeholder forum that provides a informal and flexible structure for engagement. - Regional and national meetings such as the Kenya IGF, UK IGF and EAIGF are creating more opportunities for exchange of information, focus on development and issues in the governance realm. These meetings should be fostered. - Capacity building at an individual and national level - Sharing of best practices - Enabled participation on the demand side - Multilingualism – local language use extends access - Human rights advocacy– formation of the global network initiative (GNI) - Formation of the multi-stakeholder advisory group (MAG) that is dynamic and flexible - Discussion of issues relating to the environment and sustainability - Avenue for information sharing between different regions *Criticisms of the IGF* · Idea of IGF developed by the civil society – the forum when established would not issue recommendations or guidelines (not a policy conference) – consequently maintaining the status quo – this however is not what the civil society had bargained for. · The forum has not provided an equal footing of civil society participants with government and business · The GNI is not a multi-stakeholder in nature as governments do not buy into its outputs · Meaningful change is required in the MAG and secretariat – the MAG should be more representative and accountable – representatives should be nominated, while the secretariat should be accountable to the MAG · The IGF should develop policy proposals as well as briefing material to facilitators · The plenary sessions are a waste of time – instead small group discussions on specific issues should be organised to make policy proposals/recommendations to the MAG for formalization. · Recommendations approved by the MAG (which is representative of all stakeholders) · There is a need for a re-look of the mandate of the IGF as given by the Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) · Format of the IGF needs to be changed to increase interactive between the audience and panel – sitting arrangements should be changed · Remote participation and documentation needs to be improved · Need for discussion on cross cutting theme of development including issues such as o Migration to digital technologies o Frequency licensing/frequency policy o Creating access · The phrase workshop is a misnomer · Need for a feedback mechanism *Challenges* - Continued support and funding – should be provided by all stakeholders - Avoid capture by one stakeholder group - Capacity building for new attendees and creation of advanced sessions for more experienced participants *1030 -1300 Diplo Session: IGF'08 Negotiation Simulation* Facilitated by Ambassador Kishan S Rana and Dr. Jovan Kurbalija *Importance... * * * *Objectives* Issues of conflict Common interest Cannot be solved unilaterally Commitment to issue Willingness to compromise Goal – concede to what you want and * * *Concepts* * * - *ZOPA* – zone of possible agreement - range within which agreement possible - *BATNA*– best alternative to a negotiated agreement – threshold below which one will not go not worthwhile - *Win-sets* same as zopa - *Ripe moment* – in a complex negotiation – time when negotiation can be concluded – time when there is a meeting of minds – Negotiations* *implicitly involves trust *Stages* - preparation - negotiation - pre-negotiation - follow *Harvard method principle negotiation * - project of negotiation power – Harvard university – whole range of negotiations – Books recommended "Getting to yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In" by Roger Fisher and William L. Ury and "Getting past no" * * *Four cardinal principles of negotiation * - separate people from the problem – don't personalize an issue – build trust – never be caught telling a lie – someone should not push you to a corner - behind adversarial position may lie common interest e.g. in the case of the IGF – building a secure internet - trying to share pie -only looks to one dimension - search options – creativity encouraged - common search to secure agreement - look to criteria that may offer solution *Meetings and chairmanship* - preparation – training everyone on how to chair a meeting for example after the Chec republic Slovakia republic chairman ship of the European - every meeting has core group that runs the show – observe the body language - observe and identify them - you want to join that core group gradually - study body language dynamics listen - join drafting group learn the rules procedure and how to manipulate draft - chair must constantly monitor mood meeting - chair – authority and tact – should not offend but more move along - anticipate problems before they arise observe - invest in relationships win trust esp of key problems = main capital gained - master the show *Questions/Discussions* - How do you separate people from the problem? – try create a relationship through common interest e.g. music – make it clear that you don't agree – don't take it personality – if you don't agree don't retaliate personality – junior members of a delegation are invaluable in negotiations – "float a balloon" – because they don't speak with authority. - Negotiations largely take place in the corridors and during coffee – its important to realize when negotiations are a formality – however each case is unique – realize when you are at the end of the road. - What happens when there is a stronger party in the negotiation process? – Weakness and power are in the eye of the beholder – 'sufficient incentive' –for small country apply leverage in a negotiation – the example of the treaty between Mauritius and India on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) - How are cultural differences managed during negotiations? - Cultural differences always exist, however negotiations utilise a common language – English – Translation of negotiations in different languages may be available – however the English text is considered the authoritative version/definitive text/principle text. - It is important to master the English language as an adjunct to your skills – for example be involved in the drafting group - There is usually an established common code of conduct during negotiations. - Chairmanship is a skill that is learnt – the chair has to be a member of the group. * * *Simulation Exercise on Internet Governance * Objective – reaching a zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) between the USA, G77, India, China, Russia, the Business Community and Civil society before 2011 on key IG issues including: - *The form/name of document * - Press communiqué - Chairman's statement - Declaration of principles - Code of practice - Operational declaration - Framework convention - Substantive convention - Formal treaty - *Net neutrality* - Single internet - Mixed system - Regular internet as public facility - Private internet - Multiple internet (no regulation; market driven) - *Cyber security* - Bilateral - G8 framework - G20 framework - Regional - Global - *Jurisdiction/dispute resolution * - Regular courts - Public arbitrations - Private arbitrations - *Content policy * - National - Regional - Global *Main lesson learnt*: it is important to bargain/trade-off in order to reach the ZOPA otherwise a negotiation that is not concluded could mean a win to another participant. *Closing ceremony* Transcript available at http://igf.wgig.org/cms/index.php/hyderabadprogramme On 12/10/08, mwende njiraini <mwende.njiraini(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > *Day 2: 4th December 2008* > > * * > > *Theme: Promoting Cybersecurity and Trust * > > * * > > *0930-1100 Panel discussions: Dimensions of Cybersecurity and Cybercrime* > > The internet was not originally designed with security features however > with increased use of the internet security considerations arise. > > > > It is important to recognize regional, local and cultural issues that may > affect cyber security and develop a relationship of trust in order to > develop a framework that determines - what happens in a crisis, how to > engage in law enforcement. This is important as security issues need to > be addressed before there is a crisis and should be done at all levels. > > > > *Computer Emergency Response Team* > > * * > > The use of the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) at a regional and > national level based on the framework developed by the Carnegie Mellon > University (www.cert.org) as follows: > > > > 1. *Organisational * > > At an organisational level there should be a person responsible for > security – the response to security threats need to be formalized – that is > organizational incident response should be formalized. > > > > 1. *National* > > Formation of national CERT is necessary but not sufficient. Channels for > relaying of information, mitigating threats need to be organised and tested > on a regular basis. The national CERT should work with regional CERT as > well as have links with law enforcement organisations. > > There is need for development of a strategy as well as testing of the > system. Any incidents should be reviewed. > > > > The goals of CERT should include: > > - early detection, > - short response time, > - reduction of impact, > - recognition of liability issues, > - analysis techniques – which are forensically safe, need to be > developed in advance not when time is of the essence > - Alignment of with partners > > > > ITU-D study group 1 Q 22/1 is studying issues on: *Securing information > and communication networks: best practices for developing a culture of > Cybersecurity* > > > > The security should be implemented without damaging the nature of the > internet, and protecting vulnerable groups > > > > *Introduction of cybercrime and terrorism* > > Traditional crime has moved online for example harassment and money > laundering however there are new forms of crime in the virtual world > including: > > - phishing, virus/malware, etc > > - Critical infrastructure threats – banking, transport, banking, > energy, government and national security > > - Terrorist use of the internet to publish ideologies, raise > funds, recruit new members > > > > The challenges in combating cybercrime and terrorism: > > - The crime scene and who is in charge with dealing with the > threat. > > - Relevance of geographic distance > > - Investigative cost and the need to carry out real time > investigations > > - Legal framework > > - Procedural legal problems > > - Complex search and seizure laws > > - Responsibility and data > > - It complex due to numerous operators involved > > > > *Questions and discussions* > > - Global issue – which needs coordinated effort and cooperation - > in order to avoid the development of cyber havens. > > > > - Action, feedback and reaction necessary in order to update > prevention mechanisms with regard to recent incidents > > > > - A relationship of trust important between the CERT and ISPs > –ISPs need to provide data – this should a bottom up process > > > > - Organisations work in an eco-system –sharing of information – > collecting statistics before, during and after an incident > > > > - Access (usage and querying) to the data base at the CERT should > be controlled – because of privacy issues > > > > - A mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) and formal structures > should be created through a formal bottom-up process. > > > > - Network based crime raise issues associated with creating an > appropriate balance between the needs of those investigating and prosecuting > and rights and interests. > > > > - Need for coordination is a challenge to governments because of > the lack of expertise – therefore have to rely on academia and private > sector > > > > - The CERT should be an independent group of experts that should > be fully empowered > > > > - Appropriate safeguards to protect the functioning of the > organisation necessary as they give confidence and ensure business > continuity during investigation > > > > - New institutional models based on hybrid frameworks – for > example Sri-Lanka CERT was set up in June 2006 and involves government as > well as skilled incident handlers (http://www.slcert.gov.lk/) > > > > - Need for increased cooperation as cyber crime is > multi-jurisdiction issue – harmonization of enforcement processes and > legislation approach such as that of the council of Europe. > > > > * * > > *Indian CERT* > > - The internet is used for numerous activities leading to an > increase cyber attacks consequently there is a need for training on best > practices and implementation. > > - India's legislation includes computer related offences and is > currently being amended to be in line with the European cyber convention. > > - National CERT operates in partnership with Asia and pacific > CERTs > > - The Indian CERT is a government lead industry initiative – that > aims at creating awareness and compliance to best practices > > - Training of law enforcement officers on analysis of computer > related crime a challenge and undertaken through PPP. > > - A secure national cyberspace – requires collaboration, research > in technologies through a bottom-up process. > > - Areas of conflicting interest need to be addressed as > cybercrime is a global phenomenal – these areas include conflict with > individual rights, unnecessary censorship and society issues > > - Establishment of global alliances essential to ensure stability > of internet > > - Sharing to data about cyber attacks is a challenge > > - Establishment of a CERT takes time – needs to include > participation of private sector partners > > > > The ITU has identified five pillars with regard to internet security which > include: > > > > 1. Legal issues > 2. Technical procedural issues, Organisational structures including > CERTs > 3. Capacity building > 4. International cooperation > > > > There is need for proactive approach to provide an early warning system for > example that used in the event of natural disasters as well as need for > organisation and cooperation between all stakeholders. > > > > With regard to initiating internet security measures – start with an issue > where there is a common understanding for example child protection which was > the basis of the launch of the child line protection. > > > > *Capacity building* > > *Issues* > > - Lack of capacity in of ISPs > > - Inter-south cooperation required as challenges and > infrastructure similar > > - Retention of skilled human resources a challenge > > - Use of network operator groups for capacity building > > - Need to utilize the existing educational framework by > integration of cybersecurity into curriculum – this creates sustainability > in capacity building > > - Training should be relevant to the environment – appropriate > use of technology, cost, concentrate on getting the maximum benefit – > innovation in order to derive the maximum value will be based on training > received > > - Need for collaboration platform – so as to continue sharing > information > > - Need to focus on reality on the ground > > > > *Kind of training* > > - technical training > > - policy issues – IPv4/6 > > > > *Technical challenges* > > - operators need to be profitable – environment liberalized – > however still certain monopolized areas – international connectivity – > imbalanced competition – therefore profitability issue- cant invest in new > technologies – limited investment in training > > > > *My comment*: Urgent need create of culture of cybersecurity (end-users, > at organisation level and nationally) and establishment of national, > regional CERTs. > > > > *14:30 - 16:00 Workshop 76 Neutrality Debate Important for You? (Network > Neutrality Debate: The Implications for Development) * > > * * > > *Technical issues* > > All networks need to be managed > > > > High broadband connectivity principles > > ( > http://www.tiaonline.org/gov_affairs/issues/internet_services_applications/… > ) > > > > - transparency > > - ability to attach any device > > - right to access any legal content > > - right to download any legal content > > > > *Economic issues* > > Net neutrality has significant micro and macro implications. Broadband > investment influenced by the broad economic environment because of the > massive investment required > > - Regulation is viewed more beneficial in view of the current > economic crisis > > - More users create value to the platform > > - Optimal pricing structure – a possibility - may not want to > charge content providers to contribute to access > > - Mandatory net neutrality/unbundling expected to depress > investment in broadband plus may have a significant negative effect on > investment NGN. > > - Centre for European Policy Studies – research titled: "I own > the pipes, you call the tune: The net neutrality debate and its (ir) > relevance for Europe" available at > http://shop.ceps.eu/BookDetail.php?item_id=1755 – argues that the internet > is not neutral – pro-neutrality rules/changes being proposed should be > evaluated > > - The analogy of the roads and vehicles was used to describe net > neutrality – the roads represent the pipes while the cars represent the > packets/traffic – which are not regulated and may be of any shape or size. > However there is regulation with regard to speed. > > - issue of convergence – important for users > > - internet to drive innovation and economic growth > > - activism issues are important to understand the issues > > - slowing down the traffic and packets on internet has a > consequence of slowing down the development internet > > > > *Issues from a user perspective* > > - no consensus on the issues exists > > - Users do not necessarily want free/unlimited control – however > what they want is: what they access should not be controlled > > - They do not want to be forced to buy their store brands or > services of preferred service providers of the broadband connectivity > provider. > > - There is no value in packaging/bundling of services – rather it > is designed to sell services at a high price > > - Users question whether a free market would help as suppliers > are out to make money – there is an economic motivation to invest – which > means there is no one to look out for consumers > > - Need for establish anti trust/anti monopoly regulations > > - ISPs must be made to know that users are not willing to give up > their rights thus should develop internet usage plans that are favourable to > the users - suppliers must listen to consumers > > - Users have the power to demand what we want if only they > demanded it > > - The investment on the internet should be allowed in all areas – > core and edges without fragmenting it - networks should be built using open > interfaces - end to end principle protection is significant > > - Users want the internet to encourage innovation > > - Use of restaurant analogy where the chairs, tables and food are > outsourced > > - Users should have the ability to have access to the content > they want as long as it is connected to open interfaces > > - Users have concern on the future of the internet; content > equality and its ability to deliver content in different ways thus > encouraging local innovation > > > > *My comment:* significance of net neutrality with reference to developing > countries was not addressed – taking into consideration that the motivation > for investment in broadband connectivity is socio-economic development thus > deployment of both local and international for example submarine cable is > being done by governments rather than the private sector. > > > On 12/8/08, mwende njiraini <mwende.njiraini(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> *5th December 2008* >> *930-1100 Panel Discussion Transition from IPv4 to IPv6* >> Based on several studies it is projected that IPv4 addresses will be >> globally exhausted by 2011 however address space will still be available at >> a local level. Seamless take up of IPv6 is expected with the exhaustion of >> IPv4 and there is on going discussion – to define policy to facilitate >> smooth transition for operators and ensure that new comers have minimum IPv6 >> address space allocation to start up business. >> >> The following issues were discussed from different perspectives: >> >> *Issues from operators' perspective*: >> - Deployment of IPv6 enabled equipment in the core networks should be done >> increment – however uptake is low because there is no extra revenue >> generated with the implementation of IPv6 i.e. the lack of commercial >> drivers. However this is expected to change with the as customer numbers >> grow. >> >> - Need for upgrade – therefore operators from developed countries stand at >> an advantage as they have the resources and are nearly exhausted their local >> allocations. >> >> - Getting operational experience is a challenge – there is need to invest >> in operational tools to run IPv6 in terms of software configuration >> utilities management and trouble shooting >> >> - Participation in standardization – where users have equipment that >> supports only IPv4 – how do they access services that are available only on >> IPv6-based networks? The IETF is working on the transition mechanisms >> however the co-existence of both protocols is expected for a long time >> >> - Operators are pushing for IPv6 support in customer premise equipment >> (CPE) as well as software that supports the new protocol version. However it >> is expected that legacy applications will be available in the foreseeable >> future >> >> *Issues from a vendor perspective* >> - Transition has been going on for some time in the vendor world. The >> transition has been a long process for vendors and operators – in terms of >> getting the technology and standards ready >> >> - As IP is the core of the internet – transition to ipv6 – is significant >> particularly with the increase of IPv6 enabled devices connected to the >> internet specifically mobile phones >> >> - need to understand technology and therefore need for operational and >> implementation experience >> >> - managing customer demand/expectations for IPv6 enabled services and >> devices >> >> - cost of staff training >> >> - there are mistakes that will be made – therefore need for mutual support >> in the implementation of v6 >> >> *Social and economic perspectives*- >> - Transition should be cooperative endeavour with social and economic and >> policy considerations >> >> - Gradual implementation and interoperability between IPv4 and v6 expected >> so as to preserve the investment already made >> >> - There is a general understanding that IPv6 will compliment and >> supplement the existing IPv4 as well as provide improved routing, >> multicasting, efficient infrastructure. The following questions however >> arise: >> >> o The advantages that IPv6 offer are good reasons to invest in the new IP >> version. >> o Would transition be transparent and would backward compatibility >> required >> >> - Users want the stability of the internet to be maintained and hope that >> IPv6 will offer opportunities for addition to personality features on the >> internet – this is what makes the business case >> >> - In the India case there are a large number of service providers – and >> there is only a 1/8 usage – therefore demand is low – the need to enhance >> cultural diversity however provides opportunities to create demand through >> local content development including E-government programme and Info-tainment >> >> - It is important to break the myth that IPv6 is a new internet - It is >> not a new internet rather continuation of the internet >> >> - The main benefit is the address space addition- which may allow for >> efficiency >> >> - There is no need to establish a deadline or regulate the implementation >> of IPv6 – as it will be market driven. Additionally users should have rights >> to use IPv4 and IETF is working on coexistence >> >> *Policy perspective* >> - With the impending exhaustion of IPv4 – further implementation will be >> problematic – as not all players will support transition therefore it is >> important to examine measures – for continued use of IPv4 and possible >> migration of users to private IPv4 address space >> >> - creation of action plan to be implemented by 2010 – for example offering >> of incentives such as tax exemption and capacity building >> >> - examination of existing programmes and mechanisms >> >> - establishment of taskforce of IPv4 exhaustion >> >> - the messages of ISPs is that they must carry IPv6 >> >> - IPv4 scarcity and demand for more security are the 2 major challenges >> driving the uptake of IPv6 >> >> - Institution of market transfer or reclamation mechanisms of IPv4 >> resources not required by local internet registries to the regional internet >> registries when transition to IPv6 is implemented. However this would be a >> challenge as RIRs have no contractual authority this may create a grey >> market. This challenge may be overcome through a loose membership >> association that allows others to use others resources >> >> - Institution of secure routing objects including PKI to authenticate >> users raises governance/control issues – RIRs have centralized control which >> may make it efficient and better able to address security issues this makes >> an RIR an central governance institution. Membership of security/government >> associations in the RIR would result in infiltration of technical, policy >> agendas that may make the transition to IPv6 complicated >> >> - However it is argued that RIRs should remain neutral and trans-national >> institutions which: >> o maintain a homogenous technical group >> o maintain a bottom-up approach in policy making >> o guarantee the stability of the internet and business continuity of >> members >> >> - main challenges in the deployment of IPv6 include: >> o lack of public education, information and skill >> o limited network policy decisions to make deployment happen >> o lack of incentive to deploy ipv6 >> >> *1100-1230 Workshop 59:Building a global capacity building curriculum >> framework and premier* >> >> - Integration of IG capacity building in existing ICT and public policy >> courses was advocated. >> >> - The training may be offered either online, offline or through short term >> executive courses. >> >> - Collaboration between different stakeholders who have different needs is >> imperative in order create an understanding of the issues arising from >> increased used of the internet particularly those that transcend the >> geographical, and cultural borders. >> >> - internet security awareness programme set up in India >> >> - Presentations on the Diplo IG capacity building programme ( >> www.diplomacy.edu/ig) – including a demonstration of the online platform. >> >> - The Diplo approach includes the training course (foundation and >> advanced), policy research, policy immersion and community interaction. >> >> - The impact associated with the IG capacity building programme have been >> varied and impressive including the establishment of IG governance masters >> programme in Srilanka and the use of telecentres to disseminate IG related >> information. >> >> - Diplo has successfully offered the training to professional worldwide >> for the last 4 years leading to the establishment of national, regional and >> global community >> >> *1400-1530 Workshop 29: Building confidence and security in the use and >> security in the use of ICTs for African countries >> >> *Main challenges in Africa >> - lack of infrastructure >> - lack of services >> >> Therefore opportunity to learn from mistakes in developing countries and >> establish of computer emergency response team currently there is only one >> active CERT in Africa in Tunisia, South Africa is in the process of setting >> up a CERT with the deadline of 2010 before the FIFA world cup. While >> countries such as Morocco, Kenya and Ivory Coast are thinking about set in >> up CERTs. >> >> The approach in dealing with Cybersecurity in developing countries >> >> Success of Cybersecurity is based on 3pillars >> >> 1. *Technology pillar* – ICT/security tools –including: >> o PCs / networks, physical security tools, data tools (storage media and >> cryptography), availability of infrastructure and application (redundant >> servers and PKI) >> >> 2. *Methodology pillar* – policy, procedures and regulations on three >> levels: >> o managerial level (security policy, management procedures and capacity >> building, audit) Legislative level (law and regulation) >> o operational level (acces control rules, implementation plans, >> monitoring, watch, incidence handling) >> o continuity of services level ( business continuity plan, crisis >> management, drill exercises) >> - actors in this pillar include the government, security professionals and >> users >> >> 3. *Social behaviour pillar* – creating a culture of cyber security >> o cultivate culture of cyber security through continuous action of raising >> awareness using diverse media/channels >> o the target audience includes managers, decision makers, security, >> children, parents, teachers >> >> >> *Case study: CERT-TCC - Tunisia* >> >> *The functions of the CERT include*: >> >> - Watch- collect information from different sources eg CISCO, HP. >> Microsoft, network of CERTs, community of hackers >> - Training >> - Coordination >> - Response >> - Incidence handling >> - Incident analysis >> - Awareness >> - Warning alert >> >> *Key issues*: >> >> • Information, warning and alert – carried out to in collaboration with >> ISPs, managers decision makers, internet community through mailing list, >> call centre, media >> >> • Oriented campaign – utilizing prospectus, posters, email, radio, >> cartoons, video, attack simulation and guides >> >> • Incident handling - training in new tools >> >> • Coordination important in the effective functioning of the CERT – >> incident coordination procedures and information including regional CERTs, >> other CERTs within the country (for example Brazil has more than one CERT), >> ISPs and operators, vendors and integrators, and national authorities. >> >> Need for the formation of CERTs in Africa however the challenges of lack >> of "know how" in IT security need to be overcome through: >> - capacity building >> - encouragement of the development of national solutions based on open >> source components >> - improved R&D capabilities and making it more responsive to urgent needs >> - encouraging academic research in the important topics of security >> (cryptography, methodologies…) >> >> *The following questions and comments were raised*: >> >> - the need for social engineering through the creation of a culture of >> cyber security to be addressed specifically because of the increased >> requirements by government to obligate to provide subscriber identification >> information >> >> - how can African countries start up a cert- through collaboration for >> example with existing CERTs >> >> - in establishing a culture of cybersecurity – consideration should be >> given to the fact that there are different social cultures in different >> countries however there is consensus on issues such as child pornography, >> identity theft >> >> - how can a regional approach be developed where there are differences in >> level of ICT infrastructure and use of infrastructure in the delivery of >> services, what tools can be used to encourage decision makers to be involved >> in the issues of cyber security? >> >> o It was recognised that funding and expertise was required for example >> AFDB, World Bank and Islamic Bank while ITU have regional workshops on cyber >> security >> >> o As African countries build on infrastructure and services – there is an >> opportunity to learn from those that have already developed CERTs. >> >> - How does the CERT monitor traffic: with the collaboration of ISP and >> operators as well as supporting legislation >> >> - Regulators need to advice the government to use ICT in development – >> this is a manifestation of government commitment >> >> - The role of policy making was emphasized – as it provides government >> commitment to using ICT for social economic development and governance and >> consequently support for cyber security initiatives – including the >> formulation of legislation. >> >> - There should not use a piece meal approach to cyber security to prevent >> ineffectiveness for example Mauritius has electronic transaction act but PKI >> not yet established >> >> >> >> On 12/5/08, mwende njiraini <mwende.njiraini(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Following our recent online discussions on Internet governance issues in >>> Kenya, the Kenya IGF and East African IGF; you may wish to follow the >>> discussion currently ongoing at the global IGF 2008 in Hyderabad India at >>> http://www.intgovforum.org. >>> >>> Below are highlights from workshops I attended on Day 1 December 3rd): >>> *0930-1100 hrs Workshop 43: Legal aspects of governance critical >>> internet Policy issues of public relevance* >>> *1st presentation* >>> The issues on that have legal implications include: >>> • internet security intellectual property rights, infringement, privacy >>> and protection mechanisms >>> • IP domain name protection, conflicts arising out of data and content >>> ownership privacy therefore increasing role of P2P in growth of internet 2 >>> • Consumer status and rights in relation to e-commerce cross border and >>> domestic online trade >>> • Telecom issue viz backbone deployment and interconnection costs >>> • Freedom of expression – the extent of censorship and control on online >>> content >>> >>> There is need for capacity building to create meaningful participation of >>> individual and SMEs as well as increasing connectivity through building IXPs >>> and local content development >>> >>> The question was raised as to whether there a need of alternative >>> institutional mechanism. >>> The salient features of the MOU between ICANN and the department of >>> commerce (DoC) include: >>> - The affirmation of the role of private sector leadership >>> - The role of DoC in ensuring transparency and accountability and >>> effective GAC participation >>> - Ensure accountability and publish by-laws and strategic and operational >>> plans >>> - Agreement can be terminated in 120 days >>> >>> The MOU has been criticized because of the following reasons: >>> - US governmental control on root server administration >>> - Inconsistent with WSIS principle where no single government should have >>> a pre-eminent role >>> - Domain name allocation policies need better development >>> - IPv4 address allocation have been imbalanced need to ensure IPv6 >>> address allocation does not suffer the same effects -This assertion was >>> however refuted as IP addresses allocation based on need. The need for >>> prudent management and keeping barriers low for the transition to IPv6 was >>> emphasised. >>> >>> To overcome this WGIG proposed 4 models: >>> - Global policy council >>> - Intenational internet council with leading government role to fulfil >>> the ICANN/IANA functions >>> - GAC to be strengthened with enhanced coordination function >>> - Replace US govt role by general internet council or with world ICANN >>> (in lieu of GAC) >>> >>> The common features of these models were the overwhelming government lead >>> and the presupposition of the possibility of international treaties. During >>> the discussion the viability of these models was questioned given that speed >>> is of essence in the management of internet resources. It normally takes a >>> long time to negotiate international agreements; including treaties instead >>> a set of principles should be endorsed. >>> >>> The speaker recommended on the management of critical internet >>> infrastructure should take into consideration the following >>> • Treatment of technical resources of the internet and global economic, >>> social and legal aspects arising out the internet should be at par >>> • The development and implementation of polices and standards and >>> solutions to various internet issues should be done in a coordinated manner >>> for example telecommunication standard development is done in a hierarchical >>> and predictable way. >>> • New structure would be a supreme authority over internet >>> >>> In conclusion the speaker asked: Does the internet as we know it need to >>> be altered radically? Should the status quo be maintained? Should a Red >>> Cross model of recognition by international community states be given to an >>> international entity like ITU, INTELSAT. However fundamental change is not >>> necessary as failure has not been identified. >>> >>> *My comment*: this presentation was descriptive and despite the fact >>> that an alternative model was proposed the principles, mechanisms that would >>> need to be put in place in order to make it work were not discussed >>> >>> *2nd presentation* >>> The next speaker spoke about the ccTLDs in latin Amercia which are >>> broadly organised into two main groups: non-governmental and governmental >>> organisations. A contribution from the floor however clarified that the >>> Brazilian ccTLD is a multi-stakeholder – coordinated by government – but on >>> a day by day basis operates as a non-governmental organisation. The Indian >>> ccTLD is managed by government and private sector – sovereign interest taken >>> care of through government representation. >>> >>> The rules and regulations under which the institutions that manage the >>> ccTLDs are managed determinate legal framework under which they operate. >>> Consequently ccTLDs are regulated under national law while ICANN regulates >>> gTLDs – The possibility of self regulation is based on the assumption that >>> private sector would act in the public interest. >>> >>> In the discussions some felt that there was need for increased attention >>> of government in the management of ccTLDs – as it was critical >>> infrastructure while on the other hand other felt that there was the risk of >>> excessive regulation with increased involvement of government. >>> >>> *1130 -1200 hrs Workshop 36: Strategies to prevent and fight child >>> pornography in developing countries* >>> Child pornography in Brazil has grown out of the popularity of social >>> networking. However the main challenge has been issues related to >>> jurisdiction as content is resident in ISP based in the USA and >>> trans-national ISPs like Yahoo, Microsoft and Google which have branches in >>> strategic markets and have tailored the services for these markets in terms >>> of language and content. >>> >>> Brazil was therefore unable to deal with serious offences related to >>> content – specifically child pornography - committed by Brazilians using >>> Brazilian IP addresses. The government has been able to sign an agreement >>> with Google to fight child pornography on Google's orkut social network. >>> >>> The following are consideration taken in drawing up the agreement >>> 1. Which criteria should be used to define the ability of a particular >>> country to legislate over and sanction conducts committed on the internet? >>> - Where the data is located? >>> - International law principles (territoriality or nationality) shall be >>> used to define the sovereignty of a state regarding – cyber space – which is >>> a network of networks >>> - Define some reasonable standard – for example managed by Brazilians and >>> is local content and local language >>> - Access points in Brazil, harmful conduct felt in the country – taken >>> obligation under international law to take offence – country of origin >>> approach would force thousands of users to unfamiliar rules and travel – >>> offence under human rights therefore apply local legislation >>> >>> 2. It is legitimate to enforce the conduct of local office –as it >>> impracticable to send legal request to the US. >>> >>> >>> New tools have been implement that have reduced number of images uploaded >>> and increase in number of reported cases- subject to investigation. It was >>> inspiring to listen to parliamentarian talk about the need to have >>> legislators engaged in the process as they ultimately pass the laws. I >>> appreciated the fact that in there is great cooperation between the >>> parliament, government, police, civil society and private sector. >>> >>> The main challenges are: >>> • Lack of awareness and participation by parliamentarians who are >>> critical in the formulation of legislation >>> • how to obligate ISPs to provide information without infringing on >>> freedom of expression and privacy, >>> • what criteria should be used to deal with these offences >>> • the creation of awareness of ISPs in developing countries of the need >>> for judicial cooperation as well as social initiatives to deal with cyber >>> crime. >>> • Insufficient infrastructure to deal with this issue – law enforcement >>> does not have the human resources and technology >>> • Material produced to fight child pornography are not evaluated – they >>> should be inline with the demand >>> >>> *My comment*: I would have like to know if initiatives have reduced >>> offences, what is the success rate registered in prosecution, ability of the >>> law enforcement and judicial system to deal with offences. There was no >>> mention of where initiatives had been launched to fight child pornography on >>> the financial front. >>> >>> >>> *1530-1700 Workshop 45: Opening to diversity and competition of the DNS >>> system* >>> >>> >>> >>> There were 3 presentations in this session: >>> >>> >>> - *1st presentation* - alternate DNS system used in library systems >>> >>> >>> - *2nd presentation* - implementation of security in the Handle system >>> >>> >>> - *3rd presentation –* discussed the Net4D >>> >>> >>> >>> Net4D- provides the technical solution to the political concern on the >>> control of root servers. Net4D networks enable the following: >>> >>> • Empower the second generation of the web: the semantic web. >>> >>> • Multi-stakeholder governance of DNS >>> >>> • Net4D classes should be open and interoperable >>> >>> DNS 1.0 – was a monopoly of ICANN web 1.0 html with USA parentage and >>> English only while DNS 2.0 is open allowing for competition including inter >>> alia: >>> >>> • Net4D semantic web >>> >>> • Open coherent approach to linguistic diversity >>> >>> • Allow technological innovation with value added services >>> >>> >>> >>> Concern was however raised on the: >>> >>> • Investment/implementation cost required to implementation of different >>> DNS systems depending on the BIND implemented and root servers enabled >>> >>> • relinquishing of the political control of root servers >>> >>> • Value to end users >>> >>> • Awareness and understanding of the issues by different stakeholders >>> necessary – delivered in a way that they can understand >>> >>> >>> >>> *My comment*: the session was technical – I hope the techies on the >>> mailing list can help us understand the governance issues associated with >>> the introduction of DNS competition and the impact on developing countries >>> :)! >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> mwende >>> >> >> >

1 0

Re: [kictanet] IGF 2008 Highlights - Day 2
by mwende njiraini 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

*Day 2: 4th December 2008* * * *Theme: Promoting Cybersecurity and Trust * * * *0930-1100 Panel discussions: Dimensions of Cybersecurity and Cybercrime* The internet was not originally designed with security features however with increased use of the internet security considerations arise. It is important to recognize regional, local and cultural issues that may affect cyber security and develop a relationship of trust in order to develop a framework that determines - what happens in a crisis, how to engage in law enforcement. This is important as security issues need to be addressed before there is a crisis and should be done at all levels. *Computer Emergency Response Team* * * The use of the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) at a regional and national level based on the framework developed by the Carnegie Mellon University (www.cert.org) as follows: 1. *Organisational * At an organisational level there should be a person responsible for security – the response to security threats need to be formalized – that is organizational incident response should be formalized. 1. *National* Formation of national CERT is necessary but not sufficient. Channels for relaying of information, mitigating threats need to be organised and tested on a regular basis. The national CERT should work with regional CERT as well as have links with law enforcement organisations. There is need for development of a strategy as well as testing of the system. Any incidents should be reviewed. The goals of CERT should include: - early detection, - short response time, - reduction of impact, - recognition of liability issues, - analysis techniques – which are forensically safe, need to be developed in advance not when time is of the essence - Alignment of with partners ITU-D study group 1 Q 22/1 is studying issues on: *Securing information and communication networks: best practices for developing a culture of Cybersecurity* The security should be implemented without damaging the nature of the internet, and protecting vulnerable groups *Introduction of cybercrime and terrorism* Traditional crime has moved online for example harassment and money laundering however there are new forms of crime in the virtual world including: - phishing, virus/malware, etc - Critical infrastructure threats – banking, transport, banking, energy, government and national security - Terrorist use of the internet to publish ideologies, raise funds, recruit new members The challenges in combating cybercrime and terrorism: - The crime scene and who is in charge with dealing with the threat. - Relevance of geographic distance - Investigative cost and the need to carry out real time investigations - Legal framework - Procedural legal problems - Complex search and seizure laws - Responsibility and data - It complex due to numerous operators involved *Questions and discussions* - Global issue – which needs coordinated effort and cooperation - in order to avoid the development of cyber havens. - Action, feedback and reaction necessary in order to update prevention mechanisms with regard to recent incidents - A relationship of trust important between the CERT and ISPs –ISPs need to provide data – this should a bottom up process - Organisations work in an eco-system –sharing of information – collecting statistics before, during and after an incident - Access (usage and querying) to the data base at the CERT should be controlled – because of privacy issues - A mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) and formal structures should be created through a formal bottom-up process. - Network based crime raise issues associated with creating an appropriate balance between the needs of those investigating and prosecuting and rights and interests. - Need for coordination is a challenge to governments because of the lack of expertise – therefore have to rely on academia and private sector - The CERT should be an independent group of experts that should be fully empowered - Appropriate safeguards to protect the functioning of the organisation necessary as they give confidence and ensure business continuity during investigation - New institutional models based on hybrid frameworks – for example Sri-Lanka CERT was set up in June 2006 and involves government as well as skilled incident handlers (http://www.slcert.gov.lk/) - Need for increased cooperation as cyber crime is multi-jurisdiction issue – harmonization of enforcement processes and legislation approach such as that of the council of Europe. * * *Indian CERT* - The internet is used for numerous activities leading to an increase cyber attacks consequently there is a need for training on best practices and implementation. - India's legislation includes computer related offences and is currently being amended to be in line with the European cyber convention. - National CERT operates in partnership with Asia and pacific CERTs - The Indian CERT is a government lead industry initiative – that aims at creating awareness and compliance to best practices - Training of law enforcement officers on analysis of computer related crime a challenge and undertaken through PPP. - A secure national cyberspace – requires collaboration, research in technologies through a bottom-up process. - Areas of conflicting interest need to be addressed as cybercrime is a global phenomenal – these areas include conflict with individual rights, unnecessary censorship and society issues - Establishment of global alliances essential to ensure stability of internet - Sharing to data about cyber attacks is a challenge - Establishment of a CERT takes time – needs to include participation of private sector partners The ITU has identified five pillars with regard to internet security which include: 1. Legal issues 2. Technical procedural issues, Organisational structures including CERTs 3. Capacity building 4. International cooperation There is need for proactive approach to provide an early warning system for example that used in the event of natural disasters as well as need for organisation and cooperation between all stakeholders. With regard to initiating internet security measures – start with an issue where there is a common understanding for example child protection which was the basis of the launch of the child line protection. *Capacity building* *Issues* - Lack of capacity in of ISPs - Inter-south cooperation required as challenges and infrastructure similar - Retention of skilled human resources a challenge - Use of network operator groups for capacity building - Need to utilize the existing educational framework by integration of cybersecurity into curriculum – this creates sustainability in capacity building - Training should be relevant to the environment – appropriate use of technology, cost, concentrate on getting the maximum benefit – innovation in order to derive the maximum value will be based on training received - Need for collaboration platform – so as to continue sharing information - Need to focus on reality on the ground *Kind of training* - technical training - policy issues – IPv4/6 *Technical challenges* - operators need to be profitable – environment liberalized – however still certain monopolized areas – international connectivity – imbalanced competition – therefore profitability issue- cant invest in new technologies – limited investment in training *My comment*: Urgent need create of culture of cybersecurity (end-users, at organisation level and nationally) and establishment of national, regional CERTs. *14:30 - 16:00 Workshop 76 Neutrality Debate Important for You? (Network Neutrality Debate: The Implications for Development) * * * *Technical issues* All networks need to be managed High broadband connectivity principles ( http://www.tiaonline.org/gov_affairs/issues/internet_services_applications/… ) - transparency - ability to attach any device - right to access any legal content - right to download any legal content *Economic issues* Net neutrality has significant micro and macro implications. Broadband investment influenced by the broad economic environment because of the massive investment required - Regulation is viewed more beneficial in view of the current economic crisis - More users create value to the platform - Optimal pricing structure – a possibility - may not want to charge content providers to contribute to access - Mandatory net neutrality/unbundling expected to depress investment in broadband plus may have a significant negative effect on investment NGN. - Centre for European Policy Studies – research titled: "I own the pipes, you call the tune: The net neutrality debate and its (ir) relevance for Europe" available at http://shop.ceps.eu/BookDetail.php?item_id=1755 – argues that the internet is not neutral – pro-neutrality rules/changes being proposed should be evaluated - The analogy of the roads and vehicles was used to describe net neutrality – the roads represent the pipes while the cars represent the packets/traffic – which are not regulated and may be of any shape or size. However there is regulation with regard to speed. - issue of convergence – important for users - internet to drive innovation and economic growth - activism issues are important to understand the issues - slowing down the traffic and packets on internet has a consequence of slowing down the development internet *Issues from a user perspective* - no consensus on the issues exists - Users do not necessarily want free/unlimited control – however what they want is: what they access should not be controlled - They do not want to be forced to buy their store brands or services of preferred service providers of the broadband connectivity provider. - There is no value in packaging/bundling of services – rather it is designed to sell services at a high price - Users question whether a free market would help as suppliers are out to make money – there is an economic motivation to invest – which means there is no one to look out for consumers - Need for establish anti trust/anti monopoly regulations - ISPs must be made to know that users are not willing to give up their rights thus should develop internet usage plans that are favourable to the users - suppliers must listen to consumers - Users have the power to demand what we want if only they demanded it - The investment on the internet should be allowed in all areas – core and edges without fragmenting it - networks should be built using open interfaces - end to end principle protection is significant - Users want the internet to encourage innovation - Use of restaurant analogy where the chairs, tables and food are outsourced - Users should have the ability to have access to the content they want as long as it is connected to open interfaces - Users have concern on the future of the internet; content equality and its ability to deliver content in different ways thus encouraging local innovation *My comment:* significance of net neutrality with reference to developing countries was not addressed – taking into consideration that the motivation for investment in broadband connectivity is socio-economic development thus deployment of both local and international for example submarine cable is being done by governments rather than the private sector. On 12/8/08, mwende njiraini <mwende.njiraini(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > *5th December 2008* > *930-1100 Panel Discussion Transition from IPv4 to IPv6* > Based on several studies it is projected that IPv4 addresses will be > globally exhausted by 2011 however address space will still be available at > a local level. Seamless take up of IPv6 is expected with the exhaustion of > IPv4 and there is on going discussion – to define policy to facilitate > smooth transition for operators and ensure that new comers have minimum IPv6 > address space allocation to start up business. > > The following issues were discussed from different perspectives: > > *Issues from operators' perspective*: > - Deployment of IPv6 enabled equipment in the core networks should be done > increment – however uptake is low because there is no extra revenue > generated with the implementation of IPv6 i.e. the lack of commercial > drivers. However this is expected to change with the as customer numbers > grow. > > - Need for upgrade – therefore operators from developed countries stand at > an advantage as they have the resources and are nearly exhausted their local > allocations. > > - Getting operational experience is a challenge – there is need to invest > in operational tools to run IPv6 in terms of software configuration > utilities management and trouble shooting > > - Participation in standardization – where users have equipment that > supports only IPv4 – how do they access services that are available only on > IPv6-based networks? The IETF is working on the transition mechanisms > however the co-existence of both protocols is expected for a long time > > - Operators are pushing for IPv6 support in customer premise equipment > (CPE) as well as software that supports the new protocol version. However it > is expected that legacy applications will be available in the foreseeable > future > > *Issues from a vendor perspective* > - Transition has been going on for some time in the vendor world. The > transition has been a long process for vendors and operators – in terms of > getting the technology and standards ready > > - As IP is the core of the internet – transition to ipv6 – is significant > particularly with the increase of IPv6 enabled devices connected to the > internet specifically mobile phones > > - need to understand technology and therefore need for operational and > implementation experience > > - managing customer demand/expectations for IPv6 enabled services and > devices > > - cost of staff training > > - there are mistakes that will be made – therefore need for mutual support > in the implementation of v6 > > *Social and economic perspectives*- > - Transition should be cooperative endeavour with social and economic and > policy considerations > > - Gradual implementation and interoperability between IPv4 and v6 expected > so as to preserve the investment already made > > - There is a general understanding that IPv6 will compliment and supplement > the existing IPv4 as well as provide improved routing, multicasting, > efficient infrastructure. The following questions however arise: > > o The advantages that IPv6 offer are good reasons to invest in the new IP > version. > o Would transition be transparent and would backward compatibility required > > - Users want the stability of the internet to be maintained and hope that > IPv6 will offer opportunities for addition to personality features on the > internet – this is what makes the business case > > - In the India case there are a large number of service providers – and > there is only a 1/8 usage – therefore demand is low – the need to enhance > cultural diversity however provides opportunities to create demand through > local content development including E-government programme and Info-tainment > > - It is important to break the myth that IPv6 is a new internet - It is not > a new internet rather continuation of the internet > > - The main benefit is the address space addition- which may allow for > efficiency > > - There is no need to establish a deadline or regulate the implementation > of IPv6 – as it will be market driven. Additionally users should have rights > to use IPv4 and IETF is working on coexistence > > *Policy perspective* > - With the impending exhaustion of IPv4 – further implementation will be > problematic – as not all players will support transition therefore it is > important to examine measures – for continued use of IPv4 and possible > migration of users to private IPv4 address space > > - creation of action plan to be implemented by 2010 – for example offering > of incentives such as tax exemption and capacity building > > - examination of existing programmes and mechanisms > > - establishment of taskforce of IPv4 exhaustion > > - the messages of ISPs is that they must carry IPv6 > > - IPv4 scarcity and demand for more security are the 2 major challenges > driving the uptake of IPv6 > > - Institution of market transfer or reclamation mechanisms of IPv4 > resources not required by local internet registries to the regional internet > registries when transition to IPv6 is implemented. However this would be a > challenge as RIRs have no contractual authority this may create a grey > market. This challenge may be overcome through a loose membership > association that allows others to use others resources > > - Institution of secure routing objects including PKI to authenticate users > raises governance/control issues – RIRs have centralized control which may > make it efficient and better able to address security issues this makes an > RIR an central governance institution. Membership of security/government > associations in the RIR would result in infiltration of technical, policy > agendas that may make the transition to IPv6 complicated > > - However it is argued that RIRs should remain neutral and trans-national > institutions which: > o maintain a homogenous technical group > o maintain a bottom-up approach in policy making > o guarantee the stability of the internet and business continuity of > members > > - main challenges in the deployment of IPv6 include: > o lack of public education, information and skill > o limited network policy decisions to make deployment happen > o lack of incentive to deploy ipv6 > > *1100-1230 Workshop 59:Building a global capacity building curriculum > framework and premier* > > - Integration of IG capacity building in existing ICT and public policy > courses was advocated. > > - The training may be offered either online, offline or through short term > executive courses. > > - Collaboration between different stakeholders who have different needs is > imperative in order create an understanding of the issues arising from > increased used of the internet particularly those that transcend the > geographical, and cultural borders. > > - internet security awareness programme set up in India > > - Presentations on the Diplo IG capacity building programme ( > www.diplomacy.edu/ig) – including a demonstration of the online platform. > > - The Diplo approach includes the training course (foundation and > advanced), policy research, policy immersion and community interaction. > > - The impact associated with the IG capacity building programme have been > varied and impressive including the establishment of IG governance masters > programme in Srilanka and the use of telecentres to disseminate IG related > information. > > - Diplo has successfully offered the training to professional worldwide for > the last 4 years leading to the establishment of national, regional and > global community > > *1400-1530 Workshop 29: Building confidence and security in the use and > security in the use of ICTs for African countries > > *Main challenges in Africa > - lack of infrastructure > - lack of services > > Therefore opportunity to learn from mistakes in developing countries and > establish of computer emergency response team currently there is only one > active CERT in Africa in Tunisia, South Africa is in the process of setting > up a CERT with the deadline of 2010 before the FIFA world cup. While > countries such as Morocco, Kenya and Ivory Coast are thinking about set in > up CERTs. > > The approach in dealing with Cybersecurity in developing countries > > Success of Cybersecurity is based on 3pillars > > 1. *Technology pillar* – ICT/security tools –including: > o PCs / networks, physical security tools, data tools (storage media and > cryptography), availability of infrastructure and application (redundant > servers and PKI) > > 2. *Methodology pillar* – policy, procedures and regulations on three > levels: > o managerial level (security policy, management procedures and capacity > building, audit) Legislative level (law and regulation) > o operational level (acces control rules, implementation plans, monitoring, > watch, incidence handling) > o continuity of services level ( business continuity plan, crisis > management, drill exercises) > - actors in this pillar include the government, security professionals and > users > > 3. *Social behaviour pillar* – creating a culture of cyber security > o cultivate culture of cyber security through continuous action of raising > awareness using diverse media/channels > o the target audience includes managers, decision makers, security, > children, parents, teachers > > > *Case study: CERT-TCC - Tunisia* > > *The functions of the CERT include*: > > - Watch- collect information from different sources eg CISCO, HP. > Microsoft, network of CERTs, community of hackers > - Training > - Coordination > - Response > - Incidence handling > - Incident analysis > - Awareness > - Warning alert > > *Key issues*: > > • Information, warning and alert – carried out to in collaboration with > ISPs, managers decision makers, internet community through mailing list, > call centre, media > > • Oriented campaign – utilizing prospectus, posters, email, radio, > cartoons, video, attack simulation and guides > > • Incident handling - training in new tools > > • Coordination important in the effective functioning of the CERT – > incident coordination procedures and information including regional CERTs, > other CERTs within the country (for example Brazil has more than one CERT), > ISPs and operators, vendors and integrators, and national authorities. > > Need for the formation of CERTs in Africa however the challenges of lack of > "know how" in IT security need to be overcome through: > - capacity building > - encouragement of the development of national solutions based on open > source components > - improved R&D capabilities and making it more responsive to urgent needs > - encouraging academic research in the important topics of security > (cryptography, methodologies…) > > *The following questions and comments were raised*: > > - the need for social engineering through the creation of a culture of > cyber security to be addressed specifically because of the increased > requirements by government to obligate to provide subscriber identification > information > > - how can African countries start up a cert- through collaboration for > example with existing CERTs > > - in establishing a culture of cybersecurity – consideration should be > given to the fact that there are different social cultures in different > countries however there is consensus on issues such as child pornography, > identity theft > > - how can a regional approach be developed where there are differences in > level of ICT infrastructure and use of infrastructure in the delivery of > services, what tools can be used to encourage decision makers to be involved > in the issues of cyber security? > > o It was recognised that funding and expertise was required for example > AFDB, World Bank and Islamic Bank while ITU have regional workshops on cyber > security > > o As African countries build on infrastructure and services – there is an > opportunity to learn from those that have already developed CERTs. > > - How does the CERT monitor traffic: with the collaboration of ISP and > operators as well as supporting legislation > > - Regulators need to advice the government to use ICT in development – this > is a manifestation of government commitment > > - The role of policy making was emphasized – as it provides government > commitment to using ICT for social economic development and governance and > consequently support for cyber security initiatives – including the > formulation of legislation. > > - There should not use a piece meal approach to cyber security to prevent > ineffectiveness for example Mauritius has electronic transaction act but PKI > not yet established > > > > On 12/5/08, mwende njiraini <mwende.njiraini(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Following our recent online discussions on Internet governance issues in >> Kenya, the Kenya IGF and East African IGF; you may wish to follow the >> discussion currently ongoing at the global IGF 2008 in Hyderabad India at >> http://www.intgovforum.org. >> >> Below are highlights from workshops I attended on Day 1 December 3rd): >> *0930-1100 hrs Workshop 43: Legal aspects of governance critical >> internet Policy issues of public relevance* >> *1st presentation* >> The issues on that have legal implications include: >> • internet security intellectual property rights, infringement, privacy >> and protection mechanisms >> • IP domain name protection, conflicts arising out of data and content >> ownership privacy therefore increasing role of P2P in growth of internet 2 >> • Consumer status and rights in relation to e-commerce cross border and >> domestic online trade >> • Telecom issue viz backbone deployment and interconnection costs >> • Freedom of expression – the extent of censorship and control on online >> content >> >> There is need for capacity building to create meaningful participation of >> individual and SMEs as well as increasing connectivity through building IXPs >> and local content development >> >> The question was raised as to whether there a need of alternative >> institutional mechanism. >> The salient features of the MOU between ICANN and the department of >> commerce (DoC) include: >> - The affirmation of the role of private sector leadership >> - The role of DoC in ensuring transparency and accountability and >> effective GAC participation >> - Ensure accountability and publish by-laws and strategic and operational >> plans >> - Agreement can be terminated in 120 days >> >> The MOU has been criticized because of the following reasons: >> - US governmental control on root server administration >> - Inconsistent with WSIS principle where no single government should have >> a pre-eminent role >> - Domain name allocation policies need better development >> - IPv4 address allocation have been imbalanced need to ensure IPv6 address >> allocation does not suffer the same effects -This assertion was however >> refuted as IP addresses allocation based on need. The need for prudent >> management and keeping barriers low for the transition to IPv6 was >> emphasised. >> >> To overcome this WGIG proposed 4 models: >> - Global policy council >> - Intenational internet council with leading government role to fulfil the >> ICANN/IANA functions >> - GAC to be strengthened with enhanced coordination function >> - Replace US govt role by general internet council or with world ICANN (in >> lieu of GAC) >> >> The common features of these models were the overwhelming government lead >> and the presupposition of the possibility of international treaties. During >> the discussion the viability of these models was questioned given that speed >> is of essence in the management of internet resources. It normally takes a >> long time to negotiate international agreements; including treaties instead >> a set of principles should be endorsed. >> >> The speaker recommended on the management of critical internet >> infrastructure should take into consideration the following >> • Treatment of technical resources of the internet and global economic, >> social and legal aspects arising out the internet should be at par >> • The development and implementation of polices and standards and >> solutions to various internet issues should be done in a coordinated manner >> for example telecommunication standard development is done in a hierarchical >> and predictable way. >> • New structure would be a supreme authority over internet >> >> In conclusion the speaker asked: Does the internet as we know it need to >> be altered radically? Should the status quo be maintained? Should a Red >> Cross model of recognition by international community states be given to an >> international entity like ITU, INTELSAT. However fundamental change is not >> necessary as failure has not been identified. >> >> *My comment*: this presentation was descriptive and despite the fact that >> an alternative model was proposed the principles, mechanisms that would need >> to be put in place in order to make it work were not discussed >> >> *2nd presentation* >> The next speaker spoke about the ccTLDs in latin Amercia which are broadly >> organised into two main groups: non-governmental and governmental >> organisations. A contribution from the floor however clarified that the >> Brazilian ccTLD is a multi-stakeholder – coordinated by government – but on >> a day by day basis operates as a non-governmental organisation. The Indian >> ccTLD is managed by government and private sector – sovereign interest taken >> care of through government representation. >> >> The rules and regulations under which the institutions that manage the >> ccTLDs are managed determinate legal framework under which they operate. >> Consequently ccTLDs are regulated under national law while ICANN regulates >> gTLDs – The possibility of self regulation is based on the assumption that >> private sector would act in the public interest. >> >> In the discussions some felt that there was need for increased attention >> of government in the management of ccTLDs – as it was critical >> infrastructure while on the other hand other felt that there was the risk of >> excessive regulation with increased involvement of government. >> >> *1130 -1200 hrs Workshop 36: Strategies to prevent and fight child >> pornography in developing countries* >> Child pornography in Brazil has grown out of the popularity of social >> networking. However the main challenge has been issues related to >> jurisdiction as content is resident in ISP based in the USA and >> trans-national ISPs like Yahoo, Microsoft and Google which have branches in >> strategic markets and have tailored the services for these markets in terms >> of language and content. >> >> Brazil was therefore unable to deal with serious offences related to >> content – specifically child pornography - committed by Brazilians using >> Brazilian IP addresses. The government has been able to sign an agreement >> with Google to fight child pornography on Google's orkut social network. >> >> The following are consideration taken in drawing up the agreement >> 1. Which criteria should be used to define the ability of a particular >> country to legislate over and sanction conducts committed on the internet? >> - Where the data is located? >> - International law principles (territoriality or nationality) shall be >> used to define the sovereignty of a state regarding – cyber space – which is >> a network of networks >> - Define some reasonable standard – for example managed by Brazilians and >> is local content and local language >> - Access points in Brazil, harmful conduct felt in the country – taken >> obligation under international law to take offence – country of origin >> approach would force thousands of users to unfamiliar rules and travel – >> offence under human rights therefore apply local legislation >> >> 2. It is legitimate to enforce the conduct of local office –as it >> impracticable to send legal request to the US. >> >> >> New tools have been implement that have reduced number of images uploaded >> and increase in number of reported cases- subject to investigation. It was >> inspiring to listen to parliamentarian talk about the need to have >> legislators engaged in the process as they ultimately pass the laws. I >> appreciated the fact that in there is great cooperation between the >> parliament, government, police, civil society and private sector. >> >> The main challenges are: >> • Lack of awareness and participation by parliamentarians who are critical >> in the formulation of legislation >> • how to obligate ISPs to provide information without infringing on >> freedom of expression and privacy, >> • what criteria should be used to deal with these offences >> • the creation of awareness of ISPs in developing countries of the need >> for judicial cooperation as well as social initiatives to deal with cyber >> crime. >> • Insufficient infrastructure to deal with this issue – law enforcement >> does not have the human resources and technology >> • Material produced to fight child pornography are not evaluated – they >> should be inline with the demand >> >> *My comment*: I would have like to know if initiatives have reduced >> offences, what is the success rate registered in prosecution, ability of the >> law enforcement and judicial system to deal with offences. There was no >> mention of where initiatives had been launched to fight child pornography on >> the financial front. >> >> >> *1530-1700 Workshop 45: Opening to diversity and competition of the DNS >> system* >> >> >> >> There were 3 presentations in this session: >> >> >> - *1st presentation* - alternate DNS system used in library systems >> >> >> - *2nd presentation* - implementation of security in the Handle system >> >> >> - *3rd presentation –* discussed the Net4D >> >> >> >> Net4D- provides the technical solution to the political concern on the >> control of root servers. Net4D networks enable the following: >> >> • Empower the second generation of the web: the semantic web. >> >> • Multi-stakeholder governance of DNS >> >> • Net4D classes should be open and interoperable >> >> DNS 1.0 – was a monopoly of ICANN web 1.0 html with USA parentage and >> English only while DNS 2.0 is open allowing for competition including inter >> alia: >> >> • Net4D semantic web >> >> • Open coherent approach to linguistic diversity >> >> • Allow technological innovation with value added services >> >> >> >> Concern was however raised on the: >> >> • Investment/implementation cost required to implementation of different >> DNS systems depending on the BIND implemented and root servers enabled >> >> • relinquishing of the political control of root servers >> >> • Value to end users >> >> • Awareness and understanding of the issues by different stakeholders >> necessary – delivered in a way that they can understand >> >> >> >> *My comment*: the session was technical – I hope the techies on the >> mailing list can help us understand the governance issues associated with >> the introduction of DNS competition and the impact on developing countries >> :)! >> >> >> >> Kind regards >> >> mwende >> > >

1 0

Vitriol in cyberspace
by alice＠apc.org 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Dear All, Could we comment on the presentation that Brian (a Kenyan) made at the IGF currently taking place in Hyderabad. It was an excellent presentation on access befitting the theme of the forum: "Internet for all" and he has done us proud. It is also great to have quite a large Kenyan delegation at this India IGF contributing Kenyan specific IG issues. The IGF is a process/event/forum that had not received enough attention both at the national and regional level. --------- I will also take this opportunity to remind listers of some of the KICTAnet mailing list rules: * Please mind your manners: * Be polite - virtual members are real not a cyberspace borg with no feelings. * Watch your words. Kick the bad language - People are listening. * Laws are laws - Whats real in the real world are the same in cyberspace. * Dont send rude or offensive e-mails or postings. * Be ethical in your posting. Don't lie, plagiarize, defame, or deliberately do harm to another KICTANet forum user. If you are not able to respect these simple rules...the KICTANet administrator will have no choice but to suspend you! best alice Binaifer Nowrojee wrote: > > For those who have not read this opinion piece, I would urge you to do so and reflect on it. Why do we need to bring down Brian Longwe on the basis of his nationality? Why not celebrate his success? Why assume that a non-Kenyan will not positively contribute to Kenya? > > Best > > Binaifer Nowrojee > > > > Barack Obama and the graveyard of hope > > Wambui Mwangi (2008-08-11) > > http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/comment/50078 > > Printer friendly version > > There are 2 comments on this article. > > I am finding it very difficult to join in the jubilation about Senator Barack Obama. Not that I want to deny the man his victory, but my impulse to celebrate keeps deflating on the idea that the best thing that happened to little Barack was not growing up in Kenya. > > I have been imagining alternative trajectories for him if he had come to know the world through the eyes of a Kenyan citizen, if his mother and grandparents had not rescued him from our chaos and contradictions and brought him up somewhere his intellect and talent could grow. > > If he had grown up here, and had he somehow managed to retain most elements of his current self, he would have been another outstanding, intelligent and competent Luo man in our midst: and he would have been killed. > > Yes, we would have assassinated a Barack Obama if he had remained ours, with us, one of us here in this schizophrenic cauldron we call home. This is not going to stretch the imagination of any Kenyan - after all, when we had that incredibly good-looking and charismatic home-grown hero, Tom Mboya, we shot him to death. > > And when that austerely intellectual and elegant leader, Robert Ouko, threatened to look overly intelligent to the world, we killed him too. We killed Pio Gama Pinto and we killed JM Kariuki. There is no reason to suppose that Barack Obama, whose integrity of purpose and stringent sense of ethics even his enemies concede, would have survived his Kenyan roots. > > He is much too intelligent, too charged with the promise of history, too bold in his claim to a shining destiny, too full of the audacity of hope, for us to have let him survive. Kenya would have killed Barack Obama, or at least his dream, as we inevitably destroy, in one way or another, the best and the boldest of us. Goldenberg whistle blower David Munyakei's challenge to his country to be bigger than our greed was met with a whimper, and then with rapid abandonment. We did not deserve him, either. > > As for John Githongo, he should have known better than to take the idea of public ethics seriously - this is Kenya, after all. Let him enlighten people at Oxford instead; such considerations are too virtuous for us, too sensible, too conducive to a promising future. We do not even remark on the haunting wastage of all this shining accomplishment - Micere Mugo sings her lyrical poetry for Americans, and we do not even know enough to mourn the loss. > > And yet we are all enchanted with the power of the idea of Barack Obama, the hope of him, the beauty of his life's trajectory, the universe of possibilities and probabilities that it conjures for the least of the rest of us. If someone's cousin's friend's neighbour makes it to the United States... then we all have a chance. We have a strange predilection for schizophrenic loves and loyalties; we let geography dictate our alliances and imaginary lines decide our friends. It is as if our social contract states that here, at home, we are obliged to behave like fighting rats to each other but when abroad, when released from the shackles of kin and clan and conclave, we can fly and soar and master the sky. > > When Wangari Maathai is abroad, we feel that her Nobel Prize is partly represented in each of our Kenyan living rooms; when she comes home, she is just another Kikuyu politico. We preen about our athletes winning yet another international competition to anybody who will give us half a chance, but when they are at home we turn them into more fodder for militias. > > Caine Prize winners are Kenyan by automatic assent, but Binyavanga Wainaina is a Kikuyu writer when at home and Yvonne Owuor is indelibly a Luo - we shrink them to fit the midget-sized visions we have of ourselves. > > It is clear to all of us, and the evidence continues to accrue, that we have, collectively, a certain global competence, as Kenyans, that we produce individuals of substance and historical purpose. > > Being Kenyan, however, we prefer to drown in the pettiness of our parochial quarrels when at home, and if one of us threatens to be too hopeful, too ambitious, too intelligent, too creative or too inspirational to fit into our trivial little categories of hatred and suspicion, we kill them, or exile them from our societies, or we just cause them to run away inside, hiding from us and from themselves the grandeur of their souls, the splendid landscapes of their imagined tomorrows. > > Nothing but the worst for us, at home. We recognise each other by our most rancid rhetoric. We insist upon it, we cultivate it, we elevate it to an art form: Kenyan, and quarrelsome. > > Kenyan, and clannish. Kenyan, and counter-productive. Kenyan, and self-destructive. Kenyan, and consistently heart-breaking. Genius everywhere, and not a thought to be had. Promise and potential everywhere, and not an opportunity to be had. Money everywhere, and not an honest penny to be earned. Helicopters aplenty, but no help for the needy. A land awash in Cabinet ministers and poverty. > > I have been watching Kenyans getting high on Obamamania, and I am wondering what we are so happy about? It is perhaps that we are beginning to acknowledge what we should always have known - given a half a chance, an ever so slightly conducive context, Kenyans are more likely to over-achieve than not. At the faintest provocation, Kenyans will leap past expectations without breaking their stride or breaking a sweat, especially if they happen to have escaped the imprisoning edifice we call home and found foreign contexts to flourish in, no matter how alien. > > I went to a town in the Canadian Arctic once, in the far north, where in summer the sun shines even at midnight and in the winter the world is an endless landscape of ice and snow. Here, far, far away from home, where nothing was familiar except the gentleness of elderly Inuit women and the comforting weirdness of the white residents, I was told that the local dentist had, for many years, been a Kenyan. Everybody said he had been an excellent dentist, out there in the desert of the cold. I was unsurprised. > > We are an adventurous people, we Kenyans, and we take to the world outside our home as if born to a conquistador culture - we are brave and brash and bold, out there. We buy and sell things, and make money at it, out there. We go to school and excel and cover ourselves with accreditations, out there. We win things, out there. We get prizes, out there. We are at our best, out there. > > However, at home, for some reason we refuse to either acknowledge or examine - we have chosen simply to set aside this capacity. Here, at home, nothing but the very lowest common denominator will do; nothing but the basest and most brutal aspects of our selves are to be presented to each other; nothing but the most cynical manipulation is the basis of our political space. We prefer to be ruled by individuals whose mediocrity is matched only by their mendacity, here at home. > > We prefer to abdicate our adult responsibilities and capacity for reason to "leaders" whose lack of virtue is as legendary as our attractively exotic pastoralists. We do not only waste talent, here at home - we go out of our way to suppress and repress it. We do not only deny dreams, here in Kenya - we devour them, and ask each other, "Who do you think you are?" As if the success of another is an affront. > > In Kenya, grand vision and soaring imagination is illegitimate; here, they just call you naive. Out there, you stand a chance of becoming a hero; at home, you will have nothing but the taste of ashes in your mouth. Mothers, take your children abroad. > > Barack Obama has written two books, in which he discusses ideas. Ideas. This is a man with vision and conviction, and enough good ideas that even those who do not like the pigmentally-advantaged are listening, and changing their minds. > > Even those who think that his name sounds suspiciously like a terrorist's are reading his books and listening to his speeches, and changing their minds. This is a man with interesting and inspiring things to say - which disqualifies him from any Kenyan-ness we would have liked to claim. > > Americans like the image of them that Barack Obama has painted in words; which Kenyan leader would dare to build dreams bigger than his roots? Which Kenyan leader would ever be so foolish as to attempt inspiration instead of instigation? > > Barack Obama has seduced the world by the power of his persuasiveness, and while Kenyans raise another glass to the accomplishments of "one of our own," it seems clear to me that we gave up our rights to him when we gave up our hopes for ourselves. When we settled for incompetence, and corruption, and callousness, we defined ourselves out of his universe, and out of his dreams. > > We rejected Barack Obama-ness when we allowed those pangas to slash our dreams, when we watched our hopes spiral away in smoke. We allowed the ones who had done this to become the only mirrors of ourselves, and then squelched our disgraced selves back to the mire of our despondency. > > Barack Obama cannot be a Kenyan, and Kenyans cannot grasp Barack Obama's dream. We have already despaired of it, and of ourselves. His dream would have died with ours, here at home, here in the graveyard of hope. > > But oh, how we yearn to see ourselves reflected in his eyes... > > > *Wambui Mwangi is an assitant professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto, Canada. This article first appeared inThe East African, June 15 2008. > > *Please send comments to editor(a)pambazuka.org or comment online at http://www.pambazuka.org/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: alice(a)apc.org > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alice%40apc.org

8 9

Will the cyber tourists come?
by robert yawe 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Hi all, We talk of the big 5 that bring large chunks of foreign currency through tourism, we shamelessly exploit a resource we played no part in developing. Could this be why we cannot create local content and just seat back and hope that the marine cable will bring cyber tourism just like airports brought millions to see the big 5. I ask, we keep raising the issue of generating local content and yet we still are not making the effort to do it, can someone out there, for example, put online a comprehensive database of schools and colleges that can be easily accessed from anywhere in the country? I remember being given a yellow coloured career booklet when I was in Form 4 which listed all the governments colleges and institutions of learning ranging from tailoring to engineering. Is there no way to take such a booklet, update it and make it instantly available from Lamu to Wajir (not forgetting Chepalungu). This would at least encourage domestic cyber tourism thus keeping some traffic local, while seriously thinking of what we could provide to foreign cyber tourists. Can we encourage our youth & mentally alive older geeks to come up with a thinggy (for lack of a better phrase e.g what would you have called facebook before facebook) that can drive traffic to Kenya. ICTBoard find some loose change somewhere to show case serious application ideas nothing like what is domonstrated at the IEEE exhibition (too much cut & paste), lets become venture capitalists (that sounds hip) maybe we can give DJ. CJ a new pet project. After the post election what which when who where, it might would help the healing to place our diverse cultural practices online so that I can use the tool I understand and respect, the web, to better understand other ethnic groups. Now this could be a cyber tourism puller, maybe even create online villages that someone can become a member of thus learn about the tribe. Develop online language training programs of our various languages which cyber citizens can then learn to better understand the tribes. Our strength is in our diversity let milk it to our benefit. It is interesting how as kenyans we are aware a problem &know the solution but for some unexplainable reason we still proceed to the illogical end. I am a true Kenyan. There is a very good Robert Yawe KAY System Technologies Ltd Phoenix House, 6th Floor P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200 Kenya Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696 ________________________________ From: Joseph Manthi <jmanthi(a)gmail.com> To: robert yawe <robertyawe(a)yahoo.co.uk> Sent: Tuesday, 9 December, 2008 18:15:57 Subject: Re: [kictanet] 1 million Laptops for who? Robert Very well said. 1. I agree totally that the Ministry should consider equiping students of the various public universities with laptops that they can take home at the end of their school year, After all these are the very best and brightest Kenya has to offer. One of my former high school classmates told me that the Very Brightest went to the University of Nairobi and the rest went to India, US, Canada, UK and other places according to how deep pocketed your tall relatives were. 2. Secondly, to encourage entrepreneurship shouldn't the ministry in conjunction with the ministry of commerce (I am dating myself?) to build and supply the laptops in Kenya. PCs are now commodities that can be locally assembled. 3. If you agree with 2 above, have African (Kenyan) entrepreneurs build them in rural areas. My 2 cents. Joe On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:15 AM, robert yawe <robertyawe(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: Hi Dr. Ndemo, I felt it would not be fair to close the year with one final outburst on your ministries policies. It was good to see that the governement will be giving laptops to youth in the rural area. http://www.nation.co.ke/business/news/-/1006/499894/-/jh30hdz/-/index.html Last time I checked 80% of the students in the University are from the "rural areas" would it not make more sense to first equip them with the necessary tools. I recently talked to IT degree students at Nairobi university and was shocked to find that less than 5% have computers dedicated to them and this are not provided by the institution but have been bought privately. It is good to talk of empowering the rural folk but is this the best way, should we not begin at the top and work our way down. This computers would also provide greater mileage if we example they where to be giving to to students in teacher training colleges so that they can take technology to the schools, country wide that they will be posted to after they graduate? Also do not forget the medical students who would be able to provide better medical services if they knew how to use and had access to the internet's resources. Another major issue that is lacking from the story is how the laptops are to be procured, is there any likelihood that they will be assembled locally as if they are we shall be killing to birds with 1 stone. Robert Yawe KAY System Technologies Ltd Phoenix House, 6th Floor P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200 Kenya Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696 _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent to: jmanthi(a)gmail.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jmanthi%40gmail.com -- Joseph Manthi CEO MEO Ltd http://www.meoltd.com

2 1

1 million Laptops for who?
by robert yawe 09 Dec '08

09 Dec '08

Hi Dr. Ndemo, I felt it would not be fair to close the year with one final outburst on your ministries policies. It was good to see that the governement will be giving laptops to youth in the rural area. http://www.nation.co.ke/business/news/-/1006/499894/-/jh30hdz/-/index.html Last time I checked 80% of the students in the University are from the "rural areas" would it not make more sense to first equip them with the necessary tools. I recently talked to IT degree students at Nairobi university and was shocked to find that less than 5% have computers dedicated to them and this are not provided by the institution but have been bought privately. It is good to talk of empowering the rural folk but is this the best way, should we not begin at the top and work our way down. This computers would also provide greater mileage if we example they where to be giving to to students in teacher training colleges so that they can take technology to the schools, country wide that they will be posted to after they graduate? Also do not forget the medical students who would be able to provide better medical services if they knew how to use and had access to the internet's resources. Another major issue that is lacking from the story is how the laptops are to be procured, is there any likelihood that they will be assembled locally as if they are we shall be killing to birds with 1 stone. Robert Yawe KAY System Technologies Ltd Phoenix House, 6th Floor P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200 Kenya Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696

1 0

Moderator please help us!!
by smwngi＠gmail.com 09 Dec '08

09 Dec '08

Good Afternoon KICTANET Moderator. This forum has been very benefital to use when it comes to matters and issues of ICT. However, during the last few weeks its lost value as most of the comments that are flooding our inboxes are witch haunts by a selected few individuals. I urge you to filter this from your mailboxs. I see majority of subscribers asking removal from your mailing list. Am sure you have seen what has happened and I hope you are doing something about it. Thanks Stephen Mwangi

5 8

Internship Oppirtunities at Google EMEA- Spread the word
by Robert Alai 09 Dec '08

09 Dec '08

*Do more. A lot more. Technical Internship Opportunities at Google EMEA * Here at Google, we're not looking for people who will just localise technologies developed in other countries, nor simply engineers focussed on improving infrastructure. What we are looking for are people with outstanding technical skills, creativity, potential and passion who can help invent end-to-end technologies from scratch; stuff that will interest and inspire millions of users across the world. During an internship with us you'll have the opportunity to contribute to projects in a direct and meaningful way. We're taking into account your skills and interests when determining which of our small and dynamic teams you will be joining. Your pre-assigned host will find projects that are right for you and work closely with you during your time with us. We're confident that an internship with us will be a rewarding experience that will develop your ability to programme at a global scale, deepen your understanding of Computer Science and allow you to connect with outstanding people from all over the world. Your internship will most likely take place in our engineering centre in Zurich, Switzerland<http://www.google.com/support/jobs/bin/static.py?page=studentseu.html&sid=z…>. If you are accepted for an internship, you'll need to move for the duration of your time with us and we'll gladly help you with all the logistics (visa, accommodation) related to this move. Start and end dates of Google Engineering internships are flexible, with a minimum duration of three months. Internships are typically full-time positions, are paid, and take place year-round. *The ideal intern profile for Google* To be eligible for an internship, you should be enrolled in a BS, MS or PhD in Computer Science or a related technical field and be within 12-18 months of completing a Bachelor's or Master's degree, or at any stage in your PhD. Please note that you should be returning to university after the end of your internship, or the internship should be a formal part of completing your studies. The following are also key requirements: - Experience in systems software or algorithms. - Excellent programming skills (C++; Java and/or Python). - Knowledge of UNIX/Linux or Windows environments and APIs. - Familiarity with TCP/IP and network programming a plus. - Fluency in English *How to apply? * We welcome applications from students to spend an internship with us at one of our European offices and review applications on an ongoing basis. To maximise your chances of success we'd encourage you to apply as soon as possible, and 4 months before the desired start of your internship at the latest. The following link<http://www.google.com/support/jobs/bin/answer.py?answer=112436>will lead you to our online job site through which you can submit your application. Please submit your application for the *Software Engineer Intern - Europe* position only as it will allow us to process your application without delay. Your application should contain the following documents: - An up-to-date CV - University transcripts/grades (unofficial is fine, including your GPA if possible) - A cover letter stating your graduation date and when you would be available for an internship (minimum 3, maximum 12 months) If you like more information about preparing your CV, please have a look at our Preparing your CV<http://www.google.com/support/jobs/bin/static.py?page=studentseu.html&sid=r…>section. *Should you have any questions or experience technical difficulties submitting your application, please contact us directly at africa-interns-2009(a)google.com*

1 0

Re: [kictanet] ADOPTION OF ISO/IEC 26300 AND ISO/IEC 29500
by Dorcas Muthoni 08 Dec '08

08 Dec '08

Sure Zacheus, Thanks for your work. We always follow with implementation. Thats our work. The only way to move beyond the meeting/committee rooms. Which is what you expect. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Zacheus Mwatha <zimwatha(a)kebs.org> wrote: > Dorcas, > > > > Kindly let's walk the talk. > > > > Kind regards. > > > > *Mwatha Z I (Mr.)* > > *Kenya Bureau of Standards* > > *KEBS Centre, Popo Road, off Mombasa Road, Behind Bellevue Cinema* > > *P.O. Box 54974 — 00200 Nairobi, Kenya* > > *ISDN: +254 (0)20 6948270* > > *Tel: +254 (0)20 605490, 6948000, (0)722 202137* > > *Fax:+254 (0)20 609660, 604031* > > *Other E-Mail: mwatha_zacs(a)yahoo.com <info(a)kebs.org>* > > *Personal Cellphone: +254 (0)722 368998* > > *__________________________________________________________ ** > * > *"Quality products for quality life"* > > > > *Disclaimer* > > This e-mail and its attachments are confidential, private and intended for > the addressee only. Should you not be the addressee and receive this e-mail > by mistake, kindly notify the sender, and delete this e-mail, immediately > and do not disclose or use same in any manner whatsoever. Views and opinions > expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender unless clearly stated as > those of KEBS. The Bureau accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or > damages whatsoever and howsoever incurred, or suffered, resulting, or > arising, from the use of this email or its attachments. The Bureau does not > warrant the integrity of this e-mail nor that it is free of errors, viruses, > interception or interference. For information about Kenya Bureau of > Standards visit our website at http://www.kebs.org > > > > *From:* Dorcas Muthoni [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Jumatatu, Decemba 08, 2008 1:36 PM > *To:* Gakuru Alex > *Cc:* Zacheus Mwatha; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions > *Subject:* Re: [kictanet] ADOPTION OF ISO/IEC 26300 AND ISO/IEC 29500 > > > > Dear All, > > As documents and services are increasingly transformed from paper to > electronic form, there is a growing problem that governments and their > constituents as well as private enterprises may not be able to access, > retrieve and use critical records, information and documents in the future. > To enable the public and private sector to have greater control over and > direct management of their own records, information and documents, it is > important that we adopt and advance the use of the OpenDocument Format > (ODF). > > It is important that all policymakers, IT administrators, decision mankers > (for both public and private) advance the benefits and opportunities of the > OpenDocument Format, to help ensure that government and private enterprise > information, records and documents are accessible across platforms and > applications, even as technologies change today and in the future. > > Thanks to KEBS for moving Kenya forward on this. > > Kindly take two minutes to review and complete the document for adoption. > Most importantly, remember to submit your signed form back to KEBS. > > Thanks Alex for sharing this. > > Regards, > Muthoni > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > All, > > I am forwarding this as requested on the message body. > > Please direct any inquiries to the KEBS staffer copied. > > Sincerely, > > Alex Gakuru > > PS: > Walubengo is copied to ensure this larger-than-40k post gets bounced. > AG > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Zacheus Mwatha <zimwatha(a)kebs.org> > Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:01 AM > Subject: ADOPTION OF ISO/IEC 26300 AND ISO/IEC 29500 > To: Zaheda Bhorat <zaheda(a)google.com>, Zacheus Mwatha > <zimwatha(a)kebs.org>, jsevilla(a)strathmore.edu, JOHNSONM(a)za.ibm.com, > cakunga(a)virtualcity.co.ke, chetan(a)skytechafrica.com, > dofisi(a)cskonline.org, dkamiri(a)kenyalaw.org, > michael.owuor(a)manageworks.co.ke, sammy(a)skytechafrica.com, > mail(a)cskonline.org, bremack1(a)yahoo.com, iondieki(a)vegasoftware.com, > peterk(a)sdae.co.ke, sammynjuguna(a)hotmail.com, edgar.kioga(a)wfp.org, > keziah(a)cskonline.org, jkimilu(a)icsit.jkuat.ac.ke, > samuel.kuria(a)kenya-airways.com, Emmanuel.Birech(a)microsoft.com, > emailsignet(a)mailcan.com, edgar.okioga(a)gmail.com, pmwele(a)gmail.com, > csk(a)nbi.ispkenya.com, vawuor2001(a)yahoo.com, waiganjo(a)uonbi.ac.ke, > Jeremy Allison <jra(a)google.com>, Joseph Mucheru <jmucheru(a)google.com>, > Gakuru <gakuru(a)gmail.com>, Lucy <lucym(a)za.ibm.com>, Okoth Monica > <okothm(a)kebs.org>, Wambua Amos <wambuaa(a)kebs.org> > Cc: mwatha_zacs(a)yahoo.com > > > Dear Sir/Madam, > > > > There are requests which have been received to adopt the above two > international standards. > > > > Attached are self explanatory letters and adoption proposal forms > which you are kindly requested to complete and return to us for > processing. Kindly note that the form MUST BE SIGNED AND STAMPED > otherwise it won't be taken into account during processing. You are > free to use any mode of transmission (fax/email/post/hand > delivery/etc) as long as the forms reaches us not later than the due > date. Any ballots received after the deadline will be disregarded. > > > > You are free to forward this information to as many stakeholders as > possible since we need a national response to this matter. > > > > Finally, if you forward to any stakeholder or group of stakeholders, > kindly copy me the mail so that i may have a database of all those > that received the information (if you use bcc it won't be of much help > to me). > > > > Kind regards. > > > > Mwatha Z I (Mr.) > > Kenya Bureau of Standards > > KEBS Centre, Popo Road, off Mombasa Road, Behind Bellevue Cinema > > P.O. Box 54974 — 00200 Nairobi, Kenya > > ISDN: +254 (0)20 6948270 > > Tel: +254 (0)20 605490, 6948000, (0)722 202137 > > Fax:+254 (0)20 609660, 604031 > > Other E-Mail: mwatha_zacs(a)yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________________ > "Quality products for quality life" > > > > Disclaimer > > This e-mail and its attachments are confidential, private and intended > for the addressee only. Should you not be the addressee and receive > this e-mail by mistake, kindly notify the sender, and delete this > e-mail, immediately and do not disclose or use same in any manner > whatsoever. Views and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of > the sender unless clearly stated as those of KEBS. The Bureau accepts > no liability whatsoever for any loss or damages whatsoever and > howsoever incurred, or suffered, resulting, or arising, from the use > of this email or its attachments. The Bureau does not warrant the > integrity of this e-mail nor that it is free of errors, viruses, > interception or interference. For information about Kenya Bureau of > Standards visit our website at http://www.kebs.org > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -------------------------------------------------- > "easy access to the world" > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: dmuthoni(a)gmail.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/dmuthoni%40gmail.com > > > > > -- > Muthoni > > My Blog: http://rugongo.blogspot.com/ > -------------------------------------------- > Mahatma Gandhi once said:- > > First they ignore you, > Then they laugh at you, > Then they fight you, > AND THEN YOU WIN!!! > > -------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *Jambo MailScanner* <http://www.mail.jambo.co.ke/>, > and is > believed to be clean. > -------------------------------------------------- > "easy access to the world" > -- Muthoni My Blog: http://rugongo.blogspot.com/ -------------------------------------------- Mahatma Gandhi once said:- First they ignore you, Then they laugh at you, Then they fight you, AND THEN YOU WIN!!!

1 0

Re: [kictanet] IGF 2008 Highlights - Day 3
by mwende njiraini 08 Dec '08

08 Dec '08

*5th December 2008* *930-1100 Panel Discussion Transition from IPv4 to IPv6* Based on several studies it is projected that IPv4 addresses will be globally exhausted by 2011 however address space will still be available at a local level. Seamless take up of IPv6 is expected with the exhaustion of IPv4 and there is on going discussion – to define policy to facilitate smooth transition for operators and ensure that new comers have minimum IPv6 address space allocation to start up business. The following issues were discussed from different perspectives: *Issues from operators' perspective*: - Deployment of IPv6 enabled equipment in the core networks should be done increment – however uptake is low because there is no extra revenue generated with the implementation of IPv6 i.e. the lack of commercial drivers. However this is expected to change with the as customer numbers grow. - Need for upgrade – therefore operators from developed countries stand at an advantage as they have the resources and are nearly exhausted their local allocations. - Getting operational experience is a challenge – there is need to invest in operational tools to run IPv6 in terms of software configuration utilities management and trouble shooting - Participation in standardization – where users have equipment that supports only IPv4 – how do they access services that are available only on IPv6-based networks? The IETF is working on the transition mechanisms however the co-existence of both protocols is expected for a long time - Operators are pushing for IPv6 support in customer premise equipment (CPE) as well as software that supports the new protocol version. However it is expected that legacy applications will be available in the foreseeable future *Issues from a vendor perspective* - Transition has been going on for some time in the vendor world. The transition has been a long process for vendors and operators – in terms of getting the technology and standards ready - As IP is the core of the internet – transition to ipv6 – is significant particularly with the increase of IPv6 enabled devices connected to the internet specifically mobile phones - need to understand technology and therefore need for operational and implementation experience - managing customer demand/expectations for IPv6 enabled services and devices - cost of staff training - there are mistakes that will be made – therefore need for mutual support in the implementation of v6 *Social and economic perspectives*- - Transition should be cooperative endeavour with social and economic and policy considerations - Gradual implementation and interoperability between IPv4 and v6 expected so as to preserve the investment already made - There is a general understanding that IPv6 will compliment and supplement the existing IPv4 as well as provide improved routing, multicasting, efficient infrastructure. The following questions however arise: o The advantages that IPv6 offer are good reasons to invest in the new IP version. o Would transition be transparent and would backward compatibility required - Users want the stability of the internet to be maintained and hope that IPv6 will offer opportunities for addition to personality features on the internet – this is what makes the business case - In the India case there are a large number of service providers – and there is only a 1/8 usage – therefore demand is low – the need to enhance cultural diversity however provides opportunities to create demand through local content development including E-government programme and Info-tainment - It is important to break the myth that IPv6 is a new internet - It is not a new internet rather continuation of the internet - The main benefit is the address space addition- which may allow for efficiency - There is no need to establish a deadline or regulate the implementation of IPv6 – as it will be market driven. Additionally users should have rights to use IPv4 and IETF is working on coexistence *Policy perspective* - With the impending exhaustion of IPv4 – further implementation will be problematic – as not all players will support transition therefore it is important to examine measures – for continued use of IPv4 and possible migration of users to private IPv4 address space - creation of action plan to be implemented by 2010 – for example offering of incentives such as tax exemption and capacity building - examination of existing programmes and mechanisms - establishment of taskforce of IPv4 exhaustion - the messages of ISPs is that they must carry IPv6 - IPv4 scarcity and demand for more security are the 2 major challenges driving the uptake of IPv6 - Institution of market transfer or reclamation mechanisms of IPv4 resources not required by local internet registries to the regional internet registries when transition to IPv6 is implemented. However this would be a challenge as RIRs have no contractual authority this may create a grey market. This challenge may be overcome through a loose membership association that allows others to use others resources - Institution of secure routing objects including PKI to authenticate users raises governance/control issues – RIRs have centralized control which may make it efficient and better able to address security issues this makes an RIR an central governance institution. Membership of security/government associations in the RIR would result in infiltration of technical, policy agendas that may make the transition to IPv6 complicated - However it is argued that RIRs should remain neutral and trans-national institutions which: o maintain a homogenous technical group o maintain a bottom-up approach in policy making o guarantee the stability of the internet and business continuity of members - main challenges in the deployment of IPv6 include: o lack of public education, information and skill o limited network policy decisions to make deployment happen o lack of incentive to deploy ipv6 *1100-1230 Workshop 59:Building a global capacity building curriculum framework and premier* - Integration of IG capacity building in existing ICT and public policy courses was advocated. - The training may be offered either online, offline or through short term executive courses. - Collaboration between different stakeholders who have different needs is imperative in order create an understanding of the issues arising from increased used of the internet particularly those that transcend the geographical, and cultural borders. - internet security awareness programme set up in India - Presentations on the Diplo IG capacity building programme ( www.diplomacy.edu/ig) – including a demonstration of the online platform. - The Diplo approach includes the training course (foundation and advanced), policy research, policy immersion and community interaction. - The impact associated with the IG capacity building programme have been varied and impressive including the establishment of IG governance masters programme in Srilanka and the use of telecentres to disseminate IG related information. - Diplo has successfully offered the training to professional worldwide for the last 4 years leading to the establishment of national, regional and global community *1400-1530 Workshop 29: Building confidence and security in the use and security in the use of ICTs for African countries *Main challenges in Africa - lack of infrastructure - lack of services Therefore opportunity to learn from mistakes in developing countries and establish of computer emergency response team currently there is only one active CERT in Africa in Tunisia, South Africa is in the process of setting up a CERT with the deadline of 2010 before the FIFA world cup. While countries such as Morocco, Kenya and Ivory Coast are thinking about set in up CERTs. The approach in dealing with Cybersecurity in developing countries Success of Cybersecurity is based on 3pillars 1. *Technology pillar* – ICT/security tools –including: o PCs / networks, physical security tools, data tools (storage media and cryptography), availability of infrastructure and application (redundant servers and PKI) 2. *Methodology pillar* – policy, procedures and regulations on three levels: o managerial level (security policy, management procedures and capacity building, audit) Legislative level (law and regulation) o operational level (acces control rules, implementation plans, monitoring, watch, incidence handling) o continuity of services level ( business continuity plan, crisis management, drill exercises) - actors in this pillar include the government, security professionals and users 3. *Social behaviour pillar* – creating a culture of cyber security o cultivate culture of cyber security through continuous action of raising awareness using diverse media/channels o the target audience includes managers, decision makers, security, children, parents, teachers *Case study: CERT-TCC - Tunisia* *The functions of the CERT include*: - Watch- collect information from different sources eg CISCO, HP. Microsoft, network of CERTs, community of hackers - Training - Coordination - Response - Incidence handling - Incident analysis - Awareness - Warning alert *Key issues*: • Information, warning and alert – carried out to in collaboration with ISPs, managers decision makers, internet community through mailing list, call centre, media • Oriented campaign – utilizing prospectus, posters, email, radio, cartoons, video, attack simulation and guides • Incident handling - training in new tools • Coordination important in the effective functioning of the CERT – incident coordination procedures and information including regional CERTs, other CERTs within the country (for example Brazil has more than one CERT), ISPs and operators, vendors and integrators, and national authorities. Need for the formation of CERTs in Africa however the challenges of lack of "know how" in IT security need to be overcome through: - capacity building - encouragement of the development of national solutions based on open source components - improved R&D capabilities and making it more responsive to urgent needs - encouraging academic research in the important topics of security (cryptography, methodologies…) *The following questions and comments were raised*: - the need for social engineering through the creation of a culture of cyber security to be addressed specifically because of the increased requirements by government to obligate to provide subscriber identification information - how can African countries start up a cert- through collaboration for example with existing CERTs - in establishing a culture of cybersecurity – consideration should be given to the fact that there are different social cultures in different countries however there is consensus on issues such as child pornography, identity theft - how can a regional approach be developed where there are differences in level of ICT infrastructure and use of infrastructure in the delivery of services, what tools can be used to encourage decision makers to be involved in the issues of cyber security? o It was recognised that funding and expertise was required for example AFDB, World Bank and Islamic Bank while ITU have regional workshops on cyber security o As African countries build on infrastructure and services – there is an opportunity to learn from those that have already developed CERTs. - How does the CERT monitor traffic: with the collaboration of ISP and operators as well as supporting legislation - Regulators need to advice the government to use ICT in development – this is a manifestation of government commitment - The role of policy making was emphasized – as it provides government commitment to using ICT for social economic development and governance and consequently support for cyber security initiatives – including the formulation of legislation. - There should not use a piece meal approach to cyber security to prevent ineffectiveness for example Mauritius has electronic transaction act but PKI not yet established On 12/5/08, mwende njiraini <mwende.njiraini(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Following our recent online discussions on Internet governance issues in > Kenya, the Kenya IGF and East African IGF; you may wish to follow the > discussion currently ongoing at the global IGF 2008 in Hyderabad India at > http://www.intgovforum.org. > > Below are highlights from workshops I attended on Day 1 December 3rd): > *0930-1100 hrs Workshop 43: Legal aspects of governance critical internet > Policy issues of public relevance* > *1st presentation* > The issues on that have legal implications include: > • internet security intellectual property rights, infringement, privacy and > protection mechanisms > • IP domain name protection, conflicts arising out of data and content > ownership privacy therefore increasing role of P2P in growth of internet 2 > • Consumer status and rights in relation to e-commerce cross border and > domestic online trade > • Telecom issue viz backbone deployment and interconnection costs > • Freedom of expression – the extent of censorship and control on online > content > > There is need for capacity building to create meaningful participation of > individual and SMEs as well as increasing connectivity through building IXPs > and local content development > > The question was raised as to whether there a need of alternative > institutional mechanism. > The salient features of the MOU between ICANN and the department of > commerce (DoC) include: > - The affirmation of the role of private sector leadership > - The role of DoC in ensuring transparency and accountability and effective > GAC participation > - Ensure accountability and publish by-laws and strategic and operational > plans > - Agreement can be terminated in 120 days > > The MOU has been criticized because of the following reasons: > - US governmental control on root server administration > - Inconsistent with WSIS principle where no single government should have a > pre-eminent role > - Domain name allocation policies need better development > - IPv4 address allocation have been imbalanced need to ensure IPv6 address > allocation does not suffer the same effects -This assertion was however > refuted as IP addresses allocation based on need. The need for prudent > management and keeping barriers low for the transition to IPv6 was > emphasised. > > To overcome this WGIG proposed 4 models: > - Global policy council > - Intenational internet council with leading government role to fulfil the > ICANN/IANA functions > - GAC to be strengthened with enhanced coordination function > - Replace US govt role by general internet council or with world ICANN (in > lieu of GAC) > > The common features of these models were the overwhelming government lead > and the presupposition of the possibility of international treaties. During > the discussion the viability of these models was questioned given that speed > is of essence in the management of internet resources. It normally takes a > long time to negotiate international agreements; including treaties instead > a set of principles should be endorsed. > > The speaker recommended on the management of critical internet > infrastructure should take into consideration the following > • Treatment of technical resources of the internet and global economic, > social and legal aspects arising out the internet should be at par > • The development and implementation of polices and standards and solutions > to various internet issues should be done in a coordinated manner for > example telecommunication standard development is done in a hierarchical and > predictable way. > • New structure would be a supreme authority over internet > > In conclusion the speaker asked: Does the internet as we know it need to be > altered radically? Should the status quo be maintained? Should a Red Cross > model of recognition by international community states be given to an > international entity like ITU, INTELSAT. However fundamental change is not > necessary as failure has not been identified. > > *My comment*: this presentation was descriptive and despite the fact that > an alternative model was proposed the principles, mechanisms that would need > to be put in place in order to make it work were not discussed > > *2nd presentation* > The next speaker spoke about the ccTLDs in latin Amercia which are broadly > organised into two main groups: non-governmental and governmental > organisations. A contribution from the floor however clarified that the > Brazilian ccTLD is a multi-stakeholder – coordinated by government – but on > a day by day basis operates as a non-governmental organisation. The Indian > ccTLD is managed by government and private sector – sovereign interest taken > care of through government representation. > > The rules and regulations under which the institutions that manage the > ccTLDs are managed determinate legal framework under which they operate. > Consequently ccTLDs are regulated under national law while ICANN regulates > gTLDs – The possibility of self regulation is based on the assumption that > private sector would act in the public interest. > > In the discussions some felt that there was need for increased attention of > government in the management of ccTLDs – as it was critical infrastructure > while on the other hand other felt that there was the risk of excessive > regulation with increased involvement of government. > > *1130 -1200 hrs Workshop 36: Strategies to prevent and fight child > pornography in developing countries* > Child pornography in Brazil has grown out of the popularity of social > networking. However the main challenge has been issues related to > jurisdiction as content is resident in ISP based in the USA and > trans-national ISPs like Yahoo, Microsoft and Google which have branches in > strategic markets and have tailored the services for these markets in terms > of language and content. > > Brazil was therefore unable to deal with serious offences related to > content – specifically child pornography - committed by Brazilians using > Brazilian IP addresses. The government has been able to sign an agreement > with Google to fight child pornography on Google's orkut social network. > > The following are consideration taken in drawing up the agreement > 1. Which criteria should be used to define the ability of a particular > country to legislate over and sanction conducts committed on the internet? > - Where the data is located? > - International law principles (territoriality or nationality) shall be > used to define the sovereignty of a state regarding – cyber space – which is > a network of networks > - Define some reasonable standard – for example managed by Brazilians and > is local content and local language > - Access points in Brazil, harmful conduct felt in the country – taken > obligation under international law to take offence – country of origin > approach would force thousands of users to unfamiliar rules and travel – > offence under human rights therefore apply local legislation > > 2. It is legitimate to enforce the conduct of local office –as it > impracticable to send legal request to the US. > > > New tools have been implement that have reduced number of images uploaded > and increase in number of reported cases- subject to investigation. It was > inspiring to listen to parliamentarian talk about the need to have > legislators engaged in the process as they ultimately pass the laws. I > appreciated the fact that in there is great cooperation between the > parliament, government, police, civil society and private sector. > > The main challenges are: > • Lack of awareness and participation by parliamentarians who are critical > in the formulation of legislation > • how to obligate ISPs to provide information without infringing on freedom > of expression and privacy, > • what criteria should be used to deal with these offences > • the creation of awareness of ISPs in developing countries of the need for > judicial cooperation as well as social initiatives to deal with cyber crime. > • Insufficient infrastructure to deal with this issue – law enforcement > does not have the human resources and technology > • Material produced to fight child pornography are not evaluated – they > should be inline with the demand > > *My comment*: I would have like to know if initiatives have reduced > offences, what is the success rate registered in prosecution, ability of the > law enforcement and judicial system to deal with offences. There was no > mention of where initiatives had been launched to fight child pornography on > the financial front. > > > *1530-1700 Workshop 45: Opening to diversity and competition of the DNS > system* > > > > There were 3 presentations in this session: > > > - *1st presentation* - alternate DNS system used in library systems > > > - *2nd presentation* - implementation of security in the Handle system > > > - *3rd presentation –* discussed the Net4D > > > > Net4D- provides the technical solution to the political concern on the > control of root servers. Net4D networks enable the following: > > • Empower the second generation of the web: the semantic web. > > • Multi-stakeholder governance of DNS > > • Net4D classes should be open and interoperable > > DNS 1.0 – was a monopoly of ICANN web 1.0 html with USA parentage and > English only while DNS 2.0 is open allowing for competition including inter > alia: > > • Net4D semantic web > > • Open coherent approach to linguistic diversity > > • Allow technological innovation with value added services > > > > Concern was however raised on the: > > • Investment/implementation cost required to implementation of different > DNS systems depending on the BIND implemented and root servers enabled > > • relinquishing of the political control of root servers > > • Value to end users > > • Awareness and understanding of the issues by different stakeholders > necessary – delivered in a way that they can understand > > > > *My comment*: the session was technical – I hope the techies on the > mailing list can help us understand the governance issues associated with > the introduction of DNS competition and the impact on developing countries > :)! > > > > Kind regards > > mwende >

1 0

ADOPTION OF ISO/IEC 26300 AND ISO/IEC 29500
by Gakuru Alex 08 Dec '08

08 Dec '08

All, I am forwarding this as requested on the message body. Please direct any inquiries to the KEBS staffer copied. Sincerely, Alex Gakuru PS: Walubengo is copied to ensure this larger-than-40k post gets bounced. AG ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Zacheus Mwatha <zimwatha(a)kebs.org> Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:01 AM Subject: ADOPTION OF ISO/IEC 26300 AND ISO/IEC 29500 To: Zaheda Bhorat <zaheda(a)google.com>, Zacheus Mwatha <zimwatha(a)kebs.org>, jsevilla(a)strathmore.edu, JOHNSONM(a)za.ibm.com, cakunga(a)virtualcity.co.ke, chetan(a)skytechafrica.com, dofisi(a)cskonline.org, dkamiri(a)kenyalaw.org, michael.owuor(a)manageworks.co.ke, sammy(a)skytechafrica.com, mail(a)cskonline.org, bremack1(a)yahoo.com, iondieki(a)vegasoftware.com, peterk(a)sdae.co.ke, sammynjuguna(a)hotmail.com, edgar.kioga(a)wfp.org, keziah(a)cskonline.org, jkimilu(a)icsit.jkuat.ac.ke, samuel.kuria(a)kenya-airways.com, Emmanuel.Birech(a)microsoft.com, emailsignet(a)mailcan.com, edgar.okioga(a)gmail.com, pmwele(a)gmail.com, csk(a)nbi.ispkenya.com, vawuor2001(a)yahoo.com, waiganjo(a)uonbi.ac.ke, Jeremy Allison <jra(a)google.com>, Joseph Mucheru <jmucheru(a)google.com>, Gakuru <gakuru(a)gmail.com>, Lucy <lucym(a)za.ibm.com>, Okoth Monica <okothm(a)kebs.org>, Wambua Amos <wambuaa(a)kebs.org> Cc: mwatha_zacs(a)yahoo.com Dear Sir/Madam, There are requests which have been received to adopt the above two international standards. Attached are self explanatory letters and adoption proposal forms which you are kindly requested to complete and return to us for processing. Kindly note that the form MUST BE SIGNED AND STAMPED otherwise it won't be taken into account during processing. You are free to use any mode of transmission (fax/email/post/hand delivery/etc) as long as the forms reaches us not later than the due date. Any ballots received after the deadline will be disregarded. You are free to forward this information to as many stakeholders as possible since we need a national response to this matter. Finally, if you forward to any stakeholder or group of stakeholders, kindly copy me the mail so that i may have a database of all those that received the information (if you use bcc it won't be of much help to me). Kind regards. Mwatha Z I (Mr.) Kenya Bureau of Standards KEBS Centre, Popo Road, off Mombasa Road, Behind Bellevue Cinema P.O. Box 54974 — 00200 Nairobi, Kenya ISDN: +254 (0)20 6948270 Tel: +254 (0)20 605490, 6948000, (0)722 202137 Fax:+254 (0)20 609660, 604031 Other E-Mail: mwatha_zacs(a)yahoo.com __________________________________________________________ "Quality products for quality life" Disclaimer This e-mail and its attachments are confidential, private and intended for the addressee only. Should you not be the addressee and receive this e-mail by mistake, kindly notify the sender, and delete this e-mail, immediately and do not disclose or use same in any manner whatsoever. Views and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender unless clearly stated as those of KEBS. The Bureau accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damages whatsoever and howsoever incurred, or suffered, resulting, or arising, from the use of this email or its attachments. The Bureau does not warrant the integrity of this e-mail nor that it is free of errors, viruses, interception or interference. For information about Kenya Bureau of Standards visit our website at http://www.kebs.org -------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------------------------------------------- "easy access to the world"

2 1

Google Zawadi Africa Scholarship
by Robert Alai 08 Dec '08

08 Dec '08

Google Zawadi Africa Scholarship As part of Google ongoing commitments to supporting education in Africa and to diversifying the engineering talent pool, they are encouraging African women to pursue careers in computer science and technology. Google has partnered with the Zawadi Africa Educational Fund to grant five Kenyan women full scholarships to complete degrees in computer science, computer engineering and/or ICT. The Google Zawadi Scholars will pursue studies at top universities in Kenyaand South Africa, and they'll each have the support of a Google engineering mentor. *Selection criteria include:* Excellent academics Extracurricular involvement Leadership potential and financial need. * Contacts:* Zawadi Africa Educational Fund P.O. Box 541046 Cincinnati OH45244 Tel: 513-289-8315 Fax: 513-624-6766 Email: info [at] zawadiafrica. org <http://zawadiafrica.org/> The scholarship is offered every yaer.

1 0

Kenyans embrace moving money by text message
by Mike Theuri 07 Dec '08

07 Dec '08

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-kenya-phones_bddec07,0,7…

1 0

Vitriol in cyberspace - Brian M Longwe: Moderation Alert!!
by Odhiambo Washington 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Hello members, It's my feeling that none of us can exercise the powers of Director of Immigration (whatever the title is), or even the Minister for Immigration. If anyone feels Brian is NOT Kenyan, then the right people to sort that out would be the govt, not KICTANet. I believe we all remember the purpose for which we are members of KICTANet and I am sure it has nothing to do with sorting out citizenship issues. Let KICTANet list be what it was conceived for. If there is anyone who feels deeply aggrieved by Brian's nationality, they can address it elsewhere, rather than waste time with it on this list. Let's put it this way.... I am going to apply the moderation bit on any poster who insists on discussing this issue. My action might be seen to be draconian but it will save us the agony of discussing non-issues. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Okay guys. This is Kenya. You pay taxes because you feel philanthropic, unlike our MPs!" -- Kenneth Marende, Speaker, 10th Parilament.

4 4

IGF 2008 Highlights
by mwende njiraini 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Following our recent online discussions on Internet governance issues in Kenya, the Kenya IGF and East African IGF; you may wish to follow the discussion currently ongoing at the global IGF 2008 in Hyderabad India at http://www.intgovforum.org. Below are highlights from workshops I attended on Day 1 December 3rd): *0930-1100 hrs Workshop 43: Legal aspects of governance critical internet Policy issues of public relevance* *1st presentation* The issues on that have legal implications include: • internet security intellectual property rights, infringement, privacy and protection mechanisms • IP domain name protection, conflicts arising out of data and content ownership privacy therefore increasing role of P2P in growth of internet 2 • Consumer status and rights in relation to e-commerce cross border and domestic online trade • Telecom issue viz backbone deployment and interconnection costs • Freedom of expression – the extent of censorship and control on online content There is need for capacity building to create meaningful participation of individual and SMEs as well as increasing connectivity through building IXPs and local content development The question was raised as to whether there a need of alternative institutional mechanism. The salient features of the MOU between ICANN and the department of commerce (DoC) include: - The affirmation of the role of private sector leadership - The role of DoC in ensuring transparency and accountability and effective GAC participation - Ensure accountability and publish by-laws and strategic and operational plans - Agreement can be terminated in 120 days The MOU has been criticized because of the following reasons: - US governmental control on root server administration - Inconsistent with WSIS principle where no single government should have a pre-eminent role - Domain name allocation policies need better development - IPv4 address allocation have been imbalanced need to ensure IPv6 address allocation does not suffer the same effects -This assertion was however refuted as IP addresses allocation based on need. The need for prudent management and keeping barriers low for the transition to IPv6 was emphasised. To overcome this WGIG proposed 4 models: - Global policy council - Intenational internet council with leading government role to fulfil the ICANN/IANA functions - GAC to be strengthened with enhanced coordination function - Replace US govt role by general internet council or with world ICANN (in lieu of GAC) The common features of these models were the overwhelming government lead and the presupposition of the possibility of international treaties. During the discussion the viability of these models was questioned given that speed is of essence in the management of internet resources. It normally takes a long time to negotiate international agreements; including treaties instead a set of principles should be endorsed. The speaker recommended on the management of critical internet infrastructure should take into consideration the following • Treatment of technical resources of the internet and global economic, social and legal aspects arising out the internet should be at par • The development and implementation of polices and standards and solutions to various internet issues should be done in a coordinated manner for example telecommunication standard development is done in a hierarchical and predictable way. • New structure would be a supreme authority over internet In conclusion the speaker asked: Does the internet as we know it need to be altered radically? Should the status quo be maintained? Should a Red Cross model of recognition by international community states be given to an international entity like ITU, INTELSAT. However fundamental change is not necessary as failure has not been identified. *My comment*: this presentation was descriptive and despite the fact that an alternative model was proposed the principles, mechanisms that would need to be put in place in order to make it work were not discussed *2nd presentation* The next speaker spoke about the ccTLDs in latin Amercia which are broadly organised into two main groups: non-governmental and governmental organisations. A contribution from the floor however clarified that the Brazilian ccTLD is a multi-stakeholder – coordinated by government – but on a day by day basis operates as a non-governmental organisation. The Indian ccTLD is managed by government and private sector – sovereign interest taken care of through government representation. The rules and regulations under which the institutions that manage the ccTLDs are managed determinate legal framework under which they operate. Consequently ccTLDs are regulated under national law while ICANN regulates gTLDs – The possibility of self regulation is based on the assumption that private sector would act in the public interest. In the discussions some felt that there was need for increased attention of government in the management of ccTLDs – as it was critical infrastructure while on the other hand other felt that there was the risk of excessive regulation with increased involvement of government. *1130 -1200 hrs Workshop 36: Strategies to prevent and fight child pornography in developing countries* Child pornography in Brazil has grown out of the popularity of social networking. However the main challenge has been issues related to jurisdiction as content is resident in ISP based in the USA and trans-national ISPs like Yahoo, Microsoft and Google which have branches in strategic markets and have tailored the services for these markets in terms of language and content. Brazil was therefore unable to deal with serious offences related to content – specifically child pornography - committed by Brazilians using Brazilian IP addresses. The government has been able to sign an agreement with Google to fight child pornography on Google's orkut social network. The following are consideration taken in drawing up the agreement 1. Which criteria should be used to define the ability of a particular country to legislate over and sanction conducts committed on the internet? - Where the data is located? - International law principles (territoriality or nationality) shall be used to define the sovereignty of a state regarding – cyber space – which is a network of networks - Define some reasonable standard – for example managed by Brazilians and is local content and local language - Access points in Brazil, harmful conduct felt in the country – taken obligation under international law to take offence – country of origin approach would force thousands of users to unfamiliar rules and travel – offence under human rights therefore apply local legislation 2. It is legitimate to enforce the conduct of local office –as it impracticable to send legal request to the US. New tools have been implement that have reduced number of images uploaded and increase in number of reported cases- subject to investigation. It was inspiring to listen to parliamentarian talk about the need to have legislators engaged in the process as they ultimately pass the laws. I appreciated the fact that in there is great cooperation between the parliament, government, police, civil society and private sector. The main challenges are: • Lack of awareness and participation by parliamentarians who are critical in the formulation of legislation • how to obligate ISPs to provide information without infringing on freedom of expression and privacy, • what criteria should be used to deal with these offences • the creation of awareness of ISPs in developing countries of the need for judicial cooperation as well as social initiatives to deal with cyber crime. • Insufficient infrastructure to deal with this issue – law enforcement does not have the human resources and technology • Material produced to fight child pornography are not evaluated – they should be inline with the demand *My comment*: I would have like to know if initiatives have reduced offences, what is the success rate registered in prosecution, ability of the law enforcement and judicial system to deal with offences. There was no mention of where initiatives had been launched to fight child pornography on the financial front. *1530-1700 Workshop 45: Opening to diversity and competition of the DNS system* There were 3 presentations in this session: - *1st presentation* - alternate DNS system used in library systems - *2nd presentation* - implementation of security in the Handle system - *3rd presentation –* discussed the Net4D Net4D- provides the technical solution to the political concern on the control of root servers. Net4D networks enable the following: • Empower the second generation of the web: the semantic web. • Multi-stakeholder governance of DNS • Net4D classes should be open and interoperable DNS 1.0 – was a monopoly of ICANN web 1.0 html with USA parentage and English only while DNS 2.0 is open allowing for competition including inter alia: • Net4D semantic web • Open coherent approach to linguistic diversity • Allow technological innovation with value added services Concern was however raised on the: • Investment/implementation cost required to implementation of different DNS systems depending on the BIND implemented and root servers enabled • relinquishing of the political control of root servers • Value to end users • Awareness and understanding of the issues by different stakeholders necessary – delivered in a way that they can understand *My comment*: the session was technical – I hope the techies on the mailing list can help us understand the governance issues associated with the introduction of DNS competition and the impact on developing countries :)! Kind regards mwende

1 0

Satement by Brian Longwe from Panel on Access in Main Session of Internet Governance Forum, Hyderabad, India 3rd Dec 2008
by Brian Longwe 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Brian Munyao Longwe – Main Session on Access (Development Perspective) Traditionally teledensity has been used as a measure of access or the extent to which communication technologies have pervaded a community. In the past Africa as a region has recorded extremely low fixed-line teledensity of below 1% that is less than 1 line per 100 people. Believe it or not this is still the case! However, when one incorporates mobile lines in a teledensity analysis - the results are not only incredible, they are amazing. as of 2007, Africa's mobile teledensity stood at an impressive 23% or 23 lines per 100 people. There was a recorded growth in mobile users from 128 million in 2006 to over 215 million subscribers by 2007. This represents an annual growth of over 46%. We have just heard that India's mobile network is growing at an incredible rate of over 10 million new connections per month! Given the fact that most operators around Africa have rolled out GPRS/EDGE coverage across most of their networks as well as deployment of 3G access across their larger markets it is entirely feasible that mobile, not broadband may present the opportunity for increased access for developing countries. MOBILE and not BROADBAND is the silver bullet. Another key element crucial to the growth of access in developing countries is a suitable environment for the dispersion of relevant content and applications that meet the day to day needs of the populace. Internet Exchange Points are the primary critical ingredient needed to create these conditions. By keeping all locally originated and requested traffic local, Internet exchange points serve a crucial role in enhancing the user experience, lowering operational costs and providing a suitable framework for the growth and development of the Internet in general. While many developing countries have adopted policies and regulations that encourage and promote competition in the mobile sectors, which has resulted in continued growth in the numbers of users, the establishment of IXPs has received a relatively low priority - despite the significant impact that such simple infrastructure presents to the community. Access enhances the interface between government and the citizen at a transactional level. The Kenya Revenue Authority last year suggested that the Kenya Internet Exchange Point receive "critical infrastructure" status with 24-hour armed guard due to the fact that 100% of all import/export declarations and documentation transit the IXP via the revenue authority's web-based platform. Going back to mobile, Safaricom, a Kenyan mobile operator introduced a money transfer service called M-Pesa less than two years ago. M-Pesa now has over 4 million subscribers (within 1 year - the service signed up more users than Kenya's entire banking industry signed up within a century!) Safaricom reported that over half a Billion US dollar had been transacted over the platform within less than 18 months. Key policy lesson? The financial services and communications regulator in Kenya decided not to subject m-pesa to punitive obligations through treatment as a bank but rather chose to perceive m-pesa a non-bank payment service. That decision has today affected and continues to affect millions of lives. Regulators can either promote innovation, access & development or hinder it. In East Africa communications regulators have completely opened up the communications sector; fully liberalizing every area, but providing structure through unified licensing regime that separates facilities, services and content In Kenya this has spurred investments of over half a Billion USD over the past 2 years. Key stakeholder lesson: relevant content drives demand - Safaricom's m-pesa met a basic and everyday need, this has driven the increased use of their mobile platform by touching the lives & livelihoods of both urban & rural citizens. -- Brian Munyao Longwe e-mail: blongwe(a)gmail.com cell: + 254 722 518 744 blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com

11 22

1ST GLOBAL BUSINESS INCUBATION DAY
by caroline＠kekobi.or.ke 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Greetings!! It is with pleasure that I introduce to you the Business Incubation Association of Kenya (BIAK), an umbrella body of business incubators in Kenya whose vision it is to be the leading authority in the promotion of innovation and entrepreneurship through business incubation. Business Incubation Association of Kenya (BIAK) is holding the first ever global celebration of entrepreneurship advancement through Business Incubation, which is scheduled to take place on 8th December 2008 at the KIRDI grounds, South C campus, from 8.00am to 5.00pm. For more information please see attached; 1. Invitation letter 2. Event schedule 3. Symposium registration form 4. Exhibition space booking form Best regards Caroline A. Aoll Operations Manager Kenya Kountry Business Incubator trading as KeKoBI Enterprises Ltd. ... supported by The World Bank Group's Information for Development Program (infoDev) 13th Floor, National Bank Building, Harambee Avenue P.O. Box 54438-00200 Nairobi Kenya Tel: 254-20-2214170 / 020 3596089 Cell Phone: (254)722738267 Email: caroline(a)kekobi.or.ke Website: www.kekobi.or.ke

1 0

Looking for information - but only from that know ...
by Gakuru Alex 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Dear busy people, Excuse my interruption to your days busy work schedule. I am looking for a confirmation of unbelievable news just heard. I hear that there is a primary school with a very kind headmaster. He takes time and consults the pupils on how to run that school. The teachers so well behaved, they bow in respect to the pupils. Maths, sciences, and all those difficult subjects not taught there. At the school dispensary, only sweet medicines are prescribed. Told that primary school is a kids paradise -a dream-come-true! I do not have more information other than what I've stated above. if have information please share, but if not, spare our bandwidth. Sincere regards, Alex Gakuru

2 1

Entryism according to some dictionaries
by aki 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

*The net has some interesting views on this, something that came to mind while reading world politics a while back.. * **** *Entryism* is a political tactic in which an organisation or group enters a larger organisation in an attempt to gain recruits, gain influence or to take control of the larger organisations' structure. This technique is commonly used by groups from the far left or right of the political spectrum to enter more centrist institutions. This is experienced more frequently in arenas where opportunities for political activity at the fringes is limited, such as two party/majoritarian systems rather than in multiparty/proportional systems where the cost of entry into the political system is lower. Organisations which are the subject of entryism often react by attempting either to marginalise or expel the pratagonists.

7 13

Mobile vs Broadband?
by Brian Longwe 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

THanks for the input Eric - but I beg to differ. Today you can obtain 5-7Mbps on a 3G-capable mobile phone (tested in Kenya on Safaricom's network by Aki & the local tech group Skunkworks). EDGE network can offer up to about 470Kbps. If we take the generally accepted parameters for broadband as anything above 512Kbps then we can actually argue that mobile IS broadband - when 3G and EDGE capabilities are available. This issue has actually been taken up by the W3C consortium and they have recognised the huge disruption potential that the mobile phenomenon in Africa has to usher in a new era of human/computer/network interface - to this end they are holding an even in Mozambique in April 2009 aimed at bringing together thought leaders, technologists, policy makers etc to take a better look at the subject. The future is bright! Brian On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:41 PM, <emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh> wrote: > Dear Brian and all, > > While i totally agree with you on the mobile success and how it propels > Africa to the forefront, i would caution that we need to move beyond that > and see the need for broadband in African homes and offices as a basic > utility in the knowledge economy. > > Sometimes the temptation to be caught in your success can blind you from > engaging new frontiers. Lets not get caught in semantics because MOBILE is > mobile and BROADBAND is broadband, if the later gets delivered through > mobile platforms then fine but the elements are different. It is important > to keep in mind also that broadband can come in many forms and we should > be open to exploring the whole grail. > > You are right on spot with content and the need for local, national, > regional and Africa wide interconnectedness. > > Eric here > > > > > Brian Munyao Longwe – Main Session on Access (Development Perspective) > > > > Traditionally teledensity has been used as a measure of access or the > > extent > > to which communication technologies have pervaded a community. > > > > In the past Africa as a region has recorded extremely low fixed-line > > teledensity of below 1% that is less than 1 line per 100 people. Believe > > it > > or not this is still the case! > > > > However, when one incorporates mobile lines in a teledensity analysis - > > the > > results are not only incredible, they are amazing. as of 2007, Africa's > > mobile teledensity stood at an impressive 23% or 23 lines per 100 people. > > There was a recorded growth in mobile users from 128 million in 2006 to > > over > > 215 million subscribers by 2007. This represents an annual growth of over > > 46%. We have just heard that India's mobile network is growing at an > > incredible rate of over 10 million new connections per month! > > > > Given the fact that most operators around Africa have rolled out > GPRS/EDGE > > coverage across most of their networks as well as deployment of 3G access > > across their larger markets it is entirely feasible that mobile, not > > broadband may present the opportunity for increased access for developing > > countries. MOBILE and not BROADBAND is the silver bullet. > > > > Another key element crucial to the growth of access in developing > > countries > > is a suitable environment for the dispersion of relevant content and > > applications that meet the day to day needs of the populace. Internet > > Exchange Points are the primary critical ingredient needed to create > these > > conditions. By keeping all locally originated and requested traffic > local, > > Internet exchange points serve a crucial role in enhancing the user > > experience, lowering operational costs and providing a suitable framework > > for the growth and development of the Internet in general. > > > > While many developing countries have adopted policies and regulations > that > > encourage and promote competition in the mobile sectors, which has > > resulted > > in continued growth in the numbers of users, the establishment of IXPs > has > > received a relatively low priority - despite the significant impact that > > such simple infrastructure presents to the community. > > > > Access enhances the interface between government and the citizen at a > > transactional level. The Kenya Revenue Authority last year suggested that > > the Kenya Internet Exchange Point receive "critical infrastructure" > status > > with 24-hour armed guard due to the fact that 100% of all import/export > > declarations and documentation transit the IXP via the revenue > authority's > > web-based platform. > > > > Going back to mobile, Safaricom, a Kenyan mobile operator introduced a > > money > > transfer service called M-Pesa less than two years ago. M-Pesa now has > > over > > 4 million subscribers (within 1 year - the service signed up more users > > than > > Kenya's entire banking industry signed up within a century!) Safaricom > > reported that over half a Billion US dollar had been transacted over the > > platform within less than 18 months. > > > > Key policy lesson? The financial services and communications regulator in > > Kenya decided not to subject m-pesa to punitive obligations through > > treatment as a bank but rather chose to perceive m-pesa a non-bank > payment > > service. That decision has today affected and continues to affect > millions > > of lives. Regulators can either promote innovation, access & development > > or > > hinder it. > > > > In East Africa communications regulators have completely opened up the > > communications sector; fully liberalizing every area, but providing > > structure through unified licensing regime that separates facilities, > > services and content In Kenya this has spurred investments of over half a > > Billion USD over the past 2 years. > > > > Key stakeholder lesson: relevant content drives demand - Safaricom's > > m-pesa > > met a basic and everyday need, this has driven the increased use of their > > mobile platform by touching the lives & livelihoods of both urban & rural > > citizens. > > > > > > -- > > Brian Munyao Longwe > > e-mail: blongwe(a)gmail.com > > cell: + 254 722 518 744 > > blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com > > meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > > kictanet mailing list > > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > > > This message was sent to: emko(a)internetresearch.com.gh > > Unsubscribe or change your options at > > > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emko%40internetresearc… > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > This message was sent to: blongwe(a)gmail.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/blongwe%40gmail.com > -- Brian Munyao Longwe e-mail: blongwe(a)gmail.com cell: + 254 722 518 744 blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com

3 3

Statement made by Alice Munyua at the opening session of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) taking place in India 3-6th December 2008
by alice＠apc.org 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Dear all Below the statment i presented at the IGF opening session this afternoon. best alice ------------- Statement by Alice Munyua at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) taking place in India 3-6th December 2008 Good afternoon, Chairman your Excellencies, Distinguished Guests,Ladies, Gentlemen, and remote participants. ---------------------------------------------------------- We wish to thank India for hosting the third IGF and to extend its sympathy and condolences over the recent acts of terrorism experienced in Mumbai. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The WSIS Society underscored the need for Multi-stakeholder processes initiated at the national, regional, and international levels to discuss and collaborate on the expansion and diffusion of the Internet as a means to support development efforts to achieve internationally-agreed development goals and objectives, including the Millennium Development Goals. It was in this regard that Kenya organized and hosted the First East African Internet Governance Forum (EAIGF) from the 10 to 12 November, 2008. The forums main theme was: Opening the Internet Governance Debate in East Africa; Thinking globally, acting locally. It was a follow up to national Internet Governance Forums (IGFs) held in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda in September and October 2008, to identify local priority issues in the respective East African countries. The national IG issues were then used as a building block for the regional Internet Governance Forum (EAIGF). The forum was attended by approximately 180 stakeholders drawn from the business, civil society, media, academia, internet users, government, and general public. It was the first of its kind in the Africa region and was initiated from the realization that there was a need to address the limited participation by African stakeholders on global internet governance debates and processes and the need to ensure effective and meaningful contribution to global ICT policymaking. It was organised through a collaborative partnership between various government institutions from the region, private sector, civil society, media and international partners. Some of the priority issues and recommendations identified by the EAIGF meeting are: Universal affordable Access (not from an incremental approach that focuses on creating more consumers rather looking at creating entrepreneurship opportunities, allowing for creativity, innovation that would by extension translate into social, economic, cultural and political benefits for all) Capacity and skills development Management of critical internet resources, including transition from IPv4 to IPv6 and more clarity and improved mutual collaboration on red legation of country code top level domains..Specifically dot UG and dot RW Cyber crime, security and privacy (creating a national and regional framework, which would involve setting national and regional computer emergency readiness team and computer security incident response team among other strategies Development of national and regional Internet exchange points The MSP model is important to us in the EA region and it has worked so far in terms of ICT policy and regulatory process. So it is crucial that we continue to work with all stakeholders giving them an equal footing in not only this IGF process but others as well. Finally, the EAIGF will be an annual event with the second one taking in Tanzania in 2009, prior to the Cairo IGF. For more information about the EAIGF, Visit: www.eaigf.or.ke. Thank you for your kind attention.

3 2

Vitriol in cyberspace
by Brian Longwe 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

wow! Just catching up on my email ...... incredible ..... some facts Born: Aga Khan hospital, Nairobi - August 1 1971 Kindergarten: St. Christophers, Valley Arcade Primary: Std 1-8 - St Mary's Nairobi (1st group of "8-4-4") Circumcised: Kangundo General Hospital Secondary: Form 1-2, St Mary's Nairobi Secondary: Form 3-4 (Ruiru High School) Kenyan ID# 11723803 - Kawethei Village, Kangundo Passport: A1192549 and on... and on... all Kenyan... True I have dual parentage (Kenyan & Malawian) - but does that make me less of a Kenyan? And I can assure you that I am not ashamed about my heritage. It is clear that someone here is carrying a seriously huge chip on their shoulder - maybe come clean and say what the real problem is? Ever heard about a defamation lawsuit? Chunga sana ndugu.... Brian On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Alex Gakuru <gakuru(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Someone's freedom ends where others' begin. It's that simple. > > I am removing you shortly. > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:41 PM, John Maina <j.maina(a)ymail.com> wrote: > > Alex > > > > I think you have a problem solve it. You should have banned me longtime > ago > > since I think you think that when you have a corrupt mind then all should > > have corrupt minds. I dont wish to be on your Kenya internet users where > you > > have nominated yourself to represent Kenyans. You dont believe in > democracy > > and so I dont wish to continue being in Kenyan Internet users. OK? Remove > me > > ASAP > > > > That list I think is very limited in reach and importance ndugu. ban > people > > from more important lists > > > > JM > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Alex Gakuru <gakuru(a)gmail.com> > > To: Patrick Mutiso <pmutiso(a)telkom.co.ke> > > Cc: John Maina <j.maina(a)ymail.com>; Mwende Gatabaki > > <mgatabaki(a)ktdateas.com>; Brian Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com>; Brian Munyao > > Longwe <brian(a)caret.net>; ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net > > Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 10:12:07 PM > > Subject: Re: [ke-internetusers] Re: [kictanet] Satement by Brian > > LongwefromPanel on Access in Main Session of Internet GovernanceForum, > > Hyderabad, India 3rd Dec 2008 > > > > Members have clearly stated their opinion that Brian owed is an > > apology for wrongful denial of his bona fide nationality. This list > > exists for the purpose of advancing consumer interests not fighting > > personal vendettas/lobbying for other self-interests or any such other > > thing that distracts us from our vision, mission, and objective. In > > any case, as stated by Mwende, this list will not be part of mass > > mailing lists that promote xenophobia-like attitudes. > > > > Should 'John Maina' continue with these personal mass lists attacks on > > the individual, then I will now be compelled to completely ban that > > email subscription from this list. > > > > BTW, Human beings are creatures of habit..... > > > > > > 2008/12/3 Patrick Mutiso <pmutiso(a)telkom.co.ke>: > >> John, > >> > >> If CCK which is a government body accepts a non-Kenyan as you say to sit > >> on > >> the board then he qualifies to represent us at the IGF. I happen to know > >> him > >> as a Kenyan and I agree with Mwande..you truly owe Brian an apology, and > >> even all of us. Your language feels like its made to attack, and that is > >> not > >> cool. > >> > >> Patrick Mutiso > >> ________________________________ > >> From: ke-internetusers-bounces(a)bdix.net on behalf of John Maina > >> Sent: Wed 12/3/2008 17:30 > >> To: Mwende Gatabaki; Brian Longwe; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions; > Brian > >> Munyao Longwe > >> Cc: picta-kenya(a)yahoogroups.com; ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net > >> Subject: Re: [ke-internetusers] Re: [kictanet] Satement by Brian > >> LongwefromPanel on Access in Main Session of Internet GovernanceForum, > >> Hyderabad, India 3rd Dec 2008 > >> > >> Mwende > >> > >> Brian is not a Kenyan. Why is he representing Kenya? He is malawian and > he > >> sits on CCK board. There is nothing to apologise on telling the truth > >> > >> JM > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Mwende Gatabaki <mgatabaki(a)ktdateas.com> > >> To: John Maina <[email protected]>; Brian Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com>; > >> KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke>; Brian > >> Munyao Longwe <brian(a)caret.net> > >> Cc: picta-kenya(a)yahoogroups.com; ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 5:14:29 PM > >> Subject: RE: [ke-internetusers] Re: [kictanet] Satement by Brian Longwe > >> fromPanel on Access in Main Session of Internet Governance > >> Forum,Hyderabad, > >> India 3rd Dec 2008 > >> > >> John; > >> > >> > >> > >> ….I really think you need to revise your attitude or your language – or > >> both. This is the kind of thing > >> > >> that made us kill each other at the beginning of this year. > >> > >> > >> > >> Ps: I think you owe Brian an apology. > >> > >> > >> > >> Mwende > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> From: ke-internetusers-bounces(a)bdix.net > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Maina > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:35 PM > >> To: Brian Longwe; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions; Brian Munyao Longwe > >> Cc: picta-kenya(a)yahoogroups.com; ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net > >> Subject: [ke-internetusers] Re: [kictanet] Satement by Brian Longwe > >> fromPanel on Access in Main Session of Internet Governance Forum, > >> Hyderabad > >> , India 3rd Dec 2008 > >> > >> > >> > >> KICTANET > >> > >> Why is a Malawian representing Kenya at the IGF? Do we lack enough > Kenyans > >> to sit on Kenyan boards and also represent Kenya abroad? This is > >> disgusting > >> and the earlier the masqueraders like Brian Longwe and the bunch of > >> foreign > >> attack dogs are told off the better. > >> > >> JM > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> From: Brian Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com> > >> To: j.maina(a)ymail.com > >> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 3:15:20 PM > >> Subject: [kictanet] Satement by Brian Longwe from Panel on Access in > Main > >> Session of Internet Governance Forum, Hyderabad , India 3rd Dec 2008 > >> > >> > >> Brian Munyao Longwe – Main Session on Access (Development Perspective) > >> > >> Traditionally teledensity has been used as a measure of access or the > >> extent > >> to which communication technologies have pervaded a community.. > >> > >> In the past Africa as a region has recorded extremely low fixed-line > >> teledensity of below 1% that is less than 1 line per 100 people. Believe > >> it > >> or not this is still the case! > >> > >> However, when one incorporates mobile lines in a teledensity analysis - > >> the > >> results are not only incredible, they are amazing. as of 2007, Africa 's > >> mobile teledensity stood at an impressive 23% or 23 lines per 100 > people. > >> There was a recorded growth in mobile users from 128 million in 2006 to > >> over > >> 215 million subscribers by 2007. This represents an annual growth of > over > >> 46%. We have just heard that India 's mobile network is growing at an > >> incredible rate of over 10 million new connections per month! > >> > >> Given the fact that most operators around Africa have rolled out > GPRS/EDGE > >> coverage across most of their networks as well as deployment of 3G > access > >> across their larger markets it is entirely feasible that mobile, not > >> broadband may present the opportunity for increased access for > developing > >> countries. MOBILE and not BROADBAND is the silver bullet. > >> > >> Another key element crucial to the growth of access in developing > >> countries > >> is a suitable environment for the dispersion of relevant content and > >> applications that meet the day to day needs of the populace. Internet > >> Exchange Points are the primary critical ingredient needed to create > these > >> conditions. By keeping all locally originated and requested traffic > local, > >> Internet exchange points serve a crucial role in enhancing the user > >> experience, lowering operational costs and providing a suitable > framework > >> for the growth and development of the Internet in general. > >> > >> While many developing countries have adopted policies and regulations > that > >> encourage and promote competition in the mobile sectors, which has > >> resulted > >> in continued growth in the numbers of users, the establishment of IXPs > has > >> received a relatively low priority - despite the significant impact that > >> such simple infrastructure presents to the community. > >> > >> Access enhances the interface between government and the citizen at a > >> transactional level.. The Kenya Revenue Authority last year suggested > that > >> the Kenya Internet Exchange Point receive "critical infrastructure" > status > >> with 24-hour armed guard due to the fact that 100% of all import/export > >> declarations and documentation transit the IXP via the revenue > authority's > >> web-based platform. > >> > >> Going back to mobile, Safaricom, a Kenyan mobile operator introduced a > >> money > >> transfer service called M-Pesa less than two years ago. M-Pesa now has > >> over > >> 4 million subscribers (within 1 year - the service signed up more users > >> than > >> Kenya 's entire banking industry signed up within a century!) Safaricom > >> reported that over half a Billion US dollar had been transacted over the > >> platform within less than 18 months. > >> > >> Key policy lesson? The financial services and communications regulator > in > >> Kenya decided not to subject m-pesa to punitive obligations through > >> treatment as a bank but rather chose to perceive m-pesa a non-bank > payment > >> service. That decision has today affected and continues to affect > millions > >> of lives. Regulators can either promote innovation, access & development > >> or > >> hinder it. > >> > >> In East Africa communications regulators have completely opened up the > >> communications sector; fully liberalizing every area, but providing > >> structure through unified licensing regime that separates facilities, > >> services and content In Kenya this has spurred investments of over half > a > >> Billion USD over the past 2 years. > >> > >> Key stakeholder lesson: relevant content drives demand - Safaricom's > >> m-pesa > >> met a basic and everyday need, this has driven the increased use of > their > >> mobile platform by touching the lives & livelihoods of both urban & > rural > >> citizens. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Brian Munyao Longwe > >> e-mail: blongwe(a)gmail.com > >> cell: + 254 722 518 744 > >> blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com > >> meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ke-internetusers mailing list > >> ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net > >> http://www.bdix.net/mailman/listinfo/ke-internetusers > >> > >> > > > > > -- Brian Munyao Longwe e-mail: blongwe(a)gmail.com cell: + 254 722 518 744 blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com

4 4

Re: [kictanet] [ke-internetusers] Re: Satement by Brian Longwe fromPanel on Access in Main Session of Internet Governance Forum, Hyderabad, India 3rd Dec 2008
by John Maina 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Mwende Brian is not a Kenyan. Why is he representing Kenya? He is malawian and he sits on CCK board. There is nothing to apologise on telling the truth JM ________________________________ From: Mwende Gatabaki <mgatabaki(a)ktdateas.com> To: John Maina <j.maina(a)ymail.com>; Brian Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke>; Brian Munyao Longwe <brian(a)caret.net> Cc: picta-kenya(a)yahoogroups.com; ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 5:14:29 PM Subject: RE: [ke-internetusers] Re: [kictanet] Satement by Brian Longwe fromPanel on Access in Main Session of Internet Governance Forum,Hyderabad, India 3rd Dec 2008 John; ….I really think you need to revise your attitude or your language – or both. This is the kind of thing that made us kill each other at the beginning of this year. Ps: I think you owe Brian an apology. Mwende ________________________________ From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Maina Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:35 PM To: Brian Longwe; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions; Brian Munyao Longwe Cc: picta-kenya(a)yahoogroups.com; ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net Subject: [ke-internetusers] Re: [kictanet] Satement by Brian Longwe fromPanel on Access in Main Session of Internet Governance Forum, Hyderabad , India 3rd Dec 2008 KICTANET Why is a Malawian representing Kenya at the IGF? Do we lack enough Kenyans to sit on Kenyan boards and also represent Kenya abroad? This is disgusting and the earlier the masqueraders like Brian Longwe and the bunch of foreign attack dogs are told off the better. JM ________________________________ From:Brian Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com> To: j.maina(a)ymail.com Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 3:15:20 PM Subject: [kictanet] Satement by Brian Longwe from Panel on Access in Main Session of Internet Governance Forum, Hyderabad , India 3rd Dec 2008 Brian Munyao Longwe – Main Session on Access (Development Perspective) Traditionally teledensity has been used as a measure of access or the extent to which communication technologies have pervaded a community. In the past Africa as a region has recorded extremely low fixed-line teledensity of below 1% that is less than 1 line per 100 people. Believe it or not this is still the case! However, when one incorporates mobile lines in a teledensity analysis - the results are not only incredible, they are amazing. as of 2007, Africa 's mobile teledensity stood at an impressive 23% or 23 lines per 100 people. There was a recorded growth in mobile users from 128 million in 2006 to over 215 million subscribers by 2007. This represents an annual growth of over 46%. We have just heard that India 's mobile network is growing at an incredible rate of over 10 million new connections per month! Given the fact that most operators around Africa have rolled out GPRS/EDGE coverage across most of their networks as well as deployment of 3G access across their larger markets it is entirely feasible that mobile, not broadband may present the opportunity for increased access for developing countries. MOBILE and not BROADBAND is the silver bullet. Another key element crucial to the growth of access in developing countries is a suitable environment for the dispersion of relevant content and applications that meet the day to day needs of the populace. Internet Exchange Points are the primary critical ingredient needed to create these conditions. By keeping all locally originated and requested traffic local, Internet exchange points serve a crucial role in enhancing the user experience, lowering operational costs and providing a suitable framework for the growth and development of the Internet in general. While many developing countries have adopted policies and regulations that encourage and promote competition in the mobile sectors, which has resulted in continued growth in the numbers of users, the establishment of IXPs has received a relatively low priority - despite the significant impact that such simple infrastructure presents to the community. Access enhances the interface between government and the citizen at a transactional level. The Kenya Revenue Authority last year suggested that the Kenya Internet Exchange Point receive "critical infrastructure" status with 24-hour armed guard due to the fact that 100% of all import/export declarations and documentation transit the IXP via the revenue authority's web-based platform. Going back to mobile, Safaricom, a Kenyan mobile operator introduced a money transfer service called M-Pesa less than two years ago. M-Pesa now has over 4 million subscribers (within 1 year - the service signed up more users than Kenya 's entire banking industry signed up within a century!) Safaricom reported that over half a Billion US dollar had been transacted over the platform within less than 18 months. Key policy lesson? The financial services and communications regulator in Kenya decided not to subject m-pesa to punitive obligations through treatment as a bank but rather chose to perceive m-pesa a non-bank payment service. That decision has today affected and continues to affect millions of lives. Regulators can either promote innovation, access & development or hinder it. In East Africa communications regulators have completely opened up the communications sector; fully liberalizing every area, but providing structure through unified licensing regime that separates facilities, services and content In Kenya this has spurred investments of over half a Billion USD over the past 2 years. Key stakeholder lesson: relevant content drives demand - Safaricom's m-pesa met a basic and everyday need, this has driven the increased use of their mobile platform by touching the lives & livelihoods of both urban & rural citizens. -- Brian Munyao Longwe e-mail: blongwe(a)gmail.com cell: + 254 722 518 744 blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com

2 1

Investment Opportunities in ICT
by James Kagwe 03 Dec '08

03 Dec '08

All, A potential investor has approached me to advise on an area to invest in ICT in Kenya or the East African region. Please advice on areas you have identified serious gaps in services or products offering in ICT that would be ripe for a new business model. It could also be a unique / new product or service that you feel would do well in Kenya or the east African region if offered. Best Regards, James Kagwe If you judge people, you have no time to love them ********************************************************************* Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis Bishops Garden Towers Bishops Road P.O. Box 56445 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: (254) 20 2719933, 2719934, 2714714, 2714715 Fax: (254) 20 2719951 Confidentiality Warning ======================= The contents of this e-mail and any accompanying documentation are confidential and any use thereof, in what ever form, by anyone other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify admin(a)kippra.or.ke and delete it immediately from your system. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis accepts no responsibility for losses or damage as a result of any viruses and it is your responsibility to check attachments (if any) for viruses.

3 2

Re: [kictanet] Oathing in Mount Kenya
by Robert Alai 03 Dec '08

03 Dec '08

Maurice I did contact Royal Head of radio and hope that he will talk to head of TV in regard to this. Alai On 12/3/08, Maurice Baraza <barazam(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Just seen this on Citizen like 20 min ago. Its calling on Kikuyu, Embu > and Meru for prayer on the altar (mt. Kenya) as called for by their > ancestors. > > > On 12/3/08, BidiiAfrika Moderator <bidiiafrika(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Wanabidii, > > > > The last year's version of the advert which was called "prayer" is on > this > > link > > > http://www.wananchiforums.com/showthread.php?p=1678&highlight=oathing#post1… > . > > This year's advert was more blunt and was not called anything close to > > 'prayers'. > > > > I guess it has been running for sometime in NTV and I also saw it today > the > > same time Mike saw it. I alerted NMg advertising, editorial aand MD > > broadcasting and they all agreed that its an error and pulled it off so I > > hope that its settled. > > > > Alai > > > > On 12/3/08, BidiiAfrika Moderator <bidiiafrika(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Wanabidii > >> > >> I have talked to Conrad Nkutu who is the MD broadcast division of NMG > and > >> he has assured me that the classified advert has been pulled off air as > >> they > >> agree that it was in bad taste. Conrad has told me that it was a case of > >> bad > >> gate keeping since the person who oversaw the auhtorisation of the > advert > >> is > >> new. > >> > >> But let me ask other media owners that its really not in good taste and > >> that its bad when last year the same advert was aired and when we > >> complained > >> we were ignored. The People daily, Citizen radio, Kameme FM, Daily > Nation > >> and NTV all aired the adevrt last year. There is no reason why we should > >> call our tribes to go and oath as was comanded "in 1210 AD". > >> > >> The media in Kenya must be responsible and must not blame only the > >> politicians while they also worsen the situation > >> > >> regards > >> > >> Alai > >> > >> Moderator - BidiiAfrika > >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Mike Serengu <mikeserengu(a)gmail.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> Wanabidii > >>> Forgive me but why are Kikuyus being called through this advert running > >>> in > >>> NTV classifieds to come and oath in Mount Kenya as commanded by their > >>> ancestors in 1210 AD. Why is this advert running? Whats wrong with > >>> Kenyans? > >>> Will we ever heal. Why is NTV running such an advert. I have seen the > >>> advert > >>> at 18.35pm today and its disgusting watching such tribal callings. Can > we > >>> learn? > >>> > >>> Mike > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from my mobile device > > > -- > MVP - Dertu > P.O. Box 958 - 70100, Garissa Kenya | Tel: +254(0)462103161 | Mob: > +254722853117 | Skype: mouriceb > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > You may hate gravity, but gravity doesn't care. > --- > Clayton Christensen > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > YOU ARE IN BIDII AFRIKA GROUP > > UNSUBSCRIBE: bidiiafrika-unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com > > www.wananchiforums.com > > http://www.myafricancareer.com/ > > Content at reader's discretion.Bidiiafrika is not liable since this is an > open forum. > The Moderators reserves the right to reject or let through any message > > FOR A VERY PEACEFUL AFRIKA > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > >

1 0