- KICTANet - KICTANet

You're invited to Kenya Internet Governance Forum (Kenya IGF) 2013 (Jul 26, 2013)
by ISOC Kenya Chapter 25 Jul '13

25 Jul '13

The Kenya Governance Forum is an annual event positioned to engage with a broader range of stakeholders; from the Government, Private Sector, Civil Society, Religious, Academia, Underserved Groups including Persons with Disabilities, Youth, Low-Income Communities, the General Public and the Internet Society Community. This is an opportunity to dialogue and increase understanding of Internet...Share this event on Facebook and Twitter We hope you can make it!Kindest Regards,Paul MucheneChair, Kenya IGF Working Group  ------------------------------ Event Summary: ------------------------------ Event: Kenya Internet Governance Forum (Kenya IGF) 2013 Date: Friday, July 26, 2013 from 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM (EAT) Location: Strathmore University Business School Madaraka Estate Ole Sangale Road Nairobi West Kenya ------------------------------ Event Details: ------------------------------ The Kenya Internet Governance Forum is an annual event positioned to engage with a broader range of stakeholders; from the Government, Private Sector, Civil Society, Religious, Academia, Underserved Groups including Persons with Disabilities, Youth, Low-Income Communities, the General Public and the Internet Society Community. This is an opportunity to dialogue and increase understanding of Internet Governance and related ICT issues that are pertinent to Kenya. Most of all make contributions towards more effective governance in line with this year’s theme “Vision 2030; Harnessing The Power of The Internet”. ------------------------------ Register Online: ------------------------------ More information and online registration are available here: http://www.eventbrite.com/event/7209408535/?ref=enivtefor001&invite=MzkyNzk… ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Collect event fees online with Eventbrite http://www.eventbrite.com

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Kenya Internet Governance Forum Remote Participation Details (Webex)
by Barrack Otieno 25 Jul '13

25 Jul '13

Dear Listers, Topic: Kenya Internet Governance Forum 2013 (Hosted by Internet Society Kenya Chapter) Date: Friday, July 26, 2013 Time: 7:45 am, Nairobi Time (Nairobi, GMT+03:00) Meeting Number: 923 121 613 Meeting Password: kenyachapter ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from mobile devices!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://isoc.webex.com/isoc/j.php?ED=233518522&UID=1643503102&PW=NNTc0MDg0N… 2. If requested, enter your name and email address. 3. If a password is required, enter the meeting password: kenyachapter 4. Click "Join". 5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen. To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://isoc.webex.com/isoc/j.php?ED=233518522&UID=1643503102&PW=NNTc0MDg0N… ------------------------------------------------------- To join the audio conference only ------------------------------------------------------- Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-479-3208 Global call-in numbers: https://isoc.webex.com/isoc/globalcallin.php?serviceType=MC&ED=233518522&to… Access code:923 121 613 ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://isoc.webex.com/isoc/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: chege(a)isoc.org To update this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://isoc.webex.com/isoc/j.php?ED=233518522&UID=1643503102&ICS=UMI&LD=1&… WebEx will automatically setup Meeting Manager for Windows the first time you join a meeting. To save time, you can setup prior to the meeting by clicking this link: https://isoc.webex.com/isoc/meetingcenter/mcsetup.php The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://isoc.webex.com/isoc/systemdiagnosis.php. http://www.webex.com CCP:+16504793208x923121613# IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your concerns with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do not join the session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject to discovery in the event of litigation. -- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254-20-2498789 Skype: barrack.otieno http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Kenya Internet Governance Forum, Registration Closes today at 4.00 pm
by Barrack Otieno 25 Jul '13

25 Jul '13

Dear Listers, The Kenya Internet Governance Forum will be held tomorrow 26 June 2013 at the Strathmore Business School. The draft program can be found on http://www.kenyaigf.or.ke/index.php/about-kigf/kigf-programme. Registration closes at 4.00 pm. We have limited spaces left, the event will be streamed live on the Internet for those who will not be able to make it on site. We will have an interesting program that will explore the role of the Internet and ICTs in the devolved government system, Smart Cities what does the future hold by IBM, enhanced cooperation by Grace Githaiga of Kenya ICT Action Network, and Management of dot Ke space, opportunities and challenges. In the afternoon there will be an interesting presentation based on a research by Lucy Purdon from the Institute of Human Rights and Business based in the UK on Social Media and hate speech, during the session panelists will include Richard Allan Director Policy EMEA, Facebook, Stephanie Muchai from Article 19 and Stephen Chege head of Public Policy at Safaricom, the legal framework session will be moderated by Beryl Aidi of the Kenya Human Rights Commission. we also expect Dr. Mutuma Ruteere UN special rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism to join our discussions. For the first time, we will also have a public forum modeled around the Internet cooperation for assigned names and numbers public forum that will be centered around public participation in Internet Governance and ICT development in Kenya. We encourage interested persons to register on the Kenya Internet Governance website. Best Regards -- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254-20-2498789 Skype: barrack.otieno http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/

2 2

Re: [kictanet] [Skunkworks] Website hacking on the rise
by Michael Bullut 25 Jul '13

25 Jul '13

I also note the same Pauline. The first website I read that was compromised was Kenya Power followed by Central Bank. I was quite alarmed that Apple & Ubuntu were also affected! * Please find attached an interesting whitepaper on website security I came across on Spiceworks that I thought I would share with this forum. * On 24 July 2013 15:10, Pauline Kitheka <kithekapauline(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Is it me or is the rate of websites being hacked on the rise. > > -- > Kenyan Techie: www.kentechie.com > > _______________________________________________ > skunkworks mailing list > skunkworks(a)lists.my.co.ke > ------------ > List info, subscribe/unsubscribe > http://orion.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks > ------------ > > Skunkworks Rules > http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 > ------------ > Other services @ http://my.co.ke >

1 0

Re: [kictanet] Thoughts on Kenya's National Broadband Strategy
by Brian Munyao Longwe 24 Jul '13

24 Jul '13

Hi all, I have just gone through the recently launched National Broadband Strategy. Sadly, none of my submitted input (included below) was accomodated (even after confirmation from CCK that they had been received). I guess this is a sign of the times, because it seems that over recent years "public consultations" by CCK and Govt on ICT issues have been merely stage-managed exercises aimed at giving an appearance of inclusion, but in reality are merely rubber-stamping exercises which allow largely third party driven agendas (vendors, foreign govts) to take center stage and prioritization in our strategies, policies, laws etc... I guess I will just have to stop making the effort to "contribute" to these processes as it seems to be pointless and an exercise in futility. Hopefully others will have better luck? Have a good day, Brian On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com>wrote: > I had shared these thoughts in ISOC-KE and someone asked if I would mind > sharing them with KICTANET. Well, here goes: > > ------------ > > Is it right to explicitly name a particular technology within the context > of such a high level strategy? > Pg 6 > ¬† the immediate plan to further deploy broadband through a > nationwide LTE system > > The language in principle 2 (pg 8) and principle 7 (pg 9) seem to be > contradictory. While principle 2 emphasizes technology neutrality (a good > thing), principle 7 in elaborating competitive use of technologies > explicitly names fiber optic and wireless broadband. It is proposed that > the language here be changed to distinguish between fixed and non-fixed > media as alternatives for infrastructure > > Pg 21 - the relationship between a pacemaker (for heart conditions) and > content & applications is not immediately obvious - could this be the wrong > kind of example to use in this section? > > Pg 22 (Table 4) on the problem of an unstructured innovation chain; > wouldn't it be better to aim at developing a National Innovation System - > rather than simply seeking to "institutionalize the innovation value > chain"? The current recommendations fall far short of *really* tackling the > underlying issues and proposing sufficient interventions to address the > problem in the medium to long term. > > Pg 23 the figures related to mobile penetration should be updated with > latest market estimates and not figures from 2011. Current estimates are at > 100% mobile penetration. Also the percentage of *youth* is questionable as > it is based on a 2005 study. Should statistics that are 8 years old be used > in such an important document? > > pg 26-32 Section 3.4 Policy, Legal & Regulatory Environment > > While CCK has over the past 13 years of it's existence facilitated > massive transformation with the information and communication technology > sector in the country and the region as a whole. It could be argued that > the Commission's mandate has become bloated over the years, leading to a > "too many eggs in one basket" problem. > > It could be recommended that specialized agencies be established to deal > with essential issue that do not strictly fall under the regulatory mandate > of CCK and may, in some cases create opportunity for conflict of interest. > These include but are not limited to: Operation and Administration of the > Universal Service Fund, Operation and Administration of cyber-security > related units, consumer protection etc... > > While it is evident and obvious that CCK has served and may continue to > serve as an ideal "incubator" for these types of services/agencies. It is > true that they encompass a potentially vast amount of work, especially > within a national context and could be better served by specialized > agencies that can focus time and resources and deal with issues in a > focused and timely manner. > > pg 33 Section 3.5.2 > > by specifically referring to a particular technology (in this case LTE) > as a means to accomplishing the objectives of this strategy - it might > appear that the strategy is biased towards particular vendors or operators > and may not necessarily be taking the best interests of the marketplace and > the greatest stakeholder - the citizen - into consideration. It is > recommended that the language in this section be reworked to eliminate the > mention of specific technologies. > > The section on Financing and Investment should include recommendations on > various incentives to promote activity in the area. Tax breaks, > concessions, PPP proposals, allocations from various existing (and new) > funds etc... > > Section 4 Implementation > > once again, specific reference to LTE may not be in the best interests of > leaving the strategy open enought to allow for competing and maybe more > affordable technologies that can achieve stated objectives. > > > > > >

8 20

Meet and Greet
by Harry Hare | African eDevelopment Resource Centre 24 Jul '13

24 Jul '13

It is tradition for KICTANet to host both incoming and outgoing "Sherifs" at Teleposta Towers. Just to meet and match some of the email IDs with real people/faces in an easy non-threatening environment. Alice/Barrack possible to organize this? CIO East Africa can buy the first drinks. Just a thought. Harry Hare Director | African eDevelopment Resource Centre PO Box 49475 00100 | Nairobi, Kenya Tel +254 20 4041646 | Cel +254 725 650044

7 7

kictanet Digest, Vol 74, Issue 92
by Edwin Onchari 23 Jul '13

23 Jul '13

I have this nascent feeling that this forum has been for a while now been used as a "incubation center" for ideas for the "strategically placed" to further their agenda. Why is it that constructive ideas/contributions herein seem to simply go to waste by being ignored & sidelined by past and current GOK well placed? I read contributions on this topic and reminisce on my/others remarks on this forum in regard to BPO and sigh- here we go again!! Edwin -----Original Message----- From: kictanet [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of kictanet-request(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 8:43 PM To: Edwin Subject: kictanet Digest, Vol 74, Issue 92 Send kictanet mailing list submissions to kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to kictanet-request(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke You can reach the person managing the list at kictanet-owner(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of kictanet digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Thoughts on Kenya's National Broadband Strategy (Brian Munyao Longwe) 2. Re: [ISOC_KE] Thoughts on Kenya's National Broadband Strategy (Ali Hussein) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:04:01 +0300 From: Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com> To: "Judy M. Muli" <judym.muli(a)gmail.com> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke>, "isoc(a)orion.my.co.ke" <isoc(a)orion.my.co.ke> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Thoughts on Kenya's National Broadband Strategy Message-ID: <CAHSdPfbXKRwtbFXaV8xDwMe2MCzE46XmwNEpc860Q101g=khJw(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Dear Judy, If you truly knew my track record in national ICT development as well as the amount of effort I have freely given towards this cause over the past 19 years since my first responsibilities in the now defunct East African Internet Association (EAIA), then you might not really be asking me for patience. The problem we have, very simply put, is a human factor problem, some thoughts on this from me in e 140 Friday blog http://140friday.com/?p=485 Walubengo, it is not matoke that causes me to speak out, it is sadness at the depths to which we have fallen. I think it is only a matter of time before the public (ourselves and others) start crying out for the blood of the officers who will have led us as a country into a hole out of which we cannot climb. Sadly, Mblayo On Tuesday, July 23, 2013, Judy M. Muli wrote: > Hello, > > Hi Brian and the other key stakeholders and experts in the ICT industry: > there is need to engage more with ICT officers and managers already > working in the public sector...there is lots of written material, > research papers, implementation papers, and write ups- truly rich > content in the government of Kenya so as to get and gain first hand > information and experience on what's on the ground in the public organizations.. > > Where we are as a country and ICT experts is not about Point of view, > planning etc Kenyans are the best planners, and the plans exist. our > need at the moment as a country and in major ICT projects is on implementation. > being involved and providing tangible and specific solutions on > implementation. > > Warm regards, > I am happy to have joined the right forum,- currently I am hopeful > that technology will not be blamed by organizations like IEBC and > others on our watch. > Lets get the plans already in place, empower and improve them as we > quickly provide implementation, monitoring and evaluation tangible, > specific, clear guidelines. > > Judy Muli > Head ICT > COB > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Brian Munyao Longwe > <blongwe(a)gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'blongwe(a)gmail.com');> > > wrote: > >> How about the attached. My input to the so called "National Public >> Key Infrastructure Stakeholder Consultation" >> >> Despite personal phone calls which I received from both Dr. Ndemo and >> Paul Kukubo that I would receive a response, it seems that somewhere >> along the way - I was dismissed as a "noise-maker" - I tried to keep >> it quiet, now let me make some noise. >> >> I was also very disappointed to hear through the grapevine that some >> senior people said "Brian is only making noise because he doesn't >> have a job" along with the implication that I was seeking an >> appointment/assignment into the PKI project....disgusting.... >> >> Anyway, here are the attachments. Zero response to date - and I can >> promise you, zero change in the plans/design... >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:24 PM, James Mbugua <jgmbugua(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> They are here. Let them respond. >> >> As for the Cabinet Secretary, we will judge him by performance not by >> statements. He should state at least three flagship goals he intends >> to achieve. >> >> James >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Barrack Otieno >> <otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Brian, >> >> You raise a very important issue. I attended the broadband meeting >> and whereas it was elaborately organized there is a lot of discomfort >> that i will raise on this platform. >> >> Clearly it appears the multi stakeholder model is under serious >> attack and if we are not careful the gains we have made in the last >> 10 years in building an enviable ICT community Internationaly will go >> down the drain. I interacted with several technocrats and to my >> dismay majority of those in Civil Society Organisations that are >> meant to check the government are branded as trouble makers. >> Difference in opinion is treated as personal affront , worse still it >> was clear that our input no longer matters to put it bluntly from the >> few engagements i had this morning, we are resource persons. You may >> have noticed that COFEK raised a similar issue in a press release and >> i have just seen an email from a lister in which he was quoting the >> CS that some people are making noise in a corner which i found to be undiplomatic if at all it is true. >> You have spoken for many who are murmuring and i hope the Cabinet >> Secretary who is on this list takes note of this concerns, once >> goodwill is lost it might take time to recover it and this will >> result in stalled or worse still failed projects. We need meaningful >> engagement based on national aspirations not personal preferences and >> cronyism, i agree meaningless stakeholder consultations should be put >> to an end, we need a clear process of soliciting for public input, >> the same should show when the public views have been dropped and why? >> ever wondered why open data is still a myth to name but a few? >> >> Best Regards >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have just gone through the recently launched National Broadband >> Strategy. >> >> Sadly, none of my submitted input (included below) was accomodated >> (even after confirmation from CCK that they had been received). I >> guess this is a sign of the times, because it seems that over recent >> years "public consultations" by CCK and Govt on ICT issues have been >> merely stage-managed exercises aimed at giving an appearance of >> inclusion, but in reality are merely rubber-stamping exercises which >> allow largely third party driven agendas (vendors, foreign govts) to >> take center stage and prioritization in our strategies, policies, laws etc... >> >> I guess I will just have to stop making the effort to "contribute" to >> these processes as it >> >> Unsubscribe or change your options at >> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/judym.muli%40gm >> ail.com >> >> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder >> platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT >> policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for >> reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. >> >> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable >> behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times >> and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, >> respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. >> > >

1 0

Re: [kictanet] [ISOC_KE] Thoughts on Kenya's National Broadband Strategy
by Walubengo J 23 Jul '13

23 Jul '13

@Mblayo, It appears the matoke u r consuming is really firing you up :-) But I totally agree. Stakeholder consultations without a formal feedback mechanism for the public to know if their comments were considered, and how they were then not taken onboard can be frustrating. Govt must better define how it processes stakeholder input. @Barrack asked a similar qtn at Karen meeting 2weeks ago and we were informed that Govt has final say - which is fine and acceptable. However, Govt has on the other hand an obligation to report back to public in terms of how many comments were recieved, how many were taken on board, how many were amended before adoption, and how many were rejected and reasons why. Otherwise public can get fatigued and begin to suspect perhaps correctly that no one even reads their input and public is invited to have free lunch and rubber stamp what is already predetermined by some high ranking men and women in dark suits :-) walu. ------------------------------ On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 3:41 PM AST (Arabian) Brian Munyao Longwe wrote: >How about the attached. My input to the so called "National Public Key >Infrastructure Stakeholder Consultation" > >Despite personal phone calls which I received from both Dr. Ndemo and Paul >Kukubo that I would receive a response, it seems that somewhere along the >way - I was dismissed as a "noise-maker" - I tried to keep it quiet, now >let me make some noise. > >I was also very disappointed to hear through the grapevine that some senior >people said "Brian is only making noise because he doesn't have a job" >along with the implication that I was seeking an appointment/assignment >into the PKI project....disgusting.... > >Anyway, here are the attachments. Zero response to date - and I can promise >you, zero change in the plans/design... > > >On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:24 PM, James Mbugua <jgmbugua(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> They are here. Let them respond. >> >> As for the Cabinet Secretary, we will judge him by performance not by >> statements. He should state at least three flagship goals he intends to >> achieve. >> >> James >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Hi Brian, >> >> You raise a very important issue. I attended the broadband meeting and >> whereas it was elaborately organized there is a lot of discomfort that i >> will raise on this platform. >> >> Clearly it appears the multi stakeholder model is under serious attack >> and if we are not careful the gains we have made in the last 10 years in >> building an enviable ICT community Internationaly will go down the drain. I >> interacted with several technocrats and to my dismay majority of those in >> Civil Society Organisations that are meant to check the government are >> branded as trouble makers. Difference in opinion is treated as personal >> affront , worse still it was clear that our input no longer matters to put >> it bluntly from the few engagements i had this morning, we are resource >> persons. You may have noticed that COFEK raised a similar issue in a press >> release and i have just seen an email from a lister in which he was quoting >> the CS that some people are making noise in a corner which i found to be >> undiplomatic if at all it is true. >> You have spoken for many who are murmuring and i hope the Cabinet >> Secretary who is on this list takes note of this concerns, once goodwill is >> lost it might take time to recover it and this will result in stalled or >> worse still failed projects. We need meaningful engagement based on >> national aspirations not personal preferences and cronyism, i agree >> meaningless stakeholder consultations should be put to an end, we need a >> clear process of soliciting for public input, the same should show when the >> public views have been dropped and why? ever wondered why open data is >> still a myth to name but a few? >> >> Best Regards >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have just gone through the recently launched National Broadband >>> Strategy. >>> >>> Sadly, none of my submitted input (included below) was accomodated (even >>> after confirmation from CCK that they had been received). I guess this is a >>> sign of the times, because it seems that over recent years "public >>> consultations" by CCK and Govt on ICT issues have been merely stage-managed >>> exercises aimed at giving an appearance of inclusion, but in reality are >>> merely rubber-stamping exercises which allow largely third party driven >>> agendas (vendors, foreign govts) to take center stage and prioritization in >>> our strategies, policies, laws etc... >>> >>> I guess I will just have to stop making the effort to "contribute" to >>> these processes as it seems to be pointless and an exercise in futility. >>> Hopefully others will have better luck? >>> >>> Have a good day, >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe(a)gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>> I had shared these thoughts in ISOC-KE and someone asked if I would >>> mind sharing them with KICTANET. Well, here goes: >>> >>> ------------ >>> >>> Is it right to explicitly name a particular technology within the >>> context of such a high level strategy? >>> Pg 6 >>> ¬† the immediate plan to further deploy broadband through a >>> nationwide LTE system >>> >>> The language in principle 2 (pg 8) and principle 7 (pg 9) seem to be >>> contradictory. While principle 2 emphasizes technology neutrality (a good >>> thing), principle 7 in elaborating competitive use of technologies >>> explicitly names fiber optic and wireless broadband. It is proposed that >>> the language here be changed to distinguish between fixed and non-fixed >>> media as alternatives for infrastructure >>> >>> Pg 21 - the relationship between a pacemaker (for heart conditions) >>> and content & applications is not immediately obvious - could this be the >>> wrong kind of example to use in this section? >>> >>> Pg 22 (Table 4) on the problem of an unstructured innovation chain; >>> wouldn't it be better to aim at developing a National Innovation System - >>> rather than simply seeking to "institutionalize the innovation value >>> chain"? The current recommendations fall far short of *really* tackling the >>> underlying issues and proposing sufficient interventions to address the >>> problem in the medium to long term. >>> >>> Pg 23 the figures related to mobile penetration should be updated with >>> latest market estimates and not figures from 2011. Current estimates are at >>> 100% mobile penetration. Also the percentage of *youth* is questionable as >>> it is based on a 2005 study. Should statistics that are 8 years old be used >>> in such an important document? >>> >>> pg 26-32 Section 3.4 Policy, Legal & Regulatory Environment >>> >>> While CCK has over the past 13 years of it's existence facilitated >>> massive transformation with the information and communication technology >>> sector in the country and the region as a whole. It could be argued that >>> the Commission's mandate has become bloated over the years, leading to a >>> "too many eggs in one basket" problem. >>> >>> It could be recommended that specialized agencies be established to >>> deal with essential issue that do not strictly fall under the regulatory >>> mandate of CCK and may, in some cases create opportunity for conflict of >>> interest. These include but are not limited to: Operation and >>> Administration of the Universal Service Fund, Operation and Administration >>> of cyber-security related units, consumer protection etc... >>> >>> While it is evident and obvious that CCK has served and may continue >>> to serve as an ideal "incubator" for these types of services/agencies. It >>> is true that they encompass a potentially vast amount of work, especially >>> within a national context and could be better served by specialized >>> agencies that can focus time and resources and deal with issues in a >>> focused and timely manner. >>> >>> pg 33 Section 3.5.2 >>> >>> by specifically referring to a particular technology (in this case >>> LTE) as a means to accomplishing the objectives of this strategy - it might >>> appear that the strategy is biased towards particular vendors or operators >>> and may not necessarily be taking the best interests of the marketplace and >>> the greatest stakeholder - the citizen - into consideration. It is >>> recommended that the language in this section be reworked to eliminate the >>> mention of specific technologies. >>> >>> The section on Financing and Investment should include recommendations >>> on various incentives to promote activity in the area. Tax breaks, >>> concessions, PPP proposals, allocations from various existing (and new) >>> funds etc... >>> >>> Section 4 Implementation >>> >>> once again, specific reference to LTE may not be in the best interests >>> of leaving the strategy open enought to allow for competing and maybe more >>> affordable technologies that can achieve stated objectives. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> isoc mailing list >>> isoc(a)orion.my.co.ke >>> http://orion.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Barrack O. Otieno >> +254721325277 >> +254-20-2498789 >> Skype: barrack.otieno >> http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> kictanet mailing list >> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >> >> Unsubscribe or change your options at >> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jgmbugua%40gmail.com >> >> >> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform >> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and >> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT >> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. >> >> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors >> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, >> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do >> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> kictanet mailing list >> kictanet(a)lists.kictanet.or.ke >> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet >> >> Unsubscribe or change your options at >> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/blongwe%40gmail.com >> >> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform >> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and >> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT >> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. >> >> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors >> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, >> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do >> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. >>

2 1

Re: [kictanet] [Skunkworks] [ISOC_KE] Kenya Internet Governance Forum Online Discussions Day one: Internet and the Counties
by Kivuva 23 Jul '13

23 Jul '13

We should also remember the meaning of most "e-government initiatives" in Kenya. E-government means PDF forms put online for citizens to download, then send via a courier service to the respective offices. Kudos KRA, they are one of the few government agencies who have automated most of their services for complete paperless access to services. Can the KRA story be replicated in most of our county offices? Do we have enough proactive entrepreneurs and techies who can seize these opportunities and send proposals to the county governments? Regards -- ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva twitter.com/lordmwesh kenya.or.ke | The Kenya we know

2 2

ORANGE AFRICA SOCIAL VENTURE PRIZE 2013
by Kevin 23 Jul '13

23 Jul '13

Dear Listers, Here is a great opportunity for developers and entrepreneurs in Kenya to showcase life changing innovations and make a good sum from it. The Orange Africa Social Venture Prize, an initiative of the Orange Group (Telkom Kenya Orange). The prize money for the competition is between 10,000 - 25,000 Euros. Please read through and share with your networks for those who will be interested. * * *What is the **Orange Africa Social Venture Prize (OASVP)?* The Prize, a continental platform for entrepreneurs and start-ups to showcase ICT based solutions that can improve the lives of people living in Africa, is aligned to Orange’s overall innovation strategy as well as its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy. Through the establishment of this Award, Orange is actively supporting dynamic, young entrepreneurs and start-ups across its footprint in Africa. The prize aims to offer support to entrepreneurs who have innovative ideas for promoting social development by using IT and telecommunications technology, but do not necessarily have the financial or technical resources to put their ideas into action. *Who can take part?* *Any entrepreneur aged 21 or over, or company that has existed for less than three years at the time of the competition, regardless of nationality, can enter the awards free of charge.* The projects submitted must have plans to deploy their service in at least one of the African countries where Orange is present and make innovative use of information and communication technologies to contribute to improving the living conditions of people in those countries. *The Orange African Social Venture Prize will be awarded to three entrepreneurs or start-ups that offer solutions based on mobile networks or IT systems that are designed to address various social and welfare issues faced by Africans across the continent. Projects may range from banking or payment services to applications in essential areas such as healthcare, education and agriculture.* * * *The Award* The competition shall have three prize winners receive an endowment of between *10,000 and 25,000 Euros* as well as support from professional entrepreneurs and ICT experts for a period of six months. In another new initiative this year, the project submitted by the winner of the first prize will be patented by Orange in the country where it is deployed. *How to Register* Applications should be submitted by *20 September 2013* using the Orange portal: http://www.starafrica.com. The 2013 edition of OASVP will see internet users voting online for their favourite project using the Star Africa portal: www.StarAfrica.com<http://www.starafrica.com/>. The project voted “online favourite” will be submitted directly to the jury along with 10 other finalists’ preselected by the judges. *For more information or clarification on the Competition, please contact Rachael Wandia on the following numbers –* * **+254 20 495 2521 OR +254 770 428 237. Her email address is: ** rwandia(a)orange-tkl.co.ke <smedic(a)orange-tkl.co.ke>* ................................................ Kind regards, *Kevin Wanjala* Resource Mobilization, Fundraising, Partnerships, Social Responsibility & Sustainability Nairobi, KENYA Mobile: 0775049920/0710440357 | Email: wanjalak(a)gmail.com

1 0