KICTANet
Threads by month
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
March 2007
- 48 participants
- 96 discussions
27 Mar '07
CHAKULA Issue No. 16, February 2007: Opening access to
Africa: Interviews and analyses
CONTENTS
1. EASSy: MAPPING THE PLAYERS
- EASSy stakeholder analysis by Abiodun Jagun
- Interview with Edmund Katiti, the policy and regulatory
advisor to NEPADs e-Africa Commission - Interview with
Isidoro
Pedro da Silva, CRASAs executive secretary - CIPESA
speaks to
Uganda Telecoms Donald Nyakairu - Whats in a name? The
controversy over the EASSy name change
2. A CREDIBLE THREAT: Kenya in the drivers seat
- Interview with Bitange Ndemo, Kenyas Permanent Secretary
in
the Ministry of Information and Communication - Wairagala
Wakabi asks if too much competition is a bad thing - Its like
waiting for a Matatu, says Russell Southwood - KICTANeT
reports
back on its online discussion and workshop - Rebecca
Wanjiku
spices up the debate
3. APC/UNDP WORKSHOP FOCUS
- Interview with Ben Akoh, OSIWAs ICT programmme officer
- Interview with Polly Gaster, head of the Centre for
Information and Communication at the University Eduardo
Mondlane
(CIUEM) in Maputo, Mozambique - Links to workshop reports
and
presentations
4. LATEST ANALYSES
- Satellite failure shows Africas underbelly, argues Russell
Southwood - CIPESAs Vincent Bagiire questions whether
open
access will bear much fruit if universal access does not begin to
create effective demand - Eric Osiakwan gets back to EASSy
basics - Telkom SA under pressure from consumer activists
5. BACKGROUND READING
- A selection of introductory content from
www.fibreforafrica.net to get you going
//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\
INTRODUCTION: THE FIBRE RUSH FOR AFRICA
If Kenya is anything to go by, the rush for cheap, effective
broadband in Africa is moving fast: everyone from multinationals,
to
governments, to individual investors, both local and foreign, are
involved, and they all seem to want a piece of the opportunity.
A centrepiece of all the action is the Eastern Africa Submarine
Cable
System (EASSy), a much-maligned and delayed attempt to link up
several coastal countries in Eastern and Southern Africa to other
global submarine cables systems in the North (See: http://
fibreforafrica.net) The US$300 million plus project, which will
result in about 9900km of fibre-optic cable being laid, is
struggling, and a number of countries, like Kenya, have decided to
go
it alone.
The project has the misfortune of raising several key issues about
the fibre rush for Africa. Such as: Who is going to own and run the
cable? Who is going to pay for it? And who will benefit and who will
lose out?
This issue of CHAKULA tries to offer some sense of direction. It
maps
out some of the players in the EASSy project, provides a taste of
some of the recent controversies, asks questions about open
access,
and offers links to analyses, as well as background reading for
beginners.
Two useful links for those who need to orientate themselves to the
discussions in this newsletter: In Saturating the marketplace
(See:
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5057717) Wairagala Wakabi
from Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and
Southern
Africa (CIPESA) outlines some recent fibre-optic plans for the
continent, and asks: Is too much competition a bad thing? It is a
good place to get an overview of whats happening and some of
the
political and economic challenges involved.
Some of these challenges are detailed, and technical in nature.
Recently the Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANeT) held an
online
discussion to talk about the various regulatory and institutional
challenges to fibre-optic cables in Kenya. John Walubengo
produced an
excellent explanatory document on the ownership options to get
the
discussions going. (See:
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5058919)
This issue of Chakula has been compiled by Abiodun Jagun, Ory
Okolloh
and Alan Finlay.
//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\
1. EASSy: MAPPING THE PLAYERS
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
This paper by the Association for Progressive Communications
(APC)
ICT policy researcher for the African region, Abiodun Jagun,
adopts a
stakeholder approach to analysing EASSy. It provides a graphical
illustration of the hierarchy of power and interest among the
different stakeholder groups engaged in the EASSy process. The
paper
highlights how different stakeholder groups are able - through
forming coalitions to influence the proposed ownership structure
of
the fibre-optic cable. The paper provides a graphical illustration of
the current impasse within the EASSy project, which has been
described as a disconnect between the commercial and political
ends
of the cable. The analysis of this impasse shows two competing
groups; one the NEPAD Protocol coalition, and the other the
Submarine
Fibre Consortium. The analysis identifies that the powerful position
initially held by the consortium has been diluted, and that the
impasse has created high levels of uncertainty about the viability
of
the EASSy project.
Download the stakeholder analysis: http://fibreforafrica.net/
main.shtml?x=5057715
WERE NOT TELLING ANYONE WHAT TO DO
Edmund Katiti is the policy and regulatory advisor to the New
Partnership for Africas Developments (NEPADs) e-Africa
Commission.
The e-Africa Commission is charged with the coordinated
development
of NEPADs ICT policies, programmes and projects. A top priority
is
to ensure that all African countries will be connected to one
another
by broadband fibre-optic cable systems that will, in turn, link them
to global telecommunications networks through existing or planned
submarine cable systems. CHAKULA asked Katiti some easy, and
more
difficult questions
[Interview took place in January 2007]
*************************************
The NEPAD process of conducting business does not permit any
country
to dominate the process or behave undemocratically.
-- Edmund Katiti, policy and regulatory advisor to NEPADs e-
Africa
Commission
*************************************
CHAKULA: What exactly is NEPAD's role in the EASSy project?
EDMUND KATITI [EK]: On the 9th March, 2003, the NEPAD
Heads of State
and Government Implementation Committee adopted the
development of a
broadband ICT network linking all countries in Africa to one
another
and, in turn, to the rest of the world as a top priority NEPAD
project. As a result, the NEPAD e-Africa Commission has been
working
towards the development of two regional networks, and a
continent-
wide satellite network. The first network is what we call the NEPAD
ICT Broadband Infrastructure Network for Eastern and Southern
Africa.
This comprises a submarine (Eastern Africa Submarine Cable)
segment,
and a terrestrial segment. This network was agreed at a workshop
of
stakeholders (including telecom operators) held in Johannesburg
in
July 2004. The second regional network is the NEPAD ICT
Broadband
Infrastructure Network for Central, West and North Africa. Then
theres the NEPAD e-Schools satellite network. As you can see
from
this, the submarine project is just part of a bigger ICT
infrastructure programme for the African continent, and its the
NEPAD e-Africa Commissions mandate to coordinate the
structured
developed of the ICT sector on the continent.
CHAKULA: Youve also being working on regulatory barriers?
EK: Yes. With a view to resolving policy and regulatory issues that
may impede or prevent the realization of the rationalised network,
the e-Africa Commission has worked with government ICT
experts, ICT
policy advisors, regulators, civil society, legal experts, executives
of telecom companies, and development funding institutes to
develop a
policy and regulatory framework within which the network could be
developed. The experts and policy advisors agreed that the
integrated
ICT broadband backbone should be based on several principles.
These
are: non-discriminatory open access; equitable joint ownership of
the
backbone infrastructure across the region; the separation of
ownership of the infrastructure from its use; the use of Special
Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) to build, own and operate the broadband
ICT
network; and that the infrastructure should be viewed as a public
good and operated on a cost-recovery basis.
CHAKULA: Do these principles apply to EASSy?
EK: The experts and policy advisors agreed that these principles
would cover the submarine cable as well as the terrestrial network.
In addition, they recommended that a Protocol should be signed
between the countries of the region in order to underpin their
collaboration in developing this network. A Protocol that
encapsulates these principles in a policy and regulatory
framework,
as well as the details of the SPVs that will own, operate and
maintain the NEPAD network, was developed and accepted by a
number of
governments in Eastern and Southern Africa. This Protocol has
been
signed under the auspices of the African Union, by 12 countries:
Botswana, DRC, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius,
Rwanda, South
Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe [As of January
2007].
The countries that have not yet signed the Protocol may accede to
it
in the future. The NEPAD e-Africa Commission is the
implementing
agency of the Protocol, and is also the Secretariat of the Inter-
Governmental Assembly (IGA).
CHAKULA: Of the countries that haven't signed, the sticking point
seems to be differences over the IGA. I understand the IGA to be
a
government-run structure for the ownership and management of
the
cable's inter-connection points between countries. How flexible is
this issue, if countries continue to refuse to sign the protocol
because of it? Could the requirements for an IGA be dropped from
the
protocol or changed?
EK: The IGA is not an issue with most of the countries that are yet
to sign the Protocol. Most countries were unable to sign because
of
the internal procedures for approving the signing of a regional
treaty. In some of the countries the Protocol has to be approved by
Parliament before the Minister responsible for the sector can sign
the Protocol, and this takes longer than the three months the
countries had from the date the Protocol was finalized to the
deadline for signing. The countries that did not sign the Protocol by
November 30, 2006, will be able to accede to the Protocol when it
comes into effect sometime in the first half of 2007, when it has
been ratified by seven signatory countries. The IGA is not a
government-run structure for the ownership and management of
the
cables interconnection points between countries. The IGA will
ensure that the policy and regulatory aspects of the Protocol are
upheld by the SPVs. The SPVs will have a Board of Directors and
a
Management Team and these are the structures that will be
responsible
for the ownership and management of the SPVs. There is
therefore no
need for the IGA to be dropped from the Protocol.
CHAKULA: Some role-players say that NEPAD is asserting
ownership of
the project. Is this true?
EK: As you can see from the above, NEPAD was created before
the
submarine project was started, and the NEPAD e-Africa
Commission has
been involved in the project right from the beginning.
CHAKULA: Kenya recently said South Africa was behaving
undemocratically. One can't help the feeling that some tensions
around NEPAD more generally (and South Africa's role on the
continent) are being reflected in this specific issue. Do you feel
this may be true?
EK: The inability of some countries to sign the Protocol within the
three months window was due to legislative procedures within
those
countries and not resistance to the Protocol. Only one country has
expressed reservations about a few aspects of the Protocol. The
NEPAD
process of conducting business does not permit any country to
dominate the process or behave undemocratically.
*************************************
WE ARE NOT GIVING UP ON NEPAD
Kenyas sudden exit from the EASSy project has set tongues
wagging
and the controversy has not been helped by South Africa
apparently
unilaterally changing the projects name to The Nepad Broadband
Infrastructure Network (NBIN). CIPESA recently spoke to Uganda
Telecoms Donald Nyakairu. Katiti is also canvassed by CIPESA
for his
views. http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5058257
WHATS IN A NAME?
The recent announcement by South Africas communications
minister
that the EASSy had been renamed the NEPAD Broadband
Infrastructure
Network (NBIN) was as astounding as her assertion, during the
same
function, that the original model developed for the cable is not
what international financial institutions such as the World Bank
would have liked, writes Anthony Mugeere.
http://www.cipesa.org/246
See also: NOTHINGS FIXED, SAYS NEPAD NEPADs e-Africa
Commission
issued a statement saying that the projects shareholders can
chose
any name they want at an up-coming meeting in April/May.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5058917
OPEN ACCESS IS NO LONGER JUST A CONCEPT
The Communications Regulators Association of Southern Africa
(CRASA)
is a forum of communications regulators and other ICT services
stakeholders in Southern Africa. CRASAs objectives include
introducing effective competition through liberalization, and
promoting an effective and efficient regulatory environment.
CHAKULA
spoke to its executive secretary, Isidoro Pedro da Silva.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5058892
//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\
2. A CREDIBLE THREAT: Kenya in the drivers seat
Kenya has become a vocal player in the drive for faster and
cheaper
connectivity in Africa, and the country is fast emerging as a
spirited leader on the issue. It recently announced that it is
pursuing no fewer than three major access initiatives in the
country:
The East African Marine System (TEAMS), a Kenya Data Network
(KDN)/
Flag Telecom initiative, and EASSy. The countrys spiritedness
has
caused some controversy, with a representative from the World
Bank
adding fuel to the fire by stating that the Kenyan plans are a
credible threat to the EASSy project. Indeed: it withdrew from
EASSy a few months later. But, backed up by an open and
inclusive
policy development process, that involves a range of stakeholders
and
sectors through the countrys multi-stakeholder network
KICTANeT, it
looks like the countrys take no prisoners approach may yield
results. Bitange Ndemo is Kenyas Permanent Secretary in the
Ministry
of Information and Communication which means, effectively, that
hes the person who gets things done. CHAKULA asked him about
TEAMS.
*************************************
Bottom line we have real opportunity to change our country
irreversibly.
-- Bitange Ndemo, Kenyas Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of
Information and Communication
*************************************
CHAKULA: The Kenyan government is stepping up efforts to
address the
high cost of internet access in the country. Why has infrastructure
become a priority for the government and your ministry, and what
impact do you see these efforts having on the average Kenyan
citizen?
BITANGE NDEMO [BN]: Our national ICT Policy objectives
include
lowering cost of access to emerging technologies, including
internet. Besides, unemployment in this country has reached
chronic
levels. To curb the problem the Government realized that we had
an
opportunity to utilize the highly educated youth in the Business
Processing Outsourcing (BPO) industry. We had the first
conference
in February this year [2006] and by then there was only one 200-
seat
call centre. We then started to market our country as a BPO
destination. It became apparent that in spite of the human
resource
capacity that we have, bandwidth, with acceptable levels of latency
in the BPO sector, was the bottleneck. Nevertheless, we now
have
4,000 Kenyans working in this new sector. The cost of accessing
internet continues to hurt the growth of ICT in the country. Thus
the
frustration with the delays in the implementation of EASSy.
CHAKULA: The government recently announced the launch of
TEAMS. Can
you tell us a bit more about the project and how it will be financed?
BN: Kenya is a regional gateway and as such cannot wait to be
guided
on what to do in the region. Although TEAMS is being driven by
the
Government of Kenya, the aim of the project is to fast track
connectivity to the East African region. The ultimate ownership of
TEAMS would not be entirely Government, but by willing investors
and
Governments in the region. This project is like a road whose
objectives are to open up the region and on this road you can have
many buses competing. Therefore on TEAMS shall be many
operators and
other investors from the region. We consider TEAMS as a means
to an
end that would enable us compete with India and other parts of the
world.
CHAKULA: Will non-governmental actors have a role in the project
and
how will you ensure that access to the fibre will be truly open?
BN: The Government will have a minimum role; probably not
beyond
regulation. The initial seed money will come from the Government
and
as more operators/users join, the Government would maintain
minimum
shareholding but leave the running of a special purpose vehicle to
the private sector that will be eventually be listed on the stock
exchange through an IPO. The Government, as well as other
public
institutions (e.g. universities), would buy their capacity
requirement like all other users. Our model is more like the
Swedish
one that is probably the Gold Standard of open access with
minimal
impact on the environment. Whether you are Telkom Kenya
Limited
(TKL) or a newly registered operator, you will buy your capacity
requirement at the same price as TKL
CHAKULA: How do you see EASSy co-existing with efforts like
TEAMS?
BN: Africas problems emanate from monopolies (read National
Telecoms; and note the problems being experienced with SAT-3).
We
must avoid these problems by encouraging a competitive
environment in
all infrastructure projects. Therefore EASSy or TEAMS have a
role in
maintaining low prices that would make the continent competitive.
Kenya also has another fibre project being undertaken by the
private
sector, and we as a government welcome all these developments
as they
truly become a means to economic and social development.
Fujairah,
for example, has four cables that are benefiting the region
enormously
[Interview by Ory Okolloh]
*************************************
SATURATING THE MARKETPLACE
Marine cables could flood the east coast of Africa, but how viable
will the competing cables be? asks Wairagala Wakabi.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5057717
THE FINAL FRONTIER
The East African coast remains the only seabed in Africa yet to be
covered by international submarine fibre-optic cable. An online
discussion and face-to-face workshop hosted by KICTANeT
charted the
best way forward. http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5058762
ITS LIKE WAITING FOR A MATATU
Its like waiting for a matatu. You wait for ages and none come
along. But just when youre about to give up hope, three come
along
at the same time, all trying to come to a screaming halt in front of
you. Balancing Acts Russell Southwood discusses Kenyas
options.
[Source: Balancing Act, www.balancingact-africa.com]
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5045073
SPICING UP THE DEBATE
When Kai Wulff, CEO of KDN and Bitange Ndemo are in one
room
discussing issues of internet connectivity, you can be assured of
fireworks. But the common denominator is that they are concerned
about reducing internet connectivity charges, writes Rebecca
Wanjiku.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5058921
//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\
3. APC/UNDP WORKSHOP FOCUS
OPENING UP ACCESS FOR ALL
Open access, what it means, and how best to get communities
connected
came under the spotlight at a three-day workshop held in
Johannesburg
late last year. The workshop was billed a dialogue and exchange
on
promising options and critical issues and was organized by the
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and APC. It
aimed to
share project success stories and innovations, and explore ways
of
supporting policy and capacity development initiatives that
promote
open access on the continent. Participants include community ICT
practitioners, researchers, policy advocates, regulators,
academics
and donors from across Africa.
http://africa.rights.apc.org/index.shtml?apc=n30084e_1&x=504386
3
WORKSHOP REPORT AND PRESENTATIONS
For a run down of the workshop proceedings and links to
presentations
visit: http://www.propoor-ict.net/content/view/21/1/
WE CANT STOP AND WAIT FOR MEGA-PROJECTS LIKE
EASSy
Polly Gaster is the head of the Centre for Information and
Communication at the University Eduardo Mondlane (CIUEM) in
Maputo,
Mozambique. She has been involved in telecentre development in
Mozambique for many years, and attended the Johannesburg
workshop.
CHAKULA asked her what she expected from the EASSy project.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5058916
GETTING POLITICAL
Ben Akoh is the ICT programmme officer at Open Society Initiative
for
West Africa (OSIWA). OSIWA supports the creation of open
societies in
West Africa: societies marked by a functioning democracy, good
governance, the rule of law, basic freedoms, and widespread civic
participation. OSIWA is based in Dakar, Senegal. CHAKULA
caught up
with Akoh at the Johannesburg workshop.
*************************************
Its about people talking to people for next to nothing, and its
about encouraging my African brothers and sisters living outside
the
continent to return home and contribute in the building of our
crumbled societies because there is cheap, affordable means of
communication.
--- Ben Akoh, ICT programme officer, OSIWA
*************************************
CHAKULA: There were a number of definitions of open access put
forward at the workshop. Yours struck me as having a distinctly
political aspect to it, because it included the idea of media
freedoms. What is open access to you?
BEN AKOH [BA]: The concept of open access has been a tug-of-
war
within development circles. I have seen (or heard) definitions from
'open source' to 'open content' and then 'open access'. Pre-
pending
the word 'open' to any other word seems to automatically qualify
that
word to be included in what I will call the general 'open concept'
framework or parlance. It becomes difficult to then define, and in
turn accept as final, any one or the other definition of open access.
I will also not attempt to define it, though at the workshop I
managed to 'say' what it meant to me. And these are purely my
thoughts on open access until it is subjected to scientific and
social discuss, theorized and then proven - in scientific parlance.
Russell Southwood and Eric Osiakwan [see below], in their open
access
infoDev paper say (carefully choosing my words) that open access
is
the separation of services from infrastructure and that the base
infrastructure (which I will call the medium - and not to be
confused
with media) is the responsibility of those that have the means and
power to build this. So in telecommunications it is the copper
cable,
fibre; in broadcasting it is the airwaves (frequency allocation,
spectrum management and the associated speak - 'open
spectrum') and
the attendant last mile exchanges; in electricity it is the poles,
transformers, substations; in mobile technology, the base stations,
etc. And government usually has the means to build this type of
capital-intensive infrastructure and should stick to it; although in
recent years the private sector has entered into this space. The
second component of the open access framework is the services
which
run on these mediums. The definition of open access has
therefore
been firstly the separation of this spectrum and secondly the
advocacy for unrestricted access to any of the components of the
spectrum (re: infrastructure - or mediums - and the services that
run
on these mediums). I have added the broadcast sector to this
definition because of the sooner rather than later shift towards the
convergence of technologies. It will become 'difficult' to separate
what runs on the medium - difficult but not impossible to
distinguish
the type of traffic. And if convergence will 'force' all technologies
towards a converged media then the broadcast sector should be
included in the open' speak. Broadcast can be further subdivided
into various little components - the content, the broadcaster, the
human resource within the broadcast sector (re: journalists and his
editor/publisher), the spectrum, base stations, policies that
surround broadcast, public/private broadcasters, etc. This is a
sector that is often held captive and tightly controlled by the state
and/or ruling party in most countries of Africa, if not the world.
Hence its political undertone. Advocating for open access in this
sector (not known as that) has been a long-time struggle. Indeed
media advocates have fought for some form of open access right
back
in the day with 'freedom of information' and 'freedom of
expression'
struggles. We should as well include the broadcast struggle in this
fight.
CHAKULA: How do you understand open access in the context of
West
Africa: Do you think West Africa is ahead of East Africa in the
access stakes, so to speak?
BA: One thing for sure is that SAT-3 had greatly improved
connectivity in West Africa in spite of its high cost of connectivity
induced by the closed consortium model of its ownership. This
sets
West Africa far ahead - in communication terms - of East Africa.
Although the individual cost of connectivity per country still
impacts heavily on the consumer, it may have improved the social
life
and living standards of West Africans in terms of their ability and
the ease of communication and access to information. Also, SAT-
3 has
spurred or incentivized the growth of other regional inland,
terrestrial fibre or submarine cables. While it is important to build
terrestrial networks, it is unclear, especially amongst investors in
East Africa, how much value such 'internal infrastructure' would
have
without a regional submarine cable that carries the generated
internal content to other parts of the world. I believe this is the
underlying, hidden issue that has negatively impacted the rapid
development and deployment of regional terrestrial and regional
submarine infrastructure in that part of the continent. While no-one
would say it this directly, it is the reason why the interest in
EASSy and its open access debate has led to no cable being laid
up
until the present moment. I however postulate that regions in
Africa
should not be compared against themselves. Its not a question of
how
far the West exceeds the East in regional infrastructure
development
terms. But rather, it is how Africa as a whole sees itself in the
connectivity debate - perhaps against the rest of the world. It is
about how much capital flight happens annually and how that
could be
curbed. Its about how Africans should encourage internal
communication, which will, of course, lead to the development of
our
continent as a whole and not a certain part of it while the other
suffers. (Indeed while technology growth is evident in West Africa,
there are other aspects of development in which West Africa lags
far
behind its East African counterparts). Its about continental
economics versus the poverty picture that the continent portrays to
the rest of the world. Its about people talking to people for next
to nothing, and its about encouraging my African brothers and
sisters living outside the continent to return home and contribute in
the building of our crumbled societies because there is cheap,
affordable means of communication. Which, in my opinion,
contributes
greatly to the underlying reasons why the diaspora refuses to
return
and invest in the continent. Lets look at the fibre issue as a
continental issue, from a holistic point of view rather than the
sectored, fractured spectacles we have used up until now - of
EASSy
for East Africa and SAT-3 for West Africa. Then perhaps 'open
access'
would lose its meaning and become just 'affordable access.' Then
we
would have achieved our objective.
CHAKULA: What are the key challenges in West Africa, as far as
open
access is concerned?
BA: Firstly, the availability of SAT-3 gives us an illusion that all
our communication needs have been met and hence we do not
need to
further research or invest into alternative or more available means
of connectivity. Although there has been private sector activity in
this area (for example, the GlobalCom fibre link to London, the
Festoon cable, etc.) it may be insufficient to meet the future needs
of communication especially, as I have already mentioned, that
all
services, including broadcast signals, would run on some of these
channels. This is one amongst many reasons why this medium
may not be
sufficient in the near future. Secondly, the open access debate has
not been an issue on the table of most West African connectivity
discussions, because of - you got it right - SAT-3. "It ain't broke,
don't fix it." Hence the struggle by civil society has been to lower
the cost and improve connectivity as opposed to directly
challenging
the rather 'political' status quo and structure of the closed
consortium; political in the sense that incumbents are tied to
governments and, believe it or not, governments have closely
guarded
interests in the revenue generated by their cash cows - the
telcoms.
While we also advocate for the opening up of the 'governing'
structure held tightly by the agreements countries (and their telcos)
may have signed binding them to secrecy, we also advocate for
the
ease of accessing this infrastructure from whatever landing station
one chooses. Could this be open access in another form? Or
perhaps
from a West African perspective?
CHAKULA: During the workshop you suggested that technology
can have a
detrimental affect, and that in some instances customs and
cultural
habits may be lost. In this way, a different kind of 'access' is
under threat - access to culture as it is being practiced. Could you
elaborate on this?
BA: I will put the discuss in context here, as the workshop focused
on access at the rural community level. I believe it is very
important that our rural folks should be reachable and should be
within either fixed or mobile coverage areas, fall within the
electricity grid, have running water, and information (either via
broadcast channels - TV, radio or the internet), etc. Our specific
debate focused on the use and proliferation of 'free networks' in
the
rural community. This is clearly useful as I would be able to reach
my grandmother from across the world and she me if that network
is
connected to the larger national backbone. But should my grand
mum
use that tool to speak to her neighbor in the next commune of huts
-
10 meters away, just like we are used to doing in the urban areas?
(Research shows that more 'neighborhood' calls amount for a
larger
percentage of the entire household phone bill). We happen to
always
drop into a friend's place as we find ourselves 'in the
neighborhood'
without making any prior calls or appointments. This social
dynamic,
though unpleasant in some ways, is often appreciated. I may be
myopic
in my thinking here and perhaps be looking at this using the eye of
my village, the rural community that shaped my being. 'In the
neighborhood' is not the unlikely, but rather the norm, in the rural
context. Does the introduction of technology and rural
communication
affect this very fabric of rural culture? I believe so. When my
grandmother would rather speak to her neighbor on the phone
than
visit her seems to me to negatively affect communication within
the
rural community - communication being the basis by which African
communities exist. Ours is an oral culture.
CHAKULA: As a donor, what sorts of initiatives do you think need
to
be supported in the context of open access in West Africa?
BA: Clearly, the price of access needs to drop. Not just become
affordable, but way below the disposable income of the rural
person.
Secondly, barter trade still subsists in must parts of African
communities. I would like to see, putting it plainly, the ability to
exchange a basket of tomatoes for x hours of airtime for the rural
community farmer. I would also like to see the government, private
sector, etc. putting rural access on the forefront of connectivity
discuss and not just talking about it, but ensuring that something is
done - enough of the talk now. And finally, I would like to see
empowered and organised consumers and their interests cutting
across
rural and urban communities in the open access debate; and
subsequent
implementation. While I believe that regulation may be 'evil' in
some
form, a structured regulatory framework for both rural and urban
infrastructure should exist as self-regulation may be totally
impossible in connectivity issues. There are too many interests at
stake.
Background reading: Anders Comstedt, Eric Osiakwan and
Russell
Southwood (Spintrack AB): Open Access Model, Options for
Improving
Backbone Access in Developing Countries (with a Focus on Sub-
Saharan
Africa), 2005. http://www.infodev.org/files/
2569_file_OPEN_ACCESS_REPORT.pdf
//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\
4. LATEST ANALYSES
SATELLITE FAILURE SHOWS AFRICAS UNDERBELLY
The cost of satellite bandwidth has rocketed as much as 50%
following
the failed launch of a satellite last January. The story shows just
how vulnerable Africa is. Russell Southwood explores the issue.
[Source: Balancing Act, www.balancingact-africa.com]
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5058882
ENABLING OPEN ACCESS THROUGH UNIVERSAL ACCESS
In this paper, CIPESAs Vincent Bagiire questions whether open
access
will bear much fruit if universal access does not begin to create
effective demand. http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5056029
OPENING UP EASSy
In the wake of what he calls the EASSy fallout", Eric Osiakwan
goes
back to the basics of open access to get the project's engines
started again. http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5042385
BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON TELKOM SA
The Telecoms Action Group (TAG) has been making waves in
South
Africa. That's after it took out a full-page advert in two South
African newspapers slamming Telkom SA for its higher-than-fair
connectivity costs. CHAKULA spoke to Alastair Otter, founding
editor
of Tectonic, who is part of the TAG initiative.
http://africa.rights.apc.org/index.shtml?apc=he_1&x=5052971 See
also:
CONSUMERS SHOULDNT SUBSIDISE TELKOM argues APC
Director Anriette
Esterhuysen http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=5057602
//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\
5. BACKGROUND READING
WHY AFFORDABLE INTERNATIONAL BANDWIDTH MATTERS
Currently Africa has amongst the highest international bandwidth
costs anywhere in the world. Although it varies, the international
element of the cost to the consumer is significant proportion of the
overall cost he or she pays. The same is true for institutional users
like governments or for companies in the private sector.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=4051584
FINANCING INFRASTRUCTURE
Before markets were liberalised, telephone companies were in the
main
government-owned institutions. When they wanted to build
undersea
cables, governments financed this activity and the project was
carried out by the government-owned telephone company. In the
age of
liberalisation, things get a bit more tricky.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=4051585
HOW FAR DOES DEMAND FOR LOW-COST CALLS GO?
Up until relatively recently, making international calls from Africa
has been expensive. People were less inclined or unable to afford
to
make an international call and the majority of international calling
was either corporate or government. A number of factors have
fundamentally changed this position.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=4051587
SATELLITE vs FIBRE: DIFFERENT COSTS FOR DIFFERENT
THINGS
Satellite is extremely effective in reaching places where the
volume
of traffic would not justify a fibre connection. However satellite
connectivity is often costly. On the other hand, the comparatively
low price of fibre connectivity for the consumer may not be
sustainable over the long-term in some instances.
http://fibreforafrica.net/main.shtml?x=4051583
FLATTENING THE WORLD WITH FIBRE
This paper aims to define fibre optic technology, how fibre-optic
networks function, and explains how different this technology is
from
other communication infrastructures. The paper further outlines
the
prospects for fibre-optic technology in Africa, looks at some fibre-
optic networks on the continent, as well as at how fibre-optic
applications are being used to enhance technological and
economic
development.
http://www.comminit.com/africa/strategicthinking/st2006/
thinking-1897.html
//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\
CHAKULA is a newsletter produced by the Association for
Progressive
Communications (APC)s Africa ICT Policy Monitor <http://
africa.rights.apc.org> which aims to mobilise African civil society
around ICT policy for sustainable development and social justice
issues.
We welcome your opinions about this newsletter. Send your
comments,
feedback or contributions to chakula(a)apc.org. To subscribe or
unsubscribe e-mail chakula(a)apc.org or go to:
http://lists.apc.org/cgi-
bin/mailman/listinfo/chakula
_______________________________________________
Grace mailing list
Grace(a)apcafricawomen.org
http://lists.apcwomen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grace
1
0
hi,
we are in the process of finalising the Kictanet newsletter,
i had earlier asked for articles and updates but got no response,
if you would like us to feature your organisation or any updates,
please send them directly to me, not to the list,
just cut and paste my email, dont hit the reply button,
regards
becky
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
1
0
Fyi..
_____
From: Harry Hare [mailto:harry@africanedevelopment.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:11 AM
To: 'KICTanet Committee'
Subject: Rwanda's Knowledge Revolution
Very interesting reading, I think a lot of African countries can borrow a
leaf from this. But what is probably evident in this article is the
seriousness that leadership of the country has placed on ICT as an enabler
to its development effort. It is the leadership that has facilitated the
"from rags to riches" ICT development. Read on
Harry
(http://www.businessinafrica.net/tech_telecoms/633087.htm)
<javascript:self.close()>
<javascript:window.print()>
Rwanda's knowledge revolution
Andrew Mack and Jeremy Goldberg
'28-FEB-07 23:00'
There was again, the same look - a combination of concern and disbelief -
when I told a colleague that I'd been working in Rwanda. After all, what do
we in the outside world know about Rwanda? A small country with a history of
unspeakable violence and ethnic division, perhaps, but a place of
opportunity? A leader of Africa's march into the 21st century? Rwanda?
For all its challenges, Rwanda is by nearly all accounts making tremendous
strides, working to re-build into a modern, knowledge-based economy. In
fact, a number of Rwanda-watchers these days see the country on track to
become the hottest IT spot between Cairo and Durban, a kind of "Silicon
Valley of East-Central Africa." But it certainly did not have to be this
way.
In a region where so much has gone wrong, what went right in Rwanda?
Everything started with vision. While much of the development of IT and the
Internet around the continent has historically been ad hoc, Rwanda decided
early on to build IT into its strategic plans for the future - in tangible,
not just rhetorical ways. Since coming to power, President Kagame had
stressed his eagerness to move the country from an agriculturally-based
economy to a creative, competitive and more knowledge-based system. So
following extensive consultations with different groups across Government
and society at large in and around the year 2000, Rwanda launched its Vision
2020, the country's roadmap for development, with a focus on IT as a crucial
cornerstone. It was an unusual vision, one that looked over the horizon with
a confidence rarely shown by developing nations.
In a country that needed so much, it was easy to ask the question "Why
Internet? Why tech?" But consider Rwanda's position: landlocked, with long
distances to the sea, troublesome infrastructure in neighbouring countries,
instability in bordering Congo and Burundi. Add to this crushingly expensive
air rates - the Nairobi-Kigali route is believed to be the second most
expensive flight per kilometre in the world - one can see how traditional,
goods-focused export trade would be challenging to say the least. Building a
knowledge economy was and remains more than a logical choice. It is an
enlightened necessity.
So to make this vision work, the Government decided to invest in people -
especially teachers and the tools they needed. After the genocide in 1994,
Rwanda needed to rebuild the country's tech infrastructure, but had a
shortage of trained local people to get the job done. To address the issue,
in 1997 the Government opened the Kigali Institute of Science and Technology
(KIST). Since then, KIST has graduated thousands of Rwandan tech experts and
is now recognised as a leader in the development of biogas technology and
renewable energy.
And the investment wasn't just limited to the capital, or to
university-level students. As part of its IT outreach Rwanda focused on
bringing computers and Internet access to young people across the country.
Josh Kron, a Kigali-based journalist, recently recounted to me the story of
a Danish IT consultant who came to Rwanda in 2002 with a container full of
57 computers to donate to schools. At that time it was one of the largest
(if not the largest) shipments of its kind.
Today over 1200 primary schools (not to mention secondary and university
classrooms) have computers available. It's currently estimated that some 10
percent of all Rwanda's secondary schools already have wireless internet
access, and plans are underway to expand this substantially. According to
Musabayezu Narcisse, Secretary General in the country's Ministry of
Education, "As of today (December 2006) [the Government has] given out 4 000
computers to secondary schools around the country." This combined with a
proliferation of private access points - Kigali is home to literally dozens
of internet cafes - has put Rwanda on a steep path to integrating IT into
everyday life and development. Quite a change from 2002.
At the same time, the country also set high goals for spending and
investment in infrastructure to match the focus on training. In March of
2006 Rwanda committed to spend some $1bn to build and promote telecentres,
specifically aimed at bringing rural areas online and promoting
broader-based use of technology for business. This spending was part of an
overall concentration in science. In January of this year Kagame reminded
his fellow heads of state at an African Union summit that the country had
set its science and technology spending at 1,6 percent of GDP, bringing it
in line with typical OECD nations (as opposed to other African nations,
which average less than 0.5%). He compared the IT future of Rwanda to that
of Australia, as opposed to Kenya.
Of course to make the kinds of big investments the country needed, Rwanda
would need big support from the international donor community. And they got
it, focusing a significant part of its donor-funded work on IT-related
projects, among them a $20mn Public Sector Capacity Building project and in
2006, a $10mn e-Government project - both funded by the World Bank.
The goal was to use technology to reach out over the head of logistics
challenges, streamlining communications, and using video conferencing to
facilitate work with district leaders in different parts of the country. As
Albert Butare, Minister of State in Charge of Energy and Communications,
explained simply, Rwanda wanted to use IT solutions to enable local
government leaders to function "without them having to come to Kigali all
the time". After all, e-government should be able to save time, promote
accountability, efficiency and transparency and lower cost in Rwanda - if it
can in Washington.
Rwanda has also worked hard to re-design its business environment, promoting
a new openness to investment and a series of reforms to create a
business-friendly climate. The country was described as a top regional
reformer in the recent World Bank Doing Business survey, noting some big
changes in 2006. To ease company start-up, a presidential decree
dramatically increased the number of authorised notaries, shrinking the time
it takes to register a new business from 21 days to 16 days. Rwanda also
decreased its corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 30 percent in
2005. The process of reform is far from complete, but international
investors began to take notice.
In fact, it didn't take long to attract telecommunications and software
companies. Terracom brought wireless broadband internet to Kigali. Microsoft
is bringing e-learning classrooms. Nokia set up a village phone programme,
and just last month, a partnership was announced with the One Laptop per
Child programme (the $100 laptop scheme).
And these days Rwanda is saying the proof is in the fibre. Yes, fibre.
Rwanda has become one of the most wired countries in the region. Terracom
has laid more than 220 miles of fibre-optic cable. According to Christopher
Lundh, Terracom's CEO, "Rwanda, through fibre-optic and CDMA technology,
enjoys without question, the most advanced communications technology in
Africa." And as a testament to this expertise, last year African countries
unanimously voted Rwanda the headquarters of the East Africa Submarine Cable
Project (EASSy). This $280mn project will serve Botswana, South Africa,
Kenya, Tanzania, and Lesotho. A Rwandan will serve as the Chair of its
Working Committee.
Finally, Rwanda is taking steps to build its reputation - its brand - as an
information hub for the long term. Just days ago Rwanda made public its
offer to provide up to 100 ICT scholarships for students from East and
Central African nations, starting in 2009. If East Africa were an IT
village, Rwanda might now be seen as one of the village elders.
So Rwanda is getting it right. But does that really matter for Africa as a
whole, or for other emerging markets?
Perhaps the most encouraging thing about this entire story is that the
reasons for Rwanda's success are no mystery. Rwanda's IT-focused approaches
work and can work elsewhere. If you don't yet believe me, believe The
Economist - they recently reported that Rwanda is well on its way to
achieving several of the Millennium Development Goals. And, Rwanda is not
the only example of IT turning around an emerging market country. I could
easily wave the Mauritian flag. Mauritius, a small island nation in the
Indian Ocean, is now an IT powerhouse attracting growing numbers of foreign
investors.
Why shouldn't these new technologies be used to help modernise the
government and infrastructure in Sierra Leone? Freetown is already looking
to Rwanda as an example of the possibilities, with IT as one of the central
objectives in their own Vision 2025. Could IT help trade for landlocked
countries like Burundi and Uganda as they work to enhance exports through
Tanzania and Kenya? The answer is of course yes. IT could help improve
supply chain management, expedite port clearance delays, and increase the
reliability of customs operations. all things that experts touched on at a
recent World Bank Government seminar.
In a region where so much has gone wrong, Rwanda is an example of how much
can be accomplished with a focus on IT. Investment in people, clarity of
vision and a focus on technology infrastructure have given the country new,
entrepreneurial options for the future. Especially given the challenges of
its past, we should recognise a country so focused on its potential, one
that is looking over the horizon, beyond simple rebuilding.
So, three cheers for Rwanda, the 'Singapore of Central Africa' - a model for
post-conflict nations on the continent and beyond.
Andrew Mack is a former World Bank official and the Principal of AMGlobal
-Business <http://www.businessinafrica.net> in Africa Magazine
_____
1
0
Reality check,
We all have to start from the grass roots.The only way Kenya can be
seen implementing what they have policy made is for the government
especially the ministry of Info and technology to work with
E-learning centres,equip them with internet connectivity and fund them
to implement what they(Government) have policy made.
Thereafter its the duty of the
E-learning centre(e.g Kimathi information cente),to train the
communities on a certain level then another higher institution picks
them up and takes them to a much higher level.
The government has the capacity.All it needs is to slot in E-learning
centres on the grassroots level.We are doing it in our Kimathi
community.It surely works!!
Best Regards,
Jose' Njuki-Imwe Ngunjiri
----- Original Message ----
From: Pauline Muthigani <pauline(a)nordic.co.ke>
To: ngunjirijnr(a)yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:20:29 AM
Subject: Re: [kictanet] 2-Day eHealth Workshop closes with a suprise
Hello,
I too had a chance to attend the same workshop .And relate to what Walu is
saying.I have studied many African countries and I can simply state that
the difference between Kenya and the likes of Rwanda and Namibia is that
Kenya we are GREAT In policy making BUT not as GREAT when it comes to
implementation! Kenya got GREAT plans/policies but challenged when it
comes to fast implementation.
SA ,Namibia Morocco,Egypt, Tunisia and the Rwandas of Africa have their
govt supporting ICT fully, same here our government does , but then why is
the implementation speed so low. What must we do to expedite implementing
of these.. WE NEED ACTION ACTION ACTION!!
albest,
Pauline
> Last week on Wed 21st/Thrs 22nd, I had the opportunity to
> attend the above regional (East African) meeting on eHealth
> at the Nairobi Safari Club. Member states (Ke, Ug, Tz, Rw,
> & Burundi) were showcasing their eHealth projects and
> sharing experiences.
>
> As usual, Rwanda's experience was way ahead of the pack.
> The chaps are pretty focused and have established eHealth
> Task forces that have been on the ground for over five
> years. The have a comprehensive (Vision, Mission,
> Objective, Activities, etc) eHealth Strategy that is well
> integrated into their National Health Plan (Solved their
> Budget/Funding Wars that way).
>
> Amongst some of the acitivities they have implemented was
> to link up their three National Referral Hospitals with
> fiber and are running Telemedicine & Other applications
> such as: Doctor-to-Doctor Consultations, Doctor-to-patient
> consultations(e.g. sharing digitized X-rays), Drug
> Inventory Control & Monitoring, Blood Bank Control &
> Monitoring, Epidemic Surveillance amongst others.
>
> They are currently looking forward to mapping their Health
> Information Systems (HIMS) onto a Geographical Information
> Systems (GIS) in order to extract 'Health-Intelligence'
> from their data. For example, using the two systems, they
> would be able to 'see' why consumption of Malaria drugs is
> higher in some locations as compared to the other -
> probably due to the surrounding swampy conditions. This
> would get their Health managers to intervene by way of
> treating the swampy conditions rather than just increasing
> the stock levels of Malaria drugs for that region. {I think
> that is clever}
>
> It always beats me:- How comes we are having to learn from
> Rwanda every now and then and yet we are supposedly the
> 'big brother'?
>
> walu.
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast
> with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke
> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Please unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/pauline%40nordic.co.ke
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> ---------------------------------------------
> "easy access to the world"
>
>
--
Pauline Muthigani
Telecom/ ICT Strategy Analyst
Nordic Consulting
P.O Box 61191, 00200
Nairobi-Kenya
Tel: 254 20 2736633
Cell: 254 7222614771
Fax: 254 202731194
----------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------
"easy access to the world"
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing listc
kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke
http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Please unsubscribe or change your options at http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ngunjirijnr%40yahoo.com
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
1
0
27 Mar '07
Okay Soberly now, having shared my frustrations, we need to seriously
consider re-framing the way we advocate for ICTs for development. Perhaps
linking them to concrete livelihood issues could be a start making it
easier for policy makers to place ICTS within the broader
development/poverty reduction frameworks.
We could then lobby to ensure that ICTs as tools and the sector in general
is taken seriously.
Lobbying parliamentarians to remind them of the pending communications/ICT
related bills/policies would not hurt. Luckily for us in Kenya we have a
government that listens and accomodates!
best
alice
A. Wanjira Munyua wrote:
> Agree we talk a lot, write a lot of papers, develop many policies, form
> committees that develop and submit comprehensive recommendations, etc but
> never seem to have the drive/will or is it resources to implement. Look at
> the IC bill, our impressive E-government strategy and many others.
> Did you all note that none of the bills that affect the communications
> sector were mentioned as priorities for parliamentary discussions.
> well, I am sorry I am not offering any constructive suggestions just
> sharing frustration here.
>
> best
> alice
>
>
>
> Michuki Mwangi wrote:
>> Walu,
>>
>> John Walubengo wrote:
>>> It always beats me:- How comes we are having to learn from
>>> Rwanda every now and then and yet we are supposedly the
>>> 'big brother'?
>>>
>> Maybe we talk too much? ;)
>>
>> I first heard of tele-medicine back in 2001 - 2002, its been 5yrs since
>> not sure how much has been done as a result of the forums and
>> discussions held back then.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke
> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Please unsubscribe or change your options at
http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alice%40apc.org
>
2
1
26 Mar '07
Agree we talk a lot, write a lot of papers, develop many policies, form
committees that develop and submit comprehensive recommendations, etc but
never seem to have the drive/will or is it resources to implement. Look at
the IC bill, our impressive E-government strategy and many others.
Did you all note that none of the bills that affect the communications
sector were mentioned as priorities for parliamentary discussions.
well, I am sorry I am not offering any constructive suggestions just
sharing frustration here.
best
alice
Michuki Mwangi wrote:
> Walu,
>
> John Walubengo wrote:
>> It always beats me:- How comes we are having to learn from
>> Rwanda every now and then and yet we are supposedly the
>> 'big brother'?
>>
>
> Maybe we talk too much? ;)
>
> I first heard of tele-medicine back in 2001 - 2002, its been 5yrs since
> not sure how much has been done as a result of the forums and
> discussions held back then.
>
>
1
0
26 Mar '07
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: PROJECT OFFICER: KNOWLEDGE COMMUNICATIONS position with IISD
From: "A. Wanjira Munyua" <alice(a)apc.org>
Date: Mon, March 26, 2007 12:16 pm
To: kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
KICTANet Listers,
Interesting position with International Institute for Sustainable
Development.
Please respond to the e-mail address listed at the end of this notice not
to KICTANet list.
best
alice
---------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT OFFICER
KNOWLEDGE COMMUNICATIONS
IISD is seeking a Project Officer to support the initiatives of its
Knowledge Communications program. This position is located in Ottawa.
Specific duties and responsibilities with respect to the Knowledge
Communications program:
Research policy linkages between the information society and sustainable
development.
o Develop a program of work on Internet Governance and its impact on
sustainable development: monitor the Internet governance debates, within
the IGF, ICANN, and other relevant arenas; prepare information briefs,
research papers and organize workshops that contribute to an understanding
of the importance of the Internet Governance debate to sustainable
development practitioners and policy makers.
o Liaise between the key actors (IGF, ICANN, ITU, IDRC, and others) and
IISD. o Analyze ICT4D policies in developing countries and develop
recommendations for policy coherence with sustainable development
strategies, Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, Millennium Development
Goals and other development frameworks and agendas.
o Develop new projects and funding proposals to advance this work.
Support capacity building initiatives with young people as leaders in
using information and communications technologies to achieve more
sustainable development.
Contribute to the Knowledge Communications program of work on the
operation, management and assessment of networks and other models for
individual and inter-organization collaboration
o Support evaluations of networks (interviews, surveys, etc.) as assigned
o Conduct research on knowledge management and communications topics, as
assigned.
Other duties as assigned
General
The Project Officer supports all initiatives of IISD as assigned. General
responsibilities include:
managing assigned projects, controlling budgets, and supervising IISD or
external staff associated with those projects;
maintaining contacts with domestic and international project partners;
identifying and initiating new projects through IISDs project planning
and review mechanism; developing proposals and raising funds for new
project initiatives;
contributing to IISD projects under various strategic objectives;
representing IISD at local, national and international fora;
organizing meetings and holding discussions with appropriate
persons/groups according to the needs of IISDs initiatives;
participating on IISDs Planning and Review Committee as requested;
other duties as assigned.
The Project Officer reports to the Director, Knowledge Communications.
Travel within and outside Canada may be required.
Qualifications and Skills
The Project Officer should hold a Masters degree in an appropriate field
(such as international affairs, environmental studies or ICT policy), with
two years relevant experience.
S/he should be familiar with the literature and organizations within the
fields of Internet governance, ICT for development, knowledge for
development, communications for development and institutional
collaboration. In particular, s/he should have knowledge of institutions
involved in the WSIS (including WSIS follow-up processes) and IGF. S/he
should also have a broad knowledge of sustainable development issues.
S/he should understand accountability and transparency issues in
governance processes and how they relate to sustainable development, be
aware of issues related to security and stability of the Internet and
their potential implications for the global South, and be able to draw on
linkages between ICT and PRSPs.
The Project Officer will have demonstrated capacity for managing projects
and budgets, and for working with minimal supervision. S/he should be a
team player with good interpersonal skills. Excellent writing skills, the
ability to work virtually with distributed teams and the capacity to
research and communicate via the Internet are essential. Fluency in
English is required; knowledge of other languages is desirable. Candidates
must be Canadian citizens or landed immigrants.
Closing Date: April 6, 2007
Reply in confidence to:
Director, Human Resources & Administration
International Institute for Sustainable Development
6th Floor, 161 Portage Avenue East
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0Y4
Fax: +1 (204) 958-7710
E-mail: info(a)iisd.ca
1
0
26 Mar '07
KICTANet Listers,
Interesting position with International Institute for Sustainable
Development.
Please respond to the e-mail address listed at the end of this notice not
to KICTANet list.
best
alice
---------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT OFFICER
KNOWLEDGE COMMUNICATIONS
IISD is seeking a Project Officer to support the initiatives of its
Knowledge Communications program. This position is located in Ottawa.
Specific duties and responsibilities with respect to the Knowledge
Communications program:
Research policy linkages between the information society and sustainable
development.
o Develop a program of work on Internet Governance and its impact on
sustainable development: monitor the Internet governance debates, within
the IGF, ICANN, and other relevant arenas; prepare information briefs,
research papers and organize workshops that contribute to an understanding
of the importance of the Internet Governance debate to sustainable
development practitioners and policy makers.
o Liaise between the key actors (IGF, ICANN, ITU, IDRC, and others) and IISD.
o Analyze ICT4D policies in developing countries and develop
recommendations for policy coherence with sustainable development
strategies, Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, Millennium Development
Goals and other development frameworks and agendas.
o Develop new projects and funding proposals to advance this work.
Support capacity building initiatives with young people as leaders in
using information and communications technologies to achieve more
sustainable development.
Contribute to the Knowledge Communications program of work on the
operation, management and assessment of networks and other models for
individual and inter-organization collaboration
o Support evaluations of networks (interviews, surveys, etc.) as assigned
o Conduct research on knowledge management and communications topics, as
assigned.
Other duties as assigned
General
The Project Officer supports all initiatives of IISD as assigned. General
responsibilities include:
managing assigned projects, controlling budgets, and supervising IISD or
external staff associated with those projects;
maintaining contacts with domestic and international project partners;
identifying and initiating new projects through IISDs project planning
and review mechanism; developing proposals and raising funds for new
project initiatives;
contributing to IISD projects under various strategic objectives;
representing IISD at local, national and international fora;
organizing meetings and holding discussions with appropriate
persons/groups according to the needs of IISDs initiatives;
participating on IISDs Planning and Review Committee as requested;
other duties as assigned.
The Project Officer reports to the Director, Knowledge Communications.
Travel within and outside Canada may be required.
Qualifications and Skills
The Project Officer should hold a Masters degree in an appropriate field
(such as international affairs, environmental studies or ICT policy), with
two years relevant experience.
S/he should be familiar with the literature and organizations within the
fields of Internet governance, ICT for development, knowledge for
development, communications for development and institutional
collaboration. In particular, s/he should have knowledge of institutions
involved in the WSIS (including WSIS follow-up processes) and IGF. S/he
should also have a broad knowledge of sustainable development issues.
S/he should understand accountability and transparency issues in
governance processes and how they relate to sustainable development, be
aware of issues related to security and stability of the Internet and
their potential implications for the global South, and be able to draw on
linkages between ICT and PRSPs.
The Project Officer will have demonstrated capacity for managing projects
and budgets, and for working with minimal supervision. S/he should be a
team player with good interpersonal skills. Excellent writing skills, the
ability to work virtually with distributed teams and the capacity to
research and communicate via the Internet are essential. Fluency in
English is required; knowledge of other languages is desirable. Candidates
must be Canadian citizens or landed immigrants.
Closing Date: April 6, 2007
Reply in confidence to:
Director, Human Resources & Administration
International Institute for Sustainable Development
6th Floor, 161 Portage Avenue East
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0Y4
Fax: +1 (204) 958-7710
E-mail: info(a)iisd.ca
1
0
PRESIDENTS ADDRESS AT THE INAUGURATION OF COMMONWEALTH CONNECTS: INTERNATIONAL E-PARTNERSHIP SUMMIT, 23RD MARCH 2007, NEW DELHI
by Harry Hare 26 Mar '07
by Harry Hare 26 Mar '07
26 Mar '07
Dear Colleagues,
Below is President Dr Abdul Kalami's speech when inaugurating the first
commonwealth connects International ePartnership Summit in New Delhi India
last Friday. It is important to note that the President did not just read
his speech, but he used a PowerPoint presentation to visualize his ideas. It
was quite a trip for those who were there.
Kindest Regards
Harry
PRESIDENTS ADDRESS AT THE INAUGURATION OF COMMONWEALTH CONNECTS:
INTERNATIONAL E-PARTNERSHIP SUMMIT, NEW DELHI
_____
Following is the text of the President Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalami's Address at
the Inauguration of Commonwealth Connects: International E-Partnership
Summit here today: Evolution of Commonwealth Knowledge Grid "Connectivity
enriches the societies"
I am indeed delighted to participate in the inauguration of Commonwealth
Connects: International e-Partnership Summit. I am happy that the summit is
aiming to promote effective global partnerships between public and private
sectors in developing and implementing strategies which will bridge the
digital divide across the 53 countries of the Commonwealth. My greetings to
the ICT Ministers of the Commonwealth, CEOs, Managing Directors, Government
Officials and Senior Representatives from Civil Society. Today when I am
with you, I would like to share with you some of the Indian experience in
connectivity for achieving the societal transformation. This along with the
experiences of other participating Commonwealth countries can lead to
evolution of a multi-lateral connectivity between and among nations. Hence,
I would like to discuss with you on the topic "Evolution of Commonwealth
Knowledge Grid".
Broadband economy for prosperity
The telecom revolution in India has opened multiple windows of opportunities
and the benefits of this revolution are in the process of percolating to the
vast majority of our villages. It is through this network that people living
in the villages would be able to access modern education, healthcare
services and employment opportunities. And I believe, this would be true for
many countries in the Commonwealth spectrum. Broadband connectivity is key
to realizing the stated socio-economic goals. Large scale utilization of
local languages would enable people of the Commonwealth to create content
with ease and authenticity which, when shared, would have a positive effect
in the growth of economy of all the countries of Commonwealth through the
benefits of telecom revolution and related Internet and multimedia tools.
Bandwidth is demolisher of imbalance: The bandwidth is the demolisher of
imbalances and a great leveler in the knowledge society. Making the
bandwidth available is like the Government laying the roads. Movement of
materials through these roads creates wealth in the industrial economy and
the government recovers more than the investment on the roads by way of
taxes and enhanced prosperity to its people. In the modern digital economy
driven by knowledge products, bits and bytes traverse the network and create
wealth and this will recover the cost of investments in the bandwidth. Thus,
a singular action of making the bandwidth available to all our people will
bridge the perceived divide. The free bandwidth will make economic sense if
we appropriately cost the services offered using the bandwidth. We have the
fiber infrastructure ready up to block level, last mile wireless
technologies are being implemented and the VSAT technologies for the
unreachable are in place in the form of Satellite services. Hence, we are
well on course to bridge the digital gap. We are in the midst of convergence
of digital technologies.
The total installed bandwidth capacity in India, is in the range of 19-20
Terra bytes and lit-up capacity is progressively increasing with enhanced
economic activity.
Empowerment through Connectivity
The total land area of India is around 3.3 million square kilometers with
7000 kilometers of coast line. The entire area is spread into deserts,
hilltops, mountains, sea shores, islands, valleys and plains. Out of the
billion plus population in the country 70% live in six hundred thousand
villages. We are in the process of a societal transformation towards
sustainable development for our growth. This we propose to realize in a time
bound manner through a knowledge society for empowering the entire nation.
Electronic and knowledge connectivity is the key to realize this goal.
Connecting a billion people gives multiple challenges. Now, I would like to
discuss about societal transformation.
In the proposed model, the inter-connectivity among the three sectors of the
economy is brought about by four grids: namely, Knowledge Grid, Health Grid,
e-Governance Grid and the Rural Grid,. Each grid is a system of multiple
portals. This system of grid will bring prosperity to 700 million people in
the rural areas and 300 million plus people in the urban areas. In the
process, it will ensure that the lives of 220 million people are transformed
from below the poverty line. First let me discuss about knowledge grid.
Knowledge Grid
The endeavor is indeed to build and transform an information society into a
knowledge society. The knowledge society will be a society producing,
marketing and using products and services that are rich in both explicit and
tacit knowledge, thus creating value-added products for national and
international consumption. In the knowledge economy, the objective of a
society changes from fulfilling the basic needs of all-round development to
empowerment. The education system instead of going by textbook teaching will
be promoted by creative, interactive self learning ? formal and informal
with focus on values, merit and quality. The workers instead of being
skilled or semi-skilled will be knowledgeable, self- empowered and flexibly
skilled. We have rich knowledge institutions but what we have to add is
connectivity. This connectivity today is technologically possible but would
need creation of high bandwidth reliable network infrastructure to the
extent of minimum 10 Gigabits per second all through the country to provide
uniform access of knowledge in different regions leading to the creation of
Knowledge GRID. Now, I would like to discuss on establishing the next
network in the system of GRIDs across the country, namely Health Grid.
Health Grid
The mission of telemedicine with healthcare Grid is gaining momentum and it
will spread to all the equipped Primary Health Centres in the country,
medical colleges and research institutions. Connectivity between 35 urban
super-specialty hospitals with 165 remotely located Healthcare Centres has
been established through Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)
telemedicine grid. This will enable unique case studies and experiences to
be exchanged between the super specialists through this health grid. It will
also be possible to conduct Conferences of specialist doctors from multi
centers to discuss the critical disease patterns and provide treatment. Now
I would like to take up e-Governance Grid.
Connectivity for E-Governance
Good governance is being recognized as an important goal by many countries
across the world. They have taken up specific initiatives for open and
transparent governance. Freedom of information is being redefined and
supported by detailed guidelines. The internet revolution has proved to be a
powerful tool for good governance initiatives. An important dimension of the
internet potential is the possibility of providing services any time
anywhere. Along with this there is a conscious effort to put the citizen as
the centre of focus of the governance. Citizens are being perceived as
customers and clients. E-governance has to be citizen friendly. Delivery of
services to citizens is considered as a primary function of the government.
Particularly in a democratic nation of a billion people like India,
e-Governance should enable seamless access to information and seamless flow
of information across the state and central government in the federal setup
crossing the inter-departmental barriers.
Typical scenario: I visualize an election scenario, where a candidate files
his nomination from a particular constituency. Immediately the election
officer verifies his/her authenticity from the national citizen ID database
through multifactor authentication, through a multipurpose Citizen ID card.
The education credentials of the candidate come from the university records.
Candidate's track record of employment comes from various employers with
whom the candidate had worked. His or her income and wealth resources come
from the income-tax department, and other sources. Candidate's property
record comes from the registration of land authority across the country.
Candidate's credit history comes form various credit institutions like
banks. Candidate's civic consciousness and citizenship behaviour comes from
the police crime record.
Candidate's legal track records come from the judicial system.
All the details arrive at the computer terminal of the election officer
within few seconds automatically by the act of e-Governance software agents
which crawls across the various state and central government web services
directories through the network GRID and collects the information
automatically and presents the facts in real-time without any bias.
Artificial intelligence software analyses the credentials of the candidate
and gives a rating on how successful he or she will be as a politician.
Election officer sitting at the remote block of the country decides on the
spot and the election process starts. All the voters vote from their home
through virtual polling booths. If we consider the breakthroughs and
expansion in telecommunication and internet in the last five years, this
visualization is no longer a dream and is possible to be achieved by many
nations.
To establish a system what I have visualized, we need a high bandwidth
broadband connectivity across the many Government departments such as State
and District Administration, Election commission, Universities, Banks,
Home/Police Departments, Insurance companies etc., This scenario requires
vertical and horizontal e-Governance grid established across various
institutions and the Government. Hence, we can draw information and feed
information from these GRIDs for seamless flow of data to achieve the goal
of good governance. Now let me discuss the significance of the sustainable
development through establishing Rural Grid.
Rural Grid
India with six hundred thousand villages and seven hundred million people
living in the rural areas needs an unique rural development model called
PURA. PURA envisages provision of three connectivities namely physical
connectivity, electronic connectivity and knowledge connectivity leading to
economic connectivity. For providing the knowledge connectivity to the PURA
(Providing Urban Amenities in Rural Areas) complexes, Village Knowledge
Centers will act as frontline delivery system. The Village Knowledge Centre
should provide the essential data required for the targeted population such
as farmers, fishermen, craftsmen, traders, businessmen, entrepreneurs,
unemployed youth and the students. Now the Ministry of Communication and
Information Technology is in the process of establishing 100,000 Common
Service Centre (CSC?s) across the country through public-private partnership
model.
We have so far discussed all the four connectivities at the national level
required for the societal transformation leading to empowerment. Now, I
would like to share with you the experience of establishing a Pan African
e-Network for providing connectivity among 53 African nations.
Pan African e-Network
During the year 2003-04, I visited African countries such as Sudan,
Tanzania, Zanzibar and South Africa. I addressed the Pan African Parliament
on 16 Sept 2004, at Johannesburg, South Africa which was attended by Heads
of 53 member countries of the African Union. Based on my study of the
communication, healthcare and education needs of the African countries, I
proposed the concept of Pan African e-Network for providing seamless and
integrated satellite, fiber optics and wireless network connecting 53
African countries.
The Pan-African e-Network project is estimated to cost around US$100
million. As part of the project 12 universities (7 from India and 5 from
Africa), 17 Super Specialty Hospitals (12 from India and 5 from Africa), 53
tele-medicine centers and 53 tele-education centres in Africa will be
connected. The pilot project on tele-education and tele-medicine in Ethiopia
has already been commissioned. One of our Indian Universities has taken up
the MBA Course for 34 Ethiopian students of Addis Ababa and Harmaya
Universities. As regards, tele-medicine, the specialists from CARE Hospital,
Hyderabad are providing one-hour live tele-consultation to doctors in Black
Lion Hospital, Addis Ababa in Cardiology and Radiology since November 2006.
The Pan African e-Network will primarily provide Tele-Education,
Tele-Medicine, Internet, videoconferencing and VOIP services. It also
supports e-Governance, e-Commerce, infotainment, resource mapping and
meteorological services. Each remote location will be able to access the
Internet through the network by linking the HUB to Internet backbone. Using
this network the Heads of the State in all the 53 countries will be
connected for instant communication. The network is designed to have 169
terminals and a central hub to deliver tele-education and tele-medicine
services. The proposed network will utilize state-of-the-art technology and
can be integrated with the latest broadband technologies like Wi-Fi and
Wi-Max. The network is scalable to support different applications catering
to increased number of users. I am happy to inform you that 22 countries
will be connected in the first half of 2007 and the rest will be
operationalized by early 2008.
RB Multimedia Studio
Now, I would like to share with you another experience when I delivered 2006
Phillip Tobias Lecture on 27th September 2006 from Rashtrapati Bhavan
Multimedia studio using Multimedia tele-conferencing. After the lecture, I
was interacting with Prof Tobias and his team at Durban, Johannesburg in
South Africa and Sanfrancisco in USA. This experience made me realize the
power of technology as an integrator of minds leading to a borderless world
without geographical barriers ? a symbol of universalisation. Based on these
interactions, I have suggested one of our leading scientific institutions to
collaborate with specialists in South Africa in Anthropology for promoting
conservation of certain types of endangered species.
I am sure many Commonwealth countries participating in today?s summit have
several experiences to share and Commonwealth connects programme can
formulate a plan to integrate the core-competence of nations for mutual
benefit. This power of networking can definitely be used by Commonwealth
countries for sharing their core competencies and building a knowledge
platform for serving the development aspirations of the individual nations
through collective wisdom.
Suggestions
I would like to give few suggestions for the consideration of the
Commonwealth Connects 2007: International e-Partnership Summit.
1. Evolving guidelines for common telecommunication policy to share
resources, network, infrastructure, without any barrier and facilitate
implementation through a Commonwealth co-ordination centre.
2. Evolving guidelines for Common Information Security policy in IT.
3. Modernizing education through state of the art skill development
programmes among the Commonwealth nations leading to skill certification and
acceptance among the countries for global employment opportunities.
4. Undertaking study of e-governance implementations across the Commonwealth
nations and suggest the best practices for the G2G and G2C implementations.
5. Creating a mechanism which will facilitate pooling of core competence of
nations for developing knowledge products and systems for serving the global
market in education, healthcare and e- governance.
6. Identifying gaps in educational standards of IT professionals in the
Global business scenario in IT, ITES and BPO services and creating
institutional mechanisms for training, accreditation and grading based on
performance. Creating a common web portal for sharing information and
knowledge among Commonwealth countries.
7. Creating a Commonwealth Connects Fund and Institute a Commonwealth
committee to address the above mentioned suggestions.
Conclusion
The 53 countries of Commonwealth constitute a population of 2 billion i.e.
one third of the population of the Planet. This network of independent
nations in the past has taken up many initiatives for interconnecting their
heritage in art, culture, science and technology, history, sports and way of
living. Such a strong base of relationship and the core competence of the
countries can be further integrated into a very useful partnership by
providing connectivity through the Evolution of a Commonwealth Knowledge
Grid. This can address many common challenges for development such as
developing a knowledge society through quality education, providing
affordable quality healthcare to all, sustainable rural development through
cluster approach, providing transparent people-friendly-governance and above
all evolution of an enlightened society for improving the National
Prosperity Index of all the partner countries. The model developed by the
Commonwealth Nations will have the potential to be extended to the entire
Planet.
With these words, I inaugurate the Commonwealth Connects: International
e-Partnership Summit. My best wishes to all the participants of the Summit
for success in their mission of creating a productive e-Partnership between
and amongst all the Commonwealth countries.
May God bless you.
1
0
I understand.Thank you.Tho you may order a recorded tape you get to hear what the speakers said.Its not all lost.I am sorry.
Best Regards,
Jose' Njuki-Imwe Ngunjiri || +254 722 336754 ||
----- Original Message ----
From: Judy Okite <judyokite(a)gmail.com>
To: ngunjirijnr(a)yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:55:44 AM
Subject: Re: [kictanet] SYMPOSUIM FOR THIS WEEKEND."MUST HAVE ATTEND"
Sorry Jose',
On behalf of the Chix....please give ample notice in the future.
Kind Regards,
On 3/23/07, Fatma Bashir <fbashir(a)cyberschooltech.com> wrote:
hi Jose'
I'll have to post my regrets and for my team as
well, we are off to the field today for the whole weekend...perhaps the next
time around...but good luck.
Fatma
----- Original Message -----
From:
Jose'
To:
fbashir(a)cyberschooltech.com
Cc:
CATHY ATIENO ; Goria
Lilian ; FRANCIS MWANGI
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:42
AM
Subject: [kictanet] SYMPOSUIM FOR THIS
WEEKEND."MUST HAVE ATTEND"
Dear
Colleague,
Financing is one of the setbacks that the youth face to start up
there small businesses enterprises.
It with this concern that,Kimathi
Information centre in collaboration with the Ministry of youth,Ministry of
Information and technology,IMAC/KAYE,KWFT,business consultants,Investors,UN
Habitat,GEEP,CFSK and Faulu Kenya have organized a Symposium that shall bring
together up to 250 youth delegates be able to address the need
of financing and how the delegates are going to get hold of the
resources/finances to see the SME businesses get a kick start.
I also
attach the program for your perusal.Come see also the youth show case and what
they sell in the exhibition tables.
"THIS IS A MUST HAVE ATTEND
SYMPOSIUM"
DATE:24th March
2007
TIME:0900hrs to 1400hrs
VENUE:KENYA
ASSEMBLIES OF GOD MULTI PURPOSE HALL-BAHATI
ENTRANCE
FEE:50ksh(FIFTY SHILLINGS ONLY) Including all taxes
Best Regards,
Jose' Njuki-Imwe Ngunjiri ||
+254 722 336754 ||
Never
miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail
arrives.
Check it out.
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing
list
kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke
http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Please
unsubscribe or change your options at
http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/fbashir%40cyberschooltech.com
--------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
Jambo MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--------------------------------------------------
"easy access to the world"
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke
http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Please unsubscribe or change your options at
http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/judyokite%40gmail.com
--
Judy Ann Okite,
+254-721237507,+254-734252336
P.O. BOX 2228 00100,
NAIROBI,KENYA.
"Even if you are on the right track, you'll still get run over if you just sit there."
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet(a)kictanet.or.ke
http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Please unsubscribe or change your options at http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ngunjirijnr%40yahoo.com
____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
4
4